blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 01:03:28 AM



Title: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 01:03:28 AM
villain 19/3.6

Seat 1: goku50 ($163.25 in chips)
Seat 2: ByrnKincaid ($289.90 in chips)
Seat 3: 2big2strong ($234.00 in chips)
Seat 4: smallfish7 ($60.00 in chips)
Seat 5: Rrrappe ($210.20 in chips) DEALER
Seat 6: LaLagrima ($399.15 in chips)
Seat 7: mamelli ($196.00 in chips)
Seat 8: Grundbo5 ($198.00 in chips)
Seat 9: Beggarman ($38.00 in chips)
Seat 10: Blessmyhand ($170.00 in chips)
LaLagrima: Post SB $1.00
mamelli: Post BB $2.00
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ByrnKincaid [Kh Kd]
Grundbo5: Fold
Beggarman: Fold
Blessmyhand: Raise $10.00
goku50: Fold
ByrnKincaid: Raise $30.00
2big2strong: Raise $80.00
Rrrappe: Fold
LaLagrima: Fold
mamelli: Fold
Blessmyhand: Fold
ByrnKincaid: Fold


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Smart Money on December 17, 2007, 01:06:03 AM
Ignore anyone who says you should have pushed here.

:)


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Graham C on December 17, 2007, 01:08:24 AM
This is so annoying when you call and they have aces.  I call usually, they have aces usually.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Colchester Kev on December 17, 2007, 01:08:51 AM
you repushed all in right ??


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: TightEnd on December 17, 2007, 01:13:35 AM
Easy fold versus this opponent.


Honestly


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Royal Flush on December 17, 2007, 01:31:06 AM
19/3.6! How many hands.

It's sick but vs those stats its an easy pass.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: GlasgowBandit on December 17, 2007, 01:48:13 AM
call and spike the king!


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: LuckyLloyd on December 17, 2007, 09:29:42 AM
L O L


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: boldie on December 17, 2007, 09:50:34 AM
sigh...and another sigh.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Longy on December 17, 2007, 11:53:18 AM
Any other read apart from his stats some 19/3 villans will still go crazy with qq in these spots but meh i understand why you folded.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 03:18:38 PM
Don't remember how long ago this was but it's nice to KNOW you did the right thing.

Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players: 8
Seat 1: geomax(26.65)
Seat 2: jaguar1973(5.80)
Seat 3: rekk(5.90)
Seat 4: Ellie-Anne(26.05)
Seat 5: onetwoflee(5.85)
Seat 6: dunowhut(12.00)
Seat 7:
Seat 8: Kamikaze Rik(11.05)
Seat 9: willsa(5.75)

Current Number of Players: 8
willsa start position: 5.75
Kamikaze Rik start position: 11.05
dunowhut start position: 12.00
onetwoflee start position: 5.85
Ellie-Anne start position: 26.05
rekk start position: 5.90
jaguar1973 start position: 5.80
geomax start position: 26.65
Ellie-Anne posts small blind (0.10)
onetwoflee posts big blind (0.20)
Ellie-Anne is dealt down [Qs Qd]
dunowhut calls (0.20)
Kamikaze Rik folds
willsa folds
geomax raises to (1)
jaguar1973 calls (1)
rekk folds
Ellie-Anne raises to (4.40)
onetwoflee folds
dunowhut folds
geomax raises to (26.65) and is all-in
jaguar1973 calls (5.80) and is all-in
Ellie-Anne says: "hmmmmm"
Ellie-Anne folds
geomax is refunded (20.85)
flop: [Ts 7h 4h]
turn: [6c]
river: [6d]
geomax shows [Ad Ah] for two pair, aces and sixes
jaguar1973 mucks
geomax wins (15.60)
Ellie-Anne says: "nh"
rake is (0.80)
geomax end position: 36.45
jaguar1973 end position: 0.00
rekk end position: 5.90
Ellie-Anne end position: 21.65
onetwoflee end position: 5.65
dunowhut end position: 11.80
Kamikaze Rik end position: 11.05
willsa end position: 5.75
Hand end time: 2005-05-10 13:46:13


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 03:20:20 PM
LOL, just noticed the date on the bottom.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: boldie on December 17, 2007, 03:29:41 PM
big difference between folding QQ and KK though...


