blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 21, 2025, 02:47:06 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261804 Posts in 66596 Topics by 16984 Members
Latest Member: thomas_1
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  UKIPT hand
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: UKIPT hand  (Read 2977 times)
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17072


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« on: October 12, 2014, 08:01:36 AM »

So this pot might haunt me for a while.

Blinds are 6,000-12,000/1,000

About 40 remain from 1080 starters, so average is 540k. I have 250k

UTG I find TT

I make it 24k to play.

MP has just bluffed off 90% of his chips the previous hand. He moves all in for 40k.

Passes to the big blind who is chip leader at the table with approx 800k.

He announces all in.

A little history on the all in guy.

He is a 60+ year old Scottish guy who is pretty wealthy and plays poker as a hobby. He is a rec, but he is trying very very hard to win/play well.

Although he was CL and I was the small stack, the two occasions when it is passed to his sb he has given me a walk

Also, every time he has raised previously he has just put chips in rather than making a verbal declaration. Except once, when he said "raise" before putting his chips in. He had KK in that spot.

Although this is the first time he's moved all in so this is slightly different.

FWIW my read is that circa 0% chance he is making move to get heads up with the all in guy getting good odds.

Should I call or pass?

« Last Edit: October 12, 2014, 08:03:24 AM by The Camel » Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2014, 08:10:52 AM »

I'd fold. Those old boys have AK and JJ+ always

(apart from when you reveal he had 77)
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16704


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2014, 08:56:41 AM »

I'd fold. Those old boys have AK and JJ+ always

(apart from when you reveal he had 77)

I was thinking 77 must be about the bottom and possibly some AQ combos to go with his AK ones.  Or he has lost his head.   Maybe he doesn't go so big with AA or KK, maybe he does.  I don't think it should haunt you whatever you did as I think it is close, as ICM can get you pretty bad here. I probably fold. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2014, 09:40:52 AM »

Unless he accidentally exposes his cards and shows sevens, I'm assuming it's a race or worse and folding. Cost you 24k to make a bad fold and your stack to make a bad call.

Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Junior Senior
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4628



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2014, 09:50:47 AM »

Fold on balance probably as described.
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2014, 09:59:47 AM »

Cost you 24k to make a bad fold and your stack to make a bad call.

I am in the fold camp but don't agree with this statement.
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2014, 10:17:42 AM »

Cost you 24k to make a bad fold and your stack to make a bad call.

I am in the fold camp but don't agree with this statement.

No one ever does.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7809



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2014, 10:27:26 AM »

Cost you 24k to make a bad fold and your stack to make a bad call.

I am in the fold camp but don't agree with this statement.

No one ever does.

Made me chuckle. Anyway, even in game when I get a bit braindead I'd fold this cause he's much more likely to have you beat than not have you beat
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16704


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2014, 10:59:08 AM »

Cost you 24k to make a bad fold and your stack to make a bad call.

I am in the fold camp but don't agree with this statement.

No one ever does.

Made me chuckle. Anyway, even in game when I get a bit braindead I'd fold this cause he's much more likely to have you beat than not have you beat

I don't think he is much more likely to have us beat than not, I expect we are something much closer to 50% vs his range.  I think we fold because ICM says we should.

I am not there and have no idea of Keith's opening stats UTG, which could make a big difference to how the rec perceives him, but even knowing that, I think we are arguing about which side of the 50% we are and we should just fold.  Maybe walk away so we don't see the 77 vs AK and the ten on the flop.  Still think fold is probably right whatever Keith has been doing. 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1672


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2014, 01:18:09 PM »

I think you have to get it in. Really depends on the guy and if you can soul read him here, but on paper he should be wide enough here for us to have a profitable get in with TT.
Logged
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2014, 02:03:08 AM »

Let's assume you are playing fairly tight and this is online then I'm not really liking it. To him the action probably looks like he needs a really strong hand to announce all-in.

I think your decision will only haunt you if you are going to be results orientated. I would lean towards a fold tbh but I wouldn't be too harsh on you if you called.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2014, 02:27:47 AM »

i gii. you only have 20bbs right? i think he will jam 88+ aq+ maybe potentially wider.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5369


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2014, 02:53:06 AM »

Think he'd show more of a decision if he was weak and always has it. Breath in deep and announce all in guys always have it
Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17072


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2014, 09:30:56 AM »

Let's assume you are playing fairly tight and this is online then I'm not really liking it. To him the action probably looks like he needs a really strong hand to announce all-in.

I think your decision will only haunt you if you are going to be results orientated. I would lean towards a fold tbh but I wouldn't be too harsh on you if you called.

Of course I'm being results orientated by saying it will haunt me.

But it's hard not to be, how many times a year am I at the last 4 tables of a monkey tournament which pays £130k to the winner?

I normally play super fast and my gut reaction was to call, I think against 80% of villains it an obvious call.

But I dwelled for a few seconds and thought it through.

I didn't think he had AA. I feel like he would have made a funky min raise sort of thing with the boots.

I feel like he would have called with 66 through 99 and possibly AQ too.

My read was he had exactly AK, KK, QQ or JJ.

I spoke to him while I was thinking. He answered immediately and confidently. This weighted me towards him having the big pair.

With JJ I would have called, but I reluctantly laid it down.

He had AK obv and the flop was QQT Sad
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
dreenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2382



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2014, 11:47:53 AM »

Yeah I would call it off exactly what Patrick said... not really icm considerations when there is still 40 left and you are the ss. .. play for the win imo, like u say not very often you are going to be in that situation for that sort of buy In but huge amount to winner.

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.195 seconds with 19 queries.