blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 12:46:52 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262349 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Best flop line with two pair?
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Best flop line with two pair?  (Read 2859 times)
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« on: December 30, 2012, 12:58:53 AM »

50euro freezeout. 16 left out of 400ish. We are opening a lot.

Seat 1: ptimanu14 (796623)
Seat 3: ben210 64 (404612)
Seat 4: kitkat688 (301012)
Seat 5: halteatout (367001)
Seat 6: Sr Croissant (728559)
ANTE/BLINDS
ben210 64 posts ante 1250
kitkat688 posts ante 1250
ptimanu14 posts ante 1250
halteatout posts ante 1250
Sr Croissant posts ante 1250
ben210 64 posts small blind 5000
kitkat688 posts big blind 10000
Dealt to Sr Croissant
 
PRE-FLOP
halteatout folds
Sr Croissant raises 10000 to 20000
ptimanu14 calls 20000
ben210 64 calls 15000
kitkat688 folds
FLOP
 
ben210 64 checks
Sr Croissant bets 26555
ptimanu14 calls 26555
ben210 64 raises 47220 to 73775
Sr Croissant

the btn who peels my cbet has the same stack as me (about 750k) and the check raiser has 325k
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2012, 12:59:49 AM »

think all 3 options have merits. flatting, clicking and jamming.
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 16732


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2012, 01:08:40 AM »

This is .fr, surely we bet more on the flop?   I just keep betting there with most opponents, just no need to get tricky.  So 4 bet 180, call either.  If they call, just keeping on betting on the turn.

I'd be more tempted to get tricky on stars than the other one. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1499



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2012, 01:21:00 AM »

I like flaring here to see what the other big stack does.
Logged
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1672


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2012, 04:16:21 AM »

He isn't repping anything at all, wouldn't want to fold out any of his bluffs. Clicking it could be cool to try induce a shove but would prob need a decent read.

Jamming could look weak but don't think there's quite enough of a likelihood he'll be calling off to make it better than the other 2
Logged
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2012, 06:03:28 AM »

clicking > calling > jamming > folding.

Think clicking is the best by far actually
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
stato_1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: leet

#Team_Eureka


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2012, 06:16:05 AM »

Any sort of read would help, nothing special, but fish/reg would be a start
Logged
tight4better
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1019



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2012, 01:38:11 PM »

Prob clicking this
Logged
Pugwashed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 285


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2012, 02:52:50 PM »

I think calling > clicking > jamming > folding. Calling just seems by far the best option tho.
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2012, 02:53:46 PM »

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.

clicking it seems quite bad imo.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1672


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2012, 05:34:06 PM »

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.


good post
Logged
youthnkzR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2408


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2012, 06:17:41 PM »

Too many people overthinking and overcomplicating things here. Call.
Logged
Mondeoman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 263


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2012, 07:30:31 PM »

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.

clicking it seems quite bad imo.

mmmm agreeing with pleno again.  In theory clicking here can represent a bluff but in practice it almost always means nutz - unless you think opponent is v bad and v spewy just call.
Logged
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2012, 07:41:30 PM »

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.

clicking it seems quite bad imo.

mmmm agreeing with pleno again.  In theory clicking here can represent a bluff but in practice it almost always means nutz - unless you think opponent is v bad and v spewy just call.

can we ever be bluffing if we call though?
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2012, 08:22:09 PM »

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.

clicking it seems quite bad imo.

mmmm agreeing with pleno again.  In theory clicking here can represent a bluff but in practice it almost always means nutz - unless you think opponent is v bad and v spewy just call.

i think vs all opponents calling is best here, an ace can come or board can pair or bring a fd or some additional equity. A bad aggro player just usually raises and then folds when we click.

call is by far the best line here.

If the board was K92 then ok, but K74 there are significantly less hands with equity that will jusr cram. You can't expect QJ or something to cram here but on boards like 872 where we have 2 pair its far better to click as they can spew even 1 over card etc.

clicking it seems quite bad imo.

mmmm agreeing with pleno again.  In theory clicking here can represent a bluff but in practice it almost always means nutz - unless you think opponent is v bad and v spewy just call.

can we ever be bluffing if we call though?

I don't think that matters though, its all about trying to get the maximum vs player type+hand+board

On this board

Tight player

-> Value range is prolly just sets = beats us
-> Bluff range. nits can always spaz and in this case would just have something completely random = we crush and will crush ott too

Spewy player

-> Value range = prolly non existent, or dont have to worry about it because bluff combos massively outweight
-> Bluff range, completely random crap or some back door, j9 w/fd or something idk = we crush and will crush ott too

On the turn, I would c/shove anything that is connected with the board and call down on total bricks because of this specific texture.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 20 queries.