Title: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 05, 2009, 07:02:42 PM Starts on Wednesday, really looking forward to spending 25 days on the sofa watching it.
Hoping we produce 5 raging turners and then pick 2 spinners for each game, as the Aussies don't have an international class spinner and Ponting seems to distrust them anyway unless they are called Shane Warne. Current Betfair odds Australia 1.91 England 3.2 Draw 5.8 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ACE2M on July 05, 2009, 07:05:32 PM on england heavy for the first test but expecting aussies to win series.
Hope we win but just don't see us having enough batting in our line up. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 05, 2009, 07:31:22 PM Aussies to win 4-1
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 05, 2009, 07:56:26 PM 1.91 for an Aussies series victory looks very tempting.
Just a shame i did my bollocks on Wimbledon - and the fact that i want to cheer England on that are stopping me lumping on at the moment. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 05, 2009, 07:59:42 PM This series is a coinflip, with those odds you should be lumping on England.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 06, 2009, 05:43:01 PM Brett Lee out of the 1st test and probably the 2nd test, which must be good news from an England point of view.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 06, 2009, 06:01:51 PM part 1 of a lookback at the '05 ashes with some unseen footage on c5 at 7.15 tonight
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 06, 2009, 06:13:39 PM part 1 of a lookback at the '05 ashes with some unseen footage on c5 at 7.15 tonight There are lots of recaps on the 2005 series on ESPN classic (channel 442 on sky), don't think I will ever tire of watching that series. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2009, 06:19:13 PM Cardiff is an odd choice
I gather they outbid other grounds for a test match when the ECB put it out to tender last year In the hole therefore for many thousands of pounds they are obviously praying for weather to hold but are likely to want to produce a pitch that lasts for five days In fact what we'd like is a raging turner that cracks after two days. Instead what we are likely to get is a slow low pudding that is far more likely to suit the Aussie batsman grinders (and Cook/Collingwood) than the "we want it to bounce and come onto the bat" players like Bopara and Pietersen Seriously they have Hauritz and nothing else in the spin department we have Swann, on form, spins it,who loves bowling to left handers and they have six in their top 8...Prepare a dry cracked pitch! Bet the buggers don't though. You don't turn up in India or Sri Lanka to find a green top suiting seamers, you find the home boards ordering something to suit their team. Why can't we do the same? I too think we lack a bit of batting but expect it to be decided by one test either way Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 06, 2009, 06:21:26 PM Backing the draw in Cricket is a really bad idea usually. I really think the first test is different though. They will prepare a very flat wicket, both teams bat much better they they bowl and it rains in South Wales pretty much all the time.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 06, 2009, 06:52:53 PM I think there is more to Cardiff being chosen than simply cash, although it is obviously a factor. More importantly they have gone for a random venue for the 1st test instead of Lord's where England don't have an especially good record considering it is a home venue for us. All the away teams are always really up for playing at the home of cricket and England often find themselves 1-0 down after a 1st test at Lord's.
I think the ECB have pulled a sneaky master stroke by having it away from Lord's and it gives England the best possible chance of being 1-0 after the Cardiff game. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on July 06, 2009, 07:26:49 PM Will Radio 5 have live coverage of all the games?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 06, 2009, 07:28:11 PM Yes
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Nakor on July 06, 2009, 08:13:01 PM Will Radio 5 have live coverage of all the games? 5 Live sports extra and Radio 4 LW I believe. 15 minute updates on Five live. Don't think the groundsman knows how to produce a flat pitch. If we lose no more then 4 sessions due to rain will get a result IMO. 3-1 series victory for the English - please. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 06, 2009, 08:50:25 PM why do we want turning pitches we dont have one world class spinner nevermind 2. I dont think swann will have ponting and co 2 worried imo
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 06, 2009, 08:53:42 PM why do we want turning pitches we dont have one world class spinner nevermind 2. I dont think swann will have ponting and co 2 worried imo they have none the seam bowling is a wash..Johnson and Siddle v ours.... we have an advantage in spin, world calss or not Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on July 06, 2009, 09:00:28 PM It's just a pity that all the games are on when every self respecting poker player is fast asleep.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on July 06, 2009, 10:27:17 PM I like the look of:
Bopara top series run scorer for england Simon katich top series run scorer for australia Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 06, 2009, 10:40:42 PM Katich is a great shout, I can't see any value in the England lineup, KP is the likely top runscorer but no value.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 07, 2009, 04:30:28 AM why do we want turning pitches we dont have one world class spinner nevermind 2. I dont think swann will have ponting and co 2 worried imo You don't think that the test leading wicket taker in 2009 will have the Aussies worried? A team with a pretty dismal record of playing against spin? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: vegaslover on July 07, 2009, 10:34:20 AM Backing the draw in Cricket is a really bad idea usually. I really think the first test is different though. They will prepare a very flat wicket, both teams bat much better they they bowl and it rains in South Wales pretty much all the time. The draw is often priced bigger than it should be, due to weather considerations, especially in England. Just ask Lancashire Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 07, 2009, 12:55:43 PM I have taken the 2.06 on the Aussies to win the series - this is too big for me, and i am not one of these that believe this is a 50/50 shot either way.
Just think back to 2005 and how unbelievabley well we had to play on each and every day, in each and every test, to just about win it. Both teams have lost major players , for the Aussies Hayden, Warne and McGrath, for England Trescothick, Vaughan and Simon Jones and to a certain extent i fear Flintoff. There is no way he will have the impact he had in 2005, he is nowhere near test match fitness and has to be a doubt to play all 5 matches. Also dont forget that on top of hammering us in the Ashes 2 years ago, the Aussies went to South Africa (the best test team in the world) earlier this year and won the series. Opening batsman: A lot depends on how Hughes and Katich cope with the new ball - they are both very dangerous players if they start to build an innings. For England, Strauss will be targetted by the Aussies and needs some early runs for confidence. Cook should score well, but will need support. Eng 8 Aus 8 Top order: Ponting, M Clarke, Hussey - a formiddable 3,4,5 if they hit form - capable of propelling the team to massive scores. For England, Bopara is going to be under huge pressure and Collingwood at 5 needs to improve his fairly modest form of late. We all know about KP, and he will be well up for the series. He must keep his head though in pressure situations. Eng 8 Aus 9 All rounder: As i said previously, Flintoff is probably not match fit and may hold the key to how England go in the series - if he fails with the bat and can only bowl a handful of overs in each innings i firmly believe that England will struggle. Marcus North for the Aussies is a pretty good batsman, and will probably bowl a bit, but someone that England should be able to get at. Eng 8 Aus 7 Wicket Keeper: Prior has to score runs, and lots of them to make up for the 2 or 3 wickets he will cost behind the stumps. Haddin is a top drawer keeper and also a very very good batsman. His form with the bat will be one of the keys to the series and dont be surprised if he comes up with 4 or 5 half centuries. He is not Adam Gilchrist, but he is very very talented. Eng 7 Aus 8 Fast bowlers: This is where England won the Ashes in 05. The combination of Harmison, Flintoff, Hoggard and Simon Jones was too much for the Aussies. Unfortunately we dont have them now, and Anderson, Broad and Onions are nowhere near as potent. Early wickets are crucial for England, but i'm not so sure they will get them. The Aussies are likely to go into the Test with Johnson, Siddle and either Clark or Hilfenhaus. They bowled extremely well in South Africa, and if they repeat that here then England's top order will be under great pressure. Lee is a loss, but as he wasnt match fit, not as big a loss as Johnson would be. Eng 7 Aus 8 Spinners: Every one is writing off Nathan Hauritz -this could be a major mistake. The guy can spin the bowl, and just because he hasnt done anything on the tour yet (ala Shane Warne all those years ago) he will have a major impact. He has played only 4 tests, but has taken 14 wickets. He can also bat a bit. For England Swann will be important but will be under pressure and must produce early on. He is also capable of getting important runs for the team. Eng 8 Aus 8 England 46 Austrailia 48 My prediction - Australia to win 2-1 or 3-1 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 07, 2009, 01:03:01 PM Any other individual bets Matt?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 08, 2009, 10:38:36 AM Reckon that is a good toss to win, get the runs on the board and hope the pitch wears as the match goes on.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 08, 2009, 10:44:49 AM Bit disapointed with Sky Player, they've finished the first anthum on radio and they're shaking hands on the player still!
and it's lagging too much Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 08, 2009, 11:30:50 AM I was thinking about the 2005 ashes, and remebered Shaun Tait, hows he's fallen...
''Cricket Australia announced on 14th May 2009 that Tait would not have his contract renewed for the 2009/10 season. Tait described this as "a kick in the teeth". Tait has recently signed as an overseas player for Chipstead, Coulsdon & Walcountians in Division 5 of the Surrey Championship playing alongside his brother Jarrod.'' Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 08, 2009, 11:42:44 AM Catch and a half from Hussey that. Sigh.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2009, 01:11:09 PM Session to Australia. Clever bowling from all three quicks
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 08, 2009, 01:12:23 PM Session to Australia. Clever bowling from all three quicks yep. spot on. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 08, 2009, 01:29:43 PM Session to Australia. Clever bowling from all three quicks Agreed, this looks like a should get 400 first inning wicket. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: cdw1111 on July 08, 2009, 02:18:06 PM Really enjoying having a day off and watching this.This piece during lunch showing Cardiff's preparations was very interesting,the commentators mentioned that Shane Warne would be commenting at some point after he had finished playing cards but it seems he's made day 3 of the ME on 175k so GL to him.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2009, 02:19:54 PM TMS FTW. Fantastic commentators
Bumble and Botham aside, I find the Sky commentators banal and insipid Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2009, 03:44:35 PM England's session
1-1 Seems like once the shine has gone off the ball, its a very slow but easy pitch Got to get wickets with that new ball when we come to ball Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 08, 2009, 03:51:57 PM good session, pietersen and colly looking pretty solid
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 08, 2009, 04:07:06 PM TMS FTW. Fantastic commentators Bumble and Botham aside, I find the Sky commentators banal and insipid Really? I find Botham unbearable - facile, pompous, repetitive and quite often just wrong. Don't spose they'll ever be able or willing to get rid of him though unfortunately. Amazing to think how long Willis lasted in the commentary box before they finally had enough of him just reading out whatever numbers were on the screen and gave him something else to do. Atherton and Hussain I think are pretty good - generally have something to say before they open their mouths. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 08, 2009, 04:24:33 PM MASSIVE let off for Pietersen there
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 08, 2009, 04:28:37 PM Atherton and Hussain I think are pretty good - generally have something to say before they open their mouths. Atherton is absolute class, Hussain just has a really annoying tone of voice, which overpowers anything he's actually saying. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 08, 2009, 04:28:46 PM MASSIVE let off for Pietersen there Yep what a shame lol... Had to be out one way or the other, whether he hit it or not, what's the umpire thinking..? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 08, 2009, 04:42:16 PM the sky player advert is really tilting me
if you're not paying attention and they go to the ad you just hear commentary 'could be out........is out' and I think we've lost a wicket Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2009, 04:57:47 PM horrible horribler horrible shot by Pietersen. Ugh
so much talent, so little common sense Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 08, 2009, 05:07:00 PM horrible horribler horrible shot by Pietersen. Ugh so much talent, so little common sense So annoying, Boycs is making me laugh on TMS with his views on Hauritz. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 08, 2009, 05:10:07 PM At least it's in Cardiff so there is a decent chance of rain. ;frustrated;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: LOJ on July 08, 2009, 05:30:41 PM horrible horribler horrible shot by Pietersen. Ugh so much talent, so little common sense It will give prior and Flintoff a blast with the bat, no mugs those 2... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 08, 2009, 06:06:22 PM Wtf at a night-watchman for Broad?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 08, 2009, 06:10:09 PM Wtf at a night-watchman for Broad? +1 Sent Broad in to score another 20-25 tonight imo Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 08, 2009, 06:30:01 PM Advantage Australia I think, 7 wkts down is good news for them, and we're 70-100 away from a par score
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on July 08, 2009, 08:17:54 PM Advantage England according to latest prices offered on Betfair.
Draw 2.66 England 2.9 Aussies 3.5 Disagree about the Sky commos, don't think there's a bad one among them. Big fan of Athers and Bob Willis on the highlights show. Bob'll stick the boot in over KP's shot and the poor decision to send Jimmy in. Cricket is analysed so much better than racing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: sweet potata! on July 08, 2009, 08:20:47 PM Advantage England according to latest prices offered on Betfair. Draw 2.66 England 2.9 Aussies 3.5 Disagree about the Sky commos, don't think there's a bad one among them. Big fan of Athers and Bob Willis on the highlights show. Bob'll stick the boot in over KP's shot and the poor decision to send Jimmy in. Cricket is analysed so much better than racing. Couldn't agree more. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 11:44:05 AM Graeme Swann ;tightend;
marvellous stuff Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 09, 2009, 11:52:08 AM Is it worrying that Anderson is managing to reverse sweep the spinner? ;carlocitrone;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 09, 2009, 11:58:15 AM Is it worrying that Anderson is managing to reverse sweep the spinner? ;carlocitrone; Meanwhile Shane Warne is in Vegas playing poker... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 09, 2009, 12:01:27 PM Graeme Swann ;tightend; marvellous stuff Yeah he is a really useful batsman in these situations, I have seen him smack it all over the shop opening for Notts in limited over cricket. Ball is turning as well, starting to like Englands postion in this match. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 09, 2009, 12:17:07 PM Ball is turning as well, starting to like Englands postion in this match. yeah, this looking at the spin hauritz is getting the aussies aren't going to be looking forward to their innings it's not often you get to look at an england scorecard and see everyone scoring let alone 10/11 in double figures, top stuff boys lets go and defend 230 for the follow on please Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: cia260895 on July 09, 2009, 12:25:43 PM shame swann didnt get the 50 though
come on lets rip em apart with the bowling... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 09, 2009, 12:27:42 PM With the amount of spin in the pitch, you've got to like England here (weather forecast not too bad).
I've emptied my Betfair pennies on them. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 09, 2009, 12:58:30 PM Hughes has other ideas...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 01:45:53 PM Please don't give Hughes width, ta
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 09, 2009, 02:17:21 PM Flintoff v Hughes is going to be very tasty this summer.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 02:18:44 PM Flintoff v Hughes is going to be very tasty this summer. 1-0 to Freddie. Hughes has a great eye, tremendous natural talent but doesn't like it up him Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 09, 2009, 02:59:53 PM Aussies rolling along very comfortably now. We need somebody to get a wicket and hopefully they will kick on. If not i can see us relying too much on Freddie.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 09, 2009, 03:16:57 PM Boycott is different gravy, class...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 09, 2009, 03:19:33 PM Boycott is different gravy, class... Is he still batting..... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 09, 2009, 03:26:14 PM Aussies looking at 550+ by Saturday lunchtime then some real pressure on our 2nd innings.
Ponting ton looking very likely. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 09, 2009, 04:20:59 PM Aussies looking at 550+ by Saturday lunchtime then some real pressure on our 2nd innings. Ponting ton looking very likely. I love an optimist. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 09, 2009, 04:45:23 PM With the amount of spin in the pitch, you've got to like England here (weather forecast not too bad). I've emptied my Betfair pennies on them. gg pennies Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 09, 2009, 04:47:56 PM Aussies looking at 550+ by Saturday lunchtime then some real pressure on our 2nd innings. Ponting ton looking very likely. I love an optimist. Unfortunately Longy for this series it is more about the money than me being patriotic, and i have lumped on the Aussies to win the series big time. [ X ] England's bowlers are performing as i expected. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 04:49:26 PM It's not high tide til 9.28pm tonight. Explains why the pitch is doing far less today.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 09, 2009, 04:52:45 PM Fuck me Rich i know that England's cricketers like to look for excuses but that takes the biscuit.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 04:55:09 PM Fuck me Rich i know that England's cricketers like to look for excuses but that takes the biscuit. Yesterday high tide was mid afternoon. Helped get more moisture into the pitch, and the ball wobbled a bit in the last 40 overs Today the pitch is bone dry, hence less help to the bowlers That said, we're disappointing. Expected the spinners not only to spin it a bit more (Swann is bowling too flat) but also excercise more control Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 09, 2009, 05:24:02 PM Fuck me Rich i know that England's cricketers like to look for excuses but that takes the biscuit. Yesterday high tide was mid afternoon. Helped get more moisture into the pitch, and the ball wobbled a bit in the last 40 overs Today the pitch is bone dry, hence less help to the bowlers From the Guardian OBO commentary. Quote Monty is pulled out of the attack and Anderson is brought back in. Now is the time for someone to start spouting guff about the tide coming in in Cardiff Bay affecting the climatic conditions and making the ball swing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 05:28:18 PM The groundsman himself swears by its validity
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 09, 2009, 05:46:06 PM Aussies rolling along very comfortably now. We need somebody to get a wicket and hopefully they will kick on. If not i can see us relying too much on Freddie. This was nearly 3 hours ago. Things have not changed.Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 09, 2009, 05:53:08 PM Hmm, the groundsman's only been there since February...
Swing or lack of it prompts a lot of conjecture at most grounds - whether it's affected by weather or tides or building a new stand on one side or whatever. I don't think much of it stands up well to scrutiny. In a way it's remarkable how little is understood about swing, conventional or reverse, even by top boffins with easy access to wind tunnels. Though then again I suppose it's not that surprising, given the enormous number of variables at work, with different bowlers in form or out of form, different weather, variable hand-made balls etc. What a satisfyingly depressing partnership this is. Looks like it could be turning into a proper traditional Ashes summer. Not like that nonsense we had four years ago. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 09, 2009, 07:04:40 PM The ball will swing more, when other conditions are equal, if the tide is in. Marginally greater humidity = greater resistance on the seam/rough side of the ball. It is a minor consideration in the general humidity of the air though, which is the majorfactor in swing bowling.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 09, 2009, 07:34:21 PM Still, the telling factor could be our batsmen getting 50-60 and getting out and theirs, with ruthless effiency, converting 50-60 into 100+...getting a first inning leads and in effect making us bat last
Tomorrow morning is cruical, need wickets or we're sunk. In the bay. With swing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 09, 2009, 08:05:01 PM Still, the telling factor could be our batsmen getting 50-60 and getting out and theirs, with ruthless effiency, converting 50-60 into 100+...getting a first inning leads and in effect making us bat last i agree them scoring more runs than us could be a telling factorTomorrow morning is cruical, need wickets or we're sunk. In the bay. With swing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on July 10, 2009, 06:54:38 AM TMS pwns
That is all Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 10, 2009, 10:40:12 AM Saturday almost certainly looks like it could be a total washout and Sunday's forecast is for showers, so the match seems to be heading for a draw.
