blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => The Rail => Topic started by: George2Loose on June 28, 2008, 02:12:24 AM



Title: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 28, 2008, 02:12:24 AM
Lee Childs Eliminated
Lee Childs moved all in preflop for 3,400 and after was called by Michelle Orpe after she sat an thought about the hand for a while.

Childs:   
Orpe:   

Board:     

After the hand, someone asks Orpe, "you had to think that long with that?"

Apparently, Orpe does a show in England called Sky Poker.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Longy on June 28, 2008, 02:24:42 AM
Michelle had AK fwiw and child j10o, i am good at the internet imo.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 28, 2008, 12:54:46 PM
Was it longer or shorter than Neil's slowroll dwell-up in Bristol with AK?

:D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 28, 2008, 01:00:02 PM
When did he dwell up with AK???

Least it wasn't as bad as his call/fold with JJ :D

Still, alls well that ends well!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 28, 2008, 03:56:00 PM
When did he dwell up with AK???

Least it wasn't as bad as his call/fold with JJ :D

Still, alls well that ends well!

Was with 3 tables when that numpty kept open shoving for like 30BB with K hi etc, he dwelt with AK against his button shove! I was calling with A7+ in the SB!!

What were the blinds in the Orpe hand?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 29, 2008, 01:08:23 PM
When did he dwell up with AK???

Least it wasn't as bad as his call/fold with JJ :D

Still, alls well that ends well!

Was with 3 tables when that numpty kept open shoving for like 30BB with K hi etc, he dwelt with AK against his button shove! I was calling with A7+ in the SB!!

What were the blinds in the Orpe hand?

Oh with the J7! Reason he dwelt was cos there was an all in and call at the other table and he wanted to know the outcome first (think you were playing hand for hand) Not sure what the blinds were when Orpe called


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 29, 2008, 02:01:13 PM
Not sure what the blinds were when Orpe called

difficult to make a judgement without this info and stack sizes imo


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Indestructable on June 29, 2008, 02:02:20 PM
What tournament was this?  :dontask:


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 29, 2008, 02:12:33 PM
What tournament was this?  :dontask:

WSOP Event #48 - $2,000 NLHE


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 29, 2008, 02:35:05 PM
AK isnt always an automatic call depending on stack sizes, and the stage of the tourney. If she had been able to jam I'm sure she would have done but to take the piss because of a dwell before a call is a bit harsh imo. Also lets be honest- the reports aren't always exactly accurate and it may have been raise, reraise and then decision to Michelle where she hasn't got anything invested in the pot, many people fold AK in that position.



Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 29, 2008, 02:43:11 PM
AK isnt always an automatic call depending on stack sizes, and the stage of the tourney. If she had been able to jam I'm sure she would have done but to take the piss because of a dwell before a call is a bit harsh imo. Also lets be honest- the reports aren't always exactly accurate and it may have been raise, reraise and then decision to Michelle where she hasn't got anything invested in the pot, many people fold AK in that position.



lol someone shoves for less than 10BB early in a comp you telling me AK can sometimes be a fold?!?!?! Leave it out.

Celebs + Poker, gotta love it!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: johnbhoy76 on June 29, 2008, 03:25:32 PM
AK isnt always an automatic call depending on stack sizes, and the stage of the tourney. If she had been able to jam I'm sure she would have done but to take the piss because of a dwell before a call is a bit harsh imo. Also lets be honest- the reports aren't always exactly accurate and it may have been raise, reraise and then decision to Michelle where she hasn't got anything invested in the pot, many people fold AK in that position.



lol someone shoves for less than 10BB early in a comp you telling me AK can sometimes be a fold?!?!?! Leave it out.

Celebs + Poker, gotta love it!

Think you're making a bit of a snap judgement here based on half the information

How many chips did she have? 

If the guy is pushing with any sort of random nonsense then AK is not that far in front. and if it is for half your chips (or more) then it does deserve a moment to at least think about it.

If the opponent is fairly tight then bizarrely I think it is a far easier call as he/she is far more likely to be holding Ace something.

without all the info I don't see how anyone can say this is good/bad play


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 29, 2008, 03:34:19 PM
Based on the fact the blinda are 200/400- AK should never be a fold in this spot imho


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Longy on June 29, 2008, 03:43:31 PM
AK isnt always an automatic call depending on stack sizes, and the stage of the tourney. If she had been able to jam I'm sure she would have done but to take the piss because of a dwell before a call is a bit harsh imo. Also lets be honest- the reports aren't always exactly accurate and it may have been raise, reraise and then decision to Michelle where she hasn't got anything invested in the pot, many people fold AK in that position.



lol someone shoves for less than 10BB early in a comp you telling me AK can sometimes be a fold?!?!?! Leave it out.

Celebs + Poker, gotta love it!

Think you're making a bit of a snap judgement here based on half the information

How many chips did she have? 

If the guy is pushing with any sort of random nonsense then AK is not that far in front. and if it is for half your chips (or more) then it does deserve a moment to at least think about it.

If the opponent is fairly tight then bizarrely I think it is a far easier call as he/she is far more likely to be holding Ace something.

without all the info I don't see how anyone can say this is good/bad play

Errr no, its a snap call unless our opponenet so ridic tight that their range is made up of aces and kings alot of the time. This is hardly ever the case. If our oppo is shoving random stuff we are 65/35 to win against random low cards, that is not an edge anyone should be turning down.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: snoopy1239 on June 29, 2008, 05:01:48 PM
AK isnt always an automatic call depending on stack sizes, and the stage of the tourney. If she had been able to jam I'm sure she would have done but to take the piss because of a dwell before a call is a bit harsh imo. Also lets be honest- the reports aren't always exactly accurate and it may have been raise, reraise and then decision to Michelle where she hasn't got anything invested in the pot, many people fold AK in that position.



lol someone shoves for less than 10BB early in a comp you telling me AK can sometimes be a fold?!?!?! Leave it out.

Celebs + Poker, gotta love it!

Think you're making a bit of a snap judgement here based on half the information

How many chips did she have? 