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: LuckyLloyd on December 17, 2007, 03:39:05 PM
This type of thread is really silly. 99.5% of the time this fold is the wrong fold. Maybe 0.5% of total players at any given level only show up with AA here. If you think that the villain is one of these oh so rare of exceptions than fine - the fold is a good fold I guess. But I assume that you therefore have some reason to believe this is the case beyond the generic fact that he raises 3% of his hands preflop (JJ+ AKs).

In any case, posting it up here is pointless. Because the correct advice is to never fold. And if you want to counter that with something specific about this player that people who haven't played against him can't comment on then fine - but it all seems like a fine waste of time to me.

If you believe this opponent only ever shows up with AA here and you were confident enough in that read then why fucking post the hand here? My guess is that either you:

- Aren't actually sure it was the right fold - which means it was the wrong fold;
- And want reassurance that you did the right thing;

OR

- Are sure this was a good fold;
- Want all the "ZOMG YOU'RE SO GOOD - DO YOU COACH?" comments to flood in;

Whichever one it is, know that you are wasting your time and that this is not the way to improve your game.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 03:40:31 PM
LOL


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: kinboshi on December 17, 2007, 03:42:26 PM
This type of thread is really silly. 99.5% of the time this fold is the wrong fold. Maybe 0.5% of total players at any given level only show up with AA here. If you think that the villain is one of these oh so rare of exceptions than fine - the fold is a good fold I guess. But I assume that you therefore have some reason to believe this is the case beyond the generic fact that he raises 3% of his hands preflop (JJ+ AKs).

In any case, posting it up here is pointless. Because the correct advice is to never fold. And if you want to counter that with something specific about this player that people who haven't played against him can't comment on then fine - but it all seems like a fine waste of time to me.

If you believe this opponent only ever shows up with AA here and you were confident enough in that read then why fucking post the hand here? My guess is that either you:

- Aren't actually sure it was the right fold - which means it was the wrong fold;
- And want reassurance that you did the right thing;

OR

- Are sure this was a good fold;
- Want all the "ZOMG YOU'RE SO GOOD - DO YOU COACH?" comments to flood in;

Whichever one it is, know that you are wasting your time and that this is not the way to improve your game.

So you don't agree with the fold here then?

:dontask:


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: LuckyLloyd on December 17, 2007, 03:55:58 PM
This type of thread is really silly. 99.5% of the time this fold is the wrong fold. Maybe 0.5% of total players at any given level only show up with AA here. If you think that the villain is one of these oh so rare of exceptions than fine - the fold is a good fold I guess. But I assume that you therefore have some reason to believe this is the case beyond the generic fact that he raises 3% of his hands preflop (JJ+ AKs).

In any case, posting it up here is pointless. Because the correct advice is to never fold. And if you want to counter that with something specific about this player that people who haven't played against him can't comment on then fine - but it all seems like a fine waste of time to me.

If you believe this opponent only ever shows up with AA here and you were confident enough in that read then why fucking post the hand here? My guess is that either you:

- Aren't actually sure it was the right fold - which means it was the wrong fold;
- And want reassurance that you did the right thing;

OR

- Are sure this was a good fold;
- Want all the "ZOMG YOU'RE SO GOOD - DO YOU COACH?" comments to flood in;

Whichever one it is, know that you are wasting your time and that this is not the way to improve your game.

So you don't agree with the fold here then?

:dontask:

Not getting 117 BBs in preflop with KK in a non satellite / non tournament paybubble situation is TEH LOL.

But does someone playing 1 / 2 (and presumably winning at it??) with 2350 posts on a poker forum really need to be told that??  :dontask:


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: boldie on December 17, 2007, 03:57:34 PM
This type of thread is really silly. 99.5% of the time this fold is the wrong fold. Maybe 0.5% of total players at any given level only show up with AA here. If you think that the villain is one of these oh so rare of exceptions than fine - the fold is a good fold I guess. But I assume that you therefore have some reason to believe this is the case beyond the generic fact that he raises 3% of his hands preflop (JJ+ AKs).

In any case, posting it up here is pointless. Because the correct advice is to never fold. And if you want to counter that with something specific about this player that people who haven't played against him can't comment on then fine - but it all seems like a fine waste of time to me.

