Title: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 08, 2007, 11:30:29 PM I was going for a late night stroll around Hampstead Heath last night when along one street in the nearby area, I was stopped in my tracks by a fox prowling the roads.
Now I don't have any inexplicable fear of foxes, but as I approached nonchalently, it looked back at me with menacing eyes and let out what can only be described as a shrieking war cry, and one which you would never expect to derive from the mouth of a fox. To say I almost soiled myself would be an understatement. For a moment, it disappeared into a neighbouring bush or garden, so I marched on. However, as I approached the area, back out he came. He walked back and forth across the road, and whichever side I chose to try and pass him unnoticed, he seemed to echo my movements. I felt like Clint Eastwood slowly pacing towards my arch enemy in the old West, except in the new er... Hampstead. This happened 3 times forcing me to consider an alternative route. Then, like before, Mr Fox leapt into the bush like a panther, perhaps, if I recall correctly, being summoned by another shrieking fox. As I listened intently, I heard what I believe was the high pitched noise of a screaming cat amid a host of mysterious noises that you'd expect to hear in the Blair Witch Project. Realising this was my chance, I crept a few steps forward, if anything out of fear that he was going to pounce out again and leap at me like a facehugger from Alien. However, there was no sign of him this time, so I ran like a girl down the road until I felt I was out of range. Was I right to be wary, or are foxes harmless? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 08, 2007, 11:32:33 PM rotflmfao
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: jizzemm on November 08, 2007, 11:34:40 PM I was going for a late night stroll around Hampstead Heath last night im not from down sawf, but from what i have heard there is more to be scared of than the foxes Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Claw75 on November 08, 2007, 11:35:27 PM Well, I've not been scared of foxes before, but I will be now - thanks Snoops!
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: The_duke on November 08, 2007, 11:53:09 PM A fox is like any wild animal except that increasing urbanisation is encroaching on their natural habitat. They are essentially harmless except when, like any animal, cornered. They are increasing in numbers, partly due to the hunting ban and you will see a lot more 'Urban' foxes. Best to leave them alone but if you encounter one make your own noise and it will run away.........
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: jizzemm on November 08, 2007, 11:55:56 PM or get a Farmer with a gun, who probably will do nothing now because all the city dwellers banned the hunting !!
Duke ur right there will be loads more every year now.. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: celtic on November 09, 2007, 12:00:50 AM I was going for a late night stroll around Hampstead Heath last night when along one street in the nearby area, I was stopped in my tracks by a fox prowling the roads. Now I don't have any inexplicable fear of foxes, but as I approached nonchalently, it looked back at me with menacing eyes and let out what can only be described as a shrieking was cry, and one which you would never expect to derive from the mouth of a fox. To say I almost soiled myself would be an understatement. For a moment, it disappeared into a neighbouring bush or garden, so I marched on. However, as I approached the area, back out he came. He walked back and forth across the road, and whichever side I chose to try and pass him unnoticed, he seemed to echo my movements. I felt like Clint Eastwood slowing pacing towards my arch enemy in the old West, except in the new er... Hampstead. This happened 3 times forcing me to consider an alternative route. Then, like before, Mr Fox leapt into the bush like a panther, perhaps, if I recall correctly, being summoned by another shrieking fox. As I listened intently, I heard what I believe was the high pitched noise of a screaming cat amid a host of mysterious noises that you'd expect to hear in the Blair Witch Project. Realising this was my chance, I crept a few steps forward, if anything out of fear that he was going to pounce out again and leap at me like a facehugger from Alien. However, there was no sign of him this time, so I ran like a girl down the road until I felt I was out of range. Was I right to be wary, or are foxes harmless? sorry snoops but this thee funniest thing i have read in ages. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 12:01:01 AM I'm sure Snoops could have let out a higher-pitched shriek which would have definitely scared the poor wee fox away.