If the guy is pushing with any sort of random nonsense then AK is not that far in front. and if it is for half your chips (or more) then it does deserve a moment to at least think about it.

If the opponent is fairly tight then bizarrely I think it is a far easier call as he/she is far more likely to be holding Ace something.

without all the info I don't see how anyone can say this is good/bad play

I would have thought it was the opposite. I'd rather call a maniac than a rock.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: edy g on June 29, 2008, 06:50:59 PM
And the reason for this thread getting so many replys is ........... , input your chosen word.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Indestructable on June 29, 2008, 06:52:41 PM
And the reason for this thread getting so many replys is Jealousy, input your chosen word.
;)



Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: bolt pp on June 29, 2008, 07:11:45 PM
And the reason for this thread getting so many replys is that it isnt, there was only 17 at the time of this post

 :dontask:


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: edy g on June 29, 2008, 09:24:56 PM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 29, 2008, 09:30:37 PM
I'd just like to clarify that I didnt initially post this to criticise Michelle.

Just thought it was kinda cool that a random blogger from poker news knew Michelle worked for Sky Poker.

And as for discussing whether she should call or not- isn't that what poker forums are for? Isn't that what your paid to do on Sky Poker Ed?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 29, 2008, 09:42:27 PM
seems like a slight over-exaggeration Ed - there haven't actually been that many posts on the thread.  Those posted initially were querying the situation re stack sizes/blinds, and the following posts were a discussion of how the hand was played, with views on both sides.  I'm sure no one on here would begrudge Michelle for grasping the bull with both horns and taking what she can get in the poker world - god knows most of us would jump at the opportunity, but I think your jealousy comment is misguided.

Here's hoping Michelle takes one down for the Brits!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Indestructable on June 29, 2008, 09:42:43 PM
More importantly do I win a spot Prize?   :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Longy on June 29, 2008, 09:46:35 PM
seems like a slight over-exaggeration Ed - there haven't actually been that many posts on the thread.  Those posted initially were querying the situation re stack sizes/blinds, and the following posts were a discussion of how the hand was played, with views on both sides.  I'm sure no one on here would begrudge Michelle for grasping the bull with both horns and taking what she can get in the poker world - god knows most of us would jump at the opportunity, but I think your jealousy comment is misguided.

Here's hoping Michelle takes one down for the Brits!

Exactly


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: edy g on June 29, 2008, 09:55:19 PM
fair enuf,  nice post claw,     she  ;) ;) ;)gives lessons i know you know...........


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on June 29, 2008, 09:57:11 PM
Instadwell.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 29, 2008, 10:02:35 PM
Instadwell.

no way you even think of dwelling before mucking :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: KingPoker on June 29, 2008, 11:30:41 PM
Instadwell.

no way you even think of dwelling before mucking :D

So true!

Michelle = awesome obv!

As flushy said, I need a lot less than AK to make the call here EACH AND EVERY TIME!

p.s. Claw, great photo, never even realised it was that one. How long u had it on here? x


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 29, 2008, 11:45:46 PM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Eck on June 29, 2008, 11:50:03 PM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?

Dunno really........she gets any guy she wants?  ;)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 29, 2008, 11:55:59 PM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?

Dunno really........she gets any guy she wants?  ;)

I'll bet Flushy could too!!!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Eck on June 30, 2008, 12:04:01 AM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?

Dunno really........she gets any guy she wants?  ;)

I'll bet Flushy could too!!!

Fair point he is looking good  :-*


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: action man on June 30, 2008, 12:22:14 AM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?

Dunno really........she gets any guy she wants?  ;)

ariston has to have a sporting chance, he's been grafting his brains out  mentoring her.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: blonde17 on June 30, 2008, 01:04:48 AM
 Aspades  Oh I so want to say something sarcastic but......being diplomatic..
Sky poker is for entertainment purposes only .... Ed and the other "Experts" should be respected for their concise and in depth knowledge of porker.. so please don`t criticise them or their colourful and entertaining presenters....we love you all.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 11:09:23 AM
Couple of years ago live on TV in the BPO the button moves allin and I have AK in the BB- blinds were 2-4k. The button had maybe 50k in chips and I had about 90. I was quite happy with the table and I had gone in playing to a strategy of folding till the blinds get big giving an image of playing too tight then moving through the gears when the blinds got bigger nicking loads of pots without confrontation. I dwelled and decided to call anyway and was shown 8Th which flopped a str8. I was crippled down to 40k and had to change gears way earlier than I had planned. AK is not always an instacall.

After the heat I had a few people telling me they thought I was slowrolling by dwelling before calling and all that did for me was to prove how little people understood about the game. If it hadnt have been on live TV I would have probably folded the AK there and happily moved on with my plan for the heat. I allowed the fact that it was on TV to force me to make a call (what will people think if I fold AK here etc). There was only one player at the table I was worried about and he had lost most of his chips and was on the felt. I thought I could beat the table without risk so why risk getting unlucky when it is possible to just get the chips without risking real damage to your stack?

AK is just ace high at the end of the day and imo it is a raising hand and not a calling hand. When I won mad martys game a cople of months back I folded AK twice on the final table to allins before me- there was just no need for me to make the call either time. I would rather jam allin with junk than call allin with AK in a lot of circumstances. If I am calling someone allin I reserve the right to think about it first. If I take a little to long and upset the likes of flushy who will accuse me of slowrolling then so be it. Not of us can instacall throwing our cards over screaming "ship it hollla" etc


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: TheChipPrince on June 30, 2008, 11:12:15 AM
Aspades  Oh I so want to say something sarcastic but......being diplomatic..
Sky (http://www.skypoker.com/poker/sky_lobby?aff=1062) Poker (http://www.skypoker.com/poker/sky_lobby?aff=1062) is for entertainment purposes only .... Ed and the other "Experts" should be respected for their concise and in depth knowledge of porker.. so please don`t criticise them or their colourful and entertaining presenters....we love you all.

I couldn't help but LOL...


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 11:16:10 AM
absolutly correct Ed Debaes,

Charming girl carving out a living in the poker world, congratulations Michelle, people that have critisised or tried to take piss in this thread should yake a long hard look at their own game and you too may succeed.

and yes i cant spel.w/e

lolz jealous of what exactly?

