blonde poker forum

What the hell is the point? Employees on pregnancy leave or ex-employees showing off their babies at the office. What little work was getting done stops completely when someone brings in a hamper carrying a wrinkly midget (actually that i would want to see) and people who have never said a word to said ex-employee now stand drooling over this little poop producing bundle and pretend that they care.
Really, as the ex-employee bringing in the thing..have you no life?..Have you no friends? Don't bring babies into work...it's sad...and it's annoying.

ah..she's left...I can relax now.

lol bah humbug Boldie!!

Mrs Boldie must be worried about you getting so broody.

It's all just part of his hormone imbalance, he'll be much better after his second scan!

FYP

He must be unbearable

What a misery guts!

New avatar for boldie?

one day I hope to be just like him.

I do believe it!

When you've mellowed a bit?

exacty..when i can't be bothered getting upset at the world anymore..when the passion is gone.

Just because the baby has more hair than you boldie, is no reason to get in a big strop. ;)

it's the bigger shlong that's upsetting me.... :(

Oh did i LOL

Geo

Does anyone know if a MAN has ever taken a baby into the workplace??

Not unless he's gay and adopted one, no.

and that is just not right!!!!!!!!!

Indeed..even a gay guy should not be allowed to bring his baby into work!

NO NO NO THE ADOPTING BIT

people shouldn't be allowed to adopt?

My husband took our daughter into work after she was born.

You're coming out with some very controversial views this week CIA!!!

Has he found a new boyfriend, yet? ;)

Not asked........

having just thought about it, a couple of guys I work with have brought their babies in to work over the last year or so.  No reason why they shouldn't be as proud of their little ones as the mothers.

Yeah but you're a civil servant and the government has a quota to fill on the amount of camp men they employ. ;)

1.  I'm not a civil servant 2. I don't work for the government (quite the opposite!) 3.  I would say you were camper than them actually :D

OI!. I was never confused!

IMO  i dont think it's right that same sex couples should adopt

Boldie camp?? lol   bout as camp as me i think

Why not?  IMO a lot of same sex couples make much better parents than some straight couples.

That's pretty much what you said before - controversial!

Boldie looked pretty camp when I met him :D  

the majority of people in Scotland agree it's wrong - 89%  (as per public consultation), labour scum just railroaded it through all the same.

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/may/06051807.html



Same as their going to do with the regards the EU 'constitution' without a referendum.

 ;popcorn;

I bring my daughter into work quite a lot, the work force here really enjoy seeing her.

But then the work force is her Grandad :D

at least i'm in the majority on this 1 then phew well in scotland anyway

I'd be surprised if you were in the majority among the people of blonde though.

As a Scot, I'm very surprised at the 89% figure.  Do we know where the Cardinal took his statistics from?  Not that I would question his sources - it's just I have asked the 14 (all Scottish people) sitting with me just now and 13 have no issue with it....

Signed up Labour Party drones per chance ? Gay People ? Straight People ? Men ? Woman ?

Far more concerned that kids get decent loving parents who will bring them up properly than with the parents' sexual choices personally.

Scotland's got a very puritanical streak as well.

You could ask what type of people the cardinal asked as well.  From this end it's a complete mix although mainly straight men with a variety of political viewpoints.

why on earth is that relevant?  Is the opinion of one or more of those groups somehow worth more than the others?

Exactly the point I was trying to make earlier Rod.  I've seen some goddamned awful straight parents in my time....

Yes, labour were in power at the time it was railroaded. Gay people are more likely to be in favour. Straight people are more likely to be against etc, etc.

an incredibly broad sweeping generalisation, and, in my view, not necessarily accurate.

I'm with you 100% claw.  One hell of an assumption!

I'm 100% with the 89% (and cia260895)

For those who have said they are against gay couples adopting, I'd be interested to know why?

Is it down to the fact that they are gay that you would object to them adopting, or the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?

What would your view be in the situation of an openly bi-sexual person who happens to be in a relationship with someone from the opposite sex - do you think that couple should be allowed to adopt?

Maybe because they don't want to date a man with kids?

Yes, this is COMPLETELY wrong (in my opinion) on so many counts and at odds with thousands of years of human evolution.

Can you imagine any other species evolving to this state of affairs ?

It's just another failure from the NuLabour social engineering program that has been forced on society.

I think a gay couple should adopt Ecosse.

Thank god I'm past the need for adoption.

in't adoption by definition at odds with evolution? If nature won't let you have kids nature is trying to tell you something and if a childs parents die and the family can't take care of him in the animal world he dies as well..therefore the evolution arguement is not only thin..it is incredibly poorly thought out.

If it was against evolution surely homosexuality wouldn't exist as it would have evolved out of the species?

Sorry to tell you that homosexual sex & transexuality have both been recorded in the animal kingdom as well.

Gay penguins also adopted an egg and successfully reared the chick as their own.

I think the kid starred in Happy Feet ;)

Nice to know there's at least one Scottish bloke out there who agrees!

I live in the 'Pink Triangle' and know a couple of gay people, I've no problem with them.

Pink Triangle?..Isn't that your nickname on the Celtic Supporters forum?

I'd have a far bigger problem with religious bigots adopting a child than a gay couple. 

Interesting thought, but if you think about it the suppression of homosexuality by society (and in most cases instigated and reinforced by religious doctrine) is the reason that there are (and have been) many gay people who are forced into 'marriages' to conform to society's 'norms'.  In these marriages, the gay person then has a child, who is brought up by at least one gay parent!  If homosexuality wasn't considered a 'blight' on society by so many, there'd be fewer gay people in hetro-sexual partnerships, and therefore fewer gay parents.

Oh and a big LOL @ the misunderstanding of evolution when many talk about homosexuality being 'unnatural'.  It's far more natural than the celibacy practiced by nuns and priests.

Who's talking about nun's and preist's ?

Have a poll - Do You Think Homosexuality is Normal or Abnormal ?

Brainwashed labour num-nuts on this subject.

Do a google on 'section 28 ' as well. What a joke this country has become.

That was me, in the post above.


Yes, it's a joke.  I much prefer the way Iran deals with the issue of homosexuality.  Much fairer and far more understanding.

You already won the bet, and now we're agreeing ?