blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 09:13:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272618 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  £1/£2 at the empire, tptk river decision
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: £1/£2 at the empire, tptk river decision  (Read 973 times)
Pugwashed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 285


View Profile
« on: December 23, 2011, 10:33:38 PM »

I have £400, villain covers. I've been fairly tight in a few orbits I've been at the table but aggro when I have got involved and been caught double barrelling light once. Villain (random middle aged guy) was super wide preflop, calling almost any open and making lots of light peels/call downs.

I open AK utg to £10, villain call utg+1. Get 3 more callers. Flop  , I bet £35 in to £51, villain calls, the rest fold. Turn  , I bet £85 into £121, villain tanks for ages and someone else calls the clock (he'd tanked a lot of decisions and this wasn't the first time someone had called the clock on him), Villain calls. River  two spades, pot is £291, effective stacks are £270.

What do you do and why?
Logged
Solaris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2011, 10:35:04 PM »

Shove.

I really don't see what other option there is.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10536



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2011, 10:53:27 PM »

this guy as described NEVER has AQ and doesn't seem like the type to bluff.

as long as he doesn't have the in his hand you should be a winner + you'll actually get called by worse, a LOT lol
Logged

Pugwashed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 285


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2011, 11:00:06 PM »

Cool, don't play a ton live so not that in touch with the metagame, but that was pretty much what I decided. I cram and got snapped by K4hh, was just wondering whether jamming was too thin.
Logged
Solaris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2011, 11:04:22 PM »

Cool, don't play a ton live so not that in touch with the metagame, but that was pretty much what I decided. I cram and got snapped by K4hh, was just wondering whether jamming was too thin.

Obviously this is with hindsight but given he's flatted K4hh UTG+1 it's fair to say that his range is super wide and therefore we lose out on a lot of value by not shoving imo as he's likely to call with a lot of hands we beat.

UL that he played it badly and still got there.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10536



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2011, 11:05:15 PM »

if he was slightly less stationy and a little more aggro you could c/c and be told it's a good call cos he missed.
Logged

Pugwashed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 285


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2011, 11:09:05 PM »

I did think about c/c and c/f but as far as him tanking the turn I thought he'd call quicker with draws and him tanking was more likely some sort of made hand. I thought by checking I'd just lose a ton of value from Ax
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19107



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 23, 2011, 11:28:24 PM »

bet > c>call >>>>>>>>> c>f
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14876


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2011, 01:06:02 AM »

bet > c>call >>>>>>>>> c>f
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.158 seconds with 21 queries.