Dunno really........she gets any guy she wants?  ;)

ariston has to have a sporting chance, he's been grafting his brains out  mentoring her.

if your definition of grafting his brains out is giving somebody a few pointers when they first start out then I'm sure you have plenty success with the ladies ;)

Thewy thanked me for some chats we had when he did his in the well thing a few months back- how come nobody accused me of trying to pull him? Doesn't mean I was mentoring the yoyo just because we talked a little game theory.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 11:20:52 AM
Aspades  Oh I so want to say something sarcastic but......being diplomatic..
Sky (http://www.skypoker.com/poker/sky_lobby?aff=1062) Poker (http://www.skypoker.com/poker/sky_lobby?aff=1062) is for entertainment purposes only .... Ed and the other "Experts" should be respected for their concise and in depth knowledge of porker.. so please don`t criticise them or their colourful and entertaining presenters....we love you all.

I couldn't help but LOL...

yeah..good thing he wasn't be sarcastic or I would have LOL'ed as well :)

Seriously, the discussion here surely was never offensive to Michelle or based on jealousy? This just happens to be a forum where people can say what they mean when discussing a hand, rather than being all nice and cooey wooey like the experts have to be when live on Skypoker.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 30, 2008, 11:23:54 AM

Thewy thanked me for some chats we had when he did his in the well thing a few months back- how come nobody accused me of trying to pull him?

so did you get any? ;D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 11:24:37 AM

Thewy thanked me for some chats we had when he did his in the well thing a few months back- how come nobody accused me of trying to pull him?

so did you get any? ;D

rotflmfao...don't know why but it did.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 11:28:36 AM
we cant discuss a hand when it is just 2 lines of text from a live update. Nobody knows the full facts of the hand, stack sizes blinds etc. Nobody knows the table dynamics.

what they did know was that Michelle apparently dwelled for a while before calling someones allin with AK. This means she must be either slowrolling or dumb according to some posters on here but yeh you're right boldie people can say what they like on here. I agree with ed in the fact several on here seem to be jealous of anyone who picks up a sponsorship deal who they consider to be not as good as they are- maybe if they werent such **nts all the time they would have gotten a deal by now.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 11:29:28 AM

Thewy thanked me for some chats we had when he did his in the well thing a few months back- how come nobody accused me of trying to pull him?

so did you get any? ;D

what happens in vegas stays in vegas ;)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 30, 2008, 11:30:40 AM

Thewy thanked me for some chats we had when he did his in the well thing a few months back- how come nobody accused me of trying to pull him?

so did you get any? ;D

what happens in vegas stays in vegas ;)

oooh go on - is it true that the yo-yo nickname actually has nothing to do with poker? :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on June 30, 2008, 11:38:53 AM
LOL This is comedy.

If you disagree with the dwell up then your jealous???

For me AK is a insta call. However, I am not criticising or indeed jealous of Michelle Orpe.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 11:44:30 AM
we cant discuss a hand when it is just 2 lines of text from a live update. Nobody knows the full facts of the hand, stack sizes blinds etc. Nobody knows the table dynamics.

what they did know was that Michelle apparently dwelled for a while before calling someones allin with AK. This means she must be either slowrolling or dumb according to some posters on here but yeh you're right boldie people can say what they like on here. I agree with ed in the fact several on here seem to be jealous of anyone who picks up a sponsorship deal who they consider to be not as good as they are- maybe if they werent such **nts all the time they would have gotten a deal by now.

lolz she is sponsored as well!?!??!?!??

Russ i didn't realise you had such a super duper edge in a TV crapshoot that you can fold a like 60/70 edge for 1/2 your chips, there was me thinking you had to win loads of races in those things.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 12:01:55 PM
we cant discuss a hand when it is just 2 lines of text from a live update. Nobody knows the full facts of the hand, stack sizes blinds etc. Nobody knows the table dynamics.

what they did know was that Michelle apparently dwelled for a while before calling someones allin with AK. This means she must be either slowrolling or dumb according to some posters on here but yeh you're right boldie people can say what they like on here. I agree with ed in the fact several on here seem to be jealous of anyone who picks up a sponsorship deal who they consider to be not as good as they are- maybe if they werent such **nts all the time they would have gotten a deal by now.

lolz she is sponsored as well!?!??!?!??

Russ i didn't realise you had such a super duper edge in a TV crapshoot that you can fold a like 60/70 edge for 1/2 your chips, there was me thinking you had to win loads of races in those things.


again you are showing a lack of knowledge for the full facts james. Everything isn't just black and white and there are grey areas. If I was to tell you there was a live in running market on the event and I had backed myself in from 7.6 into favourite for every ammount available it may make you think outside the box (when three handed I was trading at 1.8 ).


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 12:16:07 PM
we cant discuss a hand when it is just 2 lines of text from a live update. Nobody knows the full facts of the hand, stack sizes blinds etc. Nobody knows the table dynamics.

what they did know was that Michelle apparently dwelled for a while before calling someones allin with AK. This means she must be either slowrolling or dumb according to some posters on here but yeh you're right boldie people can say what they like on here. I agree with ed in the fact several on here seem to be jealous of anyone who picks up a sponsorship deal who they consider to be not as good as they are- maybe if they werent such **nts all the time they would have gotten a deal by now.

lolz she is sponsored as well!?!??!?!??

Russ i didn't realise you had such a super duper edge in a TV crapshoot that you can fold a like 60/70 edge for 1/2 your chips, there was me thinking you had to win loads of races in those things.


again you are showing a lack of knowledge for the full facts james. Everything isn't just black and white and there are grey areas. If I was to tell you there was a live in running market on the event and I had backed myself in from 7.6 into favourite for every ammount available it may make you think outside the box (when three handed I was trading at 1.8 ).

So the dwell was whilst you traded it out?

You slowrolled T8 got some justice!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 12:21:21 PM
level 2 still 6 handed so yeh I dwelled so I could trade out. You really are clueless aren't you.

