Title: Man U - Bayern Post by: Shawrie85 on April 07, 2010, 04:27:18 PM Who do you fancy for tonight?
Im on HT/FT draw/home.........£60 on.......hopefully get £260 back! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: action man on April 07, 2010, 05:15:48 PM rly cant see united winning without rooney, he's become as valueable for them as torress/gerrard are for pool.
LAY UNITED IN 90mins imo Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: maldini32 on April 07, 2010, 06:20:31 PM rly cant see united winning without rooney, he's become as valueable for them as torress/gerrard are for pool. LAY UNITED IN 90mins imo Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Scottish Dave on April 07, 2010, 06:24:49 PM Man utd @ 3/4
Alloa @ 1/2 Double pays just over 6/4 £30 on Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: outragous76 on April 07, 2010, 06:41:03 PM rly cant see united winning without rooney, he's become as valueable for them as torress/gerrard are for pool. LAY UNITED IN 90mins imo I will give you a straight £50 bet (are we talking about going thru or winning on the night?) - im talking on the night will need to confirm on here by 7.15 as will be in car for 1st half Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 06:57:06 PM ROONEY STARTS
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 07:07:06 PM Did agree that Man U couldn't win without Rooney but not betting against them now. Gone for Rooney to score 2 or more at 9/2.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 07, 2010, 07:08:38 PM ROONEY STARTS FK OFF SIR ALEX,SURE NOT GUNA BREAKDOWN Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: boldie on April 07, 2010, 07:17:38 PM Bayern @ 4-1 with Paddy Power for me, will put it in a double with Fulham @ 9-2 with betfred tomorrow. Both value bets IMO. Bayern on the counter attack with Robben will be very dangerous....not happy with Rooney playing obv.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Longy on April 07, 2010, 07:40:55 PM ITV+ Clive Tydsley+ Man U vs Bayern = 200000000000000000000000000000 mentions of that "famous night in Barcelona".
I might have to watch this with the sound off. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: TightEnd on April 07, 2010, 07:43:21 PM ITV+ Clive Tydsley+ Man U vs Bayern = 200000000000000000000000000000 mentions of that "famous night in Barcelona". I might have to watch this with the sound off. TV on. sound off. Radio Commentary. Oh wait. Alan Green As you were Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: George2Loose on April 07, 2010, 07:47:48 PM I'm worried as a United and England fan with Rooney starting tonight. Maybe he should have started from the bench even if he is fit
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Graham C on April 07, 2010, 07:48:36 PM I'm on Bayern
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Camel on April 07, 2010, 07:50:58 PM How stupid are some United fans?
Wearing green and gold scarves withe their AIG sponsored shirts. Sure Glazer gives a damn what they think as long as they keep buying their replica shirts at £49.99 a pop. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Longy on April 07, 2010, 07:51:31 PM Ah no Tyldseley, it will only get mention 10000000000000 times now.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: pleno1 on April 07, 2010, 08:05:21 PM How stupid are some United fans? Wearing green and gold scarves withe their AIG sponsored shirts. Sure Glazer gives a damn what they think as long as they keep buying their replica shirts at £49.99 a pop. so true. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: ACE2M on April 07, 2010, 08:08:47 PM just backed robben to score next at 10/1, no idea why.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: action man on April 07, 2010, 08:10:43 PM faded it when rooney started. Just hope bayern score next to make a game out of it
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: pleno1 on April 07, 2010, 08:16:07 PM pls take rooney off.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 08:42:21 PM Set up for a decent 2nd half now.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Scottish Dave on April 07, 2010, 08:54:04 PM Man utd @ 3/4............... 3-1 up Alloa @ 1/2.............. 1-0 up Double pays just over 6/4 £30 on Hold!! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Scottish Dave on April 07, 2010, 09:04:11 PM Fekk you ref!
I'll be happy for bayern to score in the 94th minute to send them out, and still get my double up! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: George2Loose on April 07, 2010, 09:04:58 PM Im trying not to be biased. Was that really worthy of a booking???
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 09:05:40 PM Im trying not to be biased. Was that really worthy of a booking??? YesTitle: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: George2Loose on April 07, 2010, 09:06:49 PM Im trying not to be biased. Was that really worthy of a booking??? Yesbollox lol Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: TightEnd on April 07, 2010, 09:08:12 PM Im trying not to be biased. Was that really worthy of a booking??? Yes Nice to see he's buggered up Rooney for however long, sigh Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 09:27:13 PM wowzer
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Scottish Dave on April 07, 2010, 09:27:53 PM 11 men behind the ball now Bayern!!!
