poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 29, 2024, 04:19:54 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272618
Posts in
66755
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
78
79
80
81
[
82
]
83
84
85
86
...
242
Author
Topic: Manchester United, that didn't last long. Seven up (Read 490314 times)
DungBeetle
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4925
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1215 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:02:01 AM »
Quote from: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 05:32:58 PM
"I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P?
Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades."
Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford.
And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins.
sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts.
the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season....
Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash.
Logged
DungBeetle
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4925
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1216 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:02:47 AM »
Man Utd gave David Platt a free transfer. Not the same as poaching another club's rising talent!
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6104
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1217 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:09:58 AM »
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:02:01 AM
Quote from: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 05:32:58 PM
"I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P?
Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades."
Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford.
And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins.
sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts.
the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season....
Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash.
Apologies if I'm wrong, I had taken your post on the Liverpool thread as being indicative of support for them.
I can see that that may have been wrong and withdraw the rubs about pointscoring.
All other aspects of my case remain unchanged. The 'United buy success' accusation is one of the more irritating wrongly held views in football.
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
smashedagain
moderator of moderators
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 12522
if you are gonna kiss arse you have to do it right
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1218 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:28:12 AM »
David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners?
Logged
[ ] ept title
[ ] wpt title
[ ] wsop braclet
[X] mickey mouse hoodies
aaron1867
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3659
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1219 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:30:38 AM »
Quote from: smashedagain on February 08, 2013, 10:28:12 AM
David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners?
I think you answered your own question here Jason.
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6104
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1220 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:33:17 AM »
Quote from: smashedagain on February 08, 2013, 10:28:12 AM
David, why do you think RvP left Arsenal to go to Utd. Is it financial or to win stuff or a combination of both. Do you think he would have gone if Utd were only prepared to pay him half the salary he earned with the Gunners?
It's both - and it's the lure of playing for United too. Seems likely that if it was just the money he'd be at City where he'd have had a fair chance of the odd trophy.
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
DungBeetle
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4925
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1221 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:44:54 AM »
David - the fact that Man Utd buy success is not debatable. When Ferguson built his first winning team he bought the best domestic player in each position - Pallister, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Phehan, Hughes etc. And subsequently they were in the market for all the best players that came available Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Veron, Staam, Ferdinand, Van Persie etc. The fact that they had one golden generation of home grown players does not alter this fact.
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6104
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1222 on:
February 08, 2013, 10:58:41 AM »
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:44:54 AM
David - the fact that Man Utd buy success is not debatable. When Ferguson built his first winning team he bought the best domestic player in each position - Pallister, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Phehan, Hughes etc. And subsequently they were in the market for all the best players that came available Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Veron, Staam, Ferdinand, Van Persie etc. The fact that they had one golden generation of home grown players does not alter this fact.
Yes, some top players were acquired over time. But, and this is always my major point here, they bought them with money that the club had generated.
Interesting to look at the wiki page for that first season of the Premier League - 22 clubs, 4 managed by Scots, 1 by a Welshman, 1 Irish and the rest? All English...
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1223 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:03:42 PM »
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 08, 2013, 10:02:01 AM
Quote from: david3103 on February 07, 2013, 07:02:52 PM
Quote from: DungBeetle on February 07, 2013, 05:32:58 PM
"I wrote this before I read your most recent post. I'll just add, having read that... Did we buy Giggs, Scholes, Butt, Neville G and Neville P?
Cleverley, Wellbeck, Evans? 96 ex-MUFC Academy players have full international caps, the academy is demonstrably the best in the country and has been for decades."
Yes you have youth players. You also steal other clubs youth prospects like Giggs I believe. And you stole Eagles from Watford.
And don't hold up Wellbeck as a shining light. In 2 years time he'll struggle to get into West Brom's team once Ferguson realises he is bobbins.
sigh... selective memory dungbeetle. i won't trawl for examples but it's a million that LFC don't have form for similar acts.
the sad truth here is that you opened a debate based on me saying something positive about Liverpool in an attempt to score points against us. it went the same way that your team's attempts did this season....
Not sure who you think I support but I have a general distaste for the attitudes of all "big" teams, and in fact grudgingly respect Man Utd more than the others due to the fact they at least attempt to develop their own players, and the longetivity of the Ferguson project. I am merely saying that we shouldn't pretend that Man Utd don't blow most other teams away in terms of spending cash.
Not in the last 5 years or more, even Stoke spent more net on players than we have..
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6191
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1224 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:07:17 PM »
Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html
It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more)
Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6104
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1225 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:24:55 PM »
Quote from: Jon MW on February 08, 2013, 01:07:17 PM
Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html
It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more)
Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th
No surprises that the oligarchy and the sheikhdom are top, but the scale of their net spend is staggering.
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1226 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:27:27 PM »
Quote from: Jon MW on February 08, 2013, 01:07:17 PM
Transfer spend league table for the past 5 years
http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html
It's ordered by net spend (which is how you get Stoke spending more)
Man Utd are 7th on net spend, but even on gross spend a fleeting glance means I think they'd still only be 6th
Was just looking for that, thanks.
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4013
5 2 off
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1227 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:51:30 PM »
id like to see the same table but for wages.
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6104
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1228 on:
February 08, 2013, 01:56:26 PM »
Quote from: 77dave on February 08, 2013, 01:51:30 PM
id like to see the same table but for wages.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html
deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Manchester United FC
«
Reply #1229 on:
February 08, 2013, 02:01:32 PM »
Quote from: david3103 on February 08, 2013, 01:56:26 PM
Quote from: 77dave on February 08, 2013, 01:51:30 PM
id like to see the same table but for wages.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/9514149/Graphic-Premier-League-transfer-and-wage-spending-from-the-200001-season-to-201112.html
deep in two small online comps so no time to do much commentary
glgl, sn for a rail?
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
Pages:
1
...
78
79
80
81
[
82
]
83
84
85
86
...
242
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...