I traded out when three handed when I went odds on- the plan was to always get at least 3 handed by avoiding confrontation. If I had folded the AK I wouldve made it to the three handed stage a lot easier than I did.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on June 30, 2008, 12:27:36 PM
may i suggest......

(http://www.stampit.com.au/upload/products/si3431f.jpg)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: doubleup on June 30, 2008, 12:29:33 PM
If she was in the bb its an instacall - if she was in any other position she was right to take a bit of time as she might've got a squeeze.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 12:40:24 PM
level 2 still 6 handed so yeh I dwelled so I could trade out. You really are clueless aren't you.

I traded out when three handed when I went odds on- the plan was to always get at least 3 handed by avoiding confrontation. If I had folded the AK I wouldve made it to the three handed stage a lot easier than I did.

So you agree unless you have a lumpy bet on yourself that you plan on trading it would be retarded to fold AK?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: snoopy1239 on June 30, 2008, 12:46:35 PM
This is a silly thread. Michelle is pretty and that's all that matters imo.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Jamier-Host on June 30, 2008, 12:46:50 PM
level 2 still 6 handed so yeh I dwelled so I could trade out. You really are clueless aren't you.

I traded out when three handed when I went odds on- the plan was to always get at least 3 handed by avoiding confrontation. If I had folded the AK I wouldve made it to the three handed stage a lot easier than I did.

This is why we get some stick sometimes for not laying big bets on poker markets.  In my opinion bets placed should not affect the actions of the players involved.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Graham C on June 30, 2008, 01:01:54 PM
This is a silly thread. Michelle is pretty and that's all that matters imo.

finally!  I thought we'd never get there :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Dry em on June 30, 2008, 01:14:06 PM
AK is just ace high at the end of the day

pls no....


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 01:16:22 PM
level 2 still 6 handed so yeh I dwelled so I could trade out. You really are clueless aren't you.

I traded out when three handed when I went odds on- the plan was to always get at least 3 handed by avoiding confrontation. If I had folded the AK I wouldve made it to the three handed stage a lot easier than I did.

This is why we get some stick sometimes for not laying big bets on poker markets.  In my opinion bets placed should not affect the actions of the players involved.

IMO Players should be suspended from Betfair if they lay themselves off...and banned from the poker circuit...if only there was such a thing.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 01:20:41 PM
AK is just ace high at the end of the day

pls no....

drawing had basically


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 01:25:30 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Colchester Kev on June 30, 2008, 01:27:02 PM
Never mind Orpe ... I am impressed that Russ can make bets on himself in running in a tv studio ... did they show you on the phone to your bookie on the telly ??


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 01:32:48 PM
Never mind Orpe ... I am impressed that Russ can make bets on himself in running in a tv studio ... did they show you on the phone to your bookie on the telly ??

yes you are correct I didnt lay myself off kev. However I had accidentally left my laptop at home with explicit instructions as to how much to lay off when I hit a certain price ;) After the heat I was so gutted but also didnt do my interview until after a I had checked at what price I traded and how much I had in my beer fund as a consolation prize. I would've won far more if I had won the heat but the blow of losing was still softened a little matey ;)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 01:42:07 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets.

So you would still fold a 13BB button jam to your AK BB on level 2 of a tournament?

You would still fold a 9BB open jam on level 6 of a tournament with AK?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 01:53:14 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: LLevan on June 30, 2008, 01:57:11 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Boldie as I read Ariston's comments he laid himself off in running having previously backed himself to win the heat. I can understand your comments if he hadn't already backed himself but in this instance he hadn't done anything wrong apart from locking in a profit from his original wager.

As regards some earlier comments and people talking of slow-rolling, IMO the pure definition of slow-rolling is taking you time to call with the absolute nuts and I'm sure everyone will agree that AK os preflop is far from the absolute nuts and Michelle like anyone else is very entitled to take her time to make the decision whether or not to call in this instance.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 01:58:24 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Boldie as I read Ariston's comments he laid himself off in running having previously backed himself to win the heat. I can understand your comments if he hadn't already backed himself but in this instance he hadn't done anything wrong apart from locking in a profit from his original wager.



yeah and I understand that he's locking up a tidy profit from backing himself, I am not calling him a cheat or anything..I just think people should not be allowed to bet against themselves on the exchanges.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 01:59:00 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets.

So you would still fold a 13BB button jam to your AK BB on level 2 of a tournament?

You would still fold a 9BB open jam on level 6 of a tournament with AK?

I may or I may not- I do reserve the right to at least think about it first though. Its hardly like Michelle dwelled with aces is it? she had ace high ffs and gets called a slow roller or clueless for taking a moment to think. Nothing wrong with thinking your decision through before you act with a hand like AK.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 02:00:17 PM
This just happens to be a forum where people can say what they mean when discussing a hand, rather than being all nice and cooey wooey like the experts have to be when live on Skypoker.

Apprently not, i am not allowed to suggest that she is either clueless or a slowroller.....


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 02:01:13 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Boldie as I read Ariston's comments he laid himself off in running having previously backed himself to win the heat. I can understand your comments if he hadn't already backed himself but in this instance he hadn't done anything wrong apart from locking in a profit from his original wager.



yeah and I understand that he's locking up a tidy profit from backing himself, I am not calling him a cheat or anything..I just think people should not be allowed to bet against themselves on the exchanges.

impossible to avoid as long as there are in running markets. What if for instance womble or someone had laid me off on their account? I didnt break any rules as I was clearly trying to still win the heat, locking up a few grands profit softened the blow of losing heads up thats all.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 02:01:23 PM
This just happens to be a forum where people can say what they mean when discussing a hand, rather than being all nice and cooey wooey like the experts have to be when live on Skypoker.

Apprently not, i am not allowed to suggest that she is either clueless or a slowroller.....

yes you can ..people are only saying that she's not a slowroller...make of that what you will ;)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 02:03:38 PM
This just happens to be a forum where people can say what they mean when discussing a hand, rather than being all nice and cooey wooey like the experts have to be when live on Skypoker.