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: sovietsong on April 07, 2010, 09:37:16 PM sigh my bet on man utd for the cup is not looking good now. was going to lay them off if the reached the final but looking like i've fooooked it!
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: George2Loose on April 07, 2010, 09:37:58 PM gg. Don't even look like producing a chance let alone a goal
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: pokerfan on April 07, 2010, 09:42:09 PM (http://i454.photobucket.com/albums/qq267/ppokerfan/25627_110844402265018_1000001837527.jpg)
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 09:46:52 PM Well done Dave
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: TheChipPrince on April 07, 2010, 09:47:14 PM GTFI.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Scottish Dave on April 07, 2010, 09:47:57 PM Man utd @ 3/4 Alloa @ 1/2 Double pays just over 6/4 £30 on yassssss!! Couldn't have asked for a better result! Double up and Utd out! Great build up to the Darts at SECC tomorrow night!! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Pab on April 07, 2010, 09:49:18 PM gtfo fergie, justice for risking rooney
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: TightEnd on April 07, 2010, 09:52:22 PM gtfo fergie, justice for risking rooney there is a touch of this in my mind too. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: AndrewT on April 07, 2010, 09:52:26 PM Friend of mine is getting married on the same day as the Champion's League final and the Championship playoff final. A bridesmaid is a Man Utd fan, another one is an Arsenal season ticket holder - she's clearly jinxed them so there's no clash.
She's marrying a Forest fan so gg their playoff chances. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Murph1984 on April 07, 2010, 10:08:34 PM LOL
I bet so many United fans already have Madrid booked after the quarters/semi draw was made. Ferguson really showed his faith in Berbatov and that he believes United are more than a one man band,I doubt Rooney was more than 50% fit. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 10:23:08 PM Who is better Carrick or Djemba-Djemba?
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: sovietsong on April 07, 2010, 10:25:48 PM Who is better Carrick or Djemba-Djemba? kleberson Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Camel on April 07, 2010, 10:35:34 PM gtfo fergie, justice for risking rooney You don't honestly think England have got more than a tiny chance of winning the World Cup do you? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: maldini32 on April 07, 2010, 10:51:43 PM Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Hairydude on April 07, 2010, 10:53:15 PM gtfo fergie, justice for risking rooney You don't honestly think England have got more than a tiny chance of winning the World Cup do you? As an unbiased scotsman I would say england are about 9 or 10/1 with Rooney.....then about 16 maybe even 20/1 without so I do think he will make a massive difference to yer hopes Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 11:12:56 PM without rooney we're about 100/1 with rooney about 25/1
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Murph1984 on April 07, 2010, 11:15:50 PM without rooney we're about 100/1 with rooney about 25/1 Jesus don't ever go into bookmaking whatever you do. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Hairydude on April 07, 2010, 11:23:19 PM without rooney we're about 100/1 with rooney about 25/1 I'll take £25 on either if your serious whichever one happens i'll take Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 07, 2010, 11:50:48 PM What i'm saying is we're too short. Why would i lay 25/1 when i know i can lay something around 5/1
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 02:49:23 AM I'm worried as a United and England fan with Rooney starting tonight. Maybe he should have started from the bench even if he is fit Yeah not getting this decision. Sends out an awful message to Berbatov too. Do you think he's done at Utd? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 02:53:18 AM Surely this is the proof that the "eeee pee ell" is no longer the strongest league in Europe. Not one English team could defend properly in the CL this season
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Longy on April 08, 2010, 03:29:03 AM Surely this is the proof that the "eeee pee ell" is no longer the strongest league in Europe. Not one English team could defend properly in the CL this season So it is Spain then, who you would say have proved themselves defensively in this competition? For all their greatness going forward they are hardly rock solid at the back, Barcelona and how did the mighty Real Madrid fair in this competition. Trying to make sweeping statements on one season of Champions league competion is doomed. The top 3 in the Premiership are still among the best 6 or 7 sides in Europe, the question has always been about strength in depth, where England actually have 2 teams in the final 8 of the Europa cup. I have not changed my mind personally about the hierarchy in Europe being Spain> England>>>>>>>>> Italy>> Germany>>>>>>>>The Rest. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: sweet potata! on April 08, 2010, 02:26:46 PM Who is better Carrick or Djemba-Djemba? Lol good question Carrick is completely brutal, the invisible man as i refer to him as, he's always on but you never see him. GTFO utd, even with the easy draw they couldnt get the job done, and Fergie is his usual charming gracious self , "typical germans" and all this b.s just take the defeat Sir Baconface Onetime plzzzzzz Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Teacake on April 08, 2010, 02:37:17 PM Who is better Carrick or Djemba-Djemba? GTFO utd, even with the easy draw they couldnt get the job done, and Fergie is his usual charming gracious self , "typical germans" and all this b.s just take the defeat Sir Baconface Onetime plzzzzzz Well said, Swalex doing his usual deflection job. For a great manager he talks some amount of bollox, hope he gets done for the typical Germans comment. