blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 08:40:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262325 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Would you back against Federer?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Would you back against Federer?  (Read 4007 times)
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2009, 03:08:39 PM »

murray is a horrible bet:

1) he's too short and no value

2) 2 players in the field cane him in grandslams

3) he's a prick
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2009, 03:51:05 PM »

murray is a horrible bet:

1) he's too short and no value

2) 2 players in the field cane him in grandslams

3) he's a prick

Which 2 players Federer (in 1 match) and .........................
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2009, 03:56:23 PM »

murray is a horrible bet:

1) he's too short and no value

2) 2 players in the field cane him in grandslams

3) he's a prick

Which 2 players Federer (in 1 match) and .........................

sigh, just no 3 then!
Logged
GlasgowBandit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5646


Global Pacifier


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2009, 07:47:11 PM »

murray is a horrible bet:

1) he's too short and no value

2) 2 players in the field cane him in grandslams

3) he's a prick

Anyone but England Andy Murray #1 CSC

Which 2 players Federer (in 1 match) and .........................

sigh, just no 3 then!
Logged

Somerled
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 427



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2009, 09:58:59 PM »

Well, I backed Murray at 6-1 and I think that's a great bet. Since Wimbledon last year he's the best player in the world - by far. Federer and Djokovic judging by their interviews are quite obviously worried about him. He also has a better draw than the others IMO.

As to whether he's a prick or not that doesn't affect his chances of winning.
Logged
CrestOfaWave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1126



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2009, 12:07:14 PM »

my longish shot may meet Murray if they both win their next 3rd round game.
Verdasco was 80/1 at start in top 15 in world and in good form.

will see how Murray copes with the heat - time of play a big factor. night a lot cooler.
Logged

Horneris
#5 BH
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9073



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2009, 04:25:01 PM »

will see how Murray copes with the heat - time of play a big factor. night a lot cooler.

hmm, he trained in Spain from like 14-18, playing all day in boiling conditions so i think he should be ok.
Logged

NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20204


Enchantment? Enchantment!


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2009, 04:59:10 PM »

will see how Murray copes with the heat - time of play a big factor. night a lot cooler.

hmm, he trained in Spain from like 14-18, playing all day in boiling conditions so i think he should be ok.

Very blunt of you imo.
Logged

bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2009, 01:04:48 PM »

 

[ ] wp Murray
Logged
CrestOfaWave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1126



View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: January 26, 2009, 04:59:11 PM »

will see how Murray copes with the heat - time of play a big factor. night a lot cooler.

hmm, he trained in Spain from like 14-18, playing all day in boiling conditions so i think he should be ok.

Very blunt of you imo.

I'm not anti Murray but being an ex-player have kept an eye on the new talent emerging.
I only saw bits of the game but felt Verdasco deserved the victory.
Whether he can win 3 more games and be the 2009 break through is another story.
Tsonga maybe, Nadal/Simon hmm, then Federer/Djokovic a tall ask but will take the 80/1 if he does.
 
Logged

Horneris
#5 BH
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9073



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 26, 2009, 06:25:57 PM »

yup, was a good shout on Verdasco by yourself at the start of the thread.
Logged

ItsMrAlex2u
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2226



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2009, 09:15:48 AM »

With Djoko out, it certainly looks like a Nadal v fed fnal now, so I am glad I didnt back against Fed !!!

He did have the toughest draw although he will be delighted to be facing Rodick instead of Djoko, although Roddick has played well this tourn so far.
Logged

Best QM ever

FACT !
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.171 seconds with 20 queries.