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Dewi_cool on November 09, 2007, 12:07:17 AM puff ;whistle;
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: 77dave on November 09, 2007, 12:11:05 AM When snoopy transforms into Beagle mode no fox stands a chance
Maybe the fox could sense your beagleness snoops and feared for its live Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 12:28:20 AM (http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i145/fosters211/the%20pawz%20cauze%20photos/ScaredPooplesscover.jpg)
This is probably more accurate... Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: dazzaster on November 09, 2007, 12:30:49 AM rotflmfao
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: tikay on November 09, 2007, 12:33:19 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 12:34:02 AM How can you mock? I was just being cautious because I was
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 09, 2007, 12:35:30 AM a fox is tiny and a foot in its mouth is going to kill it
what is there to be scared of apart from the rspca Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: tikay on November 09, 2007, 12:35:37 AM How can you mock? I was just being cautious because I was We need a better explanation of why you were walking round Hampstead at night. Oh, any sign of George Michael or Michael Barrymore up there? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 12:36:13 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 12:37:34 AM How can you mock? I was just being cautious because I was We need a better explanation of why you were walking round Hampstead at night. Oh, any sign of George Michael or Michael Barrymore up there? It's strange. I go for jogs round here at night, much like I used to back in the Midlands. However, instead of running past the murky canal where they once rolled out a dead body, I trundle passed the point where George was being whammed from behind. It's a different culture down here in Poshville. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: tikay on November 09, 2007, 12:40:48 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 12:43:47 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. What did the shrieking war cry mean? I was worried that it might translate as, "Someone's coming, let's get him lads," especially because he was looking at me. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 09, 2007, 12:51:43 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. they are hunted so that people living in the city can have meat on there tables its the most selective way to kill off the old and dying foxes that will attack the chickens and the lambs the younger fitter foxes can survive off the land without attacking farms the younger fitter foxes can escape the dogs the younger fitter foxes are the ones more likely to get shot thus hurting the fox population so hunting was a better way of keeping the foxes in check while allowing people who like to eat meat the freedom to eat meat, meat brought up in a humane way and not locked up in a battery farm. the banning of hunting was the worst thing that could happen for animal welfare in this country Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Robert HM on November 09, 2007, 12:53:05 AM A fox is as harmless to humans but will react like any other wild animal if it feels cornered. I have a large number of foxes in the fields locally and their "barks" to each other are awfully loud and sound, sometimes, like a baby screaming.
They were hunted as they are a problem with livestock, that was the hunters' excuse anyway. However, having lost 5 pet chickens in two nights I have difficulty shedding tears. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Laxie on November 09, 2007, 12:56:11 AM And to think, I suggested keeping you in another thread Snoops. ;marks; rotflmfao
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Karabiner on November 09, 2007, 12:56:40 AM I've had a fox come and take food from my hand in the gardens of the block of flats where I live in central Nottingham.
It was mid-winter at the time so the vixen was obviously starving, but equally obviously used to humans. That screeching noise is their call, perhaps she fancied you ? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 01:05:01 AM I've had a fox come and take food from my hand in the gardens of the block of flats where I live in central Nottingham. It was mid-winter at the time so the vixen was obviously starving, but equally obviously used to humans. That screeching noise is their call, perhaps she fancied you ? Not sure why, haven't had a haircut in ages. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 01:43:40 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. they are hunted so that people living in the city can have meat on there tables its the most selective way to kill off the old and dying foxes that will attack the chickens and the lambs the younger fitter foxes can survive off the land without attacking farms the younger fitter foxes can escape the dogs the younger fitter foxes are the ones more likely to get shot thus hurting the fox population so hunting was a better way of keeping the foxes in check while allowing people who like to eat meat the freedom to eat meat, meat brought up in a humane way and not locked up in a battery farm. the banning of hunting was the worst thing that could happen for animal welfare in this country Why block up the fox holes then if it's 'fair'? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: tikay on November 09, 2007, 01:46:51 AM We have a fox at Feltham, comes round every night, & he's as tame as can be. He's almost an office pet, & if anyone harmed him deliberately, I'd be furious. As to fixes killing chickens, yes, not nice. But it's OK for Humans to kill & eat chickens, 'cos that's different. See? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Bainn on November 09, 2007, 01:47:08 AM Only Chickens are scared of Foxes......
