Churchill: Hero or Villain ?

[Pokerpops]

^^

Same goes for some of these 50yo sexual misconduct allegations imo.

So abusing teenage girls or boys is ok? Was ok?

No. Not then, not now, not ever.

[RED-DOG]

^^

Same goes for some of these 50yo sexual misconduct allegations imo.

So abusing teenage girls or boys is ok? Was ok?

No. Not then, not now, not ever.

If you continue to blatantly twist my words I will just start ignoring you completely.

[DaveShoelace]

^^

Same goes for some of these 50yo sexual misconduct allegations imo.

So abusing teenage girls or boys is ok? Was ok?

No. Not then, not now, not ever.

If you continue to blatantly twist my words I will just start ignoring you completely.

So you think we should set fire to dogs and wee on them?

[Pokerpops]

^^

Same goes for some of these 50yo sexual misconduct allegations imo.

So abusing teenage girls or boys is ok? Was ok?

No. Not then, not now, not ever.

If you continue to blatantly twist my words I will just start ignoring you completely.

I wasn’t aware that I had twisted anything. You expressed doubt about the pursuit of sex offenders for offences committed 50yrs ago based on Sicilian’s post suggesting that we shouldn’t judge history based on today’s standards and ideals.
I took that to mean that you felt that such allegations were based on today’s standards and should be judged on the standards that applied at the time.
I disagreed with what I thought was your view.

If I have misinterpreted you please feel free to clarify your point.

Or ignore me if you feel so inclined.

[RED-DOG]

Well for a start I said 'some' and 'misconduct'  I didn't mention abuse or teenage boys and girls at all.

[Pokerpops]

Well for a start I said 'some' and 'misconduct'  I didn't mention abuse or teenage boys and girls at all.

Then my response to your original post falls under the category of Vagueness and the Aftermath 😀