blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 11, 2024, 06:42:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272978 Posts in 66760 Topics by 16723 Members
Latest Member: callpri
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  when an induce fails. $55 ante up turbo
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: when an induce fails. $55 ante up turbo  (Read 1404 times)
willrobrobu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 649


View Profile
« on: December 19, 2013, 10:42:20 AM »

$55 ante up on stars. QQ and KK to an ace on the flop is usually fairly straightforward in my opinion
but in this spot i didn't know what to do cbet wise. should i just be sticking it in. or raise/folding?

no HUD and no reads other than maybe villain has been a bit more active than the average player

9 handed. blinds are 5/5/ ante is 60

UTG raises to 99 from large stack
folds to MP who reraises to 239 from stack of 2200 ish
next to act i 4b to 599 with QQ from stack of 2000 ish
folds all the way back to middle position 3better who flats.
flop is A28 rainbow; pot is about 1800, i have 1400 left. he is first to act and checks.

----

i'm sure lots of people will (with hindsight) say shove pre flop but I was obviously inducing someone to shove, and it's pretty rare IMO (on pokerstars) for someone to flat a third of the effective stack oop even with the big ante pool in the middle. i assumed that if he was bad enough to flat me oop there then he was bad enough to be doing it quite wide.

cant remember ever being in quite this position.
having got to here can i raise/fold in this sort of tourney with ante increasing every 5minutes? if so what should i bet when i'm planning to fold? half my remaining stack?
or do i have to just shove and pray?








Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6305



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 10:50:47 AM »

You should check

I don't think the word induce applies to a cold 4-bet btw
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 10:52:56 AM by MC » Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
http://www.atkinator.net ..... @epitomised
willrobrobu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 649


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2013, 12:18:54 PM »

hehe, i didn't realise the poker dictionary had hijacked the word induce from the english dictionary. apologies....

re checking - can you explain?
i feel if i were in his shoes i'd then be leading the turn 100% of the time.
so to me checking is the only thing that guarantees i lose the pot, unless u are checking to call later streets to allow him to bluff... but thats really unlikely here surely?

Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6305



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2013, 12:46:16 PM »

I'm probably wrong, I guess you are inducing per cé, but you look super strong is what I mean.

By checking we induce (Wink) him to lead the turn. If he doesn't, probs just jam turn. I don't see much merit in jamming flop, we are essentially bluffing then, and bet/folding seems absurd.

Sorry if my tone sounded off, not intentional.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 12:49:03 PM by MC » Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
http://www.atkinator.net ..... @epitomised
youthnkzR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2406


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2013, 01:00:00 PM »

If we jam flop then we are basically turning or hand into a bluff (well not exactly but we are never really gonna be called by worse). Whereas by checking flop we are giving him a chance to bet / jam turn as a bluff.

Logged
The Squid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 346


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2013, 01:44:00 PM »

I would check back and call all in on turn. I a turbo like this I don't think we can be giving up with so many chips in the middle.

I agree with other posters you should jam. Particularly in this tournament it wont look that odd and as 4-betting like this gives people chance to fold AQ, TT etc
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16595


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2013, 02:05:33 PM »

I would check back and call all in on turn. I a turbo like this I don't think we can be giving up with so many chips in the middle.

I agree with other posters you should jam. Particularly in this tournament it wont look that odd and as 4-betting like this gives people chance to fold AQ, TT etc

Agree with this.  People are more likely to get away from hands that we beat if we look super strong.  If we just jam our entire range of strong hands, they should probably be calling with hands that we crush such as AQ and 99.  I know I often struggle to put hands like these down vs a shover in this.  If they don't call, I can't see much downside to picking up 900 chips with QQ if we started with 2k.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3531



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2013, 05:07:39 PM »

So obvs never folding.

I think that if the peeler isn't terrible (which is questionable because of the peel) I'd just bet or jam. Stack to pot ratio is really small and if this is against a reg you can't just check all your good hands here because if you were somehow bluffing pre-flop (lol) then you are always going to be betting the flop. He ain't folding any pocket pairs or 8's.

If the guy is an absolute rofler of a fish then you could check back and get him to bluff or catch a pair and go with it but I even doubt many massive fish will go off on one when you've checked back after 4betting pre.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3531



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2013, 05:26:24 PM »

A lot of people also  don't realise how shallow this plays too, you've effectively started the hand with just over 10bb's. I'd assume that the guy peeling you is terrible but he might not realise that you're really shallow.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19107



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2013, 05:41:18 PM »

Yeh this 4bet is absolutely to induce.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3531



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2013, 05:45:18 PM »

Yeh this 4bet is absolutely to induce.

You've saved the day.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
Pinchop73
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1438


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2013, 05:47:15 PM »

Logged

First they came for the nits, and I did not speak out because I was not a nit
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19107



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2013, 06:13:42 PM »

think jamming turn is optimistc at best and most likely v bad. check back imo?
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6305



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: December 19, 2013, 11:19:29 PM »

Yeh this 4bet is absolutely to induce.

Ok my bad Smiley
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
http://www.atkinator.net ..... @epitomised
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 19 queries.