Apprently not, i am not allowed to suggest that she is either clueless or a slowroller.....

yes you can ..people are only saying that she's not a slowroller...make of that what you will ;)

lol i agree i think she is not a slowroller, just clueless

I am referring to a PM that was sent to myself and Russ, clearly debate is no longer encouraged here.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: TightEnd on June 30, 2008, 02:09:52 PM
Debate is fine. Insults and the like isn't.

Please debate civilly.

Cheers.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 02:12:13 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Boldie as I read Ariston's comments he laid himself off in running having previously backed himself to win the heat. I can understand your comments if he hadn't already backed himself but in this instance he hadn't done anything wrong apart from locking in a profit from his original wager.



yeah and I understand that he's locking up a tidy profit from backing himself, I am not calling him a cheat or anything..I just think people should not be allowed to bet against themselves on the exchanges.

impossible to avoid as long as there are in running markets. What if for instance womble or someone had laid me off on their account? I didnt break any rules as I was clearly trying to still win the heat, locking up a few grands profit softened the blow of losing heads up thats all.

Sure there are ways around it but, as a rule, I think it should not be allowed.
The betting exchanges can only exist if the image of them is as clean as a whistle. The racing world has obviously not done it a lot of good with all the hassle going on but atleast those things have shown that Betfair takes that sort of thing very seriously. I reckon that the "Don't lay yourself off" rule should go for all markets on which people can bet..poker is one of them.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: AndrewT on June 30, 2008, 02:13:45 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Boldie as I read Ariston's comments he laid himself off in running having previously backed himself to win the heat. I can understand your comments if he hadn't already backed himself but in this instance he hadn't done anything wrong apart from locking in a profit from his original wager.



yeah and I understand that he's locking up a tidy profit from backing himself, I am not calling him a cheat or anything..I just think people should not be allowed to bet against themselves on the exchanges.

impossible to avoid as long as there are in running markets. What if for instance womble or someone had laid me off on their account? I didnt break any rules as I was clearly trying to still win the heat, locking up a few grands profit softened the blow of losing heads up thats all.

It's not about being fair, it's about being seen to be fair.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on June 30, 2008, 02:17:37 PM
Debate is fine. Insults and the like isn't.

Please debate civilly.

Cheers.

I wasn't aware i had insulted anyone!

Anyway i think the point has been made and a far more interesting debate has sprung up in its place.

Also good to see Russ sticking up for another bird :D Bet if it was a male player he wouldn't have said a thing!!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Colchester Kev on June 30, 2008, 02:21:09 PM
Debate is fine. Insults and the like isn't.

Please debate civilly.

Cheers.

I wasn't aware i had insulted anyone!

Anyway i think the point has been made and a far more interesting debate has sprung up in its place.

Also good to see Russ sticking up for another PRETTY bird with contacts :D Bet if it was a male player with no clout or a plug ugly recreational playing female he wouldn't have said a thing!!


FYP


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Chompy on June 30, 2008, 02:27:04 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Let's say you were to play the WSOP main event and got to the final table with around half the chips in play. The final is three months away and Betfair open a market in which you're backable at around 2.5 and can lay at slightly bigger.
First place pays $10m, second pays $5m. Would you not be tempted to take out some insurance? I would, I'd lay myself at over the odds for as much as I could get in.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 02:31:11 PM
Debate is fine. Insults and the like isn't.

Please debate civilly.

Cheers.

I wasn't aware i had insulted anyone!

Anyway i think the point has been made and a far more interesting debate has sprung up in its place.

Also good to see Russ sticking up for another PRETTY bird with contacts :D Bet if it was a male player with no clout or a plug ugly recreational playing female he wouldn't have said a thing!!


FYP

so far wide of the mark mate but why should I bother educating you. I havent defended michelle in this thread apart from saying she should be allowed to think with what is a non nut hand. Accusng her of slow rolling or calling her clueless because she thought before calling is not on. Michelle is a good mate but not really my type- you know that Kev more than most on here. Also would love to know what contacts she has in the poker world lol. If it was some plug ugly bird then you are right I wouldnt be interested as I dont have any plug ugly mates barring you ;)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ariston on June 30, 2008, 02:34:06 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Let's say you were to play the WSOP main event and got to the final table with around half the chips in play. The final is three months away and Betfair open a market in which you're backable at around 2.5 and can lay at slightly bigger.
First place pays $10m, second pays $5m. Would you not be tempted to take out some insurance? I would, I'd lay myself at over the odds for as much as I could get in.

don't talk too much common sense on here- you will get slaughtered for it.

As poker players we are meant to spot edges and cover our bets wherever the odds dictate to protect oursleves. Clearly this doesnt count when you win a seat for £100 into a major event then back yourself for a chunk, I took some insurance and would still have rather won the heat. As it happened I ended up winning more than Bengt did as he didnt get through the semifinal but thats irrelevant. Put me in the same situation tomorrow and I will do exactly the same again.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on June 30, 2008, 03:09:46 PM
I fold AK rgularly if the situation is right, nothing to do with bets. That was just one situation where flushy jumped in without knowing all the facts. There is nothing wrong with taking a few moments thought before deciding what to do with any hand. Its not like in a live game you have a timer running down and beeping at you to hurry up.

as for the suggestion I should be banned for laying myself off you are talking out your arse. I wouldve won a lot more if I hadnt lost heads up, all I did was lock in a nice profit in case I lost. I was the only one who had backed me before the heat and when I was CL 3 handed everyone else wanted to back me at much smaller odds- wouldve been foolish not to lay off.

I completely disagree with people laying themselves off. In the same way that I do that with horse trainers and jockeys laying off their horses..even if they did think at 16-1 he was too big and at 8-1 it's too short and they can make a tidy profit by laying off. I have no problem with people backing themselves to win but laying yourself off is always unacceptable in my opinion.

Let's say you were to play the WSOP main event and got to the final table with around half the chips in play. The final is three months away and Betfair open a market in which you're backable at around 2.5 and can lay at slightly bigger.
First place pays $10m, second pays $5m. Would you not be tempted to take out some insurance? I would, I'd lay myself at over the odds for as much as I could get in.

don't talk too much common sense on here- you will get slaughtered for it.
 

sigh.

