|
Title: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 02, 2011, 06:30:06 PM Welcome to the reverse sheep quiz 43 (are we really still going?)
Rules (mainly c+p from Joobie's so any complaints can be directed to her) :D Here's the deal. There are 10 questions, PM your answers for them to me by 6pm on Monday February 7th, each answer on a separate line please, next to the corresponding question number. Your score for each question is the number of people who give the same correct answer. So you want to go for answers that you think will be less commonly given. Levelling commonly happens. The answer most commonly given is called the sheep, with the corresponding sheep score. You are not allowed to do any research such as Google searches or asking your mum to come up with answers. If you give an incorrect answer, you will receive the sheep score + 5. You MUST pass on one question and score a 0 for that question. Spelling mistakes will be laughed at and may even invoke a penalty. Any questions post in this thread (or PM), but don’t post your answers obv. The reveal will be 8.30pm(ish) on Tuesday February 8th Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she may nominate a virgin QM to run the next quiz, if they so desire. Objections are allowed but may be ignored/punished (PMT bit removed coz i'm just over mine - i still might be stroppy tho :)) I reserve the right to change these rules without notice at anytime before the start of the reveal. oh - the winner is the person with the lowest score ;) Questions 1. Name an album that appears in the top 20 of NME's greatest albums of all time (as at 2006) 2. Name a current, regular, TV series on the Disney Channel or Disney XD in the UK 3. Name a blonde member (forum name) who appears in the top ten for 'most time online' as at 2/2/2011 4. Name a team that reached the quarter finals in the 2010 FIFA world cup. 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day. 6. Name a singer that had at least one solo line in Band Aid's 'Do they know it's Christmas' (from any of the 1984, 1989 or 2004 versions) 7. Name a compulsory subject on the National Curriculum for children in key stage 1 and 2 (primary school) in England. 8. Name someone that has held the title of king or queen of the jungle after winning 'i'm a celebrity, get me out of here' (UK version only) 9. Name a novel written by one of the Brontë sisters (Charlotte Brontë, Emily Brontë or Anne Brontë) 10. Name an airline that appears in the top ten for number of scheduled passengers carried in 2010 (worldwide) entrants Nakor Redsimon Moonandback Stato_1 Girgy85 Tightend JonMW Waz1892 hector62 mondatoo kinboshi AndrewT TheWhisper The Baron technolog snoopy1239 Solo Graham sharplea Cf Laxie Joobie538 Robert HM TRIP5 Delboy Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 02, 2011, 07:00:06 PM FML.
Haven't got a clue on Q2, Q5's a disgrace and you're pandering to the masses with Q4. For that reason, I'm in! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 02, 2011, 07:06:14 PM lol I like q5. Though shouldn't you add the corresponding female version for max amusement? I suggest replacing the Disney q. We don't all have kids!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 02, 2011, 07:07:13 PM lol I like q5. Though shouldn't you add the corresponding female version for max amusement? I suggest replacing the Disney q. We don't all have kids! you don't need kids to watch the disney channel! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 02, 2011, 07:08:07 PM Ok.
We don't all have sky. And new q would be much more fun! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 02, 2011, 07:09:07 PM Ok. We don't all have sky. And new q would be much more fun! i have considered your request, screwed it up and thrown it in the bin. use your pass :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 02, 2011, 07:09:27 PM lol I like q5. Though shouldn't you add the corresponding female version for max amusement? I suggest replacing the Disney q. We don't all have kids! you don't need kids to watch the disney channel! Not everyone lives in the UK but we seem to have feck loads of those type questions every week too. Deal with it! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Nakor on February 02, 2011, 07:34:44 PM 3 guesses and question 5 - huh whats that all about?
But I am in for mid table mediocrity Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 02, 2011, 08:33:22 PM lot of guesses but I'm in..
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 02, 2011, 09:29:18 PM Bloody farce. I'll give it a go anyway, and probably smash it in.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: cambridgealex on February 03, 2011, 08:12:35 AM 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day.
LOL Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Girgy85 on February 03, 2011, 03:53:38 PM In.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 03, 2011, 06:27:25 PM 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day. LOL In. If you've put that as the answer girgy you might score an Ace :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 03, 2011, 07:10:51 PM Oh btw, you need to remove the word potentially from the thread title :)
And might see if I can do something about it definitely being over in a week too :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 03, 2011, 07:35:53 PM 6 entries so far. keep 'em coming!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 03, 2011, 07:54:54 PM Go on then I'll have another go, don't think I can do much worse than the last one
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 03, 2011, 07:56:19 PM In. might make the reveal this time!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2011, 10:11:25 AM Good questions - in.