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 09, 2007, 07:40:28 AM How can you mock? I was just being cautious because I was We need a better explanation of why you were walking round Hampstead at night. Oh, any sign of George Michael or Michael Barrymore up there? lol, was thinking that myself:) id be less scared of the fox in a park late at night than i would about other 'dangers'....lol Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: taximan007 on November 09, 2007, 08:29:03 AM Not dangerous, just Clever:
image removed Also heard they are quite tame these days!!!! image removed Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: KingPoker on November 09, 2007, 08:31:25 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. they are hunted so that people living in the city can have meat on there tables its the most selective way to kill off the old and dying foxes that will attack the chickens and the lambs the younger fitter foxes can survive off the land without attacking farms the younger fitter foxes can escape the dogs the younger fitter foxes are the ones more likely to get shot thus hurting the fox population so hunting was a better way of keeping the foxes in check while allowing people who like to eat meat the freedom to eat meat, meat brought up in a humane way and not locked up in a battery farm. the banning of hunting was the worst thing that could happen for animal welfare in this country Why block up the fox holes then if it's 'fair'? Unfortunately the "hunt" is a big thing around where i live which i dont approve of, im not against hunting as such, with guns, but hunting with dogs is a cruel and inhummane act. BUT, a lot of mt country friends go hunting and they will vow that they dont block fox holes, that is a pretty big speculation, which is pretty much unfounded, made by anti-hunt protestors in the media and on the net. ITs total BS tho about having to keep the fox poplulation down, a fox/group of foxes may take 3/4 lambs ff a farm in lambing time, now when you count the actual numbers of sheep a farmer has, that 3/4 lambs is a drop in the ocean! Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: TheChipPrince on November 09, 2007, 09:33:28 AM Ive hunted foxes in the past with my Grandad, who is/was a gamekeeper... Foxes caused him mayhem, if they broke into one of his pheasant pens they'd kill at least 20/30 pheasants, while eating only 2/3 of these, the rest he would be find dead in the morning... When you consider each pheasant to him represents £20-£25 and it was his livelihood, i dont think he thought twice about 'getting rid' of them... Things have changed now obviously, but now i'm a little older i can see how some ppl view this as cruel... Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 09:37:11 AM I've seen blocked fox holes.
Also, if it's meant to be about culling of old or injured foxes then there's a huge flaw in that argument. Injured or old foxes will die soon enough. That's how nature works. The old won't be reproducing anyway, so the argument for chasing down an old fox with a pack of hounds, men on horses with guns and sticks in an effort to control the fox population is completely ridiculous. Still can't believe he folded his way to second place and $400,000+ on his final table at the WSOP though. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 09:39:03 AM Ive hunted foxes in the past with my Grandad, who is/was a gamekeeper... Foxes caused him mayhem, if they broke into one of his pheasant pens they'd kill at least 20/30 pheasants, while eating only 2/3 of these, the rest he would be find dead in the morning... When you consider each pheasant to him represents £20-£25 and it was his livelihood, i dont think he thought twice about 'getting rid' of them... Things have changed now obviously, but now i'm a little older i can see how some ppl view this as cruel... Chasing foxes down in a hunt, isn't going to prevent one from getting in to the pheasants is it? Build better fences, shoot the fox if absolutely necessary, chasing them down in a hunt where the odds are unfairly stacked against the fox for 'enjoyment' is not the way to control fox populations. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: AlexMartin on November 09, 2007, 09:39:18 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. they are hunted so that people living in the city can have meat on there tables its the most selective way to kill off the old and dying foxes that will attack the chickens and the lambs the younger fitter foxes can survive off the land without attacking farms the younger fitter foxes can escape the dogs the younger fitter foxes are the ones more likely to get shot thus hurting the fox population so hunting was a better way of keeping the foxes in check while allowing people who like to eat meat the freedom to eat meat, meat brought up in a humane way and not locked up in a battery farm. the banning of hunting was the worst thing that could happen for animal welfare in this country