I am saying it should not be allowed, how is this difficult to understand and how does it clash with "common sense"?

Should a trainer be allowed to back his own horse first and then lay it off ensuring a tidy profit? This would be common sense, no? Thsi is effectively the same as you are oing so you think this is OK.


Should a jockey be able to lay his horse off if he doesn't think it has even the faintest chance? The horse doesn't stand a chance..so why should he not make a bit of money?


If the trainer of Horse A REALLY fancies horse B to win the race and knows his own horse can never beat horse B should he be allowed to lay his own horse off?

I think it should not be allowed and in the same way I think you should not be allowed to lay yourself off...ever. It taints the market and opens it open to a tremendous amount of abuse by less honourable people than yourself who could make a lot of money doing it.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Nursey on July 01, 2008, 01:13:38 AM

Hello Gentleman

Firstly, I wouldn't worry about offending me, it can't be done. I'm completely un-offendable. I actually find it hilarious when people try and take the mick out of me and I'm always up for a bit of banter and I'm quite happy for it to get personal because usually people cant handle it back and that makes me laugh even more :) being a bit dopey works wonders for me because the hidden genius underneath is well hidden.....very well hidden, so well hidden that not even I can find it sometimes, but believe you me....it's there, and it comes out to play every now and then against certain stupid male poker players that forget to give me any credit. The other day someone made a comment that the only reason I got a poker sponsorship deal is because I'm blonde with breasts and on the tele...hahaha...you think?  Give the man a spot prize. I think if I was butch with a penis then I would definately not be sitting in Vegas right now playing poker through a sponsorship deal. Anyway yes I am blonde, I have breasts and I am on the tele. Luckily for me I have a good game as well. I'm no Phil Hellmuth but then not many of us on here are are we.

So the AK hand, I vaguely remember it but cant remember the stack sizes or blinds or anything. All I remember is I had him covered. You can't slow roll pre-flop if you ask me anyway. Even Aces get folded pre-flop by some people in some situations. You should always think for just a second, you may ave missed something. I thought slow rolling was when someone has the nuts and dwells before calling an all in anyway. I actually had ace high and was thinking whether I wanted to call an all-in pre flop with it. I thought for a few seconds and then I decided that this was a good idea.  I always think for a few seconds before I call any hand for a large portion of my chips unless I have the nuts or I have already made the decision before they act. AK against any pair is a race, this is for most my stack, I think for a bit and then I decide its worth the risk and call.....I dont get the problem.

So I went out about 600th out of 2398 people. I played some great poker but tilted a bit after a bad beat at the end which took a lot of my chips. I went all in with 99 after a raise when I had 10 big blinds left. Should of waited, but was really pleased with the days play.
I just went out the $1500 event. I had KK and raised two limpers, one called the raise and the other went all in. I figured I was up against AK and all I would have to dodge was an ace so I called. The other limper called as well. The all in guy had TT and said he was squeezing and the other shortstack limper had QJ. I was well ahead but the TT man hit his T of course........GUTTED.  I was left short stacked and was all in with AJ on a board of AQ7. The other guy had AK and I went out :(

Oh well, so they were my two bracelet events. I'm now going to play in a couple of the deepstacks at the Venetian and try make some mulah.

Wish me Luck

xx


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: snoopy1239 on July 01, 2008, 01:26:29 AM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on July 01, 2008, 01:34:07 AM
So I went out about 600th out of 2398 people. I played some great poker but tilted a bit after a bad beat at the end which took a lot of my chips. I went all in with 99 after a raise when I had 10 big blinds left. Should of waited, but was really pleased with the days play.
I just went out the $1500 event. I had KK and raised two limpers, one called the raise and the other went all in. I figured I was up against AK and all I would have to dodge was an ace so I called. The other limper called as well. The all in guy had TT and said he was squeezing and the other shortstack limper had QJ. I was well ahead but the TT man hit his T of course........GUTTED.  I was left short stacked and was all in with AJ on a board of AQ7. The other guy had AK and I went out :(

Thankyou!

GL in the Venetian!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 01, 2008, 01:56:47 AM
 ;goodluck; and more importantly - enjoy!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: byronkincaid on July 01, 2008, 06:38:16 AM
i don't understand. AK isn't the nuts? ???

good luck :)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on July 01, 2008, 10:50:11 PM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.

Again point of thread was pokernews knowing Michelle worked for skypoker= pretty cool

However I am thrilled a read I started has reached a record for me (82 replies and counting!!!) Can we get to 100 pls???


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 10:51:29 PM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.

Again point of thread was pokernews knowing Michelle worked for skypoker= pretty cool

However I am thrilled a read I started has reached a record for me (82 replies and counting!!!) Can we get to 100 pls???

Well I won't help up the reply count just for a silly game to get to 100, thats for sure.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 01, 2008, 10:53:50 PM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.

Again point of thread was pokernews knowing Michelle worked for skypoker= pretty cool

However I am thrilled a read I started has reached a record for me (82 replies and counting!!!) Can we get to 100 pls???

Well I won't help up the reply count just for a silly game to get to 100, thats for sure.

me neither


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Colchester Kev on July 01, 2008, 10:55:00 PM
Hang on a god damn minute ... I have been on telly, I have tits ... Oh ffs, i forgot to dye my hair scalp blonde


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 01, 2008, 10:55:55 PM
Hang on a god damn minute ... I have been on telly, I have tits ... Oh ffs, i forgot to dye my hair scalp blonde

thought that was tikay posting on your account for a minute....until the last bit :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 10:56:11 PM
i don't understand. AK isn't the nuts? ???

i read a book said it def was, surprised you didnt catch that one


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on July 01, 2008, 10:58:05 PM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.

Again point of thread was pokernews knowing Michelle worked for skypoker= pretty cool

However I am thrilled a read I started has reached a record for me (82 replies and counting!!!) Can we get to 100 pls???

Well I won't help up the reply count just for a silly game to get to 100, thats for sure.