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Jamier-Host on April 08, 2010, 02:56:50 PM The top 3 in the Premiership are still among the best 6 or 7 sides in Europe, the question has always been about strength in depth, where England actually have 2 teams in the final 8 of the Europa cup. I have not changed my mind personally about the hierarchy in Europe being Spain> England>>>>>>>>> Italy>> Germany>>>>>>>>The Rest. It's not really an English league though is it. Leaning towards an international league nowadays. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: dan on April 08, 2010, 03:07:47 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2010, 03:13:13 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: pleno1 on April 08, 2010, 04:06:30 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? lol that your sig has changed. jinx imo. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: kinboshi on April 08, 2010, 04:32:12 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: ACE2M on April 08, 2010, 04:50:12 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? you got to put a lot of the blame on potato head himself surely? he has to say i'm fit to play or fergie wouldn't pick him. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: henrik777 on April 08, 2010, 05:11:40 PM I think Fergie should stop playing him now so that when you inevitably lose at the world cup you can blame Fergie for his lack of match fitness.
I'm sure Fergie would love to get the blame for England being a lot poorer than the English think they are, in fact, i'm sure he'll love it. Sandy Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 06:09:56 PM Surely this is the proof that the "eeee pee ell" is no longer the strongest league in Europe. Not one English team could defend properly in the CL this season So it is Spain then, who you would say have proved themselves defensively in this competition? For all their greatness going forward they are hardly rock solid at the back, Barcelona and how did the mighty Real Madrid fair in this competition. Trying to make sweeping statements on one season of Champions league competion is doomed. The top 3 in the Premiership are still among the best 6 or 7 sides in Europe, the question has always been about strength in depth, where England actually have 2 teams in the final 8 of the Europa cup. I have not changed my mind personally about the hierarchy in Europe being Spain> England>>>>>>>>> Italy>> Germany>>>>>>>>The Rest. Well my sentences were not meant to be linked for one. The bit about bad defending was an observation, not additional proof. Of course the top 3 in the eee pee ell are in the top 8 or so in Europe I'm just saying our league isn't stronger than Spain's any more. I agree that it now goes Spain>England>the rest but not prior to this season. Spain also has two teams still in the Europa League no? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2010, 08:45:00 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Camel on April 08, 2010, 08:50:14 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 08:51:33 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. Generally agree but Spain have made it interesting for me in the last two years. The last WC was dross though. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2010, 08:54:18 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Longy on April 08, 2010, 08:55:54 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The club s might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. Meh completely disagree a club championship would be no where near as interesting for me personally compared to the world cup. Also why would anyone do away with the most popular sporting event in the world. I love the world cup as it is completely different to watching the same club sides who dominate the champions league. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 08:58:00 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) For all those games you get what, three or four great games? There are more than that in the CL every season. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: sovietsong on April 08, 2010, 09:00:17 PM I like the idea of the world cup more than I actually enjoy it. now i'm thinking that i cant waitfor the world cup but when it actually comes i will get bored with it very quickly.
Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2010, 09:00:50 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) For all those games you get what, three or four great games? There are more than that in the CL every season. Three or four ??? There are more than that with the group games alone plus the fact it's such a short time period compared to 7-8 months.Plus it's pretty immense when England get to the quarters and the whole country gets overexcited before we blow it again.I love it and am really looking forward to it. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Josedinho on April 08, 2010, 09:06:00 PM This probably sounds like a "if you don't have kids you don't understand" comment but i think if you support a decent football team then you have probably forgotten/ don't realise how good the atmosphere is before world cup games. In Liverpool the city may be buzzing on a champions league quarter final night but in places like Mansfield for example they don't really get that feeling anytime other than world cup games. Knowing that everyone is buzzing before a big England game is amazing.
