|
doubleup
|
 |
« on: March 04, 2006, 03:04:08 PM » |
|
I made a post on the internet forum about the apparent collapse of higher limit cash games on Ladbrokes. Someone responded making general allegations of cheating, but not mentioning names.
The thread appears to have been deleted without any explanation. I find this unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sark79
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2006, 03:05:56 PM » |
|
I read that post earlier. I played at Ladbrokes twice in low limts. So I didn't really have a place to make comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
byronkincaid
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2006, 03:09:17 PM » |
|
Yeah, I think that sort of info should be out in the open. I don't play there much, the first I heard about it was in the massive ZJ thread on 2+2 where someone was saying about how teams play there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2006, 03:12:46 PM » |
|
Ladbrokes Poker have complained directly to blonde.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
doubleup
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2006, 03:16:14 PM » |
|
Ladbrokes Poker have complained directly to blonde.
So... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2006, 03:18:30 PM » |
|
...I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dewi_cool
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2006, 03:22:55 PM » |
|
ROBERT where are you!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The very last hand of the night goes to Dewi James, who finds ACES and talks Raymond O’Mahoney into calling his all-in preflop bet of 15k. “If I had AQ, I’d call!” says Dewi. Raymond calls holding pocket 66’s.
|
|
|
|
byronkincaid
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2006, 03:23:47 PM » |
|
perhaps they would have been better off going through and answering the alligations one by one. just looks like it's all true now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2006, 03:24:30 PM » |
|
I've PM Snoopy and Kev asking who deleted the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
doubleup
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2006, 03:33:28 PM » |
|
I posted factually that there were only 2 games at higher limits running on a Friday evening and I thought this was surprising in comparison to the past activity at that level.
I don't think that because Ladbrokes don't like a post and apparently didn't want to respond is sufficient reason to delete. I suppose if Grovsenor complain about the Walsall collusion post, that will be deleted.
I also feel that I should have received a PM outlining the reason for deletion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2006, 03:35:29 PM » |
|
I also feel that I should have received a PM outlining the reason for deletion.
I agree. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AdamM
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2006, 03:36:33 PM » |
|
I only skim-read it but wasnt it directly attributed to collusion or cheatng? you can't make unsubstantiated claims like that without providing the evidence in the same breath. Blonde surely have to remove it for legal reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
doubleup
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2006, 03:43:14 PM » |
|
I only skim-read it but wasnt it directly attributed to collusion or cheatng? you can't make unsubstantiated claims like that without providing the evidence in the same breath. Blonde surely have to remove it for legal reasons.
Blonde have the right to remove anything for any reason, but how it is done and whether it is reasonable is my issue. I didn't post anything other than fact. The other poster responded with reasonable speculation, I would be very surprised if anything he posted was actionable. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2006, 03:45:03 PM » |
|
Ladbrokes complained and the post was deleted for legal reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2006, 03:47:25 PM » |
|
Double up, it was deleted by a moderator, I am not sure why the whole thread was removed, but the initial reply was deleted and the poster was pm'd by the moderator that deleted. I apologise for your post being deleted and I will try and find out the reasoning for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author