poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 25, 2025, 01:25:29 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262432
Posts in
66607
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Larry's challenge thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
6
...
12
Author
Topic: Larry's challenge thread (Read 24609 times)
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #15 on:
March 17, 2015, 07:47:28 PM »
I am not doubting his knowledge in specific areas, I don't doubt that.
I have no idea on this one but can any of you tell me how
Much a bookie online would accept on a Portland bet at 1/12?
Logged
Lay Low Back High
bagel
bagel
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 956
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #16 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:00:52 PM »
heads up for rolls larry?
my cheese and pickle v your ham and coleslaw
Logged
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #17 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:03:12 PM »
I hear a lot of 'bank job', 'max bet' words thrown around.
150k bank lets say, question for arbboy or any of you.
Some of you will follow arbboy in on a 1/12 banker, 6k win. It goes wrong -6k. Next bet comes up at 1/10 and arb makes it 1/25,with that bank what are you advising one of your 'followers' to stake(if you were advising) on the following bet?? 10k to win 1k?? 10k for the next 5 1/10 bets? Just want to know your strategy for such a bet. Just a discussion,not wanting an argument. Risk reward is awful no matter what you think the price is and if it isn't possible to get much on at these odds on prices it is a long grind.
Logged
Lay Low Back High
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #18 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:04:41 PM »
Hmmmm, now that really is 50/50,no edge at all. What a tough decision.
Over 240 views,this is fantastic
Logged
Lay Low Back High
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #19 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:06:12 PM »
Quote from: Larry David on March 17, 2015, 08:03:12 PM
I hear a lot of 'bank job', 'max bet' words thrown around.
150k bank lets say, question for arbboy or any of you.
Some of you will follow arbboy in on a 1/12 banker, 6k win. It goes wrong -6k. Next bet comes up at 1/10 and arb makes it 1/25,with that bank what are you advising one of your 'followers' to stake(if you were advising) on the following bet?? 10k to win 1k?? 10k for the next 5 1/10 bets? Just want to know your strategy for such a bet. Just a discussion,not wanting an argument. Risk reward is awful no matter what you think the price is and if it isn't possible to get much on at these odds on prices it is a long grind.
Please receive as well as transmit. I am reading some of your posts and cringing a bit to be frank
its about staking to correct unit sizes within a bankroll
when someone says "bank job" or "max bet" it might be 3 or 5% of bankroll, no more than that
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
edgascoigne
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2144
Newbury Racecourse's Best Dressed Gent. And What?
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #20 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:18:41 PM »
Amusingly enough, given the content of the thread, if Arb was allowed to bet whatever he wants, in whatever size, with say a caveat of one of 6 books offering the prices, and betting on tick, I would merrily back Arb at 1/33 over the course of a year.
Logged
Allez!!
simonnatur
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 766
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #21 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:18:52 PM »
Loving it, Blonde has a new pantomime villain
Logged
Reluctant to race, came home in own time
arbboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13270
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #22 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:18:57 PM »
Quote from: Larry David on March 17, 2015, 08:03:12 PM
I hear a lot of 'bank job', 'max bet' words thrown around.
150k bank lets say, question for arbboy or any of you.
Some of you will follow arbboy in on a 1/12 banker, 6k win. It goes wrong -6k. Next bet comes up at 1/10 and arb makes it 1/25,with that bank what are you advising one of your 'followers' to stake(if you were advising) on the following bet?? 10k to win 1k?? 10k for the next 5 1/10 bets? Just want to know your strategy for such a bet. Just a discussion,not wanting an argument. Risk reward is awful no matter what you think the price is and if it isn't possible to get much on at these odds on prices it is a long grind.
My strategy is the same as any other bet whether it is 1/100 or 100/1 just like any other successful long term winning gambler. The bigger the difference in price between the price the bet is and the price i can get as a % the bigger the % of my bankroll i have on. I would imagine most bookmakers given the chance to lay a 500/1 shot at 12/1 would probably go quite deep into their till as they don't get that kind of edge very often.
No idea where 'bank jobs' comes from. I have never used that phrase in my life. I am done with the whole thing and would rather if you didn't comment on any more of my posts Larry as you have clearly proved you don't have a clue about the game. Over and out.
«
Last Edit: March 17, 2015, 08:21:39 PM by arbboy
»
Logged
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #23 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:24:30 PM »
Yes I am aware of that,150k bank 6k Portland falls within that number.
Yes a staking plan is needed but the bets placed on the TFT thread are based on the price. Evs shot lets go £100. 3/1 £20. 200/1 gilles simon lets just go £5. All the different tipsters are just putting up a stake amount Correct staking plan?
Logged
Lay Low Back High
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #24 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:29:16 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on March 17, 2015, 05:49:58 PM
rules
no flaming
no trolling
no winding up
if it develops, fine
if not, nothing lost
No winding up SIMON
Logged
Lay Low Back High
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #25 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:34:27 PM »
Quote from: simonnatur on March 17, 2015, 08:18:52 PM
Loving it, Blonde has a new pantomime villain
I shouldn't even acknowledge this post from a guy who backs horses based off speed ratings in handicaps with less than 3k to most winning horses and who obviously thinks these owners make their money from prize funds You should give up now and stop being so naive, you must be one of these punters who are in shock when a 33/1 winner goes in with form reading 7889PU9. Pantomime logic indeed.
Logged
Lay Low Back High
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #26 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:37:35 PM »
No idea where 'bank jobs' comes from. I have never used that phrase in my life. I am done with the whole thing and would rather if you didn't comment on any more of my posts Larry as you have clearly proved you don't have a clue about the game. Over and out.
I may not work your way but it is naive to suggest I have no idea about this game,very foolish.
No problem,Won't comment on any of the threads,no problem at all.
Logged
Lay Low Back High
aaron1867
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3386
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #27 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:38:44 PM »
Quote from: Larry David on March 17, 2015, 08:34:27 PM
Quote from: simonnatur on March 17, 2015, 08:18:52 PM
Loving it, Blonde has a new pantomime villain
I shouldn't even acknowledge this post from a guy who backs horses based off speed ratings in handicaps with less than 3k to most winning horses and who obviously thinks these owners make their money from prize funds You should give up now and stop being so naive, you must be one of these punters who are in shock when a 33/1 winner goes in with form reading 7889PU9. Pantomime logic indeed.
This has nothing to do with what I are saying, get on with it
Logged
Larry David
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 472
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #28 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:42:05 PM »
Say what aaron???
Logged
Lay Low Back High
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Online
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Larry's challenge thread
«
Reply #29 on:
March 17, 2015, 08:44:15 PM »
Quote from: Larry David on March 17, 2015, 08:34:27 PM
Quote from: simonnatur on March 17, 2015, 08:18:52 PM
Loving it, Blonde has a new pantomime villain
I shouldn't even acknowledge this post from a guy who backs horses based off speed ratings in handicaps with less than 3k to most winning horses and who obviously thinks these owners make their money from prize funds You should give up now and stop being so naive, you must be one of these punters who are in shock when a 33/1 winner goes in with form reading 7889PU9. Pantomime logic indeed.
If you peruse our racing thread, you will see that Simon is a very shrewd and profitable horse punter. Horses for courses, so to speak, he does very well.
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
6
...
12
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...