Thanks for NOT helping  :tikay:


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on July 01, 2008, 11:00:11 PM

Hello Gentleman

Firstly, I wouldn't worry about offending me, it can't be done. I'm completely un-offendable. I actually find it hilarious when people try and take the mick out of me and I'm always up for a bit of banter and I'm quite happy for it to get personal because usually people cant handle it back and that makes me laugh even more :) being a bit dopey works wonders for me because the hidden genius underneath is well hidden.....very well hidden, so well hidden that not even I can find it sometimes, but believe you me....it's there, and it comes out to play every now and then against certain stupid male poker players that forget to give me any credit. The other day someone made a comment that the only reason I got a poker sponsorship deal is because I'm blonde with breasts and on the tele...hahaha...you think?  Give the man a spot prize. I think if I was butch with a penis then I would definately not be sitting in Vegas right now playing poker through a sponsorship deal. Anyway yes I am blonde, I have breasts and I am on the tele. Luckily for me I have a good game as well. I'm no Phil (http://www.blondepoker.com/blondepedia/blondepedia_view_player.php?player_id=708) Hellmuth (http://www.blondepoker.com/blondepedia/blondepedia_view_player.php?player_id=708) but then not many of us on here are are we.

So the AK hand, I vaguely remember it but cant remember the stack sizes or blinds or anything. All I remember is I had him covered. You can't slow roll pre-flop if you ask me anyway. Even Aces get folded pre-flop by some people in some situations. You should always think for just a second, you may ave missed something. I thought slow rolling was when someone has the nuts and dwells before calling an all in anyway. I actually had ace high and was thinking whether I wanted to call an all-in pre flop with it. I thought for a few seconds and then I decided that this was a good idea.  I always think for a few seconds before I call any hand for a large portion of my chips unless I have the nuts or I have already made the decision before they act. AK against any pair is a race, this is for most my stack, I think for a bit and then I decide its worth the risk and call.....I dont get the problem.

So I went out about 600th out of 2398 people. I played some great poker but tilted a bit after a bad beat at the end which took a lot of my chips. I went all in with 99 after a raise when I had 10 big blinds left. Should of waited, but was really pleased with the days play.
I just went out the $1500 event. I had KK and raised two limpers, one called the raise and the other went all in. I figured I was up against AK and all I would have to dodge was an ace so I called. The other limper called as well. The all in guy had TT and said he was squeezing and the other shortstack limper had QJ. I was well ahead but the TT man hit his T of course........GUTTED.  I was left short stacked and was all in with AJ on a board of AQ7. The other guy had AK and I went out :(

Oh well, so they were my two bracelet events. I'm now going to play in a couple of the deepstacks at the Venetian and try make some mulah.

Wish me Luck

xx

Is anyone completely unoffendable???

Can a thread be set up where we try and offend Michelle and the first person that does wins a blonde t shirt???  ;ifm;


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: byronkincaid on July 01, 2008, 11:00:48 PM
i don't understand. AK isn't the nuts? ???

i read a book said it def was, surprised you didnt catch that one

???


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Graham C on July 01, 2008, 11:02:39 PM
GL in the Venetian :)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 12:17:06 PM
It's a nonsensical thread. Good luck.

Again point of thread was pokernews knowing Michelle worked for skypoker= pretty cool

However I am thrilled a read I started has reached a record for me (82 replies and counting!!!) Can we get to 100 pls???

Well I won't help up the reply count just for a silly game to get to 100, thats for sure.

me neither

That would be plain stupid.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: gatso on July 02, 2008, 12:29:06 PM
93

no reason for posting that, just a number that popped into my head, thought I'd share it


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 12:29:53 PM
93

no reason for posting that, just a number that popped into my head, thought I'd share it

that's a nice number, but not as nice as 167


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Graham C on July 02, 2008, 12:30:06 PM
lets end it now


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 12:30:21 PM
Post count whores


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 12:30:49 PM
lets end it now

yes, it's just getting silly


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Graham C on July 02, 2008, 12:31:27 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 12:32:02 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed

 ;yellowcard;

Any more, and the ban stick will have to be used.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 12:32:46 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed

 ;yellowcard;

Any more, and the ban stick will have to be used.
[/quote

ok i'm scared now - not posting again


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Graham C on July 02, 2008, 12:35:40 PM
 ;spam; the lot of ya :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 12:35:55 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed

 ;yellowcard;

Any more, and the ban stick will have to be used.

ok i'm scared now - not posting again

Final warning...  ;yellowcard;


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 12:45:14 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed

 ;yellowcard;

Any more, and the ban stick will have to be used.

ok i'm scared now - not posting again

Final warning...  ;yellowcard;

ok - sorry


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: boldie on July 02, 2008, 12:55:38 PM
This thread should have been killed off after post 87, surely?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 12:57:22 PM
poo - we're over 100 now - was going to suggest getting it tp 99 then locking it ;D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 01:02:48 PM
eek!!  Thread lock needed

 ;yellowcard;

Any more, and the ban stick will have to be used.

ok i'm scared now - not posting again

Final warning...  ;yellowcard;

ok - sorry

Graham Poll-style third yellow card for you

;yellowcard;


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: gatso on July 02, 2008, 02:20:47 PM
let's wait 'til George sees how many posts there are then all go back and delete our own posts so there's only like, 3 left


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on July 02, 2008, 02:46:06 PM
let's wait 'til George sees how many posts there are then all go back and delete our own posts so there's only like, 3 left

;tightend;


Don't tell him though.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 03:50:33 PM
no really - don't tell him.  delete the last couple of posts, then we'll wait for him to say something, then delete all the other ones....