My guess is that the Aussies will try to get through the first hour (maybe until lunch) with only 1 or 2 wickets down, and then may try to increase the scoring rate and look to get to around 650 just before close of play and declare. It would be a risk, but given the weather forecast they would be very very unlikely to lose the game. If England get a couple of early wickets with the new ball, then it will just be a case of the Aussies trying to bat out the day. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 10, 2009, 12:24:03 PM The Australians are collapsing now - they've lost two wickets in a mere 76 overs.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 10, 2009, 12:35:03 PM Right, praying for rain now. Did back Englad to win, decided to back the draw now to minimise loss on the England victory. If the Aussies win, I'm screwed.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 10, 2009, 01:06:42 PM Australia 348-4 at lunch.
I dont really see any way this cant be a draw now unless either the weathermen have got the forecast totally wrong, or England have a major 2nd innings collapse. In all likliehood if the aussies bat the rest of the day, they will make about 550, a lead of about 115 with probably a days play at most to come. England would then just need to bat out for a draw. If England dismiss Australia for 450 or less, then realistically they are unlikely to have enough time to get a decent enough lead to have a chance of declaring. LEts just hope the weather men are wrong, in which case we could have a very good finish to the test. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 10, 2009, 02:49:31 PM Australia 348-4 at lunch. That usually means there is a high chance it won't be a drawI dont really see any way this cant be a draw now unless either the weathermen have got the forecast totally wrong, or England have a major 2nd innings collapse. In all likliehood if the aussies bat the rest of the day, they will make about 550, a lead of about 115 with probably a days play at most to come. England would then just need to bat out for a draw. If England dismiss Australia for 450 or less, then realistically they are unlikely to have enough time to get a decent enough lead to have a chance of declaring. LEts just hope the weather men are wrong, in which case we could have a very good finish to the test. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 10, 2009, 02:52:01 PM If, weather permitting, we begin 2nd innings 150+ behind we lose. Completely different game batting in those circumstances
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 10, 2009, 03:24:00 PM If, weather permitting, we begin 2nd innings 150+ behind we lose. Completely different game batting in those circumstances Its not looking good then as the weather forecast seems to be slightly improving and their may well be play on Saturday morning as well as most of Sunday. The way the Aussies are going there lead will be about 150 at close of play tonight. Depending on the forecast when they start tomorrow it may be enough for them to declare, but it would probably be a little to brave of Ponting this early in the series. Instead they will probably bat and lead by 200 - 220ish before declaring. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 10, 2009, 03:33:21 PM /rain dance
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 10, 2009, 03:35:14 PM I think Collingwood may have become England's leading spinner.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 10, 2009, 04:16:41 PM Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 10, 2009, 04:18:57 PM Don't stop dancing Silo. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 10, 2009, 05:31:04 PM Don't stop dancing Silo. Until September. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 10, 2009, 05:48:56 PM Don't stop dancing Silo. Until September. lol :D Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 11, 2009, 03:43:43 PM Being pummelled of course, shoddy in the field and psychologically shattered, but how Billy Doctrove who has not given a single LBW for four days gives Bopara out there I don't know
rain dance resumes Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 11, 2009, 04:56:15 PM This is thoroughly depressing it is like Ashes groundhog day with the exception of 2005.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 12, 2009, 01:58:47 AM I had the misfortune of running into my Australian friend earlier. sigh.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 12:55:56 PM why do we want turning pitches we dont have one world class spinner nevermind 2. I dont think swann will have ponting and co 2 worried imo You don't think that the test leading wicket taker in 2009 will have the Aussies worried? A team with a pretty dismal record of playing against spin? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2009, 01:11:40 PM I blame Silo - he's clearly stopped dancing.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Wardonkey on July 12, 2009, 04:55:03 PM Blowers is painful to listen to. The dear old thing has got too old.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 04:56:36 PM Blowers is painful to listen to. The dear old thing has got too old. Do you think Chris Broad will get picked for the next test? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 05:27:17 PM I am starting to get nervy here, as I just know we are going to lose in painful circumstances. Couldn't we just have collapsed before tea and saved me all this nervous energy.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 05:31:21 PM I am starting to get nervy here, as I just know we are going to lose in painful circumstances. Couldn't we just have collapsed before tea and saved me all this nervous energy. FML,wtf kind shot is that Swann. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 05:36:07 PM Think that may have been my fault. Sat on the sofa for two hours then decided it was safe to go to the shop, and what happens... Sorry England. Come on Jimmy.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ripple11 on July 12, 2009, 05:45:02 PM I am starting to get nervy here, as I just know we are going to lose in painful circumstances. Couldn't we just have collapsed before tea and saved me all this nervous energy. FML,wtf kind shot is that Swann. New ball, he should be farming the strike IMO. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 05:50:01 PM I am starting to get nervy here, as I just know we are going to lose in painful circumstances. Couldn't we just have collapsed before tea and saved me all this nervous energy. FML,wtf kind shot is that Swann. New ball, he should be farming the strike IMO. I am not sure about that with Swann in, who can bat and had 30 on the board. I think you play normally, now with the true tail enders he should farm the strike. No matter what happens, this has been a brave innings by Collingwood, if only the rest of the batsman made as much out of their talent as Colly does. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 05:55:06 PM Yeah think that's right, it gets really confusing when you try and farm the strike because both players start thinking about that too much rather than about just batting. As demonstrated by Collingwood nearly running himself out a minute ago.
Shot Jimmy! Am about to take up residence behind the sofa. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:02:30 PM Crap crap and crap.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:06:58 PM Please no more replays of that shot and Ricky's stupid little grinning face.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:13:47 PM Monty knows how to farm the strike anyway. Maybe he can mentor Collingwood on it.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 06:17:44 PM such a sick alowroll you know they r gonna get there
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 12, 2009, 06:19:54 PM lolol
rarely has a boundary been celebrated so much Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:20:16 PM such a sick alowroll you know they r gonna get there Quiet you! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:22:12 PM I am dying here, this is taking a few months off my life.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 06:27:17 PM cant believe he isnt yorkin him 2 death
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:28:28 PM Please don't send them a message from 12th man, just leave them alone. Such a mistake when they're in the zone.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:28:53 PM So we are actually batting out time here not overs, got to survive till 18:40.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2009, 06:31:24 PM So we are actually batting out time here not overs, got to survive till 18:40. Yeah - if it was overs we'd be 4 balls from safety. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:31:42 PM Shot Monty! That could be huge...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 12, 2009, 06:32:16 PM I am hating this so much yet loving it at the same time
what a fucking shot from panesar. the total is now defendable Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:33:59 PM Lol at this time wasting.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:35:09 PM Had to do it I think to make sure that if we survive this over then they only get one over max.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:37:11 PM There's a small perverse element of me that quite wants them to need 13 off one to win. And not get it obviously.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:39:08 PM Last over now.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:39:56 PM But they still get an over if we lose a wicket right now, no?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 06:40:14 PM wtf is north doin bowlin it is it just cos he will bowl it quicker
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:40:25 PM But they still get an over if we lose a wicket right now, no? I believe so Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2009, 06:40:26 PM Love the fact that no one seems to know what the situation is.
I think that's it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:41:29 PM Yeah I think it is. Anticlimactic somehow!
Brilliant effort though, and great game in the end. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 12, 2009, 06:42:17 PM Yesssssssssssssssssssssssss get in, wow what an end
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Nakor on July 12, 2009, 06:44:17 PM Please let this kick start 4 team performances of epic proportions in the coming weeks.
Think the Cardiff crowd have justified the choice of ground? Great test. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 06:45:56 PM lol at monty and anderson the heroes colly batted 4ever hope this is a springboard for better things 2 come
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2009, 06:47:33 PM I'm not at all jealous of my two friends who bought day 5 tickets for this months ago 'on the off chance we might see some play'...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 12, 2009, 06:48:12 PM awesome
completely different match circumstances but reminds me of 2005 when lee and mcgrath batted out the draw against the odds a proper classic ashes match Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Moskvich on July 12, 2009, 06:50:54 PM Very low-key celebrations from England after burgling the draw. Interesting to compare with the famous over-the-top Aussie draw celebration after McGrath managed to block a couple in 2005. Think it's good to see, though surprised that Anderson and Monty were so calm in interview immediately after what were probably their most important innings ever.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 12, 2009, 06:52:37 PM Very low-key celebrations from England after burgling the draw. Interesting to compare with the famous over-the-top Aussie draw celebration after McGrath managed to block a couple in 2005. Think it's good to see, though surprised that Anderson and Monty were so calm in interview immediately after what were probably their most important innings ever. Well, Monty will be dropped for Lords as they won't play two spinners and he's behind Swann. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 12, 2009, 06:53:37 PM lolol
how the fk did we do that? Now lets ram it down their throat on Thursday at Lords. Hopelessly outmatched for four and a half days but the Aussies didn't have a strike bowler when it counted Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 07:26:57 PM what changes would you make for lords? harmison for panesar imo
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 12, 2009, 07:29:18 PM Onions for Panesar is what I think they will do.... a control bowler
Possibly Harmison for Broad, would consider that as Broad isn't quite ready for this series I think. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 12, 2009, 07:31:20 PM i agree i think they will put onions in cant see them droppin broad tho
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 12, 2009, 07:40:47 PM I blame Silo - he's clearly stopped dancing. my chubby arse hasn't stopped boogying! (how do you spell boogieing?) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 12, 2009, 07:41:09 PM Ship the draw though, obv
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 12, 2009, 07:51:13 PM I think Harmison will replace Panesar, they need something different from the attack and he gives that and appears to be on form. Onions might replace broad but I think the selectors like the fact that Broad can bat so that will be close.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Baron on July 12, 2009, 11:33:40 PM Onions for Panesar is what I think they will do.... a control bowler Possibly Harmison for Broad, would consider that as Broad isn't quite ready for this series I think. This. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 12, 2009, 11:35:13 PM Collingwood to 3? Bopara to 5?
Expect they'll leave the top seven alone..but Bopara and Cook both looked to have technical flaws against the Aussies that they will need to sort quick Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 12, 2009, 11:51:05 PM Swann has to go, he was a below average spinner with a dreadful record in county cricket before it was decided he was the man for England. He had a couple of good series against woefully underperforimg sides he simply is poor. Sidebottom and Onions for Anderson and Swann. Possibly Rashid for Monty too.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 12, 2009, 11:55:53 PM but there is not a cat in hells chance Anderson or Swann will go.
Anderson really wouldn't deserve to go, been the best England seamer for 18 months plus. Sidebottom is only just fit without much bowling either extremely disappointing Swann in this test, but its too early to jettison him. At Lords a spinner is a stock bowler, and his batting and the fact that he has six LHB to bowl too (assuming he performs adequately not poorly and thus causes them a problem) will get him in for sure In this test Swann appeared to have lost the one delivery he got a lot of wickets with, the arm ball. Without that he lacks the variation to damage the best Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 12, 2009, 11:59:51 PM Such a good test to watch. Even in 2005 we were written of at this point after an awful first test. So to start with a draw is a nice change.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Karabiner on July 13, 2009, 12:05:28 AM I can only see one change for Lord's, Onions for Panasar.
Let's face it Harmison has had far more than his fair share of opportunities and fallen short most of the time recently. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 13, 2009, 12:19:20 AM The Times Ricky Ponting accused England of failing to play in the spirit of the game after James Anderson and Monty Panesar survived 69 balls to complete a Great Ashes Escape in Cardiff. The Australia captain was angry at what he saw as delaying tactics towards the end of the first npower Test, when England’s twelfth man and physiotherapist rushed on to the field to speak to the last-wicket pair. Andrew Strauss, the relieved England captain, denied foul play and said: “The reality of the situation is that Australia did not take the last wicket and we got away with the draw.” But the five-match series was given fresh spice on a nail-biting day when first Mitchell Johnson and Kevin Pietersen, then Peter Siddle and Stuart Broad, were involved in altercations. Johnson had to be dragged away by Michael Clarke, his team-mate, when Pietersen appeared to hit a ball into his path during pre-match practice on the outfield. Broad and Siddle were spoken to by the umpires when they made shoulder contact twice after Broad edged the frustrated bowler to the third-man boundary. Ponting was more annoyed that Bilal Shafayat, the reserve fielder carrying a glove, and Steve McCaig, the physiotherapist, held up play in the final stages when Australia wanted to cram in as many overs as possible. “I don’t think it was required,” Ponting said. “I think he changed his glove the over before so he shouldn’t have needed another, and I don’t know what the physio was doing out there. “I thought it was pretty ordinary. But England can play whichever way they want, we will play in the spirit of the game. I was unhappy with it and I am sure others will be taking it up with the England hierarchy.” Having loaded the gun, Ponting will hope that somebody else now fires the bullets. “I am not going to take it any farther,” he said. “I am not making it an issue. I won’t think about it after tonight.” Strauss said that Shafayat had been sent out to tell Panesar and Anderson that Australia were likely to bowl more overs than the minimum because they were rushing through balls. “Some drink was spilt on his glove,” Strauss said. “Jimmy called up to the dressing room, but in the confusion we did not know if he needed the twelfth man or the physio. Our intentions were good. We were not deliberately trying to waste a huge amount of time.” Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 13, 2009, 12:26:12 AM Anderson has never shown anything against world class opponenets in tests. In favorable conditions against a poor side is he is an obvious pick but he has never performed well at this level against decent sides. His bowling average is really bad against Australia, South Africa and Sri Lanka. India obviously don't bat well in England and no one else really bats well at all in tests anymore.
Turning the ball away from the bat on slow turners is invariably totally ineffective. Cardiff was slow, hopefully the rest will be quicker, so maybe keep Swann but he is a very limited cricketer. gl mr Swann and gl England. edit: younis khan, mohammad yousuf and chanderpaul all bat well obv. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 13, 2009, 06:42:57 PM Flintoff injured, FOL!
Harmy for Freddy and Onions for Monty? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: pokerfan on July 13, 2009, 06:45:19 PM Flintoff injured, FOL! Harmison added to squad.Harmy for Freddy and Onions for Monty? http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ashes/story/0,26376,12340_5431152,00.html Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ItsMrAlex2u on July 13, 2009, 06:54:23 PM The Times Ricky Ponting accused England of failing to play in the spirit of the game after James Anderson and Monty Panesar survived 69 balls to complete a Great Ashes Escape in Cardiff. The Australia captain was angry at what he saw as delaying tactics towards the end of the first npower Test, when England’s twelfth man and physiotherapist rushed on to the field to speak to the last-wicket pair. Andrew Strauss, the relieved England captain, denied foul play and said: “The reality of the situation is that Australia did not take the last wicket and we got away with the draw.” But the five-match series was given fresh spice on a nail-biting day when first Mitchell Johnson and Kevin Pietersen, then Peter Siddle and Stuart Broad, were involved in altercations. Johnson had to be dragged away by Michael Clarke, his team-mate, when Pietersen appeared to hit a ball into his path during pre-match practice on the outfield. Broad and Siddle were spoken to by the umpires when they made shoulder contact twice after Broad edged the frustrated bowler to the third-man boundary. Ponting was more annoyed that Bilal Shafayat, the reserve fielder carrying a glove, and Steve McCaig, the physiotherapist, held up play in the final stages when Australia wanted to cram in as many overs as possible. “I don’t think it was required,” Ponting said. “I think he changed his glove the over before so he shouldn’t have needed another, and I don’t know what the physio was doing out there. “I thought it was pretty ordinary. But England can play whichever way they want, we will play in the spirit of the game. I was unhappy with it and I am sure others will be taking it up with the England hierarchy.” Having loaded the gun, Ponting will hope that somebody else now fires the bullets. “I am not going to take it any farther,” he said. “I am not making it an issue. I won’t think about it after tonight.” Strauss said that Shafayat had been sent out to tell Panesar and Anderson that Australia were likely to bowl more overs than the minimum because they were rushing through balls. “Some drink was spilt on his glove,” Strauss said. “Jimmy called up to the dressing room, but in the confusion we did not know if he needed the twelfth man or the physio. Our intentions were good. We were not deliberately trying to waste a huge amount of time.” EVERY side would have done exactly the same thing under the circumstances. It was a bit of a piss tkae that they came on twice but its not unusual behaviour at all. Whinging aussies IMO Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 13, 2009, 06:59:48 PM ponting wasted more time on day 5 than the whole england camp combined as he repeatedly and completely unnecessarily walked the length of the field to speak to his bowlers. he really should've realised much earlier than 6.30 that time was a big consideration in the testmatch
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 15, 2009, 10:15:02 AM A Flintoff news conference today doesn't sound good...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 15, 2009, 10:56:11 AM Retiring from tests AFTER the ashes is the best we can hope for
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 15, 2009, 10:56:42 AM Whats to gain from announcing it now?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Acidmouse on July 15, 2009, 10:58:09 AM They really should play form players. Rashid is in form, takes wickets and is a good batsman. Why was he not selected?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 15, 2009, 04:22:46 PM They really should play form players. Rashid is in form, takes wickets and is a good batsman. Why was he not selected? He's 20, I doubt he is ready. As we've seen with Cook and Bopara its a completely different kettle of fish with the pressure of these matches At Lords, with only one spinner, you aren't going to pick a leggie...too little control. Would have him on tour in the winter, and introduce him over the next 12 months to the Test side Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 15, 2009, 04:42:22 PM Flintoff retires from tests after the Ashes http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8151402.stm .
