|
redarmi
|
 |
« Reply #300 on: October 16, 2011, 02:56:02 AM » |
|
Just watching Malignaggi. If i was Eddie hearn I would be thinking about him as a possible prelim to a world title fight for Kell Brook.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #301 on: October 16, 2011, 05:09:14 AM » |
|
I really should know better than killing myself to stay up until 5am to watch Bernard hopkins........ffs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #302 on: October 16, 2011, 05:15:30 AM » |
|
I really should know better than killing myself to stay up until 5am to watch Bernard hopkins........ffs.
Still at least you got paid  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CEO - Raspberry Express
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #303 on: October 16, 2011, 05:16:33 AM » |
|
wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii......didn't see that coming at all....would have bet 1/10 no contest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #304 on: October 16, 2011, 05:24:57 AM » |
|
I'm still pending...
Upcoming Fights
Bernard Hopkins vs Chad Dawson
Fight result
2011-10-16 05:30:00
Chad Dawson @ 4/5 Pending
Channel Internet
Bet Placed At 16/10/2011
Bet Type Single
Stake Per Line £70.00
Number Of Lines 1
Total Stake Paid £70.00
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CEO - Raspberry Express
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #305 on: October 16, 2011, 05:35:36 AM » |
|
What a touch, gets me out of it from the poor result in teh United game anyway....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CEO - Raspberry Express
|
|
|
|
lvlarc_uk
|
|
« Reply #306 on: October 16, 2011, 05:50:40 AM » |
|
I had Dawson to win by Decision. That was a complete farce, in no way was that a TKO, Hopkins hurled to the ground, unable to continue due to injury (fake or not) so ref rules a TKO win for Dawson. Should have been a NC/ND or even a Hopkins win by  before a Dawson TKO. WTF  I'll be surprised if the commission doesn't overturn the result as a NC. What stance will the bookies take? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #307 on: October 16, 2011, 06:11:24 AM » |
|
I had Dawson to win by Decision. That was a complete farce, in no way was that a TKO, Hopkins hurled to the ground, unable to continue due to injury (fake or not) so ref rules a TKO win for Dawson. Should have been a NC/ND or even a Hopkins win by before a Dawson TKO. WTF I'll be surprised if the commission doesn't overturn the result as a NC. What stance will the bookies take? Agree completely and that was exactly what the pundits said in the studio afterwards and they think it'll be ruled a NC after they look at it again. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CEO - Raspberry Express
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #308 on: October 16, 2011, 08:46:51 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
boldie
|
|
« Reply #309 on: October 17, 2011, 09:14:51 AM » |
|
Is that Matt in the 2nd vid? I would have thought he could take Kimbo TBH.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
|
|
|
|
kukushkin88
|
|
« Reply #310 on: October 17, 2011, 09:46:04 AM » |
|
I had Dawson to win by Decision. That was a complete farce, in no way was that a TKO, Hopkins hurled to the ground, unable to continue due to injury (fake or not) so ref rules a TKO win for Dawson. Should have been a NC/ND or even a Hopkins win by before a Dawson TKO. WTF I'll be surprised if the commission doesn't overturn the result as a NC. What stance will the bookies take? Which bookie is it with? You´d need a miracle to get a refund here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #311 on: October 17, 2011, 09:32:03 PM » |
|
Yeah you have basically no chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DaveShoelace
|
|
« Reply #312 on: October 17, 2011, 09:42:56 PM » |
|
Yeah you have basically no chance.
This, even if the result is overturned (which is equally unlikely, I cannot ever recall seeing a decision being overrulled) the bookie almost always pays out based on the result at the time. This also protects those punters who backed a KO. Thats the stinker in boxing, completely unfair decisions always make it a tricky sport to bet on. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BrumBilly
|
|
« Reply #313 on: October 21, 2011, 11:11:00 AM » |
|
WBC rules fight a 'technical draw' giving Hopkins his belt back. Californian Boxing Commission hasn't ruled yet but expected to declare a 'no contest'. Either way, Hopkins gets his belt back (correctly IMO) but shouldn't change things re bookies and payouts (fwiw if Hills decide to take money out of my account as a result I'll be withdrawing the balance!).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #314 on: October 25, 2011, 02:47:00 PM » |
|
Last night I half jokingly suggested to my wife that we should take a pre weekend trip to Atlantic City on the weekend of, say, 17th december just before Xmas to watch the Froch-Ward fight and Kell Brook on the same bill. To my amazement she thought this was a great idea!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author