Why block up the fox holes then if it's 'fair'? very little evidence of this, on more than 1 occasion locally animal rights protestors were thought to be behind the blocking, purely so that they could catch the "blockage" on film when the hunt came to the den. Unfortunately the "hunt" is a big thing around where i live which i dont approve of, im not against hunting as such, with guns, but hunting with dogs is a cruel and inhummane act. From a distanced, human perspective. Nature is red in tooth and claw. 10 hounds ripping the neck out of a fox is pretty instant death, faster than a .22 rimfire or .243 rifle. With the banning of hunting, farmers have had to use other methods of fox control to keep populations at a reasonable level. These include snaring and firearms. But most have resorted to using shotguns, more often than not with the wrong shot type, resulting in more wounding and injuries all of the UK. BUT, a lot of mt country friends go hunting and they will vow that they dont block fox holes, that is a pretty big speculation, which is pretty much unfounded, made by anti-hunt protestors in the media and on the net. ITs total BS tho about having to keep the fox poplulation down, a fox/group of foxes may take 3/4 lambs ff a farm in lambing time, now when you count the actual numbers of sheep a farmer has, that 3/4 lambs is a drop in the ocean! Most farmers worth their salt want a healthy fox population on their farms. Fact. It keeps disease down amongst gamebirds as foxes predate on the weak, whilst also keeping plague rabbit numbers in check. In the past, specifically in sheep country, hunts were used to target specific foxes during the lambing season that had realised a ewe in lamb is especially vulnerable and can be killed as she is in labour. I have been on hunts and speak to hunting people a lot. In principle, fox hunting was sound. The master of the hounds was an experienced countryman who recognised his role and didnt impact further than he should. I appreciate that several "bad eggs" sprung up, hunts who had little respect for the complex dynamics of the ecosystems they were acting upon and the impacts of their actions. But these were in a minority. The steroetypical huntsman hit home with the middle classes, who had an immediate reaction to the "horrific" images they were shown in their own homes, but this was purely because they had neved had to kill rabbit, hang a pig or shoot a pheasant. The publics seperation from natural occurences made them overreact. Rant over. Would like Red-Dogs opinion on this. This is an argument founded on the fact that intelligent people with zero experience of countryside matters are making a judgement based by the twisted information given by various media sources. Banning hunting was the worst example of bad law in my lifetime. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Jon MW on November 09, 2007, 10:02:45 AM Scared of a fox - are you real? I didn't know whether they were harmless. I figured if people hunt them with guns, snarling dogs, and giant horses, they must be ferocious animals liable to attack an innocent stroller by like myself. They are not harmless to chickens! They are only hunted because the landed gentry think they are "good sport", (sorry, "the farmers need to keep their numbers down for financial reasons") & it's something that Brits should be ashamed of, that we tolerated such disgusting cruelty for so long. they are hunted so that people living in the city can have meat on there tables its the most selective way to kill off the old and dying foxes that will attack the chickens and the lambs the younger fitter foxes can survive off the land without attacking farms the younger fitter foxes can escape the dogs the younger fitter foxes are the ones more likely to get shot thus hurting the fox population so hunting was a better way of keeping the foxes in check while allowing people who like to eat meat the freedom to eat meat, meat brought up in a humane way and not locked up in a battery farm. the banning of hunting was the worst thing that could happen for animal welfare in this country Why block up the fox holes then if it's 'fair'? very little evidence of this, on more than 1 occasion locally animal rights protestors were thought to be behind the blocking, purely so that they could catch the "blockage" on film when the hunt came to the den. Unfortunately the "hunt" is a big thing around where i live which i dont approve of, im not against hunting as such, with guns, but hunting with dogs is a cruel and inhummane act. From a distanced, human perspective. Nature is red in tooth and claw. 10 hounds ripping the neck out of a fox is pretty instant death, faster than a .22 rimfire or .243 rifle. With the banning of hunting, farmers have had to use other methods of fox control to keep populations at a reasonable level. These include snaring and firearms. But most have resorted to using shotguns, more often than not with the wrong shot type, resulting in more wounding and injuries