PokerStars Hand #110917376586: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2014/01/29 0:52:20 WET [2014/01/28 19:52:20 ET]
Table 'Bianca IV' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: peixete ($16.08 in chips)
Seat 2: scrinvet ($12.43 in chips)
Seat 3: crowbar1989 ($8 in chips)
Seat 4: 1Rexas1 ($10 in chips)
Seat 5: tir_50_ve ($10 in chips)
Seat 6: mambochambo ($10 in chips)
tir_50_ve: posts small blind $0.05
mambochambo: posts big blind $0.10
crowbar1989: posts big blind $0.10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to 1Rexas1 [
]
peixete: folds
scrinvet: calls $0.10
crowbar1989: raises $0.35 to $0.45
1Rexas1: calls $0.45
tir_50_ve: folds
mambochambo: folds
scrinvet: calls $0.35
*** FLOP *** [
]
scrinvet: checks
crowbar1989: bets $0.70
1Rexas1: calls $0.70
scrinvet: calls $0.70
*** TURN *** [
] [
]
scrinvet: checks
crowbar1989: checks
1Rexas1: bets $2.60
scrinvet: calls $2.60
crowbar1989: folds
*** RIVER *** [
] [
]
scrinvet: bets $6.10
So, this one felt time bank using up close. So I used up the time bank. Basically, can he value bet worse? For the most part I've been folding most nuts or nothing situations at this level, because its rarely nothing, but I really don't know if the guy could bet worse. I'm pretty much readless, although I guess I could say he's probably not a reg since I don't have many hands on him. Given his stats by the end of the session he's probably not a reg, but obvs these aren't relevant at this time.