If you believe this opponent only ever shows up with AA here and you were confident enough in that read then why fucking post the hand here? My guess is that either you:

- Aren't actually sure it was the right fold - which means it was the wrong fold;
- And want reassurance that you did the right thing;

OR

- Are sure this was a good fold;
- Want all the "ZOMG YOU'RE SO GOOD - DO YOU COACH?" comments to flood in;

Whichever one it is, know that you are wasting your time and that this is not the way to improve your game.

So you don't agree with the fold here then?

:dontask:

Not getting 117 BBs in preflop with KK in a non satellite / non tournament paybubble situation is TEH LOL.

But does someone playing 1 / 2 (and presumably winning at it??) with 2350 posts on a poker forum really need to be told that??  :dontask:

lol..I think you've been whooshed mate...in fact..pretty sure of it :)


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 04:02:47 PM
big difference between folding QQ and KK though...

I ain't never going to pass KK :D


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Colchester Kev on December 17, 2007, 04:12:36 PM
big difference between folding QQ and KK though...

I ain't never going to pass KK :D

AMEN


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 04:14:28 PM
we seem to have conflicting advice. do I believe smart money, almost certainly the biggest FR 1/2 NL winner on the internet. or LL who never plays FR cash but does seem to take the internet a little bit too seriously.

???


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Royal Flush on December 17, 2007, 04:15:23 PM
Terry vs June round 2....


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 04:16:14 PM
I often read on this forum that you should never limp, never min raise and never fold KK pre.

Only fish do such things.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 04:18:32 PM
I often read on this forum that you should never limp, never min raise and never fold KK pre.

Only fish do such things.

I think there are situations for all 3, never say never.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: booder on December 17, 2007, 04:24:56 PM
big difference between folding QQ and KK though...

I ain't never going to pass KK :D

Kings? i cant even pass queens


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 04:28:57 PM
we seem to have conflicting advice. do I believe smart money, almost certainly the biggest FR 1/2 NL winner on the internet. or LL who never plays FR cash but does seem to take the internet a little bit too seriously.

???

Decisions, decisions...........


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Ironside on December 17, 2007, 04:30:07 PM
big difference between folding QQ and KK though...

I ain't never going to pass KK :D

Kings? i cant even pass queens

i aint going to gukpt brigton with you then


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: ifm on December 17, 2007, 04:33:57 PM
we seem to have conflicting advice. do I believe smart money, almost certainly the biggest FR 1/2 NL winner on the internet. or LL who never plays FR cash but does seem to take the internet a little bit too seriously.

???

Decisions, decisions...........

I suppose though if you have a consistent monthly win rate you can afford to fold KK here even if it is the worst decision in the history of poker (it isn't BTW) because you are still making money without this hand.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Longy on December 17, 2007, 04:39:23 PM
we seem to have conflicting advice. do I believe smart money, almost certainly the biggest FR 1/2 NL winner on the internet. or LL who never plays FR cash but does seem to take the internet a little bit too seriously.

???

I think this is the crux of things, Llloyd has not played full ring cash at these levels on the internet. Its hard to believe passing kk preflop is a good idea until you have some experience of playing these game (as Smart Money has more than anyone else) and you start to realise there are nits that will only do this with aa or kk.

Also Lloyd you haven't been here long enough to realise that some threads on this board don't require analysis, it was a bug bear of mine that alot of pointless threads you used to frequent this board but they have lessened to be fair. I just sigh and move on now.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 04:43:16 PM
I've been trying to find the sets that I've folded for another thread to make steam come out of LL's ears but you don't seem to be able to filter for them on PT.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: AlexMartin on December 17, 2007, 05:10:41 PM
I've been trying to find the sets that I've folded for another thread to make steam come out of LL's ears but you don't seem to be able to filter for them on PT.

pmsl. This is a good fold against this oppo. What do you think a nit wants to jimjam with here? QQ? Get real.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: doubleup on December 17, 2007, 05:11:06 PM
Byron

You should always call pre with KK or you will never be able to make a post entitled "Kings" where you get coolered by Aces in some way.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: LuckyLloyd on December 17, 2007, 05:26:51 PM
Oh I see, the point of the thread was the latter of my suspected options:

for the purposes of receiving pats on the back. Well done so. How much do you charge for coaching??


