1. rowing back from multi day one re-entry tournaments would be the end of the nosebleed guarantees in the uk market
do you think this would be good, bad or neither for the uk players? for the operators business models?
2 i think it is generally accepted that a reutrn to freezeouts is unlikely, the market has moved on. what tournament buy in structure would you suggest to satisfy players and the operator?
3 is there any evidence that multi day one multi entry tournaments are won by non-recs compared to recs, in general? isn't the whole notion that it favours deeper bankrolls theoretical rather than something seen in practice?
1. Personally, the nosebleed guarantees don't have a huge influence on my decision making. I understand that they may do for others. I understand also that they generate publicity for the operators.
2. One re-entry seems reasonable, or, one add-on/rebuy but limited to the early levels, along with late-registration.
3. I don't have sufficient information to answer your question. I wish someone would analyse it and let us know. Be interesting to see the % itm of those who had multiple entries.