blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: AdamM on September 27, 2007, 01:07:21 PM



Title: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: AdamM on September 27, 2007, 01:07:21 PM
how come when its  6d 7d (51%) v  2c 2s (49%) the 6,7 is a "clear favourite" but later on 8,8 (55%) v KQ (45%) is a "virtual coin flip"

he's hyper critical of any tight or trap play whether it goes wrong or right but against any decent aggressive opposition he becomes tight-weak himself

wish I could watch it with the sound off but Jesse May cracks me up. Bring back Padraig Parkinson as a partner for Jesse. Comedy gold


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: bonniemonster on October 22, 2007, 12:55:22 AM
Apologies.  Far bigger comm cock-ups made during filming but two shows a day (commentated on live with no post production/editing) for ten hours a day for two weeks straight means plenty of this happens


Mrs Roy (for and on behalf of...)


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: Ironside on October 22, 2007, 01:01:46 AM
surely sky and ladbrookes have some money for post prodution editing and correcting mistakes

pulling off 10 hour shifts of watching live poker would crack anyones minds

the poker millions used to be the 2nd best show around (after LNP)

but has fallen right down the ladder

even the structure makes it no more than a crapshoot with a big prize pool IMHO


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: byronkincaid on October 22, 2007, 01:37:47 AM
Apologies.  Far bigger comm cock-ups made during filming but twelve beers a day (commentated on live with no post production/editing) for ten hours a day for two weeks straight means plenty of this happens


Mrs Roy (for and on behalf of...)

 ;)


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: hugob055 on October 22, 2007, 06:11:07 PM
how come when its  6d 7d (51%) v  2c 2s (49%) the 6,7 is a "clear favourite" but later on 8,8 (55%) v KQ (45%) is a "virtual coin flip"

he's hyper critical of any tight or trap play whether it goes wrong or right but against any decent aggressive opposition he becomes tight-weak himself

wish I could watch it with the sound off but Jesse May cracks me up. Bring back Padraig (http://www.blondepoker.com/blondepedia/blondepedia_view_player.php?player_id=690) Parkinson (http://www.blondepoker.com/blondepedia/blondepedia_view_player.php?player_id=690) as a partner for Jesse. Comedy gold

get a life...........


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: booder on October 22, 2007, 06:30:23 PM
 ;popcorn;


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: Indestructable on October 22, 2007, 08:03:46 PM
 ;popcorn; ;popcorn;


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: DesD on October 22, 2007, 08:37:03 PM
I think Roy does a good job alongside Jesse.  That role is far from easy and I think he, and most commentators on our screens, do a good deal better than their counterparts from the WPT, who have a far larger production budget.  Where the action is less than rivetting (lets be honest, a lot of the time in this format), we should not forget that guys like Roy are encouraged to bring a bit of 'drama' through commentary where they can, to keep the viewer interested.   He may not be everybody's cup of tea, but Roy is one of the most experienced co-commentators in the UK game and I'm sure he doesn't keep getting asked to do this sort of thing for his wit and charm (or Ladbrokes contract) :D

Don't get me started on Colin Murray though.....  ;D


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: AdamM on October 22, 2007, 08:40:45 PM
In his interview with Tikay on poker week recently, Roy came across as a really nice guy.

All I'm saying is, I wish he'd make an effort to get that across more in the commentary, rather than dismantling and criticising every move played.

 ;popcorn; ;popcorn; ;popcorn;

no argument from me about Murray


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: Dewi_cool on October 22, 2007, 09:04:08 PM
U turn then?


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: AdamM on October 22, 2007, 09:20:43 PM
not at all. I still think Roys commentary is overly critical, often rude, and often not in line with how he actually plays himself.

Just prepared to admit that, away from the commentary job, he seemed like a nice guy. I posted as much in the poker week thread a couple of weeks ago.

It's his commentary I dislike, not him personally. I don't know the bloke.


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: DesD on October 22, 2007, 09:56:25 PM
I think Compo is an absolutely brilliant broadcaster and one of the best at one on one interviews.  He always puts his subject at ease and knows his content inside out. I can't compliment him enough.  BUT....I have several outtakes of Compo doing show intros and links and it is comedy gold.  I'm just rushing to get old so I can sell the stuff on ebay to pay for my winters somewhere warm, like an all night Tescos. 

Point being, 5 minutes can be a lot of time in broadcast terms, 10 hours a day for a couple of weeks might try a lot of us.


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: Bainn on October 22, 2007, 09:57:45 PM
I think Compo is an absolutely brilliant broadcaster and one of the best at one on one interviews.  He always puts his subject at ease and knows his content inside out. I can't compliment him enough.  BUT....I have several outtakes of Compo doing show intros and links and it is comedy gold.  I'm just rushing to get old so I can sell the stuff on ebay to pay for my winters somewhere warm, like an all night Tescos. 

Point being, 5 minutes can be a lot of time in broadcast terms, 10 hours a day for a couple of weeks might try a lot of us.

PM sent with first secret bid for Compo "Bloopers"......


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: DesD on October 22, 2007, 10:01:04 PM
lol...maybe we can put something together for the next bash  rotflmfao


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: Bainn on October 22, 2007, 10:01:57 PM
lol...maybe we can put something together for the next bash  rotflmfao

Class !


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: George2Loose on October 22, 2007, 10:20:14 PM
I agree that Roy can often be very critical- sometimes he trivialises decisions- it's easy when u can see the cards!!!!


Title: Re: Brindleys commentary on Poker Million
Post by: crapper on October 23, 2007, 01:33:11 AM
Personally,

I think that Roy does a great job and is very brave with his criticisms of certain plays. By trying to be honest, I am sure that he has upset several players in the game, but his analysis is very good generally....and I'm not just saying that coz he gave me such good press in my televised heat last week, although I obviously do thank him for that !

Roy and Jesse have a good rapport together in the commentary box and I have always thought that their differing styles make for a good combination for the viewing public.

I have always found Roy to be great company on the social side of things and a very pleasant and likeable guy. I feel that certain people forget that as far as televised poker goes, it is entertainment at the end of the day and that a bit of bite is, therefore, required. It is better to create interest by being a bit controversial at times, than to create no interest at all !

Keep it up Roy,

Ian.

P.S. Continue to be kind to me though ( Creep, creep )