Title: Riots in london. Post by: action man on April 01, 2009, 02:52:04 PM sky news now. Hillarious scenes
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: TheChipPrince on April 01, 2009, 02:55:37 PM Is swampy there?
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: AndrewT on April 01, 2009, 03:14:06 PM Yeah, let's smash those evil bankers. Let's storm the office of RBS who, er, we own now it's been nationalised. Every window they break has to be paid for by taxpayers. Like the extra police costs.
Meanwhile, due to all the disruption, the City workers have basically got themselves an afternoon off work, so are going home or spending the afternoon out having a few drinks in a beer garden somewhere. [ ] Protest will make a lick of difference to global economic policy [ ] gg Swampy Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Acidmouse on April 01, 2009, 03:59:02 PM I wondered where all the rich brats from Universitys had gone today..
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Dingdell on April 01, 2009, 04:03:20 PM I was going to go down to Luton tonight but I may go down to London and join in the riots....probably less hullaballoo there than there is in Luton when you outdraw MDD.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Indestructable on April 01, 2009, 05:56:42 PM I LOL'ed at a guy being interviewed on the radio, think too much booze on the way didn't make him the best guy to interview as wasn't sure what he was protesting about, or perhaps thats why they picked him. :D
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 01, 2009, 06:00:39 PM Damn hippies.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: StuartHopkin on April 01, 2009, 06:08:14 PM These people make my head want to pop.
I liked the lady i heard on the radio who was completely convinced we needed a new financial system. Er like what? Magic beans under your bed? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Rooky9 on April 01, 2009, 06:11:34 PM If all these people just got jobs, worked hard and paid taxes we'd be laughing.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on April 01, 2009, 06:11:51 PM Just seen this on Sky News. Russel Brand even turned up and had no idea why he was there, clearly.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Colchester Kev on April 01, 2009, 06:13:37 PM the hardcore protesters will be pros ... they do the lot.
The majority wont have a clue what they are protesting about, but just fancy a ruck. so sad. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Colchester Kev on April 01, 2009, 06:14:19 PM Round them up and make 'em do National service !
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Indestructable on April 01, 2009, 06:15:08 PM Round them up and make 'em do National service ! + 1 PS Kev for Prime Minister Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Dewi_cool on April 01, 2009, 06:15:17 PM ;dingdell;
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Graham C on April 01, 2009, 06:17:34 PM There was a guy on 5 Live who'd set up a protest camp that was environmentally friendly and invited loads of people down. They'd set up nice things to do and it all looked lovely. Obviously he was convinced that people would come and join in the fun for the protest rather than....well, for the fun.
Round them up and make 'em do National service ! + 1 PS Kev for Prime Minister These people make my head want to pop. I liked the lady i heard on the radio who was completely convinced we needed a new financial system. Er like what? Magic beans under your bed? and Stu for Chancellor :D Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: StuartHopkin on April 01, 2009, 06:22:51 PM Round them up and burn them. Chancellor Stu has spoken. I award one magic bean to my loyal patron Silo. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: henrik777 on April 01, 2009, 06:23:12 PM There was a guy on 5 Live who'd set up a protest camp that was environmentally friendly and invited loads of people down. They'd set up nice things to do and it all looked lovely. Obviously he was convinced that people would come and join in the fun for the protest rather than....well, for the fun. Round them up and make 'em do National service ! + 1 PS Kev for Prime Minister These people make my head want to pop. I liked the lady i heard on the radio who was completely convinced we needed a new financial system. Er like what? Magic beans under your bed? and Stu for Chancellor :D Yeah because environmental stuff is well know to be cheaper .... Is the protest against making the recession ease ? Get the batons out and beat the living shit out of these morons who are costing us taxpayers a fortune for no reason other than publicity. Sandy Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Geo the Sarge on April 01, 2009, 06:44:11 PM Round them up and make 'em do National service ! Why lump the forces with this bunch of reprobates? Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. That'll stop most of these morons having the free time to do this nonsense. Geo Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Hairydude on April 01, 2009, 06:50:50 PM Geo, call me ignorant but isn't it the rich toff students who are the ones usually protesting- i.e these ones that would still be going to uni anyway as mummy and daddy would be paying???