Can't say i am surprised but is a blow for the England test team, his record especially as bowler doesn't do him justice and England will miss the control and agression he brings to the attack. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 15, 2009, 04:49:23 PM They really should play form players. Rashid is in form, takes wickets and is a good batsman. Why was he not selected? He's 20, I doubt he is ready. As we've seen with Cook and Bopara its a completely different kettle of fish with the pressure of these matches At Lords, with only one spinner, you aren't going to pick a leggie...too little control. Would have him on tour in the winter, and introduce him over the next 12 months to the Test side Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: dousche on July 15, 2009, 05:18:16 PM They really should play form players. Rashid is in form, takes wickets and is a good batsman. Why was he not selected? He's 20, I doubt he is ready. As we've seen with Cook and Bopara its a completely different kettle of fish with the pressure of these matches At Lords, with only one spinner, you aren't going to pick a leggie...too little control. Would have him on tour in the winter, and introduce him over the next 12 months to the Test side ok he's a leggy so could take some punishment so its a little different, but phil hughes is 19 (i think) and he seems to be coping alright. shane warne was only 23 when he bowled gatting... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 10:36:15 AM Win toss and bat
Onions for Panesar the only change Now bat better please, lets get a score that puts it out of reach for the oppo Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on July 16, 2009, 10:46:11 AM Game is going to be severly disprupted by the weather, with showers possible every day and tomorrow looking like it could be a total washout.
The more games Strauss keeps winning the toss, the longer England stay in the series IMO. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 16, 2009, 10:49:16 AM The more games Strauss keeps winning the toss, the longer England stay in the series IMO. Cricket = Poker How you play doesn't really matter as long as you win your flips. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 16, 2009, 10:55:04 AM The more games Strauss keeps winning the toss, the longer England stay in the series IMO. Cricket = Poker How you play doesn't really matter as long as you win your flips. The greatest cricketer ever - W. G. Leknave Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Baron on July 16, 2009, 11:24:00 AM Found myself agreeing with Warne this morning. Harmison should be in the side.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 16, 2009, 01:10:53 PM Well, that was all strangely fantastic.
Assuming our attack will be as toothless as the Aussies' the draw looks nailed on. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 01:12:10 PM FAMOUS LAST WORDS
Mitchell Johnson has been awful. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 16, 2009, 01:32:36 PM FAMOUS LAST WORDS Mitchell Johnson has been awful. Truly awful, he was pretty unimpressive at Cardiff but as you infer his test record is actually very good, so I suspect he will improve. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 16, 2009, 02:17:59 PM Ouch! Looking at Hauritz's finger made me feel a little squeamish!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 02:20:10 PM Ouch! Looking at Hauritz's finger made me feel a little squeamish! All hail HDTV! not. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 16, 2009, 02:24:42 PM I don't think i needed to see it on hotspot either!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 16, 2009, 05:00:37 PM Why can't we go and make a good score rather than just ok or a bit below par?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 16, 2009, 05:02:41 PM Why can't we go and make a good score rather than just ok or a bit below par? Fk knows, i guarentee Ponting doesn't get himself out playing a stupid shot. I almost tempted to say they are playing in 2020 mode, but they played less attacking shots in that form of the game. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 05:03:47 PM Why can't we go and make a good score rather than just ok or a bit below par? because our batsmen mostly won't show patience and build an innings without taking chances I think it is related to the amount of one day cricket they play, though it affects the Aussies less for some reason Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 05:13:32 PM and thats Pietersen, Colly and Prior all getting themselves out, not got out by good bowling
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 16, 2009, 05:19:53 PM Sigh - we've now lost 5 wickets for 125 runs.
Old England are back. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 05:30:51 PM Marvellous
Hilfenhaus is a good bowler though, by far the most threatening today Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 16, 2009, 05:33:32 PM whats the score please
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 05:34:06 PM Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 16, 2009, 05:34:37 PM whats the score please 333-6, flintoff just got out. My mood is darkening by the wicket. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 16, 2009, 05:37:31 PM whats the score please 333-6, flintoff just got out. My mood is darkening by the wicket. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 16, 2009, 06:21:32 PM has play finished for the day? what is the score?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 06:23:21 PM 364-6
We need about 200 more really, its a blameless pitch Strauss 160*. Shown the rest how to do it Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 16, 2009, 06:25:45 PM This from Skipper Strauss: "There's more in this wicket than at Cardiff, but it was pretty good to bat on. From 196-1 we'd like to be in a better place than we are now. As captain you always want to lead from the front, so it was nice to get a big score today - hopefully I can carry on tomorrow. It's jus a little frustrating we couldn't get another big partnership today."
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 16, 2009, 06:39:03 PM cheers 4 the update tighty
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 17, 2009, 11:04:13 AM FFS
[ ] Good leave Strauss Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 17, 2009, 11:11:43 AM Interesting stat about Strauss.
Five times he has resumed on an overnight score of 120 or more. He has never added more than 4 runs before being out. And now Swann has gone. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 17, 2009, 11:14:23 AM At least if the ball is doing something we might be able to bowl them out for less than 800 ;carlocitrone;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 17, 2009, 11:15:07 AM At least if the ball is doing something we might be able to bowl them out for less than 800 ;carlocitrone; Silo - get dancing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 17, 2009, 11:16:50 AM Dun dun dun - another one bites the dust!
:'( Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on July 17, 2009, 11:20:31 AM Only if monty was there him and anderson could have put on a hundred run partnership now lol
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 17, 2009, 11:24:16 AM Watch it swing for the Aussies this morning, the thing won't deviate when we bowl.
We're about 200 under par, ridiculous Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on July 17, 2009, 11:26:43 AM Watch it swing for the Aussies this morning, the thing won't deviate when we bowl. We're about 200 under par, ridiculous It would have been nice to have played harmison in my opinon, so if the ball doesnt deviate there would have been another dimension to the attack Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 17, 2009, 11:34:38 AM I reckon its going to swing for our bowlers, assuming they bowl in the right places........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 17, 2009, 01:55:46 PM For those who missed Ponting's face when he got out:
http://www.cricinfo.com/engvaus2009/content/image/414871.html Absolutely brilliant! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 17, 2009, 01:58:15 PM that was proper com. he knew he should've been out lbw but thought he'd got away with it when they referred it upstairs
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 17, 2009, 02:08:30 PM ffs silo, stop dancing. you're only supposed to do it when we're struggling
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 17, 2009, 05:17:35 PM Starting to make progress here, come on lets captilise on this.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 17, 2009, 05:21:00 PM Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on July 17, 2009, 05:22:00 PM Cmonnnnnnnnnn
GOGOGOGOGO England Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on July 17, 2009, 05:24:08 PM here comes the ironside rain dance
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on July 17, 2009, 05:26:15 PM Even better, get in
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 17, 2009, 05:34:38 PM loving haddin running away to stop cook catching the dead ball
still up to 90 minutes play. do we enforce the follow on? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on July 17, 2009, 05:36:44 PM loving haddin running away to stop cook catching the dead ball still up to 90 minutes play. do we enforce the follow on? If we get to i say definitly do,not that clued up on cricket but why wouldn't we ? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 17, 2009, 05:41:08 PM still up to 90 minutes play. do we enforce the follow on? Really depends on a few things but i would imagine we will, we haven't bowled that many overs. It is likely if we get them out before the follow on it will be late this evening meaning we will have an awkward 6 or 7 overs at the openers again and then a fresh attack in the morning. I don't think this pitch looks like it is going to fall apart to make batting 4th chasing a small total a problem. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 17, 2009, 05:43:12 PM loving haddin running away to stop cook catching the dead ball still up to 90 minutes play. do we enforce the follow on? If we get to i say definitly do,not that clued up on cricket but why wouldn't we ? I would, especially if we get them tonight. more wondering if there's any argument against Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: 77dave on July 17, 2009, 05:43:30 PM Word is that Hauritz will come out to bat, but dont expect too much from him.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 17, 2009, 05:46:38 PM loving haddin running away to stop cook catching the dead ball still up to 90 minutes play. do we enforce the follow on? If we get to i say definitly do,not that clued up on cricket but why wouldn't we ? I would, especially if we get them tonight. more wondering if there's any argument against The arguements against are normally 1) Bowling attack is weakened through tiredness or injury and would be better with a rest to bowl 4th innings. 2) Batting 4th on the wicket would be a nightmare cos the pitch is likely to fall to pieces. 3) Poor light, means the batsman will walk off. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on July 17, 2009, 05:50:06 PM Haddin is the danger, such a quality batsmen in my opinion and always plays in a postive manner, wouldnt be suprised if he makes another century
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 17, 2009, 05:54:31 PM Haddin is the danger, such a quality batsmen in my opinion and always plays in a postive manner, wouldnt be suprised if he makes another century [/quote doesn't look like he'll have enough support to do it Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: 77dave on July 17, 2009, 05:59:52 PM England's work is not done yet though. Johnson is the new batsman and, if he could bowl, he'd be an all-rounder
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: trafficjam on July 17, 2009, 06:19:29 PM Haddin is the danger, such a quality batsmen in my opinion and always plays in a postive manner, wouldnt be suprised if he makes another century whoohooo OUT Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 17, 2009, 06:28:32 PM I dunno if I'd enforce the follow-on...Australia have no spinner and Siddle's got food poisoning, so I might have a quick smash at them.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 17, 2009, 06:34:26 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on July 17, 2009, 06:35:21 PM It depends on the conditions tomorrow for me. If it's cloudy stick them back in, if it's sunny probably have a bat. Either way we win from here.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 17, 2009, 06:35:22 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow. Yeah, definitely now (I'm following BBC commentary and wrote that before I saw they were off for bad light lol!) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 17, 2009, 06:36:50 PM It depends on the conditions tomorrow for me. If it's cloudy stick them back in, if it's sunny probably have a bat. Either way we win from here. Will be another on/off day tomorrow, difficult for the batsmen to get settled in. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 17, 2009, 06:59:08 PM Strauss thinks the pitch will stop offering anything to the bowlers after the 3rd day so we need to enforce the follow on and get them out quick.
Good day though! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 17, 2009, 09:06:23 PM England's work is not done yet though. Johnson is the new batsman and, if he could bowl, he'd be an all-rounder lolTitle: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 18, 2009, 12:04:39 PM wtf bad decision imo we have to bowl them out twice to win why restrict the time we have to do it strauss and ponting should just shake hands and call it a draw
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 18, 2009, 12:13:06 PM I wouldn't mind us batting again if we weren't such pussies when it comes to declaring. Strauss won't declare unless he gets a lead of 550, brings the draw back in. Should have enforced the follow on.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 18, 2009, 12:22:54 PM They can got close to a a lead of 550 today though. Strauss will probably want 800 to be sure though. ;frustrated;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on July 18, 2009, 12:30:06 PM If Johnson bowls 20 overs today we could be 800 in front tonight!
With so much time left in the game i really don't think it made much difference whether we enforced the follow on or not. I actually think it's rarely the correct decision to make a side follow on. Botham really pisses me off with his criticism of Strauss, like he was ever in a position to enforce the follow on when he was captain. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on July 18, 2009, 12:32:22 PM If Johnson bowls 20 overs today we could be 800 in front tonight! it doesnt matter how many we r in front if we dont bowl them outWith so much time left in the game i really don't think it made much difference whether we enforced the follow on or not. I actually think it's rarely the correct decision to make a side follow on. Botham really pisses me off with his criticism of Strauss, like he was ever in a position to enforce the follow on when he was captain. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 18, 2009, 12:57:48 PM Hmmm i actually don't mind not enforcing it, looks like a good batting day at the moment. What we don't know is how the England bowlers are feeling, I am sure giving Freddie a rest played a part.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Karabiner on July 18, 2009, 01:36:13 PM Hmmm i actually don't mind not enforcing it, looks like a good batting day at the moment. What we don't know is how the England bowlers are feeling, I am sure giving Freddie a rest played a part. Exactly, and it's perfect batting conditions at present so let's make hay while the sun shines and bowl when it suits. Remember that Strauss has been captain of Middlesex for years now and understands Lords as well as anyone. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 18, 2009, 01:37:43 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow. Yeah, definitely now (I'm following BBC commentary and wrote that before I saw they were off for bad light lol!) why don't you just watch it? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 18, 2009, 04:07:13 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow. Yeah, definitely now (I'm following BBC commentary and wrote that before I saw they were off for bad light lol!) why don't you just watch it? [ ] I have Sky Sports Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 18, 2009, 04:17:59 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow. Yeah, definitely now (I'm following BBC commentary and wrote that before I saw they were off for bad light lol!) why don't you just watch it? [ ] I have Sky Sports you have now http://www.p2p4u.net/watch-live-sports.php?id=2979&link=Link%202&site=MOPAGES.co.uk p/w is p2p4u.net Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 18, 2009, 04:25:14 PM Deffo enforce the follow on, bowlers will be rested and ready for a full day tomorrow. Yeah, definitely now (I'm following BBC commentary and wrote that before I saw they were off for bad light lol!) why don't you just watch it? [ ] I have Sky Sports you have now http://www.p2p4u.net/watch-live-sports.php?id=2979&link=Link%202&site=MOPAGES.co.uk p/w is p2p4u.net Cheers :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 18, 2009, 05:40:43 PM Perfect innings this from Prior at this stage, fancy we should have a quick half an hour at them this evening.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 18, 2009, 06:00:04 PM Yeh great by Prior. I'd probably get to 550 and then start to look. I wouldn't be declaring if Freddie was still in. If they can bat for 2 days they can probably chase 500 down too.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 18, 2009, 06:04:52 PM can't see us putting them in tonight after the light meter just came out
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 19, 2009, 02:14:20 AM Yeh great by Prior. I'd probably get to 550 and then start to look. I wouldn't be declaring if Freddie was still in. If they can bat for 2 days they can probably chase 500 down too. lol, this is strauss remember, he'll want 700, 'just to be safe' Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on July 19, 2009, 06:49:33 PM i bet he is wishing he he had waited now
this could go down to the wire Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 19, 2009, 06:50:58 PM i bet he is wishing he he had waited now this could go down to the wire No it won't, new ball etc Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 19, 2009, 07:02:39 PM We'll lose
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 19, 2009, 07:05:41 PM Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 19, 2009, 07:26:32 PM probably not but i'm trying to get upset about it now just incase
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 20, 2009, 09:54:44 AM Nearly £200 was traded on Aus @ 95's! Would love to be freerolling that...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 20, 2009, 10:12:50 AM Nearly £200 was traded on Aus @ 95's! Would love to be freerolling that... Fk that would rather see England win Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 20, 2009, 11:13:14 AM Nearly £200 was traded on Aus @ 95's! Would love to be freerolling that... Fk that would rather see England win 20K>>>>>>Eng win Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 20, 2009, 12:02:04 PM Nearly £200 was traded on Aus @ 95's! Would love to be freerolling that... Fk that would rather see England win 20K>>>>>>Eng win Mmmm 20k ok then, less than £5k forget it. Clarke down that's the wicket! Should do it easy now. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 20, 2009, 12:49:56 PM wooooohooooooooooooo :)
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 20, 2009, 12:53:45 PM (http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/884/freddien.jpg) (http://img27.imageshack.us/i/freddien.jpg/)
imo Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 20, 2009, 01:04:22 PM Fred will be a massive loss
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 20, 2009, 01:26:45 PM (http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/9533/graphofz.png) (http://img38.imageshack.us/i/graphofz.png/)
. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 20, 2009, 01:34:56 PM longy's graph makes me smile
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 20, 2009, 01:40:49 PM longy's graph makes me smile It made me chuckle too :)Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on July 20, 2009, 03:10:42 PM longy's graph makes me smile It made me chuckle too :)wp sir Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on July 20, 2009, 03:12:14 PM longy's graph makes me smile It made me chuckle too :)wp sir +1 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on July 20, 2009, 03:53:22 PM Great result,i'm going to day 3 of the next test at edgbaston really looking forward to it,one time Sir Fred and KP be passed fit please
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 22, 2009, 02:08:25 PM KP out for 3 months... Gonna be interesting now, Ian Bell?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 22, 2009, 02:10:22 PM KP out for 3 months... Gonna be interesting now, Ian Bell? Yup, ahead of Key and Shah Makes the top six look a lot weaker though. Bopara at 3 remains a big worry too Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 22, 2009, 02:10:56 PM KP out for 3 months... Gonna be interesting now, Ian Bell? Ugh, bad news. Let's hope Freddie stays fit......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 22, 2009, 02:20:39 PM Bell at 3 and Bopara moved down to 4/5?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 22, 2009, 02:22:52 PM meh. would've liked to see bopara dropped for bell, gonna have to keep him in now
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: dousche on July 25, 2009, 01:54:27 AM chances of shah appearing in the series at some point?
iv always enjoyed watching him bat but it seems that he's got a rep for just being a one-day player these days Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 25, 2009, 11:52:38 AM chances of shah appearing in the series at some point? iv always enjoyed watching him bat but it seems that he's got a rep for just being a one-day player these days Behind Bell in the pecking order Also got a rep now for being lazy and a bit unfit. Fielding v poor for example I don't especially like the look of a middle order of Bopara, Belly, Colly..looks a bit powder puff to me..but with Shah not trusted too much, Key's face not seeming to fit and the likes of Denly and Moore untried I don't see we have another option for the moment Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 29, 2009, 12:55:07 PM A bit damp then
the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 29, 2009, 01:14:11 PM Is there any legs in the idea that this will be a semi-washout, so instead of fred playing 85% for 3 tests, rest him for this, and get him 100% for the last 2?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 29, 2009, 01:16:15 PM Is there any legs in the idea that this will be a semi-washout, so instead of fred playing 85% for 3 tests, rest him for this, and get him 100% for the last 2? Nah. Got to play him. Weather affected would be good though, as Headingley follows straight o Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 29, 2009, 02:09:58 PM A bit damp then the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please, though with an uninterrupted day's play on Sunday. FYP Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 29, 2009, 02:10:46 PM A bit damp then the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please Bollocks. I have tickets for tomorrow :( Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 29, 2009, 02:16:19 PM A bit damp then the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please, though with an uninterrupted day's play on Sunday. FYP +1 Just managed to get a free ticket for Sunday, got to love families imo. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: jizzemm on July 29, 2009, 10:57:36 PM A bit damp then the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please, though with an uninterrupted day's play on Sunday. + 1 FYP Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on July 29, 2009, 11:00:06 PM A bit damp then the scene ten minutes ago Rain affected draw please Bollocks. I have tickets for tomorrow :( In Birmingham now - weather's shocking. Not looking good for play tomorrow. Ah well, least tickets and hotel were free :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on July 29, 2009, 11:47:43 PM Lucky git!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 30, 2009, 10:11:31 AM Big decision to drop Hughes, Watson to open presumably...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Jon MW on July 30, 2009, 10:24:40 AM Pitch inspection at 11.00
"It's like the Sargasso out there. " according to the BBC Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on July 30, 2009, 11:40:26 AM The draw has got to be a silly price in a hurry. Got to be laying at 1.5. They'll play a lot of cricket on a wicket that's bound to assist the bowlers.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on July 30, 2009, 12:19:37 PM 1.38 now the draw
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 30, 2009, 12:21:07 PM forecast for Weekend is horrible
If they get enough play it can't be a draw, but will they get enough play? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 30, 2009, 04:55:00 PM surprised punter's decided to bat
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 30, 2009, 04:55:33 PM PHil Hughes quite unlucky I think.