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 05:39:38 PM
(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/3013783/2/istockphoto_3013783_rusty_old_school_bus_from_a_better_day.jpg)

£1 a ride


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Smart Money on December 17, 2007, 06:33:39 PM

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/index.php?module=see&lang=uk&code=80176a84a2e5b6b9de1bbea4a3ec76d8


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: byronkincaid on December 17, 2007, 07:34:40 PM
 rotflmfao

the sad thing is I've had 3 coaches now and I'm still a complete donkey.

oh well, off to fold some more premiums...


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: b4matt on December 18, 2007, 12:41:52 AM
Good pass...


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Colchester Kev on December 18, 2007, 09:53:14 AM

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/index.php?module=see&lang=uk&code=80176a84a2e5b6b9de1bbea4a3ec76d8

Quality :D


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: b4matt on December 18, 2007, 10:10:33 AM

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/index.php?module=see&lang=uk&code=80176a84a2e5b6b9de1bbea4a3ec76d8

 ;hattip; ;sark;


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Tragic on December 18, 2007, 02:44:43 PM
If you were aware of odds you would realize that  7d 8d is actually in better shape vs Aces than KK so I would be waiting for a hand like this to stack off in this spot. KK will just cost u money in the long run in these spots.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Moskvich on December 18, 2007, 06:39:53 PM
Quote
If you were aware of odds you would realize that    is actually in better shape vs Aces than KK so I would be waiting for a hand like this to stack off in this spot. KK will just cost u money in the long run in these spots.

Not quite sure what this means - but I don't think a call here with 7d 8d is going to make you money long-term either... Why do you want to 'stack off' with anything in this spot?


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: KarmaDope on December 18, 2007, 10:15:56 PM
Using Pokerstove shows that 7d 8d is actually a better hand to hold than Kh Kd!

With the Kh Kd

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    81.946%     81.71%    00.23%           8395224        23769.00   { AA }
Hand 1:    18.054%     17.82%    00.23%           1831062        23769.00   { KdKh }

but with 7d 8d

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    77.537%     77.37%    00.17%           7948710        17266.50   { AA }
Hand 1:    22.463%     22.30%    00.17%           2290581        17266.50   { 8d7d }

Either way, I'm folding here.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: totalise on December 18, 2007, 10:18:11 PM
Using Pokerstove shows that 7d 8d is actually a better hand to hold than Kh Kd!

With the Kh Kd

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    81.946%     81.71%    00.23%           8395224        23769.00   { AA }
Hand 1:    18.054%     17.82%    00.23%           1831062        23769.00   { KdKh }

but with 7d 8d

   equity    win    tie          pots won    pots tied   
Hand 0:    77.537%     77.37%    00.17%           7948710        17266.50   { AA }
Hand 1:    22.463%     22.30%    00.17%           2290581        17266.50   { 8d7d }

Either way, I'm folding here.

lol?


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: TightEnd on December 18, 2007, 10:20:38 PM
slight pause

tries to express it in words

instead settles for

 rotflmfao


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: totalise on December 18, 2007, 10:23:33 PM
just to expand, if we know that the other guy has AA, why are we arguin over what is the better hand to lose money with? it seems like its similar to saying "id rather stick a fork in my thigh then stick it in my eye", when the logical action should be to do neither... unless of course you are trying to bluff out AA preflop, which is prolly likely at full ring.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: AlexMartin on December 18, 2007, 11:10:49 PM
just to expand, if we know that the other guy has AA, why are we arguin over what is the better hand to lose money with? it seems like its similar to saying "id rather stick a fork in my thigh then stick it in my eye", when the logical action should be to do neither... unless of course you are trying to bluff out AA preflop, which is prolly likely at full ring.

LOL.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Tragic on December 19, 2007, 03:18:34 AM
No I was obviously saying shoving with  7d 8d is +EV in this spot cos of odds and stuff.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Smart Money on December 19, 2007, 05:20:55 AM
TAXI !!!


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: Longy on December 19, 2007, 10:56:49 AM
Wow wait what, Im hoping this thread is turning into a massive level. If he only has  Ad Ac here i think we can safely say that passing is the best option no matter what our hand.


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: kinboshi on December 19, 2007, 11:31:48 AM
I'd consider calling with  Aspades Ahrt


Title: Re: First time for everything
Post by: boldie on December 19, 2007, 11:42:48 AM
I'd consider calling with  Aspades Ahrt

and 83 suited obviously as we know the flop will come 88Q :)