student loans allow the more "working class" student to get an education Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 01, 2009, 07:07:03 PM Geo, call me ignorant but isn't it the rich toff students who are the ones usually protesting- i.e these ones that would still be going to uni anyway as mummy and daddy would be paying??? student loans allow the more "working class" student to get an education Working classes can either go down the mines, join the army or go on the dole..just like they used to. Now ;slavedriver; Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: StuartHopkin on April 01, 2009, 07:07:26 PM student loans allow the more "working class" student to drink whilst wasting an education FYP Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: TheChipPrince on April 02, 2009, 09:35:17 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Jon MW on April 02, 2009, 09:55:24 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. Monumental fail to suggest it imo Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 02, 2009, 09:59:58 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. what's your point? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Jon MW on April 02, 2009, 10:21:00 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. what's your point? I was agreeing and supporting ChipPrince That's why I added that I thought it was a fail to suggest it - to make it clear that was how I interpreted the statement - and that I thought that was a bad thing Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 02, 2009, 10:22:19 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. what's your point? I was agreeing and supporting ChipPrince Yeah but he's probably just a student so gets no say in the matter...in fact, I reckon we should send him the bill for the damage in London. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: TheChipPrince on April 02, 2009, 10:25:29 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. what's your point? I was agreeing and supporting ChipPrince Yeah but he's probably just a student so gets no say in the matter...in fact, I reckon we should send him the bill for the damage in London. Was a student, and I would never have been able to go without a student loan, likewise my girlfriend who is there now would not have been able to go. I'll pay for the damage though. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: thetank on April 02, 2009, 10:42:20 AM No student loans would mean only people from rich families get University degrees.
[ ] Is a good idea Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 02, 2009, 11:43:54 AM Make anyone that wants to go to Uni pay their own way, none of this student loans pisch, if they can't afford or don't want to cough up, tuff- get a job. I cannot agree with that. It's effectively saying that education should be the sole preserve of the rich and the working classes should stay working class forever and not even consider trying to improve on what their parents achieved. what's your point? I was agreeing and supporting ChipPrince Yeah but he's probably just a student so gets no say in the matter...in fact, I reckon we should send him the bill for the damage in London. Was a student, and I would never have been able to go without a student loan, likewise my girlfriend who is there now would not have been able to go. I'll pay for the damage though. Excellent..That'll be £2.50 please :) Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 02, 2009, 11:46:04 AM No student loans would mean only people from rich families get University degrees. [ ] Is a good idea unless universities would have a scholarship system in which top students from poor backgrounds could get in for free. We need less thickos and average students clogging up the education system IMO....since we can't get rid of the rich ones as we need them topay for stuff, the stupid poor ones will have to go first....unless they get a job. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Colchester Kev on April 02, 2009, 11:48:18 AM Boldie, April fools day was yesterday mate.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: boldie on April 02, 2009, 11:50:59 AM Boldie, April fools day was yesterday mate. Seriously, I reckon we should go back to the old beautiful British way where the toffs go to uni and the poorer people work in service of the toffs. Poor people don't need an education..they only waste it by reading The Sun anyways. If you can't be arsed reading The Times or, if need be, the Daily Torygraph you have no business being enrolled in one of Brittain's finest educational institutions. God Save the Queen! Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: TheChipPrince on April 02, 2009, 12:13:36 PM Someone's put someting in the Scottish water system (except Tanks obv)
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Acidmouse on April 02, 2009, 12:16:15 PM Reading a few papers this morning most of the pictures are taken with 4-5 protestors surrounded by 20+ police and 4000 people from the press taking pictures.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: AndrewT on April 02, 2009, 12:41:17 PM Reading a few papers this morning most of the pictures are taken with 4-5 protestors surrounded by 20+ police and 4000 people from the press taking pictures. From the BBC G20 update blog. Quote 07:39 The BBC's Philip Hampsheir at the London Stock Exchange says there are 150 police officers outside, about the same number of reporters, and just 15 protesters. Quote 11:15 The BBC's Ben Brown outside the Excel Centre says: There's room for between 5,000 and 6,000 protesters. Police have been surprised that there are only about 200 protesters here at the moment. One policeman suggested anarchists did not get up very early. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: snoopy1239 on April 02, 2009, 12:43:51 PM For a moment I thought these riots were a result of Tighty postponing Reverse Sheep. Nevertheless, I performed a quiet riot in the confines of my own home. Farce.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: MANTIS01 on April 02, 2009, 02:11:48 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. Jamie from Jamie and his Magic Torch did that and it looked fun, so whatever. But be aware that's a pretty stupid thing to say.