Surprised he is batting too. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on July 30, 2009, 05:01:33 PM Ball gets wet it's harder in the field.
Depends how much swing there will be. Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 30, 2009, 05:02:25 PM PHil Hughes quite unlucky I think. Surprised he is batting too. Strauss is running hot - wins the first two tosses then loses the tricky one. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on July 30, 2009, 05:04:20 PM PHil Hughes quite unlucky I think. Surprised he is batting too. Strauss is running hot - wins the first two tosses then loses the tricky one. And now Brad Haddin breaks his finger in practice so the Aussies have a debut wicketkeeper. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 30, 2009, 07:51:09 PM well that was crap
would've been very diff if the 2 clear lbws had been given though Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 30, 2009, 07:52:22 PM bowling very inconsistent. I reckon Broad or Onions will go for Harmison next game
Looks a good pitch though rain please Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on July 31, 2009, 11:03:00 AM 2 balls, 2 wickets!!!
What a start! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 31, 2009, 11:03:38 AM Get innnnnnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: jizzemm on July 31, 2009, 11:06:13 AM Awsome
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 31, 2009, 12:51:00 PM wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on July 31, 2009, 12:52:13 PM ship the session to england
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 31, 2009, 12:53:13 PM wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwooooooooooooooohooooooooooooo
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on July 31, 2009, 01:14:24 PM Jimmy Anderson is a great bowler when it swings.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on July 31, 2009, 02:11:53 PM England are a good team when it swings AlsoTitle: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on July 31, 2009, 02:28:31 PM I'm backing Australia when the final wicket drops, hopefully at around 6.
If they get the first wicket quick, I can see the rest tumbling. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 31, 2009, 03:02:47 PM I'm backing Australia when the final wicket drops, hopefully at around 6. If they get the first wicket quick, I can see the rest tumbling. ^^^ ban please! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on July 31, 2009, 03:03:29 PM Will it swing for the Aussies? If not we're in business. If it does, tight match
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on July 31, 2009, 03:15:02 PM I'm backing Australia when the final wicket drops, hopefully at around 6. If they get the first wicket quick, I can see the rest tumbling. ^^^ ban please! No room for sentiment here cobber. Will green up at 3 if the chance arises. Pass the sugar! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 31, 2009, 03:54:13 PM I'm backing Australia when the final wicket drops, hopefully at around 6. If they get the first wicket quick, I can see the rest tumbling. ^^^ ban please! No room for sentiment here cobber. Will green up at 3 if the chance arises. Pass the sugar! [ ] Good Luck Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ACE2M on July 31, 2009, 06:52:39 PM probably been mentioned here before but i hope shane warne stays commentating for sky, he's quality.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on July 31, 2009, 06:58:56 PM probably been mentioned here before but i hope shane warne stays commentating for sky, he's quality. Good wind up material for Botham etc as well Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on July 31, 2009, 10:39:30 PM Surprised also how well Matthew Hayden comes across both on TMS and on Channel 5 earlier
Never liked his whole persona as a player but seems yet another good bloke, inisghtful too Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on July 31, 2009, 10:46:11 PM Looking forward to my first cricket match tmoro,sure expecting to see any cricket SIGHHHHHH
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on August 01, 2009, 09:48:41 AM Surprised also how well Matthew Hayden comes across both on TMS and on Channel 5 earlier Never liked his whole persona as a player but seems yet another good bloke, inisghtful too +1 Hayden has been excellent on TMS. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 01, 2009, 11:02:05 AM Very much so. Completely different to how I thought he would be when you watch him as a player.
His argument with Boycott was superb. It'll be on a podcast somewhere. Old skool meets new skool and ended up with Boycott storming out of the box Meanwhile, Rain. Brum will be underwater soon! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 01, 2009, 11:17:39 AM Very much so. Completely different to how I thought he would be when you watch him as a player. His argument with Boycott was superb. It'll be on a podcast somewhere. Old skool meets new skool and ended up with Boycott storming out of the box Meanwhile, Rain. Brum will be underwater soon! If anyone finds a link please post it as I didn't hear it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Nakor on August 01, 2009, 11:26:41 AM Very much so. Completely different to how I thought he would be when you watch him as a player. His argument with Boycott was superb. It'll be on a podcast somewhere. Old skool meets new skool and ended up with Boycott storming out of the box Meanwhile, Rain. Brum will be underwater soon! If anyone finds a link please post it as I didn't hear it. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00lw62g/Test_Match_Special_30_07_2009/ Starts hotting up at about 1h 15 mins Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 01, 2009, 11:26:43 AM http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00lw62g/Test_Match_Special_30_07_2009/
a minute in onwards Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 01, 2009, 11:47:16 AM Has the link changed? 6 mins into an 8 hour recording and nothing yet.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 01, 2009, 11:49:46 AM same here I listened to both days as well..........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 01, 2009, 12:43:29 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00lw62g/Test_Match_Special_30_07_2009/ a minute in onwards 1hr 5 mins in Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 01, 2009, 12:44:33 PM http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00lw62g/Test_Match_Special_30_07_2009/ a minute in onwards 1hr 5 mins in SORRY! 1:05 in is not minutes oops Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on August 01, 2009, 12:46:11 PM has ther been any play 2day yet?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 01, 2009, 12:47:53 PM has ther been any play 2day yet? nah. lunch at 12.50. pitch inspection at 1.30 but unlikely they'll be playing until late if at all Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 01, 2009, 03:05:49 PM play called off for the day
I say scrap the test and arrange a 1 dayer for monday instead like they used to do in the good old days Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 01, 2009, 03:35:57 PM play called off for the day I say scrap the test and arrange a 1 dayer for monday instead like they used to do in the good old days Meh i am going tomorrow and would still rather see a days test match than impromptu one dayer, ofc it is never going to happen no matter how likely a draw is. Weather forecast is good for tomorrow as well. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 01, 2009, 06:13:54 PM Great result,i'm going to day 3 of the next test at edgbaston really looking forward to it,one time Sir Fred and KP be passed fit please did you have fun? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 01, 2009, 06:19:25 PM i just cant believe england
they get 1 nil up in the series but makes sure it rains so they cant give away the advantage atleast the windies just made it impossible to take 20 wickets on there flat pitches Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 02, 2009, 11:19:35 AM Great result,i'm going to day 3 of the next test at edgbaston really looking forward to it,one time Sir Fred and KP be passed fit please did you have fun? Yeah thanks day on the lash with me dad,could be worse Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 02, 2009, 02:56:10 PM Rubdown fail
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 03:15:03 PM i just cant believe england they get 1 nil up in the series but makes sure it rains so they cant give away the advantage atleast the windies just made it impossible to take 20 wickets on there flat pitches gotta lol at this if it wasn't for the rain we'd 100% be 2 up with 2 to play by tomorrow. properly screwed by the weather Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ACE2M on August 02, 2009, 05:26:00 PM anybody at the game who can get 2 tickets for tomorroW?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 02, 2009, 05:42:16 PM i just cant believe england they get 1 nil up in the series but makes sure it rains so they cant give away the advantage atleast the windies just made it impossible to take 20 wickets on there flat pitches gotta lol at this if it wasn't for the rain we'd 100% be 2 up with 2 to play by tomorrow. properly screwed by the weather nah aussies had it covered Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 06:13:24 PM anybody at the game who can get 2 tickets for tomorroW? according to sky commentary you can buy online @ edgbaston.com and print your own tickets. I can't see where though Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 06:15:41 PM found it
https://www.eticketing.co.uk/edgbaston/default.aspx Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 06:41:14 PM what an amazing position we're in now. 1 up in the ashes and playing a game that we can win but can't lose, love it
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 02, 2009, 06:46:13 PM what an amazing position we're in now. 1 up in the ashes and playing a game that we can win but can't lose, love it you sure you cant lose? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ACE2M on August 02, 2009, 06:50:44 PM found it https://www.eticketing.co.uk/edgbaston/default.aspx cheers, already found that and i've been in the queue for 2 hours. They are selling them at the ground and got someone trying to pick me some up on the way out. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 06:51:45 PM what an amazing position we're in now. 1 up in the ashes and playing a game that we can win but can't lose, love it you sure you cant lose? do you even know what sport this is? how do you envisage the aussies setting a defendable target? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 02, 2009, 06:53:19 PM batting collapse from england seen them all out for 49 before
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 02, 2009, 06:53:23 PM only possible way is Aussies all out with a 100 lead, so 220-250. England all out for less.
Not impossible, but a huge long shot Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 06:56:41 PM batting collapse from england seen them all out for 49 before big difference between a team likely to collapse and the 11 out there now Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on August 02, 2009, 07:21:56 PM i just cant believe england they get 1 nil up in the series but makes sure it rains so they cant give away the advantage atleast the windies just made it impossible to take 20 wickets on there flat pitches gotta lol at this if it wasn't for the rain we'd 100% be 2 up with 2 to play by tomorrow. properly screwed by the weather Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 02, 2009, 07:32:19 PM batting collapse from england seen them all out for 49 before big difference between a team likely to collapse and the 11 out there now yeah the team likely to collapse have more backbone Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 02, 2009, 09:21:49 PM wiiiiiiiiiiii, went today fantastic day out.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 02, 2009, 10:19:29 PM wiiiiiiiiiiii, went today fantastic day out. +1. Had a fking great day today, nothing quite like giving the Aussies a bit of stick. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 02, 2009, 10:21:53 PM great choice of days from you 2. that was proper test cricket
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 02, 2009, 11:50:49 PM Great day to have there
Didn't like the booing of Ponting personally (though you could boo Mitchell Johnson all day for all I care, a real panto villain!), but expect everyone was a bit carried away in the moment. Certainly the players had plenty of aggro in the middle which was spicy. Great over from Swann that got Ponting Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 02, 2009, 11:56:15 PM Sure wasn't jealous and wishing we had went today
Wish we could have got one more wicket today but we still have a decent chance to win if play a full day gogogogogogo Anderson & Co. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 03, 2009, 12:01:54 AM Ponting got some boos on Thursday when he came out to bat as well.
He also got a standing ovation led by the Barmy Army when he hit his 20,000th first class run. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 03, 2009, 12:08:29 AM Great day to have there Didn't like the booing of Ponting personally (though you could boo Mitchell Johnson all day for all I care, a real panto villain!), but expect everyone was a bit carried away in the moment. Certainly the players had plenty of aggro in the middle which was spicy. Great over from Swann that got Ponting I think the booing is meant to be banter and tbf where we were there was applause in reaction to the booing from England supporters. Mitchell johnson was getting standing ovations from the barmy army whenever he went to field over there and chants of "there's only 1 Mitchell Johnson", thought it was pretty funny personally. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 03, 2009, 12:15:56 AM The booing of Ponting was a bit unseemly, but the Eric Hollies stand does get very rowdy in the afternoon and it does all get a bit pantomime.
Brilliant day's cricket - not one single Mexican wave all day. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: jizzemm on August 03, 2009, 12:55:27 AM wiiiiiiiiiiii, went today fantastic day out. +1. Had a fking great day today, nothing quite like giving the Aussies a bit of stick. + 2 What a fantastic day today.. That is all.. bed time Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 04, 2009, 04:52:08 PM No comment about England having to play a Scotsman? Have you got no home bred cricketers? ;whistle;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 04, 2009, 04:57:41 PM No comment about England having to play a Scotsman? Have you got no home bred cricketers? ;whistle; He only Scottish when he's out, he's English until then IMO............ Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 04, 2009, 05:02:22 PM No comment about England having to play a Scotsman? Have you got no home bred cricketers? ;whistle; He only Scottish when he's out, he's English until then IMO............ He's not just Scottish, he's a teuchter - went to the Gaelic School in Glasgow. Best of it is he was dropped by the Scotland team last month. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 04, 2009, 05:05:20 PM No comment about England having to play a Scotsman? Have you got no home bred cricketers? ;whistle; who's scottish? not that we care, we played 3 south africans in the first test, foreigners ftw imo nationalities have always been very fluid in cricket Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 04, 2009, 05:07:30 PM Mike Denness, Dougie Brown, Gavin Hamilton all Scots who played for England at some point
Many Welshmen too, recently a few Irish loads of naturalised Saffers, Aussies too based on residency laws etc Menawhile Flintoff must be very touch and go for this one. He was on one leg fielding that last day. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 04, 2009, 05:20:34 PM ok, I'm seriously confused now. who are you talking about? trott's been called up so he'll be the 4th SA player of the series if he plays and sidebottom but he's def english. who the hell is scottish?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 04, 2009, 05:29:25 PM ok, I'm seriously confused now. who are you talking about? trott's been called up so he'll be the 4th SA player of the series if he plays and sidebottom but he's def english. who the hell is scottish? I didn't have a clue who he was talking about either, I just say a spotted an opportunist piss take v Scotland without knowing what he talking about LOL. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 04, 2009, 05:31:33 PM ok, I'm seriously confused now. who are you talking about? trott's been called up so he'll be the 4th SA player of the series if he plays and sidebottom but he's def english. who the hell is scottish? I didn't have a clue who he was talking about either, I just say a spotted an opportunist piss take v Scotland without knowing what he talking about LOL. lol. anyone got a clue? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 04, 2009, 05:32:44 PM twitter with bumble lol
@ tighty big prob for me is that grounds insist on taking all grass off pitch..i.e. slow pitch...leave grass on and harmy is a must...we don't get it @BumbleCricket. Is that because the home clubs want revenue from five days? Or instructed by the England coach/captain? @tighty club holds sway Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 04, 2009, 05:34:09 PM ok, I'm seriously confused now. who are you talking about? trott's been called up so he'll be the 4th SA player of the series if he plays and sidebottom but he's def english. who the hell is scottish? I didn't have a clue who he was talking about either, I just say a spotted an opportunist piss take v Scotland without knowing what he talking about LOL. lol. anyone got a clue? nope. can't see a Scot in the 14 names. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: DUNK619 on August 04, 2009, 05:34:28 PM twitter with bumble lol ask bumble who the scottish guy rod is talkin about is@ tighty big prob for me is that grounds insist on taking all grass off pitch..i.e. slow pitch...leave grass on and harmy is a must...we don't get it @BumbleCricket. Is that because the home clubs want revenue from five days? Or instructed by the England coach/captain? @tighty club holds sway Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 04, 2009, 05:36:04 PM ok, I'm seriously confused now. who are you talking about? trott's been called up so he'll be the 4th SA player of the series if he plays and sidebottom but he's def english. who the hell is scottish? I didn't have a clue who he was talking about either, I just say a spotted an opportunist piss take v Scotland without knowing what he talking about LOL. lol. anyone got a clue? I think Rod misheard 'Trott included in England cricket team' on the radio. :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 04, 2009, 05:36:41 PM Is the scottish person, back up wicketkeeper Neil Sullivan?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 04, 2009, 05:38:45 PM Is the scottish person, back up wicketkeeper Neil Sullivan? the doncaster goalkeeper? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 04, 2009, 05:39:24 PM Is the scottish person, back up wicketkeeper Neil Sullivan? the doncaster goalkeeper? Yeah you can't get anyone more Scottish, have you heard him speak? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 04, 2009, 05:40:34 PM nope. can't see a Scot in the 14 names. lol. another one replying to rod without knowing who he was on about you're my new hero rich for talking to bumble Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 04, 2009, 05:42:32 PM nope. can't see a Scot in the 14 names. lol. another one replying to rod without knowing who he was on about you're my new hero rich for talking to bumble I assumed Rod meant Trott. When prompted by you I wiki'ed Trott, I realise Rod must have meant someone else. Perhaps Gordon Strachan is the new physio or summat. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 04, 2009, 05:43:54 PM nope. can't see a Scot in the 14 names. lol. another one replying to rod without knowing who he was on about you're my new hero rich for talking to bumble I assumed Rod meant Trott. When prompted by you I wiki'ed Trott, I realise Rod must have meant someone else. Perhaps Gordon Strachan is the new physio or summat. McHarmison? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 05, 2009, 08:54:49 AM Calum MacLeod from Stepps (just outside Glasgow), played as the emergency fielder.