all of the UK. BUT, a lot of mt country friends go hunting and they will vow that they dont block fox holes, that is a pretty big speculation, which is pretty much unfounded, made by anti-hunt protestors in the media and on the net. ITs total BS tho about having to keep the fox poplulation down, a fox/group of foxes may take 3/4 lambs ff a farm in lambing time, now when you count the actual numbers of sheep a farmer has, that 3/4 lambs is a drop in the ocean! Most farmers worth their salt want a healthy fox population on their farms. Fact. It keeps disease down amongst gamebirds as foxes predate on the weak, whilst also keeping plague rabbit numbers in check. In the past, specifically in sheep country, hunts were used to target specific foxes during the lambing season that had realised a ewe in lamb is especially vulnerable and can be killed as she is in labour. I have been on hunts and speak to hunting people a lot. In principle, fox hunting was sound. The master of the hounds was an experienced countryman who recognised his role and didnt impact further than he should. I appreciate that several "bad eggs" sprung up, hunts who had little respect for the complex dynamics of the ecosystems they were acting upon and the impacts of their actions. But these were in a minority. The steroetypical huntsman hit home with the middle classes, who had an immediate reaction to the "horrific" images they were shown in their own homes, but this was purely because they had neved had to kill rabbit, hang a pig or shoot a pheasant. The publics seperation from natural occurences made them overreact. Rant over. Would like Red-Dogs opinion on this. This is an argument founded on the fact that intelligent people with zero experience of countryside matters are making a judgement based by the twisted information given by various media sources. Banning hunting was the worst example of bad law in my lifetime. And the major alternatives to keeping foxes down with a hunt are suggested as being to either have the single farmer trying to shoot them, which most likely will end in the foxes just being injured and bleeding to death. Or poison which has the potential for affecting other wildlife, but also means that the fox just dies in agony from poisoning. Much more humane then? As far as I can see the law was introduced because one minority (those who think killing any animal for sport is wrong) were more influential than another minority (those who participated and supported the hunt). I applaud anybody who believes enough in their principles to make a stand for them, so I can't condemn anybody who just believes that hunting as a sport is wrong, but I think it was wrong for it to be legislated upon. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Jon MW on November 09, 2007, 10:13:05 AM ... Was I right to be wary, or are foxes harmless? As for that. I live quite near a country park, and I work in a rural village, so it's a fairly regular occurrence for me to see foxes - usually in the morning. But a couple of weeks ago I was waiting for my train in the evening when the most magnificent fox I've ever seen sloped out of the bushes on the opposite platform. It was an absolutely beautiful creature, but I was glad to have the rail lines between us because its the first time I've seen a fox which genuinely intimidated me. I only wish I'd had the presence of mind to take a photo before it wandered off, but I was too busy being simultaneously impressed and scared. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: TheChipPrince on November 09, 2007, 10:22:42 AM Ive hunted foxes in the past with my Grandad, who is/was a gamekeeper... Foxes caused him mayhem, if they broke into one of his pheasant pens they'd kill at least 20/30 pheasants, while eating only 2/3 of these, the rest he would be find dead in the morning... When you consider each pheasant to him represents £20-£25 and it was his livelihood, i dont think he thought twice about 'getting rid' of them... Things have changed now obviously, but now i'm a little older i can see how some ppl view this as cruel... Chasing foxes down in a hunt, isn't going to prevent one from getting in to the pheasants is it? Build better fences, shoot the fox if absolutely necessary, chasing them down in a hunt where the odds are unfairly stacked against the fox for 'enjoyment' is not the way to control fox populations. Maybe i worded it badly, it wasn't a hunt, it was exterminating vermin... Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 11:01:28 AM Ive hunted foxes in the past with my Grandad, who is/was a gamekeeper... Foxes caused him mayhem, if they broke into one of his pheasant pens they'd kill at least 20/30 pheasants, while eating only 2/3 of these, the rest he would be find dead in the morning... When you consider each pheasant to him represents £20-£25 and it was his livelihood, i dont think he thought twice about 'getting rid' of them... Things have changed now obviously, but now i'm a little older i can see how some ppl view this as cruel... Chasing foxes down in a hunt, isn't going to prevent one from getting in to the pheasants is it? Build better fences, shoot the fox if absolutely necessary, chasing them down in a hunt where the odds are unfairly stacked against the fox for 'enjoyment' is not the way to control fox populations. Maybe i worded it badly, it wasn't a hunt, it was exterminating vermin... OK, that's different to hunting for pleasure. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: The_duke on November 09, 2007, 03:04:19 PM A lot of arguments about fox culling is around the method of dispatch. But just a thought, when you put down your anticoagulant poison (or call in RentAKill to do it for you) to dispatch Rats in your vicinity, which kills them slowly and painfully are you better that the farmer who kills a fox, who he classes as a disease carrier and livestock killer. Is it because the perception of foxes, is that they are magnificent creatures to look at whilst the perception of rats, is that they are horrible and evil.
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: snoopy1239 on November 09, 2007, 03:09:24 PM A lot of arguments about fox culling is around the method of dispatch. But just a thought, when you put down your anticoagulant poison (or call in RentAKill to do it for you) to dispatch Rats in your vicinity, which kills them slowly and painfully are you better that the farmer who kills a fox, who he classes as a disease carrier and livestock killer. Is it because foxes are magnificent creatures to look at whilst rats are horrible and evil. Rats aren't evil. Have you not seen Wind in the Willows? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 09, 2007, 03:33:00 PM A lot of arguments about fox culling is around the method of dispatch. But just a thought, when you put down your anticoagulant poison (or call in RentAKill to do it for you) to dispatch Rats in your vicinity, which kills them slowly and painfully are you better that the farmer who kills a fox, who he classes as a disease carrier and livestock killer. Is it because the perception of foxes, is that they are magnificent creatures to look at whilst the perception of rats, is that they are horrible and evil. I wouldn't condone hunting of rats with a group of hounds and men on horses either. I think many mouse traps are nasty, particularly the ones that use poisoned bait, and like you said inflict a long and painful death on the animal. One that explodes or runs a million volts through the animal are far more humane however. I don't think foxes or rats should be hunted for fun. Cats on the other hand... Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Sark79 on November 09, 2007, 03:39:35 PM lol , Snoopy .
They are harmless, however if they have young or are threatened they will defend themselves, as they should. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: tikay on November 09, 2007, 04:14:10 PM A lot of arguments about fox culling is around the method of dispatch. But just a thought, when you put down your anticoagulant poison (or call in RentAKill to do it for you) to dispatch Rats in your vicinity, which kills them slowly and painfully are you better that the farmer who kills a fox, who he classes as a disease carrier and livestock killer. Is it because the perception of foxes, is that they are magnificent creatures to look at whilst the perception of rats, is that they are horrible and evil. I wouldn't condone hunting of rats with a group of hounds and men on horses either. I think many mouse traps are nasty, particularly the ones that use poisoned bait, and like you said inflict a long and painful death on the animal. One that explodes or runs a million volts through the animal are far more humane however. I don't think foxes or rats should be hunted for fun. Cats on the other hand... Oi! Angell reads blonde, you know. Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: boldie on November 09, 2007, 04:43:17 PM A lot of arguments about fox culling is around the method of dispatch. But just a thought, when you put down your anticoagulant poison (or call in RentAKill to do it for you) to dispatch Rats in your vicinity, which kills them slowly and painfully are you better that the farmer who kills a fox, who he classes as a disease carrier and livestock killer. Is it because the perception of foxes, is that they are magnificent creatures to look at whilst the perception of rats, is that they are horrible and evil. I wouldn't condone hunting of rats with a group of hounds and men on horses either. I think many mouse traps are nasty, particularly the ones that use poisoned bait, and like you said inflict a long and painful death on the animal. One that explodes or runs a million volts through the animal are far more Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 10, 2007, 10:58:32 AM Ive hunted foxes in the past with my Grandad, who is/was a gamekeeper... Foxes caused him mayhem, if they broke into one of his pheasant pens they'd kill at