blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 27, 2025, 11:27:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262527 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  bringing babies to work
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Go Down Print
Author Topic: bringing babies to work  (Read 9029 times)
Ecosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: January 25, 2008, 03:00:55 PM »


I'm 100% with the 89% (and cia260895)
Logged
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #46 on: January 25, 2008, 04:25:22 PM »

For those who have said they are against gay couples adopting, I'd be interested to know why?

Is it down to the fact that they are gay that you would object to them adopting, or the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?

What would your view be in the situation of an openly bi-sexual person who happens to be in a relationship with someone from the opposite sex - do you think that couple should be allowed to adopt?

Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #47 on: January 25, 2008, 04:27:01 PM »

For those who have said they are against gay couples adopting, I'd be interested to know why?

Is it down to the fact that they are gay that you would object to them adopting, or the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?

What would your view be in the situation of an openly bi-sexual person who happens to be in a relationship with someone from the opposite sex - do you think that couple should be allowed to adopt?



Maybe because they don't want to date a man with kids?
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Ecosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: January 25, 2008, 05:15:22 PM »

the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?


Yes, this is COMPLETELY wrong (in my opinion) on so many counts and at odds with thousands of years of human evolution.

Can you imagine any other species evolving to this state of affairs ?

It's just another failure from the NuLabour social engineering program that has been forced on society.

Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #49 on: January 25, 2008, 05:28:26 PM »

I think a gay couple should adopt Ecosse.
Logged
Ecosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: January 25, 2008, 05:38:00 PM »

I think a gay couple should adopt Ecosse.


Thank god I'm past the need for adoption.
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #51 on: January 25, 2008, 05:38:18 PM »

the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?


Yes, this is COMPLETELY wrong (in my opinion) on so many counts and at odds with thousands of years of human evolution.


in't adoption by definition at odds with evolution? If nature won't let you have kids nature is trying to tell you something and if a childs parents die and the family can't take care of him in the animal world he dies as well..therefore the evolution arguement is not only thin..it is incredibly poorly thought out.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Rod Paradise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7650


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: January 25, 2008, 05:51:30 PM »

the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?


Yes, this is COMPLETELY wrong (in my opinion) on so many counts and at odds with thousands of years of human evolution.

Can you imagine any other species evolving to this state of affairs ?

It's just another failure from the NuLabour social engineering program that has been forced on society.



If it was against evolution surely homosexuality wouldn't exist as it would have evolved out of the species?

Sorry to tell you that homosexual sex & transexuality have both been recorded in the animal kingdom as well.

Gay penguins also adopted an egg and successfully reared the chick as their own.

Quote
Homosexual sexual behavior occurs in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly in marine birds and mammals, monkeys, and the great apes. Homosexual behavior has been observed among 1,500 species, and in 500 of those it is well documented.[133] [4]. This discovery constitutes a major argument against those calling into question the biological legitimacy or naturalness of homosexuality, or those regarding it as a meditated social decision. For example, male penguin couples have been documented to mate for life, build nests together, and to use a stone as a surrogate egg in nesting and brooding. In a well-publicized story from 2004, the Central Park Zoo in the United States replaced one male couple's stone with a fertile egg, which the couple then raised as their own offspring.
I think the kid starred in Happy Feet Wink
« Last Edit: January 25, 2008, 05:59:36 PM by Rod Paradise » Logged

May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
MrsBoldie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 285



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: January 25, 2008, 06:11:57 PM »

the fact that they are in a same-sex relationship and want to bring the child up in that environment?


Yes, this is COMPLETELY wrong (in my opinion) on so many counts and at odds with thousands of years of human evolution.

Can you imagine any other species evolving to this state of affairs ?

It's just another failure from the NuLabour social engineering program that has been forced on society.



If it was against evolution surely homosexuality wouldn't exist as it would have evolved out of the species?

Sorry to tell you that homosexual sex & transexuality have both been recorded in the animal kingdom as well.

Gay penguins also adopted an egg and successfully reared the chick as their own.

Quote
Homosexual sexual behavior occurs in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly in marine birds and mammals, monkeys, and the great apes. Homosexual behavior has been observed among 1,500 species, and in 500 of those it is well documented.[133] [4]. This discovery constitutes a major argument against those calling into question the biological legitimacy or naturalness of homosexuality, or those regarding it as a meditated social decision. For example, male penguin couples have been documented to mate for life, build nests together, and to use a stone as a surrogate egg in nesting and brooding. In a well-publicized story from 2004, the Central Park Zoo in the United States replaced one male couple's stone with a fertile egg, which the couple then raised as their own offspring.
I think the kid starred in Happy Feet Wink

Nice to know there's at least one Scottish bloke out there who agrees!
Logged
Rod Paradise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7650


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: January 25, 2008, 06:13:34 PM »


Nice to know there's at least one Scottish bloke out there who agrees!

