blonde poker forum

Poker Forums => Poker Hand Analysis => Topic started by: easypickings on December 22, 2010, 04:04:06 AM



Title: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: easypickings on December 22, 2010, 04:04:06 AM
Ok, this is probably going to sound stupid, I think the answer might be quite simple.

If I make a big check-raise on, say Jd Jc 8d 6h 3d, that's a nuts or air move. I'm polarising my range.

My question is, what's the opposite of polarise? If I want to bluff someone off a wider range, I'm probably best making a medium size lead, giving myself a much wider range.

But what's the word for that? Maybe just de-polarise?


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Rupert on December 22, 2010, 04:14:37 AM
merged or de-polarised


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Dubai on December 22, 2010, 04:18:45 AM
You can still merge ranges in situations where you look polarised. Such as check raising 99 on the board above, could be considered a merge


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: RED-DOG on December 22, 2010, 10:44:52 AM
Evaginate.


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Simon Galloway on December 22, 2010, 11:06:13 AM
You can still merge ranges in situations where you look polarised. Such as check raising 99 on the board above, could be considered a merge

Doesn't that also come under the 'air' bit of 'nuts or air'?

And I have seen plenty of players make a big CR with a small flush there, believing it to be the 'nuts' bit of 'nuts or air'


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: action man on December 22, 2010, 12:17:42 PM
lol a good 2 pair doesnt come under the air bit, but it comes in the nuts bit if someone is sat there with AK thinking "nuts or air"


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Simon Galloway on December 22, 2010, 01:46:59 PM
And what happens to a good 2pr when someone is sat there with KJ and says "I know I'm beat but..."


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Dubai on December 22, 2010, 01:53:37 PM
The reason why its a merge is occasionally people fold better and call with worse.

Id say 77 is probably a better example on that board, because people might bet fold an 8, or bet call a 6 depending on the action.


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: outragous76 on December 22, 2010, 02:16:42 PM
Next time im in a pot with Trigg I gonna polar merge value bluff! That should do he trick!


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: AlexMartin on December 22, 2010, 05:25:29 PM
The reason why its a merge is occasionally people fold better and call with worse.

Id say 77 is probably a better example on that board, because people might bet fold an 8, or bet call a 6 depending on the action.

good example sharky. wp.


Title: Re: Boring, probably stupid, question
Post by: Amatay on December 22, 2010, 07:49:35 PM
Interesting little thread. I known along time what polarising your hand means and i guess i've also known what a merge is although until reading this i didnt know that was the name of it. I recently saw A E Jones refering to the term merge on the big game with DN and thought wtf is he on about