blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: Rooky9 on June 03, 2008, 12:34:42 PM



Title: Mark Hughes
Post by: Rooky9 on June 03, 2008, 12:34:42 PM
Is anyone else baffled by his front running for two top premeirship jobs?!

Okay he has done a good job at Blackburn, playing a better quality of football than he is often given credit for, but surely Chelsea in particular would be out of his league. Even Man city under this crazy owner might be too big a step.

The main problem I think he'll have at a 'bigger' club, with higher profile players, is that he still has a players ego himself. He's had a decent amount of fall outs with players where they have similar ego's - and he'll come up against a lot of them at Chelsea, and an increasing number at Man City.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Obviously success at one of those would line him up well for what would probably be his dream job.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: TightEnd on June 03, 2008, 12:37:11 PM
great judge of talent though

Roque Santa Cruz for £3.5m?? superb buy

Bentley too, Matt Derbyshire etc


I would think he'd do well at City, was surprised to see that Chelsea had/have him in the frame though



Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 12:42:38 PM
Is anyone else baffled by his front running for two top premeirship jobs?!

Okay he has done a good job at Blackburn, playing a better quality of football than he is often given credit for, but surely Chelsea in particular would be out of his league. Even Man city under this crazy owner might be too big a step.

The main problem I think he'll have at a 'bigger' club, with higher profile players, is that he still has a players ego himself. He's had a decent amount of fall outs with players where they have similar ego's - and he'll come up against a lot of them at Chelsea, and an increasing number at Man City.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Obviously success at one of those would line him up well for what would probably be his dream job.

I'm suprised you class man city as a top prem job i would say spurs everton and dare i say it newcastle are all bigger jobs than city job especially not so inticing when the chairmans a nutcase and players are all pissed off.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Rooky9 on June 03, 2008, 12:45:23 PM
Is anyone else baffled by his front running for two top premeirship jobs?!

Okay he has done a good job at Blackburn, playing a better quality of football than he is often given credit for, but surely Chelsea in particular would be out of his league. Even Man city under this crazy owner might be too big a step.

The main problem I think he'll have at a 'bigger' club, with higher profile players, is that he still has a players ego himself. He's had a decent amount of fall outs with players where they have similar ego's - and he'll come up against a lot of them at Chelsea, and an increasing number at Man City.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Obviously success at one of those would line him up well for what would probably be his dream job.

I'm suprised you class man city as a top prem job i would say spurs everton and dare i say it newcastle are all bigger jobs than city job especially not so inticing when the chairmans a nutcase and players are all pissed off.

I'd put it in the top half and in terms of finances its probably going to be above all but Man U and Chelsea.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: kinboshi on June 03, 2008, 12:47:49 PM
Citeh are in Europe, and until Shinawatra got all dictatorial (he's had practice at that) they seemed to be building a strong squad to try and build something there.  The Citeh job is definitely a top premiership job.

I'm sure a manager would be happy to have the funds that are available, but would also be very concerned with the interference from above.



Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Rooky9 on June 03, 2008, 12:48:03 PM
great judge of talent though

Roque Santa Cruz for £3.5m?? superb buy

Bentley too, Matt Derbyshire etc


I would think he'd do well at City, was surprised to see that Chelsea had/have him in the frame though



Cruz was a good buy, but I don't think he took any talent spotting. He was good in Germany and they somehow got a cracking deal. I'd agree that it is one of his strengths though - but it is also one of the least required attributes at the two jobs he's being touted for. They will be after the big name players that everyone knows all about imo.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: TightEnd on June 03, 2008, 12:50:00 PM
yes agreed.

it may be that he's best having to look for a bargain (as say O'Neill was historically) rather than being given gazillions to spend on Grade A stars

as you say, will be interesting to see how he gets on


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Horneris on June 03, 2008, 12:57:36 PM
Is anyone else baffled by his front running for two top premeirship jobs?!

Okay he has done a good job at Blackburn, playing a better quality of football than he is often given credit for, but surely Chelsea in particular would be out of his league. Even Man city under this crazy owner might be too big a step.

The main problem I think he'll have at a 'bigger' club, with higher profile players, is that he still has a players ego himself. He's had a decent amount of fall outs with players where they have similar ego's - and he'll come up against a lot of them at Chelsea, and an increasing number at Man City.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Obviously success at one of those would line him up well for what would probably be his dream job.

I agree with this.

I still 100% believe he isnt gona get the Chelsea job.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Nem on June 03, 2008, 12:58:34 PM
Where does it say that Hughes is in line for the Chelsea job? IMO just lazy journalism, adding 2+2 together because he is a good manager and a former player.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: bolt pp on June 03, 2008, 01:48:04 PM
the problem he'll have if he goes to city is that they want instant success there and as a manager i think of him as more of a grinder, look how long it's taken him(and david moyes) to build solid teams with good home records and i just dont think he'll be given that time at city, if you're looking to build for the next decade hughes perfect pick but if you want flair and instant success they're gonna come unstuck with Hughes, he seems like a manager that looks long term at things where the lunatic owner seems to have he's own ideas which contradict that of Hugues's managerial philosophy


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: AdamM on June 03, 2008, 01:53:25 PM
Sparkey's taking the City Job to save him having to move house again in two years time when the United job becomes vacant.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: scotty2hatty on June 03, 2008, 02:13:31 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: jizzemm on June 03, 2008, 02:15:57 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

good shout, was wondering who would take that..