least 20/30 pheasants, while eating only 2/3 of these, the rest he would be find dead in the morning... When you consider each pheasant to him represents £20-£25 and it was his livelihood, i dont think he thought twice about 'getting rid' of them... Things have changed now obviously, but now i'm a little older i can see how some ppl view this as cruel... we should ban mother nature. foxes eating birds? Its a scandal!! its like my australian cousins who see kangaroos as a pest because they eat grass. humans are so selfish that they want to control everyting including the breeding and slaughter of animals. we decide on what the pests are and we decide what animals get the chop. im not critising you or your grandad but this just brings out some strong emotions in me that humans are selfish, self centred b****** an cant stop trying to control nature. foxes are wonderful creatures and i hear them calling to each other often from where i live and they know each other and will help each other. my mum used to feed this 3 legged fox that came to her garden every night. an urban fox pushed out of the country by house builders. i dont give a shit if they involve themselves in survival such as killing to eat but breeding birds for profit its not a living i would even consider. not even for a split second. this is the modern day and dont believe we need to kill at all. sorry i wwent on one a bit but foxes dont need to be feared. they keep out of our way and dont generally come near humans. they kill other animals because they need to. we kill animals because we want to, not because we need to survive :( Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 10, 2007, 04:09:25 PM they kill other animals because they need to. if thats all they did i would be against fox hunting. but its not so i am. foxes will slaughter a whole hen coup to get 1 or 2 chickens then the next night they will have to go find somewhere else to find food as they have killed all the chickens in one night Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 10, 2007, 04:11:51 PM they kill other animals because they need to. if thats all they did i would be against fox hunting. but its not so i am. foxes will slaughter a whole hen coup to get 1 or 2 chickens then the next night they will have to go find somewhere else to find food as they have killed all the chickens in one night well forgive the fox for its instinct..........................................................as for the birds, keep them more secure or dont farm them for a living:) simple! Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 10, 2007, 04:16:01 PM they kill other animals because they need to. if thats all they did i would be against fox hunting. but its not so i am. foxes will slaughter a whole hen coup to get 1 or 2 chickens then the next night they will have to go find somewhere else to find food as they have killed all the chickens in one night well forgive the fox for its instinct..........................................................as for the birds, keep them more secure or dont farm them for a living:) simple! some of us like meat just like some people like eating that green stuff that grows in the ground each person can make there choice as for the chicken keeping them somewhere more secure would be a crime against the chickens have you seen the hen houses that some countries still use they keep the chickens out of danger but the chickens dont even have roon to flap there wings and many chickens are trampled to death Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 10, 2007, 04:45:12 PM they kill other animals because they need to. if thats all they did i would be against fox hunting. but its not so i am. foxes will slaughter a whole hen coup to get 1 or 2 chickens then the next night they will have to go find somewhere else to find food as they have killed all the chickens in one night well forgive the fox for its instinct..........................................................as for the birds, keep them more secure or dont farm them for a living:) simple! some of us like meat just like some people like eating that green stuff that grows in the ground each person can make there choice as for the chicken keeping them somewhere more secure would be a crime against the chickens have you seen the hen houses that some countries still use they keep the chickens out of danger but the chickens dont even have roon to flap there wings and many chickens are trampled to death C'mon Iron, is there no happy medium? Give the birds as much room as you want and you can still keep them safe. I agree we all make our own choices. I wonder how many people wound rear a chicken, ring its neck, gut and pluck it then eat it? Not many ill bet. The majority of humans dont like to think about the process by which 'meat' gets to them on their plate. Its just food after all isnt it? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 10, 2007, 04:51:05 PM i've had to kill a chicken and cook it but never rear it first.