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: tikay on April 02, 2009, 02:13:24 PM Just seen this on Sky News. Russel Brand even turned up and had no idea why he was there, clearly. Interview of the year! Sky News to Russell Brand. "Why are you here?" "Same reason as all these people". "And what reason is that?" (coy look), "err........." He's not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer.... Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Jon MW on April 02, 2009, 02:14:49 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: MANTIS01 on April 02, 2009, 02:52:18 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Jon MW on April 02, 2009, 02:56:07 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. Thanks - I really didn't understand what you were getting at but The banks are also making the country billions The net contribution of the banks to society >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> net contribution of the protestors Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: MANTIS01 on April 02, 2009, 03:51:43 PM I disagree Jon. I would say the sum total of the protesters net worth to society>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sir Fred Goodwin alone.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: cia260895 on April 02, 2009, 04:03:58 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. wow are you that skint?? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Royal Flush on April 02, 2009, 04:30:20 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. wow are you that skint?? You not seen his PHA posts? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: MANTIS01 on April 02, 2009, 04:37:52 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. wow are you that skint?? You not seen his PHA posts? Pls ban this troll Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Woodsey on April 02, 2009, 04:38:26 PM If you chastise the protests against the financial institutions because the protesters are costing the government and the people of this country money you would be enjoying a ride on a helterskelter in dreamworld. ... I don't understand what you mean. in what way? Errr, the banks are costing the country billions. The protesters broke a few windows and stuff. I was in my local RBS branch the other day when I saw a RBS piggy bank on the counter with some smug poster about watching the pennies. Man, I coulda picked that pig up and smashed it on the floor. I didn't. But I coulda. wow are you that skint?? You not seen his PHA posts? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: StuartHopkin on April 02, 2009, 07:28:21 PM I disagree Jon. I would say the sum total of the protesters net worth to society>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sir Fred Goodwin alone. You are joking arent u? Please? Your saying that a bunch of worthless fools are worth more to society than a man who successfully ran a huge business for 8 years? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: thetank on April 02, 2009, 08:43:30 PM Given that the main point of a protest is to raise awareness and get media exposure, as the protestor:mediaman ratio seems to be about 1:10, that would suggest that these protestors are far from worthless, and are actually very efficient at what they do. They didn't even have to set themselves on fire.
Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: Jon MW on April 02, 2009, 10:01:53 PM Given that the main point of a protest is to raise awareness and get media exposure, as the protestor:mediaman ratio seems to be about 1:10, that would suggest that these protestors are far from worthless, and are actually very efficient at what they do. They didn't even have to set themselves on fire. The main point was to protest against the banks, or the war, or the environment - all three answers were given by different protestors : what were they raising awareness of? Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: MANTIS01 on April 02, 2009, 10:44:29 PM I disagree Jon. I would say the sum total of the protesters net worth to society>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sir Fred Goodwin alone. You are joking arent u? Please? Your saying that a bunch of worthless fools are worth more to society than a man who successfully ran a huge business for 8 years? The RBS under Fred Goodwin sought £12billion from shareholders in last year's rights issue. They encouraged thousands of regular people to invest in the bank by buying shares at £2 each. They provided all the figures to convince people the investment was solid...and they did this just before the bank lurched into crisis. That's a pretty big offence vs society in my mind. If you defraud thousands of people out of their savings then I figure you commit a bigger offence against society vs bricking a window. People auto-believe the protesters are the villains. But I don't know who those dudes are, there could be doctors/nurses in that group? Who knows? What we do know is Fred Goodwin has little to protest about....considering the hugeness of his £8.4m pension. Anyway, we don't agree who the worthless fools are. That's ok. But the fact the guy left in humiliation after a £15billion government bail out...that saw the bank's value plummet from £75billion to £4billion...suggests at best the dude was a real spaz-tard of a businessman. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: StuartHopkin on April 03, 2009, 09:25:42 AM Anyway, we don't agree who the worthless fools are. That's ok. But the fact the guy left in humiliation after a £15billion government bail out...that saw the bank's value plummet from £75billion to £4billion...suggests at best the dude was a real spaz-tard of a businessman. Was it really his fault or just bad timing? Was he aloud solely to decide they were buying ABN Amro? If you were to work as a driver and delivered a package to the wrong person would you expect to lose your pension? Could a 'real spaz-tard' get himself into that position in the first place? I would be interested to know how many of the protestors have ever created a job for someone else. Title: Re: Riots in london. Post by: AndrewT on April 03, 2009, 10:24:02 AM I would be interested to know how many of the protestors have ever created a job for someone else. Some of them created work for glaziers. |