poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 27, 2024, 09:54:09 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272597
Posts in
66755
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while) (Read 2646 times)
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8089
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #15 on:
April 16, 2009, 05:25:46 PM »
Ok, me and girgy were both on this table, and I was dealing (not that that really makes any difference). My first instinct was that the hand was dead. Girgy and some others thought the hand is live, but he can only call, not raise. We got the card room supervisor over and a typical "grosvenor ruling" was made that he could call. So he did. The big blind went all in, UTG player called and had his KK busted by the BBs AJ.
I was pretty sure I was right on this one so RRs to the rescue:
12. To retain the right to act, a player must stop the action by calling “time” (or an equivalent word). Failure to stop the action before three or more players have acted behind you may cause you to lose the right to act.
So, the magic number of 3 players. I note the rule says MAY lose the right to act, but I think this decision is pretty clear cut - you simply cannot fail to notice the entire table act on a hand out of turn and expect to keep your hand. Scope for all sorts of angle shoots here, esp given what he was holding! (though i don't think he was trying to pull an angle, think it was simply a case of being new to the game)
Logged
Blue text
Girgy85
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9507
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #16 on:
April 16, 2009, 05:35:05 PM »
Quote from: Cf on April 16, 2009, 05:25:46 PM
Ok, me and girgy were both on this table, and I was dealing (not that that really makes any difference). My first instinct was that the hand was dead. Girgy and some others thought the hand is live, but he can only call, not raise. We got the card room supervisor over and a typical "grosvenor ruling" was made that he could call. So he did. The big blind went all in, UTG player called and had his KK busted by the BBs AJ.
I was pretty sure I was right on this one so RRs to the rescue:
12. To retain the right to act, a player must stop the action by calling “time” (or an equivalent word). Failure to stop the action before three or more players have acted behind you may cause you to lose the right to act.
So, the magic number of 3 players. I note the rule says MAY lose the right to act, but I think this decision is pretty clear cut - you simply cannot fail to notice the entire table act on a hand out of turn and expect to keep your hand. Scope for all sorts of angle shoots here, esp given what he was holding! (though i don't think he was trying to pull an angle, think it was simply a case of being new to the game)
Like you say all aspects point to he was new to the game so really didnt know the procedures. Also i would of agreed his hand was dead if there had been a raise before he spoke up.
Logged
Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis
Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie
Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis
Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #17 on:
April 16, 2009, 06:31:22 PM »
again grosvenor makes the wrong ruling when there own rulings are that if 3 people have made action than the players hand is dead
Logged
relaedgc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1186
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #18 on:
April 27, 2009, 05:58:54 AM »
Quote from: phatomch on April 16, 2009, 06:31:22 PM
again grosvenor makes the wrong ruling when there own rulings are that if 3 people have made action than the players hand is dead
Grosvenor rules state that if three or more people have acted then the hand is dead. Why these card room supervisors in provincial casinos cant even grasp the basic company rules is beyond me.
Logged
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster...when you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you..."
Friedrich Nietzsche
EvilPie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14253
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #19 on:
April 28, 2009, 04:04:11 PM »
Quote from: relaedgc on April 27, 2009, 05:58:54 AM
Quote from: phatomch on April 16, 2009, 06:31:22 PM
again grosvenor makes the wrong ruling when there own rulings are that if 3 people have made action than the players hand is dead
Grosvenor rules state that if three or more people have acted then the hand is dead. Why these card room supervisors in provincial casinos cant even grasp the basic company rules is beyond me.
Does passing count as action?
What I mean is if someone acts out of turn behind you then 2 more instamuck before you get a chance to say anything would the hand be dead?
Obviously if there's betting action then you really should have time to notice and say something but if people are passing it can happen very fast.
Logged
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
#1Instigator
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 203
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #20 on:
April 28, 2009, 04:57:16 PM »
passing is not counted as an action. Only betting or raising constitutes as an action
Logged
making an appearance...hi...i'm here
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #21 on:
April 28, 2009, 05:20:15 PM »
Quote from: #1Instigator on April 28, 2009, 04:57:16 PM
passing is not counted as an action. Only betting or raising constitutes as an action
Not technically right #1 say it was 5 handed and it is (you) UTG to act and you have a marginal hand 4 and 5 pass so you are now left against the blinds, has/will this have changed your decision?
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #22 on:
April 28, 2009, 05:27:44 PM »
Quote from: #1Instigator on April 28, 2009, 04:57:16 PM
passing is not counted as an action. Only betting or raising constitutes as an action
yes it is.
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #23 on:
April 28, 2009, 05:29:35 PM »
of course passing is an action
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
#1Instigator
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 203
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #24 on:
April 28, 2009, 08:18:32 PM »
i should really have read the posts before i replied. I was refering to out of turn betting and whether folding counts as action that re-opens new options...but nvm
According to Robert's rules, its 2 players and the cards are dead. Obvious the dealer needs to have basic common sense and not kill player's hands if the out of turn folding happened too quick and the player was not buying time to gain any sort of advantage.
Logged
making an appearance...hi...i'm here
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #25 on:
April 28, 2009, 09:05:53 PM »
Quote from: #1Instigator on April 28, 2009, 08:18:32 PM
iObvious the dealer needs to have basic common sense and not kill player's hands if the out of turn folding happened too quick and the player was not buying time to gain any sort of advantage.
Well said!!
Although technically if the hands are folded out of turn quickly, action has taken place, this should be at the dealers discretion IMO, I had an incident whereby someone folded out of turn (seat 9), I have immediately brought this to the players attention, yet a mexican wave of folding happened behind me whilst I am waiting for player to act. I never killed his hand as he had done nothing wrong and acted quite quick (not taking advantage etc)
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #26 on:
April 29, 2009, 11:09:11 AM »
no dealers dont have the discretion, thats what td's are for it takes the onius from the deale, they do what they are told and nothing else.
Logged
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: rulingthread (not made one of these in a while)
«
Reply #27 on:
April 29, 2009, 03:20:38 PM »
Sorry, I used the word discretion instead of common sense
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...