poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
August 11, 2025, 11:32:57 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262839
Posts in
66615
Topics by
16992
Members
Latest Member:
Rmf22
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Hatton v Pacquiao
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
...
9
Author
Topic: Hatton v Pacquiao (Read 19325 times)
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22507
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #30 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:10:05 AM »
Quote from: sharplea on May 01, 2009, 02:07:32 AM
Quote from: mondatoo on May 01, 2009, 02:06:37 AM
Quote from: sharplea on May 01, 2009, 02:05:05 AM
hold the money for you I think
OI
What, I was giving an answer!
I challenge thou to a dual u went to far... to far
Logged
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9281
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #31 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:11:02 AM »
*is confused*
Did I get it wrong? All i said was that the "arb" is a neutral who holds the cash for you.
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22507
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #32 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:14:36 AM »
Quote from: sharplea on May 01, 2009, 02:11:02 AM
*is confused*
Did I get it wrong? All i said was that the "arb" is a neutral who holds the cash for you.
I said OI coz u spoilt my full house,im waiting for u at blonde cash,why wudnt someone want to put a £100 bet on when they cant lose and they might win like £10 or woteva it is for 2 secs work not bad imo
Logged
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9281
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #33 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:16:44 AM »
cant play Blonde cash - busto.
Now I understand...
Logged
Gamblor21
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1576
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #34 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:18:29 AM »
Quote from: mondatoo on May 01, 2009, 02:02:18 AM
Quote from: Gamblor21 on May 01, 2009, 02:00:05 AM
Quote from: mondatoo on May 01, 2009, 01:12:01 AM
Hatton is 2/1 on betfair anyone who wants to give me 7/4 before the fight @ £100 and i'll transfer on blonde give me a shout
Who is going to arb mond?
What does arb mean ?
If they lay you 7/4 and back him @ 2/1 on the fair they win no matter what.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage_betting
Logged
Hear me knocking... Let me in then!
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9281
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #35 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:19:18 AM »
Now I get it, cheers Gamblor.
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22507
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #36 on:
May 01, 2009, 02:24:38 AM »
Quote from: Gamblor21 on May 01, 2009, 02:18:29 AM
Quote from: mondatoo on May 01, 2009, 02:02:18 AM
Quote from: Gamblor21 on May 01, 2009, 02:00:05 AM
Quote from: mondatoo on May 01, 2009, 01:12:01 AM
Hatton is 2/1 on betfair anyone who wants to give me 7/4 before the fight @ £100 and i'll transfer on blonde give me a shout
Who is going to arb mond?
What does arb mean ?
If they lay you 7/4 and back him @ 2/1 on the fair they win no matter what.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage_betting
That's the whole point,as i have no money in the bank but do have on blonde so am basically offering someone a freeroll as i want a bet on the fight and think hatton will win and is a huge price at 2/1 obv a cuda said 15/8 but 7/4 will do
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #37 on:
May 01, 2009, 08:51:06 AM »
Quote from: Josedinho on April 30, 2009, 11:49:07 PM
Will Manny being southpaw make much difference? I saw Hatton look pretty average against a leftie when he stepped up a weight (might have been against Collazo?) that was under Graham and not at his weight but i thought the left handed thing was a bit of an issue too.
Collazo makes everyone he fights look bad - he's an awkward, ugly fighter.
Pacquiao is undoubtedly quick and accurate - but unlike De La Hoya, Hatton will not be a static target or give Pacquiao the space and opportunity to work openings. My worry is if Hatton cuts early. That problem seems to have been sorted, but fast chopping punchers are the ones who open cuts.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9165
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #38 on:
May 01, 2009, 08:55:53 AM »
Quote from: kinboshi on May 01, 2009, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: Josedinho on April 30, 2009, 11:49:07 PM
Will Manny being southpaw make much difference? I saw Hatton look pretty average against a leftie when he stepped up a weight (might have been against Collazo?) that was under Graham and not at his weight but i thought the left handed thing was a bit of an issue too.
Collazo makes everyone he fights look bad - he's an awkward, ugly fighter.
Pacquiao is undoubtedly quick and accurate - but unlike De La Hoya, Hatton will not be a static target or give Pacquiao the space and opportunity to work openings. My worry is if Hatton cuts early. That problem seems to have been sorted, but fast chopping punchers are the ones who open cuts.
Agreed, for some reason Freddie Roach thinks it will be an early KO for Pacman, but I cant see him being able to do that, much more likely he wins on points if he does win. For me, Hatton is too big, too powerful, too conditioned and too fast (Pacman is faster, but Hatton will be a shit load faster than De La Hoya was). Could go either way though, such an interesting match, thank god boxing is producing interesting encounters like this, Hatton vs Mayweather, Haye vs Klitchsko, Khan vs Barrera, Hopkins vs Pavlik etc etc. Belts mean sod all, its about exciting fights.