Funny enough when you search Google News for any stories about it only the Scots papers have mentioned it ;D Even better he was dropped by Scotland a couple of weeks before. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 05, 2009, 09:29:10 AM Calum MacLeod from Stepps (just outside Glasgow), played as the emergency fielder. Funny enough when you search Google News for any stories about it only the Scots papers have mentioned it ;D Even better he was dropped by Scotland a couple of weeks before. My favourite person from Stepps was Lisa. (http://www.pop-music.com/steps/steps.jpg) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 05, 2009, 09:36:30 AM Calum MacLeod from Stepps (just outside Glasgow), played as the emergency fielder. Funny enough when you search Google News for any stories about it only the Scots papers have mentioned it ;D Even better he was dropped by Scotland a couple of weeks before. So, completely irrelevant then? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 05, 2009, 09:39:51 AM Calum MacLeod from Stepps (just outside Glasgow), played as the emergency fielder. Funny enough when you search Google News for any stories about it only the Scots papers have mentioned it ;D Even better he was dropped by Scotland a couple of weeks before. My favourite person from Stepps was Lisa. (http://www.pop-music.com/steps/steps.jpg) I work with a girl who is the spitting image of Lisa, she's a beauty...... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 05, 2009, 10:51:59 AM sigh, it's like being a ballboy at tennis. they get the local youngsters to do it, he won't be involved again as we move grounds.
if he ever turns into a decent cricketer then he's welcome to come and play for us but he needs to work on his bowling action first. even worse than malinga's Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 05, 2009, 10:55:16 AM Calum MacLeod from Stepps (just outside Glasgow), played as the emergency fielder. Funny enough when you search Google News for any stories about it only the Scots papers have mentioned it ;D Even better he was dropped by Scotland a couple of weeks before. So, completely irrelevant then? What kind of game can have people who play as irrelevant? Like saying a sub at football doesn't get a cap for coming on. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 05, 2009, 10:57:48 AM A substitute fielder does not get a cap at cricket.
ergo, posturing that there was a Scottish influence on the English cricket team is irrelevant Still, I got to check Trott's wiki bio. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 05, 2009, 11:08:17 AM What kind of game can have people who play as irrelevant? Like saying a sub at football doesn't get a cap for coming on. in test matches sub fielders on the travelling team are drawn from the squad sub fielders on the home team however are not squad players, they used to be but that stopped some time ago. they are now kids from whichever ground the match is being played at given a bit of experience of being around the test team. you could have 3 or 4 of them on at once on a 5th day if the result isn't in doubt and you're resting a few niggling injuries. they are completely irrelevant, can't bowl, don't think they can keep wicket and their name isn't recorded if they're involved in taking a wicket Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 05, 2009, 02:42:53 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 05, 2009, 03:19:40 PM What kind of game can have people who play as irrelevant? Like saying a sub at football doesn't get a cap for coming on. in test matches sub fielders on the travelling team are drawn from the squad sub fielders on the home team however are not squad players, they used to be but that stopped some time ago. they are now kids from whichever ground the match is being played at given a bit of experience of being around the test team. you could have 3 or 4 of them on at once on a 5th day if the result isn't in doubt and you're resting a few niggling injuries. they are completely irrelevant, can't bowl, don't think they can keep wicket and their name isn't recorded if they're involved in taking a wicket So if he'd caught someone out would he have got a cap? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 05, 2009, 03:20:00 PM No.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rod Paradise on August 05, 2009, 03:25:33 PM That's just weird. What other sport has people playing but not officially playing?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 05, 2009, 03:26:52 PM That's just weird. What other sport has people playing but not officially playing? Scottish lower leagues often have "A Triallist" scoring in league games. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 05, 2009, 03:30:21 PM That's just weird. What other sport has people playing but not officially playing? Scottish lower leagues often have "A Triallist" scoring in league games. Jeff Stelling on Soccer Saturday often questions why this guy never gets a transfer to an SPL club as he tends to score a lot of goals. :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 05, 2009, 06:36:34 PM So if he'd caught someone out would he have got a cap? it would be listed on the scorecard as- c sub if there was more than 1 sub on the field at the time you wouldn't even know which one it was Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 06, 2009, 10:01:25 PM June, whats happened today?
I had £500 on Austrailia last night on Betfair @ 2.82, and now they are 2.6 Gona lay off for a £100 freeroll, wiiiii. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 06, 2009, 10:01:43 PM They call me the Blatchly of Cricket, yo!!! ^^^
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 06, 2009, 10:08:26 PM June, whats happened today? I had £500 on Austrailia last night on Betfair @ 2.82, and now they are 2.6 Gona lay off for a £100 freeroll, wiiiii. Presume it is injury news, Freddie struggled in the nets today. Whereas the Aussies could well have Haddin and Lee fit for the game. Possibly the forecast has improved as well? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 06, 2009, 10:09:29 PM probs realised that the scottish bloke won't play the whole game
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 06, 2009, 10:11:23 PM I live in Headingley, sure am going to the games tho.
Went down to the bars/pubs area earlier to go to Laddies and there were thousands of Aussies there, pretty comedy. Think the forecast now is ok for next 3 days but bad on Mon & Tues. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 06, 2009, 11:41:57 PM Rest Fred and draw please
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 06, 2009, 11:51:26 PM June, whats happened today? I had £500 on Austrailia last night on Betfair @ 2.82, and now they are 2.6 Gona lay off for a £100 freeroll, wiiiii. Just diagf for betting against your motherland imo......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 07, 2009, 09:31:48 AM Norrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr - Freddie's out.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 09:32:39 AM Aussie fans setting the fire alarms off last night too, naughty naughty...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 07, 2009, 09:47:59 AM Norrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr - Freddie's out. FFS, at least we seem to have a couple of guys on form to potentially still do a good job. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 10:34:42 AM Prior out?!
Collingwood behind stumps until a replacement arrives?! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 10:37:01 AM False alarm...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ripple11 on August 07, 2009, 10:39:53 AM Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ripple11 on August 07, 2009, 10:42:08 AM Hmmm...would have thought Trott would have played with Priors back a worry.............lucky we won the toss! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 07, 2009, 11:02:46 AM you do have to wonder about the warm ups that cricketers do before a test.
in 2005 mcgrath injured himself on the morning of the 2nd test playing rugby and today we nearly lose prior from playing football. if he was out and punter refused to allow us a replacement as he's perfectly entitled to do we'd be in huge trouble v.v. lucky man first ball strauss Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 07, 2009, 11:03:05 AM Good start from Billy Bowden - more of that please.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on August 07, 2009, 11:21:06 AM what a catch that was.
Looking at that middle order this spells trouble for england, can bopara finally step up and make a gd knock Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 07, 2009, 11:29:14 AM can bopara finally step up and make a gd knock no we know he's poor at 3, really should've had him at 4 and moved bell up Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Tuffster on August 07, 2009, 11:29:38 AM what a catch that was. Looking at that middle order this spells trouble for england, can bopara finally step up and make a gd knock Bokked! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on August 07, 2009, 11:31:51 AM can bopara finally step up and make a gd knock no we know he's poor at 3, really should've had him at 4 and moved bell up Totally agree with that, bopara confidence is really low, this is the reason i think puttin him in at number three is just asking for trouble Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on August 07, 2009, 11:45:10 AM Putting him in at all is worng at the moment. Just doesn't have it against reasonable quality bowling and in my humble, never will unless he makes a big change to his attitude
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 07, 2009, 11:46:01 AM Bopara does not have a tight enough technique to play 3 in tests, except on something very flat
He's a number six Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 07, 2009, 12:09:54 PM GG Ashes
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 07, 2009, 12:18:45 PM Think we need Dancing Silo back again.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 12:25:34 PM Harmy better be ready to fire...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Colchester Kev on August 07, 2009, 12:26:09 PM sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... big weight on Cooks shoulders now.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 07, 2009, 12:26:52 PM sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 07, 2009, 12:27:33 PM Worth ringing up on the hour every hour for the next 5 days reporting a bomb in the ground?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 07, 2009, 12:29:53 PM Cunning plan by England this - giving away the wickets waiting for England to hit 500 on Betfair then BOOM, betting coup.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 12:44:58 PM sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... big weight on Cooks shoulders now. GG Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 07, 2009, 12:45:31 PM sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... big weight on Cooks shoulders now. Oy pack it in bokker......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: GreekStein on August 07, 2009, 12:57:09 PM We had a good run.
gg Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 07, 2009, 01:22:14 PM wiii
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: outragous76 on August 07, 2009, 02:03:28 PM ZOMG this is embarrasing!
Such poor poor batting on this wicket! could be over by sunday at this rate! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: NoflopsHomer on August 07, 2009, 02:10:08 PM My tickets for Tuesday sure will be needed.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 07, 2009, 02:10:44 PM sigh, 98/8
We should just declare and get cracking at the Aussie openers Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Bongo on August 07, 2009, 02:22:15 PM The top scorer is the man injured in the warm up! ;frustrated;
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 07, 2009, 02:41:38 PM weeee
9 more please Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 07, 2009, 02:43:01 PM Harmy better be ready to fire... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 07, 2009, 02:47:02 PM Because I'm
One time please :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 07, 2009, 04:45:17 PM Not been able to watch for the last few hours, WTF happened? >:(
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 07, 2009, 04:51:47 PM Has Swann been shagging Mrs Strauss or something ?
Sandy Edit :- Bok Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on August 07, 2009, 05:21:30 PM The umpires have been really bad this whole series, Aleem Dar is an exceptional umpire and so is Billy usually but in this series there've been some real shockers and they all seem to go one way. Australia can't get an lbw unless it's hitting the middle of middle (they've had at least 4 turned down when it was hitting the middle of middle), then they lose Ponting and Hussey to balls that were barely shaving leg stump (according to hawkeye).
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 07, 2009, 05:23:24 PM The umpires have been really bad this whole series, Aleem Dar is an exceptional umpire and so is Billy usually but in this series there've been some real shockers and they all seem to go one way. Australia can't get an lbw unless it's hitting the middle of middle (they've had at least 4 turned down when it was hitting the middle of middle), then they lose Ponting and Hussey to balls that were barely shaving leg stump (according to hawkeye). I agree that they have been some poor decisions in the past, but criticising umpires just after making 2 correct decision is pretty bizarre. They both looked out when i first saw them and they were. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on August 07, 2009, 05:31:58 PM The umpires have been really bad this whole series, Aleem Dar is an exceptional umpire and so is Billy usually but in this series there've been some real shockers and they all seem to go one way. Australia can't get an lbw unless it's hitting the middle of middle (they've had at least 4 turned down when it was hitting the middle of middle), then they lose Ponting and Hussey to balls that were barely shaving leg stump (according to hawkeye). I agree that they have been some poor decisions in the past, but criticising umpires just after making 2 correct decision is pretty bizarre. They both looked out when i first saw them and they were. I'm not criticising either of those decisions, they highlight the inconsistency though. They were marginal and the correct decision was made. KP, Strauss, Cook and Bell have been plumb in front several times this series not given. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 07, 2009, 05:34:13 PM I think Swan has had 2 or 3 LBW's turned down that were out.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 07, 2009, 05:39:33 PM The umpires have been really bad this whole series, Aleem Dar is an exceptional umpire and so is Billy usually but in this series there've been some real shockers and they all seem to go one way. Australia can't get an lbw unless it's hitting the middle of middle (they've had at least 4 turned down when it was hitting the middle of middle), then they lose Ponting and Hussey to balls that were barely shaving leg stump (according to hawkeye). I agree that they have been some poor decisions in the past, but criticising umpires just after making 2 correct decision is pretty bizarre. They both looked out when i first saw them and they were. I'm not criticising either of those decisions, they highlight the inconsistency though. They were marginal and the correct decision was made. KP, Strauss, Cook and Bell have been plumb in front several times this series not given. What goes round comes around, its ok picking out a mistake or two in a particular game, these things even themselves out in the long run. Always has done, always will do. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 07, 2009, 05:43:13 PM 2 very clear lbws weren't given in the aussies' 1st innings last test. think it was watson and clarke who got away with it
in general the umpires haven't been giving the decisions either way, certainly not been one sided Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 07, 2009, 06:44:40 PM siddle is comedy. in his 2 minute post match interview he said 'yeah' 29 times and that was only from when I started counting. even when the answer to a question was 'no' he said 'yeah, no'
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: ItsMrAlex2u on August 07, 2009, 08:22:14 PM Was going to day 4
FML Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 07, 2009, 09:54:01 PM Was going to day 4 FML Better than watching 2 hours of day 3 and paying full whack to be humiliated no ? Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 05:47:39 PM ffs this just aint cricket
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 05:51:19 PM Bopara just got a complete shocker from Asif Rauf
He hit it, outside the line...obv LBW then This'll be over tomorrow, sadly Don't worry. I'll get the lads round to distract Ironside til he forgets about the cricket! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 05:59:57 PM farce what sort of batting display is this
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:06:28 PM batting collapse from england seen them all out for 49 before big difference between a team likely to collapse and the 11 out there now wow the 11 this week look alot like the 11 last week bet the aussies are kicking themselves for not declaring now Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 08, 2009, 06:10:22 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:12:54 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. why? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 06:13:07 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. Just Ironside. Hopefully he'll self ban because it has got very tiresome. People who troll aren't too funny after a while I vote Ramprakash to replace Bopara for the Oval. It will be Trott. Somehow we have to get some steel into the batting. Without Pietersen and Flintoff the middle order is powder puff and the tail too long Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:16:39 PM actually i aint trolling
i am a big cricket fan although i do love tms as it helps me sleep my posts on this thread are just because of the easy easy expentations of posters after 1.5 good matches Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 08, 2009, 06:18:44 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. why? Like Tighty said, every post just seems like an uneducated rubdown. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 06:19:09 PM actually i aint trolling i am a big cricket fan although i do love tms as it helps me sleep my posts on this thread are just because of the easy easy expentations of posters after 1.5 good matches fair enough expentation? I don't know what this word is meant to be. Expectation? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:23:28 PM actually i aint trolling i am a big cricket fan although i do love tms as it helps me sleep my posts on this thread are just because of the easy easy expentations of posters after 1.5 good matches fair enough expentation? I don't know what this word is meant to be. Expectation? sorry trying to post and 4 table hi/lo Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:27:23 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. why? Like Tighty said, every post just seems like an uneducated rubdown. think you will find that today is the first rubdown i have given as for uneducated i think my knowledge on the game compares favourably against most poster on this thread Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 06:36:06 PM as for uneducated i think my knowledge on the game compares favourably against most poster on this thread what would you do with the English team before the last test...team changes? batting order changes? All piss taking aside, without Pietersen and maybe Flintoff, how do we win back the Ashes? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 08, 2009, 06:38:42 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. why? Like Tighty said, every post just seems like an uneducated rubdown. think you will find that today is the first rubdown i have given as for uneducated i think my knowledge on the game compares favourably against most poster on this thread I take you comments about Ponting declaring in the last test were a joke then? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 08, 2009, 06:43:53 PM 82/5 at stumps day 2?
Wow, that's bad. Was 52/1 last time I checked. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 06:52:05 PM Can we ban Scots from posting on this thread. why? Like Tighty said, every post just seems like an uneducated rubdown. think you will find that today is the first rubdown i have given as for uneducated i think my knowledge on the game compares favourably against most poster on this thread I take you comments about Ponting declaring in the last test were a joke then? wow your quick today Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 08, 2009, 07:00:32 PM I vote Ramprakash to replace Bopara for the Oval. It will be Trott. Somehow we have to get some steel into the batting. Without Pietersen and Flintoff the middle order is powder puff and the tail too long I actually think this is about the only circumstances I would agree with bringing back Ramprakash as a pure 1 off option, our batting is all fine and dandy when batting is easy, or the match situation requires attacking shotmaking. I am thinking they will wheel Freddie out if he is anywhere near capable of bowling for the final test. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 07:00:47 PM tighty there isnt much england can do when there team is built around a couple of world class players and a few journey men
if the world class players are missing then the journymen are going to struggle the media have a habbit of building up the journymen after one good innings/match england will struggle when freddie gives up Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 08, 2009, 07:06:05 PM if I'm on the board of selectors I proper shake things up and throw in mascheranas for a debut in place of broad and throw in ramps instead of bopara
abs no point putting the same 11 out again Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 07:11:46 PM I think I finally ditch Bell too. Just not quite good enough
Colly is in his last year...gone a long way on limited talent. When Freddie goes might as well do a thorough rebuild Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 08, 2009, 07:53:46 PM My team for the fifth test would be:
Strauss Cook Ramps Trott Collingwood Prior/Foster (dependent on Prior's injury) Blackwell Broad/Swann (decision based on pitch) Anderson Harmison Onions Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 08:49:47 PM My team for the fifth test would be: Strauss Cook Ramps Trott Collingwood Prior/Foster (dependent on Prior's injury) Blackwell Broad/Swann (decision based on pitch) Anderson Harmison Onions u ruling out flintoff already? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 08:51:35 PM Blackwell? Not a hope
Swann is an automatic choice. Second spinner if played maybe roll the dice on Rashid rather than Monty. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 08, 2009, 09:02:00 PM Flintoff - would play but when I chose my team it was based on the assumption that he wouldn't play.
Blackwell is arguably the most in-form man in the CC this year. His move to Durham has rejuvenated him plus he's a lefty. In other sports, we pick the players based on form, why not cricket? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 08, 2009, 09:07:07 PM Flintoff - would play but when I chose my team it was based on the assumption that he wouldn't play. Blackwell is arguably the most in-form man in the CC this year. His move to Durham has rejuvenated him plus he's a lefty. In other sports, we pick the players based on form, why not cricket? Blackwell blotted his copybook on the tour he was selected on, unfit, not popular with the management for being a party animal Similarly Key had a ruck with the management at World 20-20 time. Probalby our most secure number 3, technically solid....unlikely to get a look in again Much the same as someone falling out with Capello, or Martin Johnson...if your face doesn't fit or you blot your copybook its pretty hard to get back. Unless you are Steve Harmison. Who gets seventeen chances to be forgiven for whatever the management got pissed off with him for last time, and the time before that...... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 08, 2009, 09:25:55 PM Unless you are Steve Harmison. Who gets seventeen chances to be forgiven for whatever the management got pissed off with him for last time, and the time before that...... harmison on form is the best bowler england has by a mile problem is he is out of form more often than inform Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on August 08, 2009, 09:58:13 PM Flintoff - would play but when I chose my team it was based on the assumption that he wouldn't play. Blackwell is arguably the most in-form man in the CC this year. His move to Durham has rejuvenated him plus he's a lefty. In other sports, we pick the players based on form, why not cricket? Blackwell blotted his copybook on the tour he was selected on, unfit, not popular with the management for being a party animal Similarly Key had a ruck with the management at World 20-20 time. Probalby our most secure number 3, technically solid....unlikely to get a look in again Much the same as someone falling out with Capello, or Martin Johnson...if your face doesn't fit or you blot your copybook its pretty hard to get back. Unless you are Steve Harmison. Who gets seventeen chances to be forgiven for whatever the management got pissed off with him for last time, and the time before that...... Real travesty that Key doesn't get in this team Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Singheee on August 08, 2009, 10:31:09 PM My team for the fifth test would be: Strauss Cook Ramps Trott Collingwood Prior/Foster (dependent on Prior's injury) Blackwell Broad/Swann (decision based on pitch) Anderson Harmison Onions I would like to see davies the worcestershire wicket keeper play, i think hes a real classy player Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on August 08, 2009, 11:05:05 PM Flintoff - would play but when I chose my team it was based on the assumption that he wouldn't play. Blackwell is arguably the most in-form man in the CC this year. His move to Durham has rejuvenated him plus he's a lefty. In other sports, we pick the players based on form, why not cricket? Lol @ Blackwell, and Maschrenus for that matter. The media always say we must pick players in form, so how do you judge a player is form? Because he has plundered a few runs in county cricket? I'm afraid you don't get too many 75 mph long hops in international cricket. It's been said time and time again by many respected players that county cricket simply doesn't prepare players for the teat arena, and it never will in it's current format. When you go from a four day game, to a one day game to a 20/20 game, where is the time for practise and preparation? Duncan Fletcher took a huge amount of criticism from the media because he wasn't 'media friendly', but the guy was a brilliant coach, and team manager if you like. When he selected Trescothick and Vaughan neither of them were 'in form' in county cricket, if i remember correctly Trescothick was batting at 7 for Somerset at the time, and Vaughan had hardly scored a run for Yorkshire. However Fletcher identified players that had the mentality to improve for the step up to test cricket. Rob Key is also certainly one of those players, until the last two or three weeks he had a poor season for Kent, but that's not important. Key showed a lot of promise in Australia in 2003, but i'm afraid he may have missed the boat , maybe his face doesn't fit now. David Sales is another that has somehow slipped through the net, a remarkable talent that has never played international cricket, partly due to injury, and also due to a lack of self fitness, someone somewhere should have addressed this though. I was a big fan of Andy Flower as a player, and i was sure he was the right man for the England coach's job, i still am sure he is the right man, but surely he must have had something to do with the length we bowled this morning? Was no one in the England camp actually watching the area's the Aussies bowled on the first day? You can bet your life that there will calls for mass change for The Oval in the media, but i would be very surprised if this happens, who should go? who should come in? I'm not sure right now. Ramprakash? Highly unlikely imo. We bounced back from an awful performance at Cardiff, i believe we can do it again. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 09, 2009, 01:02:39 AM I don't no a great deal about cricket Pelham boy that the difference is huge between int cricket and county cricket.People like bell and bopara are completely unreliable to get you out of the shit bell isn't good enough he was lucky to get his 50 but he definitly shouldn't play for eng imo.Surely the suggestion of a wicketkeeper wasn't to replace prior ? since he's been one of our best players
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 09, 2009, 03:53:54 PM Hooligans ::)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ud5o-8eOnk Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on August 10, 2009, 03:36:54 PM England without Pieterson and Flintoff are only better than W Indies and Bangladesh of the test playing nations IMO.