The buzz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the football Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Camel on April 08, 2010, 09:06:45 PM What price would Barca be to win the world cup?
I would take 3/1 for sure. They play better than any international team by far. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 09:09:25 PM What price would Barca be to win the world cup? I would take 3/1 for sure. They play better than any international team by far. Bit harsh? Seeing as international footy is part time and Barca are one of the greatest sides of all time. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Camel on April 08, 2010, 09:09:48 PM This probably sounds like a "if you don't have kids you don't understand" comment but i think if you support a decent football team then you have probably forgotten/ don't realise how good the atmosphere is before world cup games. In Liverpool the city may be buzzing on a champions league quarter final night but in places like Mansfield for example they don't really get that feeling anytime other than world cup games. Knowing that everyone is buzzing before a big England game is amazing. The buzz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the football Bleh. A load of hooligans getting overly drunk and racially abusing anyone they think isn't English. Not my idea of fun. I spend the whole year loathing the likes of Asley Cole, John Terry, Rio Ferdinand etc, why should I suddenly want them to do well. I dread the jingoism which would ensue if England win the World Cup. COME ON SPAIN! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 09:11:57 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) For all those games you get what, three or four great games? There are more than that in the CL every season. Three or four ??? There are more than that with the group games alone plus the fact it's such a short time period compared to 7-8 months.Plus it's pretty immense when England get to the quarters and the whole country gets overexcited before we blow it again.I love it and am really looking forward to it. No chance! Which ones from the last WC will go down in living memory as great? Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: mondatoo on April 08, 2010, 09:13:35 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) For all those games you get what, three or four great games? There are more than that in the CL every season. Three or four ??? There are more than that with the group games alone plus the fact it's such a short time period compared to 7-8 months.Plus it's pretty immense when England get to the quarters and the whole country gets overexcited before we blow it again.I love it and am really looking forward to it. No chance! Which ones from the last WC will go down in living memory as great? We'll have to agree to disagree since I don't remember a month ago nevermind four year Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: The Baron on April 08, 2010, 09:15:38 PM It makes me laugh all the "England fans" being pissed off that Rooney started because it could ruin their world cup hopes. ManUtd pay his wages not England. If he's injured they still have to pay his wages so surely its up to Fergie to do whatever he sees best to win the game. International football pisses me off. Players go on international duty come back injured for a serious length of time, ie Van Persie and the clubs get nothing so why should the clubs not play their best players at crucial times of the season if that is what the managers think best [ ] This is true Obv he can do what he want's but since England fans are looking forward to the World Cup and since no Rooney equals no chance surely we're entitled to care ? Twice Torres has come back from games with Spain (friendlies or WC qualifiers) with injuries that took ages for him to recover from. In fact, he's still recovering from the last one. Same for Van Persie, as Dan mentioned, and a whole load of other players. Whenever Gerrard plays for England, I'm hoping he doesn't get injured first and foremost before I'm worried about the result and if England win. The clubs might get some compensation, but does it cover the costs of missing out on a key player for months? How would Liverpool and Arsenal have faired this season if Torres and Van Persie had been fit all the way through? How are manu going to get on without Rooney (not that I'm saying he was injured in an International, but key players being injured can hinder a team's chances of winning anything, if the injury occurs away from club duty, the club feels aggrieved)? I was just making the point that clubs do get some compo.Injuries are inevitable with all players and since International football isn't going to stop anytime in the near future then clubs will have to live with it. International football is pants. A four yearly club championship of the world would be 10000 times better than the World Cup. World Cups are incred,football everyday with upto three games a day,don't get better.FACT :) For all those games you get what, three or four great games? There are more than that in the CL every season. Three or four ??? There are more than that with the group games alone plus the fact it's such a short time period compared to 7-8 months.Plus it's pretty immense when England get to the quarters and the whole country gets overexcited before we blow it again.I love it and am really looking forward to it. No chance! Which ones from the last WC will go down in living memory as great? We'll have to agree to disagree since I don't remember a month ago nevermind four year Lol fair one. Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: TheChipPrince on April 09, 2010, 09:18:51 AM Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: Royal Flush on April 11, 2010, 12:26:10 PM What price would Barca be to win the world cup? I would take 3/1 for sure. They play better than any international team by far. I would smash 3/1 off the board, even a market as liquid as the WC! Title: Re: Man U - Bayern Post by: sovietsong on April 11, 2010, 02:01:38 PM i would say most decent european sides would do better in the world cup than individual nations.
|