I live in the 'Pink Triangle' and know a couple of gay people, I've no problem with them.
Logged

May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #55 on: January 25, 2008, 07:05:27 PM »


Nice to know there's at least one Scottish bloke out there who agrees!

I live in the 'Pink Triangle' and know a couple of gay people, I've no problem with them.


Pink Triangle?..Isn't that your nickname on the Celtic Supporters forum?
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #56 on: January 25, 2008, 11:21:05 PM »

I'd have a far bigger problem with religious bigots adopting a child than a gay couple. 

Interesting thought, but if you think about it the suppression of homosexuality by society (and in most cases instigated and reinforced by religious doctrine) is the reason that there are (and have been) many gay people who are forced into 'marriages' to conform to society's 'norms'.  In these marriages, the gay person then has a child, who is brought up by at least one gay parent!  If homosexuality wasn't considered a 'blight' on society by so many, there'd be fewer gay people in hetro-sexual partnerships, and therefore fewer gay parents.

Oh and a big LOL @ the misunderstanding of evolution when many talk about homosexuality being 'unnatural'.  It's far more natural than the celibacy practiced by nuns and priests.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Ecosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #57 on: January 25, 2008, 11:29:43 PM »

I'd have a far bigger problem with religious bigots adopting a child than a gay couple. 

Interesting thought, but if you think about it the suppression of homosexuality by society (and in most cases instigated and reinforced by religious doctrine) is the reason that there are (and have been) many gay people who are forced into 'marriages' to conform to society's 'norms'.  In these marriages, the gay person then has a child, who is brought up by at least one gay parent!  If homosexuality wasn't considered a 'blight' on society by so many, there'd be fewer gay people in hetro-sexual partnerships, and therefore fewer gay parents.

Oh and a big LOL @ the misunderstanding of evolution when many talk about homosexuality being 'unnatural'.  It's far more natural than the celibacy practiced by nuns and priests.


Who's talking about nun's and preist's ?

Have a poll - Do You Think Homosexuality is Normal or Abnormal ?

Brainwashed labour num-nuts on this subject.

Do a google on 'section 28 ' as well. What a joke this country has become.

« Last Edit: January 25, 2008, 11:31:14 PM by Ecosse » Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #58 on: January 25, 2008, 11:32:46 PM »

I'd have a far bigger problem with religious bigots adopting a child than a gay couple. 

Interesting thought, but if you think about it the suppression of homosexuality by society (and in most cases instigated and reinforced by religious doctrine) is the reason that there are (and have been) many gay people who are forced into 'marriages' to conform to society's 'norms'.  In these marriages, the gay person then has a child, who is brought up by at least one gay parent!  If homosexuality wasn't considered a 'blight' on society by so many, there'd be fewer gay people in hetro-sexual partnerships, and therefore fewer gay parents.

Oh and a big LOL @ the misunderstanding of evolution when many talk about homosexuality being 'unnatural'.  It's far more natural than the celibacy practiced by nuns and priests.


Who's talking about nun's and preist's ?

That was me, in the post above.

Quote
Have a poll - Do You Think Homosexuality is Normal or Abnormal ?

Brainwashed labour num-nuts on this subject.

Do a google on 'section 28 ' as well. What a joke this country has become.


Yes, it's a joke.  I much prefer the way Iran deals with the issue of homosexuality.  Much fairer and far more understanding.

Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Ecosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: January 25, 2008, 11:43:25 PM »

I'd have a far bigger problem with religious bigots adopting a child than a gay couple. 

Interesting thought, but if you think about it the suppression of homosexuality by society (and in most cases instigated and reinforced by religious doctrine) is the reason that there are (and have been) many gay people who are forced into 'marriages' to conform to society's 'norms'.  In these marriages, the gay person then has a child, who is brought up by at least one gay parent!  If homosexuality wasn't considered a 'blight' on society by so many, there'd be fewer gay people in hetro-sexual partnerships, and therefore fewer gay parents.

Oh and a big LOL @ the misunderstanding of evolution when many talk about homosexuality being 'unnatural'.  It's far more natural than the celibacy practiced by nuns and priests.


Who's talking about nun's and preist's ?

That was me, in the post above.

Quote
Have a poll - Do You Think Homosexuality is Normal or Abnormal ?

Brainwashed labour num-nuts on this subject.

Do a google on 'section 28 ' as well. What a joke this country has become.


Yes, it's a joke.  I much prefer the way Iran deals with the issue of homosexuality.  Much fairer and far more understanding.



You already won the bet, and now we're agreeing ?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.247 seconds with 20 queries.