Key, Bopara, Bell, Ramprakash, Collingwood etc etc are all of the same average standard, so the selectors may as well go for a couple of players with form and confidence ahead of those under extreme pressure. If it was up to me the team would be: Trott Cook Strauss Ramprakash Collingwood Prior Flintoff Broad Swann Anderson Onions/Rashid (depending on pitch) If Flintoff is not fit then either Sidebottom or Plunkett to bat at 9 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 10, 2009, 04:11:19 PM England without Pieterson and Flintoff are only better than W Indies, New Zealand and Bangladesh of the test playing nations IMO. New Zealand could barely make 200 against our bowling attack in the last few series. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 10, 2009, 04:23:32 PM Why does everyone want Ramps in the side? He's like 40 years old and hasn't played any test cricket for 8 years. When he did, his test average was under 30
He might have over 100 first class centurys but he only has 2 in test matches. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 10, 2009, 04:26:01 PM Why does everyone want Ramps in the side? He's like 40 years old and hasn't played any test cricket for 8 years. When he did, his test average was under 30 He might have over 100 first class centurys but he only has 2 in test matches. Far better player now than he was a decade ago, has made 60 first class centuries since he was last dropped for England Test Ave of 42 vs Australia back then even so Best batsman in the country, well one of them. Pick a team for a one off cup final..I'd have him in over any of the alternatives Don't think they'll pick him though Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 10, 2009, 04:32:36 PM Say you do pick Ramps and he goes out in the first innings for under 20 (which would probably happen ~50% of the time) Would that not have a huge psychological impact on the rest of the innings, the secret weapon not working.
Ignoring the last test, England have had a pretty good series. If Freddie's fit for the showdown (fit enough to play anyway) then why make too many changes? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 10, 2009, 04:35:37 PM Bowling wise I wouldn't make too many changes
Maybe a second spinner, of course Flintoff if fit Batting wise numbers 3,4,5 are the big problem. Bopara has to go. Question is do you go the whole hog? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 10, 2009, 04:43:46 PM Ramprakash is good now, in county cricket, where there is absolutely no pressure on him.
The only time he has been under recent pressure (when he was on 99 first class hundreds) it totally got to him and he got stuck. I think there might be a bit of pressure on him were he to play against Australia... Chopping and changing batsmen rarely works as well as swapping bowlers. I'd keep Bopara and Bell in - give them the opportunity to respond to the situation. They're not terrible players (otherwise they wouldn't have got picked). It's not as if we've got Wally Hammond and Len Hutton on the sidelines - there's absolutely no reason to think Key, Shah, Ramps et al are appreciably better. If they were they'd already be in the team. It's our bowlers I worry about - on a good batting track without help from the conditions they are just not good enough. I'd be tempted to tell the groundsman to attack the pitch with a blowtorch and play two spinners. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 10, 2009, 04:45:09 PM I'd be tempted to tell the groundsman to attack the pitch with a blowtorch and play two spinners. agree totally. For gawd's sake prepare something that loads the dice in our favour Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 10, 2009, 05:35:31 PM Yeh seems like a bit of an over reaction to me. Vaughn Ramps and Key all been mentioned to ship out Bell Bopara and Colly. I'd probaly drop Bell. Let Key bat at 3 and let Ravi come in as late as possible.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 11, 2009, 01:45:49 AM Freddie gonna be fit by the sounds of it...........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on August 11, 2009, 07:21:36 AM Other than openers the Aussies tend to bring new batsman in the team at 6 and then let them work their way up. Bopara at 6 might be OK
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 11, 2009, 08:20:16 PM LOL that we crush them in 2 tests then they crush us in one and we now want to change whole middle order,only player i'm not keen on is bell,obv bopara had bad series but he's better than any of the replacements being mentioned imo and has had a few harsh decisions against him, show of faith may be the boost he needs
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on August 11, 2009, 10:51:21 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/8195859.stm
WTF. Just typical of Surrey, they should concentrate on getting their own house in order before telling the England selectors what to do. What about the speculation surrounding Bopara,Bell etc? I expect us to name a 13/14 man squad, so even if he's in the squad, there's no guarantee he will play. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on August 12, 2009, 01:20:20 AM I have cogitated, ruminated etc Lloyd Grossman style and overall I think we should stick with the same top 6, bring Flintoff back for Harmison and let the bulk of the guys who took us this far (1-1 with 4 played is better than the general trend of the last 20 years) & see if they can finish the job, no panic, no weakness of mind shown.
After this series is over think about who our 3 & 5 should be for the long run, the rest of the top 6 picks itself. Could even consider promoting Collingwood to 3 for a year or so and just look for a 5. Replacing Flintoff at 7 not directly necessary imo, horses for courses picks (batsman, sipinner or seamer) in his spot should do, as I think Onions, Anderson, Swann, Broad (with a little more development) represent a half decent attack with useful runs to contribute too. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 12, 2009, 02:12:58 AM LOL that we crush them in 2 tests then they crush us in one and we now want to change whole middle order,only player i'm not keen on is bell,obv bopara had bad series but he's better than any of the replacements being mentioned imo and has had a few harsh decisions against him, show of faith may be the boost he needs 2 2 in my book Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 15, 2009, 11:58:15 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/8201312.stm
Bad bad decision if true imo,bell should be dropped bopara moved to 5 or 6 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 15, 2009, 12:10:32 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/8201312.stm Bad bad decision if true imo,bell should be dropped bopara moved to 5 or 6 wouldn't be the worst move if it happened pure speculation though as they say in the article Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 19, 2009, 04:33:33 PM Here we go then
How do we score enough runs? and take 20 wickets? Pitch has been left open with the sun shining. It should turn, will we play Panesar? got to win the toss too Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 19, 2009, 04:34:34 PM Going to be a result either way I reckon.
glgl Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 19, 2009, 04:42:09 PM How do we score enough runs? make the batsmen bat for a change instead of being rescued by the tail and take 20 wickets? hope the aussies have bad day at office got to win the toss too 2 headed coin anyone and hope teh aussies choice tails Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 19, 2009, 04:57:30 PM If we lose the toss it's game over.
We have to win the toss and have scored 500 by tea on Friday. We are bowled out/declare an hour before the close and end the day with the Aussies on 32/3. Anything worse than that and we're out of it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Colchester Kev on August 19, 2009, 05:06:29 PM Caught the tail end of some news about betting irregularities on the ashes ...
Anyone know the story or has a link to it ? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 19, 2009, 05:09:46 PM Caught the tail end of some news about betting irregularities on the ashes ... Anyone know the story or has a link to it ? A shady character known in betting circles approached an Aussie player Aussie player reported it to the authorities who are now investigating the attempt Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Colchester Kev on August 19, 2009, 05:09:54 PM ahhhh found it ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8208736.stm Probably explains Hicks England career. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Matt50 on August 20, 2009, 11:31:32 AM Cook out already - uphill battle for England!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 20, 2009, 11:32:10 AM gg Cook.
From the Guardian OBO commentary. "Could you confirm whether Ian Bell will be undergoing a gender test this morning?" chortles Dan Smith, "They seem to be popular at the minute and I'd like to know in advance whether he has grown the necessary balls." Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 11:33:19 AM FFS Blameless pitch, won the toss. Need to bat for two days. Leave the flipping thing alone outside off-stump!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 11:38:49 AM Don't panic, our rock solid middle order will save us. I am not worried at all, sigh.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 20, 2009, 12:24:07 PM Am actually skiving from work today, fk it...........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 01:04:44 PM Will take that at Lunch. Strauss looking good, hopefully he can get a big score here. Bell looks extremely shaky and could get out at any stage.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: amcgrath1uk on August 20, 2009, 01:05:07 PM Will take that at Lunch. Strauss looking good, hopefully he can get a big score here. Bell looks extremely shaky and could get out at any stage. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 20, 2009, 01:07:20 PM FFS Blameless pitch, won the toss. Need to bat for two days. Leave the flipping thing alone outside off-stump! not sure he could leave that tbh. not edging it would be nice though great session, exactly what was called for. wp england Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 20, 2009, 01:08:22 PM At least Bell is scoring runs while not looking completely settled. Decent session England
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 20, 2009, 01:59:51 PM Will take that at Lunch. Strauss looking good, hopefully he can get a big score here. Bell looks extremely shaky and could get out at any stage. Longy, can you please shout out loud Utd & Chelsea will be the only teams contesting the league this year... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 02:18:56 PM Will take that at Lunch. Strauss looking good, hopefully he can get a big score here. Bell looks extremely shaky and could get out at any stage. Longy, can you please shout out loud Utd & Chelsea will be the only teams contesting the league this year... If you want me to say that, I will. It won't be too far from my opinion on the league this year. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 03:49:33 PM Collingwood. Sigh. No excuse for playing so loose, not his strength
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 03:50:35 PM Meh Aussies session. This really is a big final session reckon we can only lose 1 for it to be considered a goodish day for England, given our record so far this series of blowing good 1st innings in the final session, i am not overly optimistic.
Collingwood dismissal was very disappointing, you are not Viv Richards so stop trying to play like him. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 04:10:27 PM another disappointing dismissal. Needed to go on to the close, but a technique misjudgement
We are just not strong enough in the top six, without Pietersen Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 20, 2009, 04:32:56 PM Huuuuugggeee partnership now need a 100 between them here
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:25:08 PM Encouragingly its turning a bit and quite a few are going through the top. Not a five day pitch, hey presto they've finally prepared something that might give us a chance to get wickets if it deteriorates more, if we set a total
Every run in this first innings is vital, we have to then bowl with discipline Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 05:26:32 PM Encouragingly its turning a bit and quite a few are going through the top. Not a five day pitch, hey presto they've finally prepared something that might give us a chance to get wickets if it deteriorates more, if we set a total Every run in this first innings is vital, we have to then bowl with discipline What do you reckon we need Tighty as a par score, 400? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:28:48 PM Encouragingly its turning a bit and quite a few are going through the top. Not a five day pitch, hey presto they've finally prepared something that might give us a chance to get wickets if it deteriorates more, if we set a total Every run in this first innings is vital, we have to then bowl with discipline What do you reckon we need Tighty as a par score, 400? suppose so. Watch the ball on the surface, dust when it pitches is encouraging if we can set them a target we have to get a first innings lead, simple as that. They have to bat last If we score 350, they then get away and get 550, game over edit. Flintoff out, wicket given away. Usual theme Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 20, 2009, 05:28:54 PM We're dead.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:30:54 PM twitter news
philtufnell This wicket is going to crumble, even me aunty could spin on this Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 05:34:21 PM I have no idea why we seem so keen to score at 4,5 runs per over, if there was a situation and a position to grind out 500 in 2 days this was it. I am starting to come round to the idea that these players play far too much one day cricket and it has destroyed their ability to build a proper test match innings. Strauss is the only one to make a century this series and to be frankly honest the only one who hasn't seem to want to give his wicket away.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 20, 2009, 05:39:05 PM Yes - the big difference between the teams is that the Australians just don't give their wicket away.
Too many times our batsmen have got in, scored some runs, then spazzed out on some shot when a century was there to be taken. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:41:23 PM Totally agree
The Aussies play more one day cricket than us The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 20, 2009, 05:43:30 PM The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it So how would you make the county game "harder" to use a word? I agree that the difference between county level and Test level is far too big right now and this will only hurt the national side in years to come. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 05:48:23 PM The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it So how would you make the county game "harder" to use a word? I agree that the difference between county level and Test level is far too big right now and this will only hurt the national side in years to come. In an ideal world would we get something that equates to Sheffield shield (is it still called that??) cricket, where there are small number of teams with mainly homegrown players playing tough hard quality cricket. Of course this never going to happen because of the structure of the county game which is run and watched by people who are snobbish, self interested and not in touch with what is required. That has been the case for over a century and has to be part of the reason the Aussies have been dominant in the Ashes for eons. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:48:36 PM The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it So how would you make the county game "harder" to use a word? I agree that the difference between county level and Test level is far too big right now and this will only hurt the national side in years to come. Big question It will probably never happen, too many vested interests...but I am not sure our professional game should support 18 counties each with staffs of 20 plus Six regions, 15 players each. One 4 day comp, one 20-20 comp and that is it..that The Australian model, works well...with a well developed structure beneath it in the states/counties I think the comments of someone like Gillespie are quite telling, talking about county players finishing a 4 day in leeds at 6pm, starting a 1 day in Canturbury at 11am the next morning, then back to Bristol for a 4 day two days later.Slimline the whole thing IMO...as it is too many players coast through games And cancel central contracts. Players need to play, not sit doing nothing between tests. Someone like Pietersen has played once for Hampshire in a four day game over three years. That's unfair to the county game, the county and its supporters Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 20, 2009, 05:48:49 PM The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it At Taunton today, Murray Goodwin has scored 344 at nearly a run a ball - who says county cricket is easy to bat in? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:49:24 PM p.s Longy..snap!!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:50:15 PM The answer lies in concentration levels and our less than teak tough temperaments, both of which are underdeveloped in our soft county game where too many average players appear the business, but in fact are far from it At Taunton today, Murray Goodwin has scored 344 at nearly a run a ball - who says county cricket is easy to bat in? Ramprakash, for one. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 20, 2009, 05:54:20 PM great fielding
North is spinning this sideways. 350 might be adequate..got to get there though Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 20, 2009, 05:56:05 PM Sigh about the first person have felt sorry for today is Trott, was actually got out and played alright I thought. Worth a further look on todays evidence, i have to find something positive to say!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 20, 2009, 06:05:47 PM i think england have been guilty of giving there wickets away today, but i wouldnt rule them out the match, if the aussie can swing on this pitch then england SHOULD rip into the aussies
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 20, 2009, 06:07:19 PM Sigh about the first person have felt sorry for today is Trott, was actually got out and played alright I thought. Worth a further look on todays evidence, i have to find something positive to say! Yes, he looked good. Showing signs of good old-fashioned English determination like Strauss and Pietersen - we need to find more of these Englishmen from somewhere. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: WarBwastard on August 20, 2009, 06:09:23 PM Sigh about the first person have felt sorry for today is Trott, was actually got out and played alright I thought. Worth a further look on todays evidence, i have to find something positive to say! Yes, he looked good. Showing signs of good old-fashioned English determination like Strauss and Pietersen - we need to find more of these Englishmen from somewhere. Tee hee Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 20, 2009, 06:31:15 PM Sigh about the first person have felt sorry for today is Trott, was actually got out and played alright I thought. Worth a further look on todays evidence, i have to find something positive to say! Yes, he looked good. Showing signs of good old-fashioned English determination like Strauss and Pietersen - we need to find more of these Englishmen from somewhere. Tee hee I reckon half of white saffies would be able to play for us, lets start scouring the country now IMO.......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: 77dave on August 20, 2009, 07:02:20 PM Wow, Ironstein excluded you boys really are English.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 03:06:21 PM I have always rated Stuart Broad as a bowler.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on August 21, 2009, 03:15:38 PM Booooooooom, Broady!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:15:55 PM Fuuuuuuuuucccccckkkkkkkiiiiiinngggggggggg game on!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:17:29 PM Booooooooom, Broady! Hope u haven't bet on the convicts this time :( Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 03:25:23 PM I have always rated Stuart Broad as a bowler. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on August 21, 2009, 03:26:38 PM wooo hooooooooooooooooooooo!
Joseph Hachem will be livid... Pass the sugar... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 21, 2009, 03:27:13 PM *ponders risking the sack to go down the pub for the rest of the afternoon*
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: sweet potata! on August 21, 2009, 03:29:12 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 03:33:31 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like a near relative has died. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 03:36:57 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:39:18 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: sweet potata! on August 21, 2009, 03:42:04 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... Is it ok for me to stay here as I'm irish? Let it be said i support England and want them to pump the Aussies if that will sway it in my favour.:) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 03:43:34 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... There is another side in the ashes you know ..... Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:44:18 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... Is it ok for me to stay here as I'm irish? Let it be said i support England and want them to pump the Aussies if that will sway it in my favour.:) Only if your a Protestant........... Joke obv Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 03:45:05 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... There is another side in the ashes you know ..... Sandy How many Aussies have posted on this thread? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:45:42 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... There is another side in the ashes you know ..... Sandy Not on this thread there ain't :P Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 03:47:33 PM No idea but the notion of being an ashes thread kind of suggests it's about the ashes and not the English.
