Are you talking solar panels for hot water or photo voltaic for electricity.
If its for your hot water and you have a cylinder - its worth having 2 as they will pay you back over a 10 year period and then your probably freerolling for the next 10 years.
If its photo voltaic for your electricity dont bother as the technology is just not quite right yet, also if you own your own property it can devalue it when you come to sell.
When they brought out the original tarriffs it was a no brainer, but all the tarriffs have been dramatically reduced and will possibly be reduced further after the election
This makes zero sense. You say not to bother because the technology is not quite right yet but then you say that on the original tariffs it was a no brainer. Was the technology not the same (or worse) then?
The technology is irrelevant anyway as long as it actually works. The panel manufacturers will freely admit that the panels are far from efficient, usually in the order of 20% efficiency or so but as it's free energy it doesn't matter one bit how much of it isn't converted to usable electricity.
Also MPower is obviously talking about PV as he mentions 'free' systems and the company 'a shade greener'. There's nobody out there providing free solar hot water systems as they don't benefit from feed in tariffs so there's zero financial benefit other than for the homeowner.
God knows what you mean by "it's worth having 2"? There's so many factors to take in to account before you decide how many to have this just doesn't help at all. You're basically saying that whatever he's considering he should double it without factoring in anything else.
M. if you go for solar thermal (water) then it's the governments RHI (renewable heat incentive) that makes it worthwhile financially. A typical system costing about £3k to £5k will save between £50 and £80 per year if you currently use electric (less if you use gas). The RHI payment could be anywhere between £1k and £3k over a 7 year period depending on the size of your house and several other factors. It's nowhere near as simple as '10 year payback then a freeroll'.
Financially if you're looking at one or the other it's obviously the PV to go for. If what Mikey says was correct you'd see the hot water solar everywhere instead of the PV. If it's about doing your bit for the environment and you have no other medium to long term requirement for the money then roof space permitting I'd go for both.