I'm a bit slow into this one, sorry, but it reminded me of something shown on last years WSOP. It's a little bit hazy by now, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Not the main event, Joe Hachem got HU with a lesser player. ( I forget his name, I'll call him Bob ).
Bob had a chip lead & his game plan was to get Hachem all in as often as possible, whether he had the best hand or not. Hachem was happy as long as he had the best hand, Bob was working on the idea that eventually the maths would drop in his favour. He might be a 2/1 dog each hand, but that meant that in 3 or 4 hands he was likely to win.
Eventually it worked.
I think in this case similar tactics sound good to me. It's not gambling, it's using the mathematical fact that you need to have him all in before you can win, and it doesn't matter if you are 4/1 favourite or 4/1 dog, do it enough times & one will fall in your favour.
You mean well known pro Dutch Boyd?
I agree easy call in relation to chip stacks esp holding an Ace. Before you posted his holding Iwould have said hes likely to push with any pictures which he did. ul gg