I want Ricky to win, I think he will, but the boxing purist in me also wants to see Pacman vs Mayweather, which would probably happen if he won.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #39 on:
May 01, 2009, 09:00:29 AM »
Quote from: DaveShoelace on May 01, 2009, 08:55:53 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on May 01, 2009, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: Josedinho on April 30, 2009, 11:49:07 PM
Will Manny being southpaw make much difference? I saw Hatton look pretty average against a leftie when he stepped up a weight (might have been against Collazo?) that was under Graham and not at his weight but i thought the left handed thing was a bit of an issue too.
Collazo makes everyone he fights look bad - he's an awkward, ugly fighter.
Pacquiao is undoubtedly quick and accurate - but unlike De La Hoya, Hatton will not be a static target or give Pacquiao the space and opportunity to work openings. My worry is if Hatton cuts early. That problem seems to have been sorted, but fast chopping punchers are the ones who open cuts.
Agreed, for some reason Freddie Roach thinks it will be an early KO for Pacman, but I cant see him being able to do that, much more likely he wins on points if he does win. For me, Hatton is too big, too powerful, too conditioned and too fast (Pacman is faster, but Hatton will be a shit load faster than De La Hoya was). Could go either way though, such an interesting match, thank god boxing is producing interesting encounters like this, Hatton vs Mayweather, Haye vs Klitchsko, Khan vs Barrera, Hopkins vs Pavlik etc etc. Belts mean sod all, its about exciting fights.
I want Ricky to win, I think he will, but the boxing purist in me also wants to see Pacman vs Mayweather, which would probably happen if he won.
Yes, people seem to think that Hatton is a slow, cumbersome plodder. This isn't the case. He throws a lot of fast punches from different angles. Yes, he might have to walk through a few of Pacquiao's shots to get in close - but we'll see how concussive Pacquiao is when he catches Hatton.
I'm loving these match ups too. It's the only way the alphabet soup of organisations and belts was ever going to be sorted - ignore them and just get the best to fight the best.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9165
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #40 on:
May 01, 2009, 09:03:00 AM »
Quote from: kinboshi on May 01, 2009, 09:00:29 AM
Quote from: DaveShoelace on May 01, 2009, 08:55:53 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on May 01, 2009, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: Josedinho on April 30, 2009, 11:49:07 PM
Will Manny being southpaw make much difference? I saw Hatton look pretty average against a leftie when he stepped up a weight (might have been against Collazo?) that was under Graham and not at his weight but i thought the left handed thing was a bit of an issue too.
Collazo makes everyone he fights look bad - he's an awkward, ugly fighter.
Pacquiao is undoubtedly quick and accurate - but unlike De La Hoya, Hatton will not be a static target or give Pacquiao the space and opportunity to work openings. My worry is if Hatton cuts early. That problem seems to have been sorted, but fast chopping punchers are the ones who open cuts.
Agreed, for some reason Freddie Roach thinks it will be an early KO for Pacman, but I cant see him being able to do that, much more likely he wins on points if he does win. For me, Hatton is too big, too powerful, too conditioned and too fast (Pacman is faster, but Hatton will be a shit load faster than De La Hoya was). Could go either way though, such an interesting match, thank god boxing is producing interesting encounters like this, Hatton vs Mayweather, Haye vs Klitchsko, Khan vs Barrera, Hopkins vs Pavlik etc etc. Belts mean sod all, its about exciting fights.
I want Ricky to win, I think he will, but the boxing purist in me also wants to see Pacman vs Mayweather, which would probably happen if he won.
Yes, people seem to think that Hatton is a slow, cumbersome plodder. This isn't the case. He throws a lot of fast punches from different angles. Yes, he might have to walk through a few of Pacquiao's shots to get in close - but we'll see how concussive Pacquiao is when he catches Hatton.
I'm loving these match ups too. It's the only way the alphabet soup of organisations and belts was ever going to be sorted - ignore them and just get the best to fight the best.
I think Lewis unifying the belts killed the value of them off (It probably was the death of heavyweight boxing too). Belts only really mean something if there is some sort of extra achievement added to them like defending the same belt for X years or winning belts at X different weights.
Logged
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #41 on:
May 01, 2009, 12:45:52 PM »
pac man in the 6th i think
Logged
Blatch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2622
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #42 on:
May 01, 2009, 07:51:30 PM »
Pacman on points for me
Logged
DUNK619
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2180
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #43 on:
May 01, 2009, 07:55:27 PM »
does anyone know what time this starts
Logged
Hairydude
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2458
Re: Hatton v Pacquiao
«
Reply #44 on:
May 01, 2009, 07:58:18 PM »
Quote from: DUNK619 on May 01, 2009, 07:55:27 PM
does anyone know what time this starts
will be about 4ish or even 5ish going by past fights
Logged
Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
...
9
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...