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 02:40:28 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: scotty2hatty on June 03, 2008, 02:42:15 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.

yeh, I'm gutted that Hughes is leaving but I'd be fairly happy with Big Sam as a replacement.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 03:29:55 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.

yeh, I'm gutted that Hughes is leaving but I'd be fairly happy with Big Sam as a replacement.

 rotflmfao no offence m8 but be shocked if ur still saying that in 6 months time


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 03:34:47 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.

yeh, I'm gutted that Hughes is leaving but I'd be fairly happy with Big Sam as a replacement.

 rotflmfao no offence m8 but be shocked if ur still saying that in 6 months time

Big Sam doesn't play nice attacking footie and that would be my only concern (though maybe he can, who knows?) but other than that he's a good manager.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 06:18:35 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.

yeh, I'm gutted that Hughes is leaving but I'd be fairly happy with Big Sam as a replacement.

 rotflmfao no offence m8 but be shocked if ur still saying that in 6 months time

Big Sam doesn't play nice attacking footie but instead for every away game whether its man u or shitty derby he thinks defending for 90mins and getting a 0-0 draw is a great result and that would be my biggest concern although there are quite a few (he definitly cant play attacking football mike ashley knows as he asked him to and fat sam said that wasn't his way)but other than that he's a good manager of some sort.

FYP  ;)


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Rooky9 on June 03, 2008, 06:24:07 PM
Big Sams football isn't a poorer quality than Hughes' so I don't think they'll be any issues there. I think it would be a good move for Blackburn and BSA.

I think he has a very effective style of play (often wrongly just labbeled long ball) under the right set of circumstances. They weren't at Newcastle, but I think they could be at Blackburn.




Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 06:57:17 PM
Allardyce a cert for Blackburn job if/when Hughes leaves?

it seems so yes...good choice for them.

yeh, I'm gutted that Hughes is leaving but I'd be fairly happy with Big Sam as a replacement.

 rotflmfao no offence m8 but be shocked if ur still saying that in 6 months time

Big Sam doesn't play nice attacking footie but instead for every away game whether its man u or shitty derby he thinks defending for 90mins and getting a 0-0 draw is a great result and that would be my biggest concern although there are quite a few (he definitly cant play attacking football mike ashley knows as he asked him to and fat sam said that wasn't his way)but other than that he's a good manager of some sort.

FYP  ;)

lol


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 08:13:53 PM
Glad i cud help


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Indestructable on June 03, 2008, 10:23:22 PM
It does seem as though we have got rid of Sven on the basis that we will have a top manager like Scholari, he then says no or wait till the euros. we then  look for someone else to do the job. I have a feeling of Dejas Vu.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: The Baron on June 04, 2008, 06:48:20 PM
Is anyone else baffled by his front running for two top premeirship jobs?!

Okay he has done a good job at Blackburn, playing a better quality of football than he is often given credit for, but surely Chelsea in particular would be out of his league. Even Man city under this crazy owner might be too big a step.

The main problem I think he'll have at a 'bigger' club, with higher profile players, is that he still has a players ego himself. He's had a decent amount of fall outs with players where they have similar ego's - and he'll come up against a lot of them at Chelsea, and an increasing number at Man City.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Obviously success at one of those would line him up well for what would probably be his dream job.

He's a good manager so I'm not surprised by clubs being after him but City?

Why would you want to go to a club where you'll probably be sacked if you dont make the top 5 next season?


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: The Baron on June 04, 2008, 06:49:29 PM
Big Sams football isn't a poorer quality than Hughes'

Completely disagree - the last two seasons Hughes' football has improved no end.


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 04, 2008, 06:52:55 PM
Big Sams football isn't a poorer quality than Hughes'

Completely disagree - the last two seasons Hughes' football has improved no end.

+1


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Colchester Kev on June 04, 2008, 06:55:51 PM
Who cares about Man City or B@stard Rovers anyway ??

And its NO NAY NEVER .... no nay never no more .. etc etc :)


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Indestructable on June 04, 2008, 08:11:08 PM
Says the fan of a club that lost to both sides last year.  :D


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: mondatoo on June 04, 2008, 09:39:26 PM
Nowt to do with sparky but Dean Ashton signs new long term contract at west ham (didnt think it was worth starting thread for)

ALSO 12 DAYS TILL THE PREMIERSHIP FIXTURES FOR NEXT SEASON !!!! WOOHOO


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Colchester Kev on June 04, 2008, 09:44:27 PM
Says the fan of a club that lost to both sides last year.  :D

ahhh but my second team is Burnley :)


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Indestructable on June 04, 2008, 10:06:48 PM
Big news, Brighton have signed Kev from Colchester. (Kevin Mcleod from Colchester United. )


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Colchester Kev on June 04, 2008, 10:07:43 PM
hw was a poor mans Colchester Kev


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: bigalhx1 on June 05, 2008, 03:33:05 PM
i see wot he meant now when he said that he did not want to go to spurs because they was not a bigger club then blackburn he was waiting for that big club in man city a club that had there ground given to them have won 1 European cup winners cup 2 league titles 4 fa cups and 2 league cups (9 in total the last was in 1976) compaired to that little club spurs League Champions 2 fa cups 9 league cups 4 European Cup-Winners Cup 1 UEFA Cup Winners 2 (17 in total last 1 was in 2008) hope he does a good


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: kinboshi on June 05, 2008, 03:50:24 PM
You left out the league titles from the Spurs list.

:dontask:


Title: Re: Mark Hughes
Post by: Nem on June 06, 2008, 05:44:47 AM
You left out the league titles from the Spurs list.

:dontask:

wat?

Quote
to that little club spurs League Champions 2 fa cups 9 league cups 4 European Cup-Winners Cup 1 UEFA Cup Winners 2 (17 in total last 1 was in 2008) hope he does a good