Satellite bubble

TL900

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 2418

Satellite bubble

« on: September 21, 2012, 05:49:06 PM »

***** Hand History for Game 4289551981 ***** (IPoker)
Tourney Hand NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, September 19, 11:44:53 ET 2012
Table GUKPT 150 Freezeout Qualifier 759696601 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Seat 3: Walwyn1 ( $20145.00 USD )
Seat 4: oldQP_Jonhooks1986 ( $9517.50 USD )
Seat 5: HERO ( $8917.50 USD )
Seat 10: superbyrney1010 ( $76420.00 USD )
hero posts ante of [$50.00 USD].
superbyrney1010 posts ante of [$50.00 USD].
Walwyn1 posts ante of [$50.00 USD].
oldQP_Jonhooks1986 posts ante of [$50.00 USD].
hero posts small blind [$250.00 USD].
superbyrney1010 posts big blind [$500.00 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ ]
Walwyn1 folds
oldQP_Jonhooks1986 folds
HERO :

this was the hand from a GUKPT satellite, 4 left with 3 seats. We are 4/4 atm and it folds to us with the huge stack in the bb. The guy in 3/4 was playing very bad satellite strategy and peeling the big stacks opens alot from the bb. Whats our shoving range here?

(assuming we dont have a raising range in this spot which i think is a fair assumption)

Do you shove tighter and hope the guy in 3rd does something spazzy at the risk of us blinding down? Whats our range?


« Last Edit: September 21, 2012, 06:03:43 PM by TL900 »	Logged

@MtSpewmore

Quote from: jgcblack

I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.

Ironside

Administrator
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 41950

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2012, 06:38:39 PM »

89s+ 22+


	Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.

Doobs

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 16734

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2012, 07:00:00 PM »

Quote from: Ironside on September 21, 2012, 06:38:39 PM

89s+ 22+

This is a terrible range. Huge stacks tend to call way more than they should. If he just calls 10%, you'd be knocking yourself out 7% of the time. I'd far rather wait for the other fella to knock himself out. if that doesn't happen I widen, until then range is tiny.


	Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots

Ironside

Administrator
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 41950

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2012, 09:05:01 PM »

Quote from: Doobs on September 21, 2012, 07:00:00 PM

Quote from: Ironside on September 21, 2012, 06:38:39 PM

89s+ 22+

sorry miss read though he had 7k not 70k


	Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.

skolsuper

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1504

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2012, 12:20:22 AM »

JJ+?

Although, as I always post on these threads, this stuff is solved, get SNGWiz.


	Logged

pleno1

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 18912

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2012, 12:27:04 AM »

I'd shove 10s and aq but aq
May be a little light just think a lot of the hands he ahhhhhh go on then with we dominate so much.


	Logged

Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol

OverTheBorder

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 3573

just one of those days

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2012, 12:45:54 AM »

Any money in 4th? or is it just 3 seats! errrrm in this spot into more than half the chips in play blind on blind he is going to be calling wide with equity I will be all in with pairs and only pairs with paint!


	Logged

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 2565

Probably the worst player here

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2012, 01:57:55 AM »

Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though


	Logged

skolsuper

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1504

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2012, 03:31:20 AM »

Quote from: JK on September 22, 2012, 01:57:55 AM

Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though

Because youre expecting to get called v wide, JJ and AQ are so far apart in this situation it's not even funny. 88 is better than AQ here.


	Logged

JustinSayne

Full Member

Offline

Posts: 278

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2012, 04:13:21 AM »

Im inclined to jam pretty damn tight here considering how bad 3/4 is playing apparently.


	Logged

rfgqqabc

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 5371

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2012, 06:01:12 AM »

Quote from: skolsuper on September 22, 2012, 12:20:22 AM

JJ+?

Although, as I always post on these threads, this stuff is solved, get SNGWiz.

Whilst i completely agree, sometimes these need to be posted as the weakness of the 3/4 opponent is significant.


	Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 2565

Probably the worst player here

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2012, 11:43:29 AM »

Quote from: skolsuper on September 22, 2012, 03:31:20 AM

Quote from: JK on September 22, 2012, 01:57:55 AM

Snap reaction was JJ/AQ so gonna say that. I'm shit at satties though

Because youre expecting to get called v wide, JJ and AQ are so far apart in this situation it's not even funny. 88 is better than AQ here.

You're right, ofc. Didnt take that into account. Was very tired Tongue


	Logged

discomonkey

Sr. Member

Offline

Posts: 316

Re: Satellite bubble

« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2012, 11:56:13 PM »

pretty tight bc of the guy playing bad, hes gonna peel/spaz himself out vs such a huge stack, jj ak i guess??

agree with keys tho... sngwiz should answer this question better than any of us


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »