blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 07:13:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272618 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  PokerTracker 4 weirdness
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: PokerTracker 4 weirdness  (Read 899 times)
Evilpengwinz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 302



View Profile
« on: November 15, 2013, 11:28:40 AM »

Noticed this on PT4 yesterday

 Click to see full-size image.


Any idea why the "C Net Adjusted" column says I should lose more than the SNG buy-in? How is that even possible?! :S
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10536



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2013, 02:20:54 PM »

wow you must be terrible Cheesy -200% roi :p

In seriousness I don't think that the calculation is an overall ICM calc I think they just do it individually for each AI, so if you get AI 3 times KK vs AA and win all three it'll prolly tell you overall you should be losing significantly more than the buyin, after-all it's a "long - term expectation" not really relevant for individual sit n goes.

*disclaimer - I might be totally wrong.
Logged

theprawnidentity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3602


8 high happens!


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2013, 08:27:53 PM »

The C net adjusted stat is defo not designed for SNGs.  Basically daves right, as per usual!
Logged
Evilpengwinz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 302



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2013, 12:48:12 PM »

Ah right, makes sense. Cheers Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.159 seconds with 21 queries.