blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: julian on June 03, 2008, 04:22:03 PM



Title: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: julian on June 03, 2008, 04:22:03 PM
"As a result of the long, grueling day, many of the player began to complain. While the tournament staff sympathized with their current situation, they could do nothing about it due to the ESPN filming schedule. ESPN is filming a set number of events here at the Rio, and tommorow's $1,500 event final table is one of them. While some of the players may have enjoyed their chance to be in the spotlight, others were busy griping about the hour and the late-night rail that had gathered around them."

i heard james akinhead was in the last 18 of a 1500 event & went to check it out on the cardplayer site - apparently they played til 6am....i know it's gone on before & doubt it will ever stop but think it's pretty appalling that the tv dweebs get to call the shots when so much is at stake.
they wouldn't be seeing my hole cards.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 04:27:00 PM
you're not wrong.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: Djinn on June 03, 2008, 04:34:11 PM
Yep, I was reading the coverage on Pokernews, and apparently multiple votes were taken, with the majority in favour of playing on until they reached 18, when finally the majority were in favour of passing out, probably.  No mention (at least in the last three pages of updates) of the filming restrictions being the primary cause... but that sounds plausible and bad.

They get from 6am until 1:30pm off and then have to come back and start again.  I hope James doesn't need a lot of sleep. 


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: I KNOW IT on June 03, 2008, 04:40:57 PM
Pffft ESPN will be delaying the main event final next


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: SuffolkPunch on June 03, 2008, 04:52:48 PM
Pffft ESPN will be delaying the main event final next

That'll never happen


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: DungBeetle on June 03, 2008, 04:57:54 PM
In their defence, it's fair to say that stamina is considered a prerequisite for successful WSOP players, and this situation is unlikely to change with so many player entries and so many tournaments scheduled.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: Djinn on June 03, 2008, 05:03:30 PM
In '06 the ludicrous scheduling of the $50k HORSE event meant that they played until something like 11am on Day 1, before coming straight back that afternoon (I know how long that felt because I was reporting on it).  My respect for Doyle Brunson rose another notch as he displayed the sort of stamina the rest of the field half his age was struggling to produce, but honestly I don't feel like he should have had to.  You pay that sort of money for an event, and your physical stamina shouldn't be the main thing tested, imo, past reasonable parameters.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: dino1980 on June 03, 2008, 05:24:10 PM
In '06 the ludicrous scheduling of the $50k HORSE event meant that they played until something like 11am on Day 1, before coming straight back that afternoon (I know how long that felt because I was reporting on it).  My respect for Doyle Brunson rose another notch as he displayed the sort of stamina.

And then on day two they played to stupid o'clock too which meant the final table started at 9pm that night instead of 2/4pm. This is turn meant that by the time the heads up between Reese and Bloch (all seven hours of it) was watched by more poker media than spectators. I have no idea what time it finished as I bailed at about 6a.m as I had a flight to catch.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: FuglyBaz on June 03, 2008, 06:31:06 PM
In '06 the ludicrous scheduling of the $50k HORSE event meant that they played until something like 11am on Day 1, before coming straight back that afternoon (I know how long that felt because I was reporting on it).  My respect for Doyle Brunson rose another notch as he displayed the sort of stamina.

And then on day two they played to stupid o'clock too which meant the final table started at 9pm that night instead of 2/4pm. This is turn meant that by the time the heads up between Reese and Bloch (all seven hours of it) was watched by more poker media than spectators. I have no idea what time it finished as I bailed at about 6a.m as I had a flight to catch.

Is it true that the FT of the $50k HORSE was changed from HORSE to Hold'em?

Sorry to jack the thread


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 06:49:58 PM
In '06 the ludicrous scheduling of the $50k HORSE event meant that they played until something like 11am on Day 1, before coming straight back that afternoon (I know how long that felt because I was reporting on it).  My respect for Doyle Brunson rose another notch as he displayed the sort of stamina.

And then on day two they played to stupid o'clock too which meant the final table started at 9pm that night instead of 2/4pm. This is turn meant that by the time the heads up between Reese and Bloch (all seven hours of it) was watched by more poker media than spectators. I have no idea what time it finished as I bailed at about 6a.m as I had a flight to catch.

Is it true that the FT of the $50k HORSE was changed from HORSE to Hold'em?

Sorry to jack the thread

Yes the FT was Holdem..because that's what works on telly.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 06:53:55 PM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: redsimon on June 03, 2008, 08:20:55 PM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit

First 50K HORSE final was NLHE only. Last year reverted to HORSE for final


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: Indestructable on June 03, 2008, 08:27:41 PM
They have TV cameras, get in!
 ;indestructable;


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: boldie on June 03, 2008, 08:32:38 PM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit

First 50K HORSE final was NLHE only. Last year reverted to HORSE for final

ah yes..forgot about last year's final


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: mondatoo on June 03, 2008, 08:54:36 PM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit

First 50K HORSE final was NLHE only. Last year reverted to HORSE for final

Did they change the holdem from limit to no limit last year as well that be wot am thinkin of (i think)


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: deputydawg on June 03, 2008, 10:54:30 PM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit

First 50K HORSE final was NLHE only. Last year reverted to HORSE for final

Did they change the holdem from limit to no limit last year as well that be wot am thinkin of (i think)

think it was still limit HE on the FT last yr


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: AlexMartin on June 04, 2008, 01:00:08 AM
think both were holdem only finals, thought they were nlhe but unsure. this year going to be horse i think.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: NoflopsHomer on June 04, 2008, 01:38:25 AM
think both were holdem only finals, thought they were nlhe but unsure. this year going to be horse i think.

No, last year was HORSE due to the outcry from the year before.


Title: Re: (one of) the problem('s) with the wsop
Post by: redsimon on June 04, 2008, 06:34:44 AM
Didn't they just change the holdem from limit to no limit

First 50K HORSE final was NLHE only. Last year reverted to HORSE for final

Did they change the holdem from limit to no limit last year as well that be wot am thinkin of (i think)

Yes they did (2 years ago), but they also ditched the ORSE to :) making it an H final (If that makes any sense!). This year theres a mixed games event HORSE plus NLHE and PLO and 2-7 TD I believe.