Bloody Jacks

[deejaypee]

Well I enjoyed reading this post, quite an in depth discussion over what the correct decision is/was/could have been.

[pleno1]

Well I enjoyed reading this post, quite an in depth discussion over what the correct decision is/was/could have been.

yeah i intially posted fold with little study or depth to my post, dan changed tht for me imo.

[cambridgealex]

I'll explain why I was irritated enough to respond in that manner.

You'd crunched some numbers and come up with a conclusion that it was a clear call/jam/GII whatever.

I'd crunched some different numbers, with a different range (including no 3bet bluffs) and explained my reasons for doing so in a long post. My numbers had shown it was 0 ev to get it in (well + 1 ante or something).

Without considering this, you simply said "after 3 pages of number crunching it's obvious that you make a ton of chips by getting it in", when I'd concluded near enough the exact opposite. Which I found immensely dismissive of what I'd tried to communicate, as well as quite obnoxious.  Not to mention ignoring the numerous posters who'd said fold.

Given the debate, it was anything but obvious.

I apologise for the cutting response though, which was clearly very non-constructive and rude. I don't post like that often at all.

[theprawnidentity]

4b gii

ainec


 

[CHIPPYMAN]

Fold pre . Next hand pls