Besides it was an Englishman that brought up regarding typical fans was it not ? Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:53:41 PM 5 down wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, looks like he was unlucky though.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on August 21, 2009, 03:53:46 PM LOL, what an awful decision. Can almost hear Bob Willis chuntering about the standard of umpiring from here.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 03:56:06 PM Terrible decision, [ ] I care.
5 wickets so far for Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:57:11 PM Terrible decision, [ ] I care. 5 wickets so far for LOL mofoing this........ Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 03:57:33 PM bopara is currently 199 not out
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 03:58:05 PM bopara is currently 199 not out meh who cares now.... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 04:00:03 PM shall we enforce the follow on?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 04:01:20 PM shall we enforce the follow on? Lets get there 1st, but interesting decision on this wicket. Oh and Swannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 21, 2009, 04:02:15 PM Terrible decision, [ ] I care. details currently at health centre and they wont put on tms 5 wickets so far for Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 04:02:57 PM England 1.5 on Betfair, lump on surely?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Chompy on August 21, 2009, 04:03:19 PM Can't believe they'd even think about enforcing the follow on
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Tuffster on August 21, 2009, 04:03:59 PM shall we enforce the follow on? That's a difficult one. We've got to take 20 wickets, but will it be easier to take the second ten in the third or fourth innings? Gut feeling is yes they should, give the bowlers as long as possible to take the full 20, at least then we can chase the runs knowing how many overs are left. Especially given Aus have no regulation spinner in the side, batting last is less of a concern for us. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 04:05:13 PM Terrible decision, [ ] I care. details currently at health centre and they wont put on tms 5 wickets so far for England got 332 and Australia in reply are 109-6 after being 74-0. 4 for broad and 2 for swann (1st of which was lbw when North clearly hit it). Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Graham C on August 21, 2009, 04:08:24 PM Weeeeeeee
Follow on please, carry on the momentum Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 04:08:48 PM Wiiiiiiiiii got a chunk at 1.6 just before that wicket
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 21, 2009, 04:11:38 PM shall we enforce the follow on? That's a difficult one. We've got to take 20 wickets, but will it be easier to take the second ten in the third or fourth innings? Gut feeling is yes they should, give the bowlers as long as possible to take the full 20, at least then we can chase the runs knowing how many overs are left. Especially given Aus have no regulation spinner in the side, batting last is less of a concern for us. Enforcing the follow-on would be crazy. Part of the reason to win the toss at the Oval is to make the other team bat last - you don't want to give up that advantage. The only reason to take the follow on would be if you thought you had a really good chance of winning by an innings (ie not having to bat again). As much as the Aussies are collapsing here you wouldn't want the English bowlers' hot streak to end and then the Aussies grind out 350-400 in the second innings, leaving us to chase 150-200 on a pitch which is falling apart. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 04:12:03 PM would be so com to win the ashes with an innings defeat though
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: nirvana on August 21, 2009, 04:12:50 PM shall we enforce the follow on? That's a difficult one. We've got to take 20 wickets, but will it be easier to take the second ten in the third or fourth innings? Gut feeling is yes they should, give the bowlers as long as possible to take the full 20, at least then we can chase the runs knowing how many overs are left. Especially given Aus have no regulation spinner in the side, batting last is less of a concern for us. Enforcing the follow-on would be crazy. Part of the reason to win the toss at the Oval is to make the other team bat last - you don't want to give up that advantage. The only reason to take the follow on would be if you thought you had a really good chance of winning by an innings (ie not having to bat again). As much as the Aussies are collapsing here you wouldn't want the English bowlers' hot streak to end and then the Aussies grind out 350-400 in the second innings, leaving us to chase 150-200 on a pitch which is falling apart. This is exactly right, not a chance they'll enforce it if the option arises Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Tuffster on August 21, 2009, 04:18:33 PM shall we enforce the follow on? That's a difficult one. We've got to take 20 wickets, but will it be easier to take the second ten in the third or fourth innings? Gut feeling is yes they should, give the bowlers as long as possible to take the full 20, at least then we can chase the runs knowing how many overs are left. Especially given Aus have no regulation spinner in the side, batting last is less of a concern for us. Enforcing the follow-on would be crazy. Part of the reason to win the toss at the Oval is to make the other team bat last - you don't want to give up that advantage. The only reason to take the follow on would be if you thought you had a really good chance of winning by an innings (ie not having to bat again). As much as the Aussies are collapsing here you wouldn't want the English bowlers' hot streak to end and then the Aussies grind out 350-400 in the second innings, leaving us to chase 150-200 on a pitch which is falling apart. Good point, thinking about it again, the wicket is such that you'd expect all 40 to go down in 5 days, so yes, I agree now, 150 1st innings lead, a quick 250 over 3 sessions then a good day and a half to knock the Aussies over on inconsistent pitch. lol U-turn-aments. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Nakor on August 21, 2009, 04:20:47 PM Best afternoon off I could of taken this summer.
Laugh at me they did as I left the office with a bounce in my step looking forward to an afternoons cricket. Bat again if the choice has to be made. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 04:24:11 PM lolz, I jokingly asked about the follow on when it was 5 down and didn't look likely, didn't think anyone would think it was a good idea
the only way 40 wickets don't fall on this pitch is if monsoon season starts though still think an innings defeat would be com Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 04:37:45 PM australia's session imo. they got 72, we only got 8
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 21, 2009, 04:49:22 PM Get in there you beautyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, COME ON ENGLAND
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: bagel on August 21, 2009, 04:57:19 PM i have got a very broad smile this afternoon
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 05:05:09 PM possibly the worst decision I've ever seen in a test match
wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 05:05:25 PM Another awful decision, hahahahah.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: sweet potata! on August 21, 2009, 05:07:24 PM How the hell can the umpire not see whats going on , hes got a good vantage point looking straight at it no?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 21, 2009, 05:07:54 PM possibly the worst decision I've ever seen in a test match wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Bat hit the pad - think the umpire gave it on hearing two sounds. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on August 21, 2009, 05:11:06 PM It's more likely he gave the LBW, the bat was a foot away from the ball the LB was closer than that.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 05:31:17 PM Should stop Tighty and Longy from writing the obituaries for a while anyway. Lol I have found pessimism is best way to be when you follow sport, it gives you a sense of balance and you don't end up being featured on tv as one of those idiots crying at the end of football match, like Fyp Sandy Please stay off the English thread and go argue about celtic/rangers or something............... PS http://domain779724.sites.fasthosts.com/forum_archive-2004/philboard_read.asp?id=735&recordnum=50 http://www.fiso.co.uk/fsn57.htm "FCC England-India Test series - Top prize won by FISO member, Alexander Hughes, following the success of S Legg (aka Goose) in the First 2002 Fantasy Test Game." Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 05:37:00 PM Given the way the wicket is playing now, I actual don't mind England playing their shots within reason. If we get over 200 here i will be delighted.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 05:37:55 PM Given the way the wicket is playing now, I actual don't mind England playing their shots within reason. If we get over 200 here i will be delighted. Tha'ts plenty.......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 21, 2009, 05:39:37 PM Just having 1st beer of the day, feels good...........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 21, 2009, 06:02:45 PM no longer neutral wanted to put tenner on aussies but got offered 4 to 1 got offer of 1 to 4 on england so took the value with 20to win 5 come on flintoff
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 06:49:11 PM Sighhhhhhhhhhh, Edgbaston 05' anyone?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 06:50:55 PM so sick. didn't think that going to footy on saturday afternoon would mean missing the end of the ashes but it's starting to look like it might
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 07:05:14 PM These umpires have been terrible, that is 5 wickets this test they have given that haven't been out. Two Aussies lbw and three England batsman to clear no balls.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Indestructable on August 21, 2009, 09:00:04 PM no longer neutral wanted to put tenner on aussies but got offered 4 to 1 got offer of 1 to 4 on england so took the value with 20to win 5 come on flintoff Based on this I have backed the Aussies. ;) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 21, 2009, 09:16:42 PM Well done to the Oval groundsman who prepared something a bit less than normal, left it uncovered for a few days, and thus produced a result wicket
County games at the Oval all year have been 500-5 dec, 600-8 draw just as well we won the toss Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 21, 2009, 09:26:13 PM If I was a gambling man I'd lump a small wodge on the Aussies now, and then lump a bigger wodge on England at the end of the first session tomorrow after they go all out for ~100 more
Get the book looking like Aussies +$0 England +$xx Tie -$millionsquillion Is plan? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 09:29:44 PM If I was a gambling man I'd lump a small wodge on the Aussies now, and then lump a bigger wodge on England at the end of the first session tomorrow after they go all out for ~100 more Get the book looking like Aussies +$0 England +$xx Tie -$millionsquillion Is plan? swap the aussies and the draw and that's what my book looks like. I have to sell a kidney if the aussies somehow win this Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 09:34:21 PM A tie and a draw are vastly different in cricket.
Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 09:38:22 PM A tie and a draw are vastly different in cricket. Sandy Not according to betfair which is the context it is being used in. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 21, 2009, 09:40:19 PM Wow that's pretty bad even if there have only been 2 ties.
Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 21, 2009, 09:57:43 PM Wow that's pretty bad even if there have only been 2 ties. Sandy Lol I suppose before some else corrects me i presumed that was the case. Checked my info now and i am wrong. If the official result is a tied match and there is no such eventuality offered in the market, all bets on match odds markets will be void. I am surprised by this as voiding an event costs betfair commission, so fair play I suppose. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 21, 2009, 10:03:25 PM yeah, law 16 defines a draw as a game that doesn't end in a win or a tie
I thought a tie was a type of draw, apparently not Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 03:57:50 AM put more on after england lost wickets in the 2nd innings got 4/11 ffs no one is going to make 200 on that wicket on a 4th day
just want england to get anotehr 100 runs and i'll be happy if england lose i will never support them or bet on them to win again atleast the money i get back will make up for the next 18 months Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 22, 2009, 11:26:52 AM Why the hell is Bumble banging on about us declaring, the pitch is only going to get worse and I will be surprised if we ever get to that point. If we bat to Tea, it should be gg Australia.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 22, 2009, 12:13:26 PM Strauss gets to 50 excellant start to the morning,englands best player in the series by far, great captain imo
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 22, 2009, 01:06:02 PM Will deffo take that session, wp Trott and Strauss. Think we can afford to have a go after lunch and anything over 400 lead will be fine. Also lol at Ponting taking one in the face.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 01:10:05 PM Will deffo take that session, wp Trott and Strauss. Think we can afford to have a go after lunch and anything over 400 lead will be fine. Also lol at Ponting taking one in the face. He's got a permanent scar on his cheek from the last ashes here, when a Harmison ball smacked him square on in the face. Maybe he'll get another scar just to remind him of this series for the rest of his life as well :D Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 22, 2009, 01:46:39 PM So immense how good a mood it put's you in when where winning at any sport,gogogogogo England
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 01:49:45 PM So immense how good a mood it put's you in when where winning at any sport,gogogogogo England Especially when u have to wait 4 years since the last one...............I don't do footy so this is my biggie along with rugby. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 22, 2009, 04:22:35 PM Love watching Swann bat he is a very useful No.9 (soon to be 8). Come on Trott, deserves a century.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 22, 2009, 04:31:12 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :(
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 04:34:16 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :( WTF!? Hang your head in shame if you have bet against your homeland........... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 04:35:24 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :( ticket for monday?Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 04:36:33 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :( ticket for monday?Let u off then lol Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 22, 2009, 04:38:25 PM VWP Trott - lovely hundred.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 22, 2009, 04:41:24 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :( ticket for monday?....Is the correct answer.. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 04:57:13 PM We should declare now............
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: WarBwastard on August 22, 2009, 04:57:59 PM I would give my left testicle now for 2 sessions lost to rain... :( I will give my right testicle. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 22, 2009, 04:59:04 PM Glad I never put the bet on. Storming day for England.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 22, 2009, 05:12:40 PM Whole series comes down to this: 10 wickets to win.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 05:15:08 PM all over tonight
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 22, 2009, 05:53:13 PM If no wickets fall this session, will anyone get nervous overnight?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 22, 2009, 05:57:29 PM If no wickets fall this session, will anyone get nervous overnight? no Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 08:12:57 PM gg england
sorry england fans but i am running real bad losing to 12-1 shots so what chance have i got of winning when australia are only 4-1 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 22, 2009, 08:14:30 PM this has got a lot of play left in it yet.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 22, 2009, 08:15:58 PM Cliff notes on the latest from the ashes please.. Including what we need to do and what they need to do etc. Is it 2-2 now? I haven't watched any so far obv.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 08:17:11 PM they need to break a world record by some margin to win
we need to take 10 wickets in 2 days Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 22, 2009, 08:24:41 PM Cliff notes on the latest from the ashes please.. Including what we need to do and what they need to do etc. Is it 2-2 now? I haven't watched any so far obv. Series is 1-1 after 4 matches, currently playing the 5th. We won the 2nd at Lords and lost the 4th at Headingley, other 2 were draw. This test we have played 3/5 days and our in the final innings with Australia batting, they need nearly 500 more to win (which has never been done in history) to win, we need 10 wickets. Winner takes all effectively, England are big favourites. I and many others are extremely excited by this, if we lose I will probably committ suicide, gg me. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 22, 2009, 08:40:24 PM What was Strauss doing bowling Harmison for so long tonight, ahead of Broad?
Anyway, 2 days to do it. No one approach me for weeks if we don't! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 22, 2009, 09:04:40 PM Pitch is not deteriorating as fast as I thought, although obv taking turn and the odd seamer breaking through the top. England batted very well today, so did Oz too. Hopefully a little bit of rain 2mrw and a few runs scored, so going in to day 5 Australia need 280 runs with 6 wickets left.
In which case, I will require surgery in order to get my hand off my cock. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 22, 2009, 09:19:03 PM finally caught up watching today after stupid football interupted it
strauss needs knighting, abs immense welcome to the team trott great to see freddy going out and just enjoying himself in his last ever innings, knighthood with strauss please queeny tighty, if we lose this please take me off the list for leeds as most likely I will be dead Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 22, 2009, 09:21:45 PM Pitch is not deteriorating as fast as I thought, although obv taking turn and the odd seamer breaking through the top. England batted very well today, so did Oz too. Hopefully a little bit of rain 2mrw and a few runs scored, so going in to day 5 Australia need 280 runs with 6 wickets left. In which case, I will require surgery in order to get my hand off my cock. they would score 350 if it goes all day tomorrow so 430 (350+80) on the board going into day 5. Maybe a session left Please let us win tomorrow. gatso, joint funeral if we cock this up. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 22, 2009, 09:34:47 PM thx for cliff notes
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 22, 2009, 09:35:08 PM You are all nuts to think the Aussies have anything other than a tiny chance of making these runs..
This is the best 1/3 chance I have ever seen. Lump on England, they are true 1/20 shots. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 22, 2009, 09:44:52 PM You are all nuts to think the Aussies have anything other than a tiny chance of making these runs.. who are you talking to keith? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 22, 2009, 09:53:12 PM I thought by you and tighty talking about defeat you two believe there is a realistic chance it might happen.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 22, 2009, 10:04:33 PM You are all nuts to think the Aussies have anything other than a tiny chance of making these runs.. This is the best 1/3 chance I have ever seen. Lump on England, they are true 1/20 shots. I total agree, it is the fact that we are such big faves, is giving me thoughts that I would be devestated if we lost it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 22, 2009, 10:06:00 PM I thought by you and tighty talking about defeat you two believe there is a realistic chance it might happen. lolz, no. the fact that I'm so sure we'll win means I put the house on england yesterday which is why I'll need to at least fake death if we lose Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 22, 2009, 10:10:43 PM Anyone wanna lend me their house so I can put it on England pls?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 22, 2009, 10:16:25 PM This is the best 1/3 chance I have ever seen. Lump on England, they are true 1/20 shots. i did that yesterday Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 22, 2009, 10:25:31 PM I thought by you and tighty talking about defeat you two believe there is a realistic chance it might happen. lolz, no. the fact that I'm so sure we'll win means I put the house on england yesterday which is why I'll need to at least fake death if we lose No, I would just hate it if this was the one time a miracle happened We have to be at least 1/10 to win, in truth Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mickyp on August 22, 2009, 11:03:01 PM No contest Rich ,your boys done good.(and i supported them for once) ;D
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: maldini32 on August 23, 2009, 03:44:00 AM come on englaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand! plz dont fk this up!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 23, 2009, 11:26:43 AM Amazingly, before the first wicket fell, but after Broad bowled that first ball which ripped off the pitch, England were still 1.35 on Betfair, which, as The Camel said, is the closest you could ever come to buying money.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 23, 2009, 11:27:37 AM Anyone wanna lend me their house so I can put it on England pls? I can't, I've already bet mine :) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 23, 2009, 11:41:47 AM Amazingly, before the first wicket fell, but after Broad bowled that first ball which ripped off the pitch, England were still 1.35 on Betfair, which, as The Camel said, is the closest you could ever come to buying money. Anyone who missed the boat can still take 1.1 when it should be 1.01... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 11:45:44 AM Amazingly, before the first wicket fell, but after Broad bowled that first ball which ripped off the pitch, England were still 1.35 on Betfair, which, as The Camel said, is the closest you could ever come to buying money. Anyone who missed the boat can still take 1.1 when it should be 1.01... Na got the 1.31 last night, thx Camel. One of the few bets i am not going to lay off for a profit as this market is never going to offer any value for the lay. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 12:11:40 PM Wiiiiiiiiii got a chunk at 1.6 just before that wicket Chirp.......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 23, 2009, 01:06:14 PM i am scared tms is talking rain
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 02:03:26 PM Just checked train times for tomorrow, starting to get nervous.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 23, 2009, 02:06:28 PM Bring your brolly!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 23, 2009, 02:29:31 PM Bring your FYPTitle: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 02:40:51 PM Thank fk for that......
Odds on BF went from 1.42 to 1.19 with that. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 02:41:50 PM Aaaaaaah wp Ponting, getting run out in this situation is unforgivable.
