On the flop i did jam, i had intended on doing so pre, unless the flop came very favourable.
I got called, bb showed

no help on turn or river for me
Afterwards friends suggested to me i was out of tourney again due to not being satisfied with taking a little, that i was always looking for more and that such was a fault in my game which regularly cost me.
I felt that in this spot i wanted more than 1 bb + my sb back and should have aimed for more, i felt 2.5x was the correct bet size that would allow me to do so, by either enticing him to come over the top or call with a likely weaker holding.
For those who said / thought shove, on the basis that the majority of times the bb would fold, would you be happy just taking down the bb & getting your sb back? I feel that to progress in a situation like mine, i needed to make more of these favourable situations
One friend suggested i had taken too much of a risk for an extra 6k and that i should have made it a min 3x or 3.5x or 4x providing a better risk / reward ratio should he elect to call
Others commented that had i just shoved i would still be in the tournament with an extra 6k in my stack and that is what i should have done, hindsight is a wonderfull thing!
As for the flop, (without taking his holding into consideration) i wondered if many would choose to check, hoping to induce a shove whilst being more than happy to call with my hand or whether most would prefer to shove and hopefully take down what is a decent pot on a scary board. Would anyone elect to check fold? Or hope / attempt to check it down?