there is a happy medium give the birds the room they need to lead a happy life and keep the old infirmed foxes away from them the young foxes dont go looking for chickens and lambs as they can hunt there natural prey Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 10, 2007, 04:57:58 PM i've had to kill a chicken and cook it but never rear it first. there is a happy medium give the birds the room they need to lead a happy life and keep the old infirmed foxes away from them the young foxes dont go looking for chickens and lambs as they can hunt there natural prey :) Ive reared some carrots, skinned, topped and tailed them, then got the grater out. Is was nasty business but I was so hungry I had to do the deed:) lol As you didnt rear the bird, there was less emotion when you looked into its frightened eyes before doing your deed. Although I would never support the killing of animals, I'm impressed you did it but then again you are tough army bloke that requires to have survival skills. Was this part of your training? Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 10, 2007, 05:07:18 PM yep
they even made me eat sprouts once Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: madasahatstand on November 10, 2007, 05:13:05 PM yep they even made me eat sprouts once Impressive:) Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: brad.strider on November 10, 2007, 07:07:47 PM the reason foxes go for the chickens is that those nice farmers cut off the chickens wings so they cant fly, then they put them in a big pen, this is almost entrapment against the foxes, chickens natural habitat is up trees,in the wild were they come from they stay in trees at night and feed on the ground during the day, dont blame foxes for farmers stupidity, GO ON THE FOXES
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: The_nun on November 10, 2007, 07:59:44 PM I used to have a pet fox...obviously called Basil, I hand reared it as the farmers gassed the rest of it's family, as farmers did then, once reared I let it roam free to learn to return to fox land. Now as it turned out Basil was a she and decided to take on a mate whom she brought home on a regular basis for a slap up Chappie meal for two, compliments of mummy Mo, always took on the bank of our garden in the sunrise. Now, we had some neighbours who used to think they were the dogs bollocks in sickness and thought it would be fun to shoot Basil at short range through the head, then lead me on a wild goose chase to where they had buried her ...in pup...Needless to say mummy Mo went n dug her up and gave her a burial to remember under the apple tree of life at Stoke On Tern. I recall this part of my life as a part that woke me up to cruelty, ( I know foxes hunt to kill in order to survive but these folk never had any animals except half starved dogs so they had no justified reason to kill, and who doesn't kill to survive, we as humans get abattoirs to do our dirty work ).
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: KingPoker on November 10, 2007, 08:33:05 PM I have some interesting statistics on hunting but unfortunately im bound under the Official Secrets Act 8)
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: The_nun on November 10, 2007, 09:47:34 PM I have some interesting stats too on slaughter houses , from personel experience ..it was "quicker" to kill the cows without using the protective equipment supplied to make it less painfull shall we say, stun then slit or just sllit..until the ministry came around to do there periodic checks..then obviously they used to stun first.But saying that I seem to recall some sort of rubber ends being removed? Anyone expand here? Needless to say I only worked there for a short period.
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: kinboshi on November 11, 2007, 12:16:33 AM Then there's halal and kosher meat - now that is cruel.
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Ironside on November 11, 2007, 12:22:51 AM cruel is kev forcing ginger to marry him
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: booder on January 21, 2009, 07:29:14 PM cruel is kev forcing ginger to marry him +1Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: Colchester Kev on January 21, 2009, 07:34:20 PM http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=36611.msg888040#msg888040
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: booder on January 21, 2009, 08:30:33 PM :)up
Title: Re: Are Foxes Dangerous? Post by: trafficjam on January 21, 2009, 10:24:14 PM How can you mock? I was just being cautious because I was We need a better explanation of why you were walking round Hampstead at night. Oh, any sign of George Michael or Michael Barrymore up there? LOL that is exactly what I thought rotflmfao rotflmfao |