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: gatso on July 02, 2008, 04:04:31 PM
what are you not telling who? I want in


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Claw75 on July 02, 2008, 04:08:06 PM
what are you not telling who? I want in

you are in - it was your idea :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: gatso on July 02, 2008, 04:17:06 PM
what are you not telling who? I want in

you are in - it was your idea :D

that's alright then, I hate being left out


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: George2Loose on July 02, 2008, 06:13:08 PM
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom

 Td 3d

4 colour decks suck


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: FuglyBaz on July 02, 2008, 06:29:31 PM
 Td 4c - The absolute nuts

Just ask James Akenhead :D


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: gatso on July 02, 2008, 06:42:44 PM
why's no-one deleted their posts yet? George has been on but the thread just keeps getting longer


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: RoyCropper on July 03, 2008, 12:08:02 AM
All the best in vegas Michelle but you can't get away with saying `I have a good game', `I played some great poker'. Then say stuff like you should have passed 99 with 10 bb's and `I called with kk because I thought he had ak'. The ak, kk and 99 all sound like insta insta/auto/easy peasy calls/shoves. If you have someone helping you with your game then they need to have a long chat with you about opponents ranges of hands and how hands like 99/ak/kk stack up against them.
Anyway, it's a bit rich having a pop when my one moment of fame on tv involved dwelling for ages pre flop with ak, and ..............slowrolling like a %$nt?, no....... I passed.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Nursey on July 04, 2008, 02:56:45 AM
All the best in vegas Michelle but you can't get away with saying `I have a good game', `I played some great poker'. Then say stuff like you should have passed 99 with 10 bb's and `I called with kk because I thought he had ak'. The ak, kk and 99 all sound like insta insta/auto/easy peasy calls/shoves. If you have someone helping you with your game then they need to have a long chat with you about opponents ranges of hands and how hands like 99/ak/kk stack up against them.
Anyway, it's a bit rich having a pop when my one moment of fame on tv involved dwelling for ages pre flop with ak, and ..............slowrolling like a %$nt?, no....... I passed.

I gotta disagree with you there. The 99 was a bad shove with 10/12 BB's because there had been a raise and a re-raise. I was always going to be behind. It is arguable but it is not an instant call. Also, the KK was always a call I never said it wasn't. I was just telling you what I put him on and I put him on an AK which is why I was surprised when he turned over TT. The AK call pre-flop for most my stack wasn't an instant call either, if I'm up against any pair its a race. I chose to take that chance but having 10 seconds to make that decision is absolutely fine. I paid my money I think I'm allowed to think for 10 seconds before commiting most my stack with whatever hand I have. It's not like its the nuts so therefore its not slow rolling.

:)


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on July 04, 2008, 10:57:59 AM
It's not like its the nuts so therefore its not slow rolling.

[  ] Speaks the truth
[X] Lee Childs didn't pay his money to get slowrolled


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Grier78 on July 04, 2008, 06:24:46 PM
All the best in vegas Michelle but you can't get away with saying `I have a good game', `I played some great poker'. Then say stuff like you should have passed 99 with 10 bb's and `I called with kk because I thought he had ak'. The ak, kk and 99 all sound like insta insta/auto/easy peasy calls/shoves. If you have someone helping you with your game then they need to have a long chat with you about opponents ranges of hands and how hands like 99/ak/kk stack up against them.
Anyway, it's a bit rich having a pop when my one moment of fame on tv involved dwelling for ages pre flop with ak, and ..............slowrolling like a %$nt?, no....... I passed.

I gotta disagree with you there. The 99 was a bad shove with 10/12 BB's because there had been a raise and a re-raise. I was always going to be behind. It is arguable but it is not an instant call. Also, the KK was always a call I never said it wasn't. I was just telling you what I put him on and I put him on an AK which is why I was surprised when he turned over TT. The AK call pre-flop for most my stack wasn't an instant call either, if I'm up against any pair its a race. I chose to take that chance but having 10 seconds to make that decision is absolutely fine. I paid my money I think I'm allowed to think for 10 seconds before commiting most my stack with whatever hand I have. It's not like its the nuts so therefore its not slow rolling.

:)

I agree with you Michelle, whether any hand is an instant call/fold is always down to your read on the table and there is never anything wrong with a short dwell up if only to put your OP on a range.

I think you use that the fact that you come across a little bit ditsy to your advantage.

AFAIK you have never claimed to be the greatest player ever but you do have a good game and have as much right as anyone else to sit down and play without being criticised.

Good luck in Vegas.


PS 19 posts on Europes Greatest Poker Forum is disgraceful please post on here more often.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Nursey on August 12, 2008, 04:10:46 PM
Yes i know I do need to post more but I hate computers and am not on them that much :) gonna come to the Blonde Bash in Sept though woohoo


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on August 12, 2008, 04:31:17 PM
Well now you've learnt how to play Chinese poker, you can learn how to play a Tighty SNG.  They are loosely based on poker, but not as you know it...


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: action man on August 12, 2008, 05:43:03 PM
blatant self spamming imo


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Pab on August 12, 2008, 06:03:51 PM
is this whole thread a level?


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: ripple11 on August 12, 2008, 07:05:09 PM
Well now you've learnt how to play Chinese poker, you can learn how to play a Tighty SNG.  They are loosely based on poker, but not as you know it...

...and she bloody won! ;madasahatstand;


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: kinboshi on August 12, 2008, 07:38:20 PM
Well now you've learnt how to play Chinese poker, you can learn how to play a Tighty SNG.  They are loosely based on poker, but not as you know it...

...and she bloody won! ;madasahatstand;

Nope, think you'll find I did.  She was ahead, but then we were told we weren't needed straightaway - and I managed to win it (it's a game of luck, so can't really brag).


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on August 13, 2008, 03:00:32 AM
Slowroll!


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Indestructable on October 04, 2008, 11:21:08 AM
Get in Nursey!
 :)up


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Robert HM on October 04, 2008, 03:06:24 PM
Get in Nursey!
 :)up


Not the best chat up line I've heard


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Royal Flush on October 04, 2008, 04:25:52 PM
Still a slowroll


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: MANTIS01 on October 04, 2008, 05:57:46 PM
Quote
Not the best chat up line I've heard

This is the best chat up line I've heard....

Knock Knock...

Who's there?

Ewan...

Ewan Who?

Ewan me baby.


Title: Re: Michelle Orpe from pokernews...
Post by: Indestructable on October 04, 2008, 06:17:20 PM
Get in Nursey!
 :)up


PS Good luck in the final.
 :)up