That is a guarentee, I tend to drink quicker when i am nervous about something. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 23, 2009, 02:46:20 PM That was brilliant.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 02:46:27 PM GTFIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 02:46:56 PM Wowowow, i am surprised that was given. Benefit of the doubt given to the batsman, no?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 23, 2009, 02:49:27 PM Wowowow, i am surprised that was given. Benefit of the doubt given to the batsman, no? Clearly out on the freeze frame. Also, not Pontings fault, he was responding to the call. But we will take it. No more wickets until aftyer tea though? k - thks. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: sweet potata! on August 23, 2009, 02:49:56 PM Wowowow, i am surprised that was given. Benefit of the doubt given to the batsman, no? No doubt imo, he wasnt over the line from any angle Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 02:50:07 PM Wowowow, i am surprised that was given. Benefit of the doubt given to the batsman, no? I though it was deffo out, dunno what they were thinking so long about. Bat has to be over the line not on it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 02:53:36 PM Meh ok fair enough, wasn't sure when the bail after left the groove personally.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 23, 2009, 03:05:10 PM Jesus Christ England are still 1.11.
They need 320 with 6 wickets left. England win thia 99 times out 100. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 03:07:35 PM Jesus Christ England are still 1.11. They need 320 with 6 wickets left. England win thia 99 times out 100. Its baffling isn't it? If this was a match with lesser importance somewhere else in the world. I would have thought there might be a fix on. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 23, 2009, 03:12:16 PM Will Paul Collingwood plz stop dropping Australian batsmen, kthxbye.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 23, 2009, 03:21:05 PM Jesus Christ England are still 1.11. They need 320 with 6 wickets left. England win thia 99 times out 100. i thought this on friday when i wanted to get a cheeky bet on austrailia but the odds on england were just too good Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 23, 2009, 04:32:33 PM If Bradman and Lawry were at the crease, with Hassett and Waugh next in then England *might* be 1.11.
They aren't. Chargeeeeeeee! Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 23, 2009, 04:37:28 PM If Bradman and Lawry were at the crease, with Hassett and Waugh next in then England *might* be 1.11. They aren't. Chargeeeeeeee! but you forgot how bad i run and i have bet on england cause the bookies wouldnt give me 10-1 on ausstrailia Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 04:42:44 PM broad 5/1 to take the ashes winning wicket looks good
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 04:44:16 PM Brad Haddin can you please give me the lottery numbers for Wednesday, kthxbye.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: maldini32 on August 23, 2009, 05:07:55 PM England cant fuck this up? Can they?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 05:09:26 PM England cant fuck this up? Can they? Only if people keep suggesting they might......... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 23, 2009, 05:12:51 PM the scoreboard keeps ticking along....
could be exciting yet. I know nothing about cricket tho, bar the Ashes i hate it. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 23, 2009, 05:14:25 PM So I have some winnings from the Spurs game, should I just put it all on England at 1.22?
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 23, 2009, 05:14:38 PM 1.26...
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Blatch on August 23, 2009, 05:16:23 PM yes we will win this
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Horneris on August 23, 2009, 05:16:37 PM So I have some winnings from the Spurs game, should I just put it all on England at 1.22? nah, you might have to wait like 24 hours to collect. Get involved at Sittingbourne tonight. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Rookie (Rodney) on August 23, 2009, 05:18:03 PM So I have some winnings from the Spurs game, should I just put it all on England at 1.22? nah, you might have to wait like 24 hours to collect. Get involved at Sittingbourne tonight. This is a good point. Although im guessing we must have taken a wicket as its just gone to 1.1? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 05:20:33 PM LOL at the big scab on Pontings mouth........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 05:24:47 PM wiiiiiiiiiii
should get the extra 1/2 hour now Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Simon Galloway on August 23, 2009, 05:28:47 PM Cmon black clouds.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: The Camel on August 23, 2009, 05:36:17 PM Cmon black clouds. Why don't you want them to finish it tonight? If they play for a couple of overs tomorrow you don't get a refund for your tickets do you? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 23, 2009, 05:37:19 PM Cmon black clouds. Why don't you want them to finish it tonight? If they play for a couple of overs tomorrow you don't get a refund for your tickets do you? Under 10 overs is a full refund. Over 10 but under 25 overs is a 50% refund. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 05:38:18 PM Cmon black clouds. Why don't you want them to finish it tonight? If they play for a couple of overs tomorrow you don't get a refund for your tickets do you? Being there when England win the Ashes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ticket Refund. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 05:39:11 PM I'm not too far from the oval and if I look out the window I can tell you that the only chance of rain is if aircraft trails are made of rain clouds
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on August 23, 2009, 05:41:37 PM Cmon black clouds. Why don't you want them to finish it tonight? If they play for a couple of overs tomorrow you don't get a refund for your tickets do you? Being there when England win the Ashes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ticket Refund. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 23, 2009, 05:42:10 PM Harmison hat-trick to win the Ashes plz!
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 05:42:16 PM LOL come on the Hat Trick to win the ashes........
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 05:42:46 PM let's do it harmy
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Jon MW on August 23, 2009, 05:43:37 PM OK, now I'm confident we won't mess it up
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 23, 2009, 05:44:18 PM If Bradman and Lawry were at the crease, with Hassett and Waugh next in then England *might* be 1.11. They aren't. Chargeeeeeeee! but you forgot how bad i run and i have bet on england cause the bookies wouldnt give me 10-1 on ausstrailia I'll give you 15/1 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 05:45:42 PM Time to get the beer out imo.
Can i start this thread in 2013, please? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: KarmaDope on August 23, 2009, 05:48:56 PM Time to get the beer out imo. Can i start this thread in 2010/11, please? FYP. and yes, plz do. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Indestructable on August 23, 2009, 06:13:41 PM Get in, and GL for the future Freddie
(http://www.inthestands.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/3571984135_4e0f423b1f.jpg) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 23, 2009, 06:25:20 PM If Bradman and Lawry were at the crease, with Hassett and Waugh next in then England *might* be 1.11. They aren't. Chargeeeeeeee! but you forgot how bad i run and i have bet on england cause the bookies wouldnt give me 10-1 on ausstrailia I'll give you 15/1 Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: kukushkin88 on August 23, 2009, 06:30:21 PM LOL at the big scab on Pontings mouth........ Not this. Well done to England excellent result. The lack of confidence the betfair market had in them after the first innings was just staggering, printing money. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 23, 2009, 10:29:30 PM I like to let the following people know you took a hell of a
(http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/2373/haroldbishop.jpg) (http://img18.imageshack.us/i/haroldbishop.jpg/) (http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/5073/kyliez.jpg) (http://img36.imageshack.us/i/kyliez.jpg/) (http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8273/russelcrowe.jpg) (http://img9.imageshack.us/i/russelcrowe.jpg/) (http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/1310/rickyggi.jpg) (http://img10.imageshack.us/i/rickyggi.jpg/) (http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1239/damet.jpg) (http://img15.imageshack.us/i/damet.jpg/) Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Josedinho on August 23, 2009, 11:43:37 PM Good Series - a case of when it mattered i think. Good thread - a nice mixutre of negativity, over reaction and joy.
Cheers to Freddie - rumours that he's now out for 9-12 months shows what he put himself through. Provided us all with great memories and he will be missed. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 23, 2009, 11:52:39 PM This series is a coinflip, with those odds you should be lumping on England. Ship the prediction at the start the series, shame I didn't have enough cash at the time to lump more on at 3.2 when I was confident it was value. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: WarBwastard on August 24, 2009, 12:03:58 AM Alf Stewart has not taken it well
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MUZsdWSixI Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 24, 2009, 04:16:17 PM Now i have sobered up. I think we were slightly lucky to win this series and like normal in this country we have completely over reacted one way or the other, I am guilty of this as the next man btw.
If the series was run 100 times in this country with these squads, the Aussies would win significantly more times than England imo. Winning 4 tosses out of 5 was a big influence on the series. I do think we have something to build on and what looks a reasonably balanced side, with Broad and Swann both useful batsman down the innings. Also Prior is a good batting wicketkeeper, his work with the gloves has improved quite a bit. Also we have that great luxury which hasn't all been the case that Strauss plays better as a captain, even Vaughan who was a great captain, his batting was effected by the responsibility. Looking forward to South Africa which is going to be a real tough tour against the worlds best test side, I would be looking at a team something like this. Strauss (c) - Obviously Cook - He is struggling but I don't see any obvious replacement coming through (maybe Joe Denly), get him playing for Essex and let him work on his technique. Bell - This is the spot up for grabs and Bell has just about done enough, but will be the first to be replaced if he fails. Pietersen - Injury permitting Trott - Looked really good, get the scouts out trying to find some more saffers imo. Prior (wk) - Much improved with the gloves, always rated him with the bat Broad - Needs to continue working on his bowling but deffo has potential as a first change bowler. Swann - Easily good enough to bat 8, wish he was a bit more consistent with the ball. Sidebottom - Bit unlucky to be dropped imo and presuming he is now injury free. Anderson - As good as anyone in the world when the ball swings Onions - I was pretty impressed with him and think he is worth persevering with If it is a turner Adil Rashid who has been playing well for Yorkshire would be my no9 in place of Sidebottom, he has scored two first class centuries for Yorkshire recently. I am afraid despite being a big Monty fan he seems to have lost it and my patience has worn thin. Harmison will retire imo as he doesn't seem to be relishing a tour to South Africa and he was hardly a sensation in the final two tests. I would take Collingwood with the team as a replacement but I think his limited talent, is eventually taking its toll at the top level. Also like to see Denly taken as back up opener especially given Cook's struggles. Will be interesting to see how the Aussies react to this, they certainly need to starting trusting Hauritz more and give him a run in the team. Will Ponting still lead the side, reckon they will keep him but I still don't rate him as a captain, though he is a fantastic batsman one of the best in the world still. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Acidmouse on August 24, 2009, 04:25:29 PM I agree with Rashid, although he's alot better batsman than 9. He is currently top of Yorkshires batting averages with 77! and hes taken 26 wickets for a ave of 31.46
How the hell he wasnt picked above Monty I have no idea. It was plain crazy picking him for the 20/20 games too. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 24, 2009, 05:01:06 PM Silly question.
Is it possible to listen to the forthcoming series vs South Africa on the radio? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 24, 2009, 05:03:12 PM Silly question. Is it possible to listen to the forthcoming series vs South Africa on the radio? yes. TMS will be on air Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 24, 2009, 05:03:55 PM Silly question. Is it possible to listen to the forthcoming series vs South Africa on the radio? Silly answer - not yet, you'll have to wait until December. Yes you will - TMS does them all. There was a dark time a few years ago when Talksport managed to win the radio rights to a series or two but there was such an outcry over it that I doubt the BBC will lose the rights again, certianly whilst it's not on terrestrial telly. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2009, 05:06:15 PM Even better, Sir Geoffrey has a joint contract to do SABC telly and TMS all winter
Love him or hate him, he's a great listen. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: thetank on August 24, 2009, 05:13:12 PM Good good.
Listening to this series on the i-player in the middle of the night pwned pretty hard. The only tough thing was trying to avoid all mention of the score during the day. Geoffrey Boycott is fantastic, but I'd take Henry Blowfeld or whatever his name is every day of the week. He updates you on what the seagulls are up to and when, through the gap between the stands, he sees a bus momentarily appearing going down the road. I've never known anything to accompany a session of grinding sit n gos quite like TMS. It's perfect Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 24, 2009, 06:05:13 PM Oh and why the hell are we playing 7 (seven!!!!!) 50 over games against the Australians, ffs 3 would be enough. I will watch them probably but even as a big cricket fan this seems a little tiresome. Roll on the South African tour.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: AndrewT on August 24, 2009, 06:08:27 PM Oh and why the hell are we playing 7 (seven!!!!!) 50 over games against the Australians, ffs 3 would be enough. I will watch them probably but even as a big cricket fan this seems a little tiresome. Roll on the South African tour. £££££££££££ Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Woodsey on August 24, 2009, 06:36:06 PM Oh and why the hell are we playing 7 (seven!!!!!) 50 over games against the Australians, ffs 3 would be enough. I will watch them probably but even as a big cricket fan this seems a little tiresome. Roll on the South African tour. This, I'm a massive fan too, but I lose interest when there is this many. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: gatso on August 24, 2009, 06:40:34 PM yeah, would've preferred to drop a couple of them and play a 6 test series. although I don't want that now obv, 5 is enough
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TightEnd on August 24, 2009, 06:58:13 PM Oh and why the hell are we playing 7 (seven!!!!!) 50 over games against the Australians, ffs 3 would be enough. I will watch them probably but even as a big cricket fan this seems a little tiresome. Roll on the South African tour. This, I'm a massive fan too, but I lose interest when there is this many. I agree. 7 is far too many. Just don't care about 1 dayers outside the trophies like the world cup/champions trophy the problem is its a moneyspinner, the one day game is huge in a lot of cricketing countries Boring old traditionalist, out. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: TheChipPrince on August 24, 2009, 06:58:24 PM Even better, Sir Geoffrey has a joint contract to do SABC telly and TMS all winter Love him or hate him, he's a great listen. He also does a weekly answer session on Cricinfo which is a pretty good 15 min listen... Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Pelham Boy on August 24, 2009, 06:59:19 PM I admit that after the test series the one dayers are going to be an anti climax, we certainly need as much practise as we can get in this form of the game.
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 24, 2009, 07:01:05 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 24, 2009, 07:07:40 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on August 24, 2009, 07:09:06 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Probably quite high given there is a pretty good chance one of them will be rained out. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 24, 2009, 07:22:57 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Probably quite high given there is a pretty good chance one of them will be rained out. i am an optimist looking for a summer sometime this year and dwl will sort out the shower effected games Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on August 24, 2009, 07:26:09 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Probably quite high given there is a pretty good chance one of them will be rained out. i am an optimist looking for a summer sometime this year and dwl will sort out the shower effected games The weathers been immense this year compared to normal,i'd prefer it was raining then stuffy weather like it is most the time at the minute Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Ironside on August 24, 2009, 07:29:59 PM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Probably quite high given there is a pretty good chance one of them will be rained out. i am an optimist looking for a summer sometime this year and dwl will sort out the shower effected games The weather's been immense this year compared to normal,i'd prefer it was raining then stuffy weather like it is most the time at the minute swap you weather every time i go out i end up soaked at the moment Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: henrik777 on August 25, 2009, 12:00:05 AM Gives us 7 opportunities to mock the Aussies,not bad imo aussie win 5-2 what odds am i offered? Probably quite high given there is a pretty good chance one of them will be rained out. i am an optimist looking for a summer sometime this year and dwl will sort out the shower effected games The weather's been immense this year compared to normal,i'd prefer it was raining then stuffy weather like it is most the time at the minute swap you weather every time i go out i end up soaked at the moment Don't go out when it's raining then :P Sandy Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on September 09, 2009, 04:29:25 PM Anyone make any sense of this ?
I had 2 tickets for the day that was rained off at edgbaston bought them through ticketmaster(registered seller for ECB) paid £100 per ticket but face value was £75 emailed ticketmaster to ask why they said nothing to do with them speak to ECB i just left it at that but was entitled to a full refund due to no play,sent them a letter saying i expected a full refund of £200 as that's what i paid and if not an explanation why sent my receipt with the tickets,refund back today £150 no explanation,how does that work.Anyone know why i would be charged extra £25 per ticket,not that bothered about the money just the principal why i had to pay more.Tried to ring refund line listened to voicemail then end of the msg says please hold for an advisor,two seconds later "thank you for calling,goodbye" ?? Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on September 09, 2009, 04:50:44 PM Anyone make any sense of this ? I had 2 tickets for the day that was rained off at edgbaston bought them through ticketmaster(registered seller for ECB) paid £100 per ticket but face value was £75 emailed ticketmaster to ask why they said nothing to do with them speak to ECB i just left it at that but was entitled to a full refund due to no play,sent them a letter saying i expected a full refund of £200 as that's what i paid and if not an explanation why sent my receipt with the tickets,refund back today £150 no explanation,how does that work.Anyone know why i would be charged extra £25 per ticket,not that bothered about the money just the principal why i had to pay more.Tried to ring refund line listened to voicemail then end of the msg says please hold for an advisor,two seconds later "thank you for calling,goodbye" ?? The ECB/ Warwickshire County cricket club, have given you the £75 back via ticketmaster. I presume ticketmaster are going to come with some bs that the extra 25 is a booking fee and you are not entitled to a refund. Do you have the original small print regarding the ticketmaster booking, I bet somewhere in there it will probs say you are not entitled to a refund on the extra 25. These ticket companies are pretty ruthless fuckwits when it comes to this kind of thing. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on September 09, 2009, 05:05:05 PM They replied to my email saying the 25 extra had nowt to do with them and that it was the ECB,i thought it was illegal to sell at more than face value of a ticket which is why i was bit surprised when it had 75 on the ticket,obv won't get the extra 50 back just interested in which one of them is ripping me off :)
Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: jizzemm on September 09, 2009, 05:07:56 PM Ticket Marster are fuckwits
End of.... Its their charge and they should refund u.. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: Longy on September 09, 2009, 05:10:56 PM They replied to my email saying the 25 extra had nowt to do with them and that it was the ECB,i thought it was illegal to sell at more than face value of a ticket which is why i was bit surprised when it had 75 on the ticket,obv won't get the extra 50 back just interested in which one of them is ripping me off :) I went to the Sunday of that test match and our tickets were £75. My uncle bought them directly through Warwickshire as he gets priority there, the extra £25 is deffo something to do with Ticketmaster. Title: Re: 2009 Ashes Post by: mondatoo on September 09, 2009, 05:14:54 PM They replied to my email saying the 25 extra had nowt to do with them and that it was the ECB,i thought it was illegal to sell at more than face value of a ticket which is why i was bit surprised when it had 75 on the ticket,obv won't get the extra 50 back just interested in which one of them is ripping me off :) I went to the Sunday of that test match and our tickets were £75. My uncle bought them directly through Warwickshire as he gets priority there, the extra £25 is deffo something to do with Ticketmaster. I was thinking i was charged extra because they originally went on sale to 12th man members and then wen't on resale to anyone late on when i got one. Impossible to speak to anyone at ticketmaster it seems,ecb don't seem much better either |