Question 5 is probably the best question ever in a RSQ. :D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 04, 2011, 10:34:53 AM Good questions - in. Question 5 is probably the best question ever in a RSQ. :D i thought so too. some potential farce though as i've realised from one or two of the answers that i worded it a bit too ambiguously. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2011, 10:36:21 AM Good questions - in. Question 5 is probably the best question ever in a RSQ. :D i thought so too. some potential farce though as i've realised from one or two of the answers that i worded it a bit too ambiguously. Which is why it is the best question ever, on multiple levels. DUCY, love? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 04, 2011, 10:37:21 AM Good questions - in. Question 5 is probably the best question ever in a RSQ. :D i thought so too. some potential farce though as i've realised from one or two of the answers that i worded it a bit too ambiguously. Which is why it is the best question ever, on multiple levels. DUCY, love? yes, petal Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 04, 2011, 11:36:58 AM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2011, 12:00:44 PM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far. Can I change my answer now I know what year the list is from? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 04, 2011, 12:02:11 PM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far. Can I change my answer now I know what year the list is from? if you're answer was a post 2006 album you may. i believe your answer considerably predates 2006 though. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2011, 12:05:11 PM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far. Can I change my answer now I know what year the list is from? if you're answer was a post 2006 album you may. i believe your answer considerably predates 2006 though. But if it's based on a particular year, people will include recent albums from around that time. These albums might replace other, older albums. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 04, 2011, 12:07:03 PM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far. Can I change my answer now I know what year the list is from? if you're answer was a post 2006 album you may. i believe your answer considerably predates 2006 though. But if it's based on a particular year, people will include recent albums from around that time. These albums might replace other, older albums. well, I'm going to have to say no, as i'm aware that you've looked at the list. sorry for being so harsh and all that. if you want to replace it with another fail, that's ok though. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 04, 2011, 12:14:10 PM in some pre-reveal farce i've just realised that the chart i'm looking at for question 1 was compiled in 2006. I don't think that will affect anyone who has entered so far. Can I change my answer now I know what year the list is from? if you're answer was a post 2006 album you may. i believe your answer considerably predates 2006 though. But if it's based on a particular year, people will include recent albums from around that time. These albums might replace other, older albums. well, I'm going to have to say no, as i'm aware that you've looked at the list. sorry for being so harsh and all that. if you want to replace it with another fail, that's ok though. :D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: smashedagain on February 04, 2011, 02:26:01 PM ref q5...ask richard keys
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: smashedagain on February 04, 2011, 02:28:49 PM ref q2... shame on you guys. both the 2 year old twins both just nailed that one
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 05, 2011, 10:10:57 AM 13 entries. come on the rest of you - dawn, jack, adam, joobs etc
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Joobie538 on February 06, 2011, 01:36:37 AM 13 entries. come on the rest of you - dawn, jack, adam, joobs etc got ages yet... I'll get it done at some point tomorrow Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 06, 2011, 01:56:02 AM 13 entries. come on the rest of you - dawn, jack, adam, joobs etc got ages yet... I'll get it done at some point tomorrow good good! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Ironside on February 06, 2011, 02:07:46 AM man i would enter this but out of the first 5 questions the only answer i have is england for question 4
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 06, 2011, 02:17:27 AM In. This is not my answer to Q5 btw.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Girgy85 on February 06, 2011, 04:39:56 AM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 07, 2011, 05:50:03 AM bump to remind myself to enter tomorrow
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 07, 2011, 08:40:58 AM bump to remind myself to enter tomorrow Can you remind me too please? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 07, 2011, 04:20:26 PM bump to remind myself to enter tomorrow Can you remind me too please? Yup. Do it now! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 07, 2011, 05:34:21 PM bump to remind myself to enter tomorrow Can you remind me too please? Yup. Do it now! Good man...in by a hair. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 07, 2011, 07:56:09 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you.
an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 07, 2011, 08:18:07 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you. an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. WTF?! I've missed the last couple because of deadlines. Rush me backside to get it in for a change and now ya say I didn't need to rush?! FARCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 07, 2011, 08:28:37 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you. an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. WTF?! I've missed the last couple because of deadlines. Rush me backside to get it in for a change and now ya say I didn't need to rush?! FARCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can hardly be held responsible for the inflexibility of former QMs now, can I? Could use some help with the keeping the scores up to date tomorrow if there are any willing vounteers? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 07, 2011, 08:38:33 PM VERY very late...but if i'm allowed then i've sent my randoms and am IN!!!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 07, 2011, 08:44:53 PM Don't anyone worry about deadlines imo. Send em when ye like.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 07, 2011, 08:56:30 PM QM changing the rules already doesn't instil me with confidence.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 07, 2011, 11:56:30 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you. an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. WTF?! I've missed the last couple because of deadlines. Rush me backside to get it in for a change and now ya say I didn't need to rush?! FARCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can hardly be held responsible for the inflexibility of former QMs now, can I? Could use some help with the keeping the scores up to date tomorrow if there are any willing vounteers? I'd love to help if I can but I'm over my ex-mother-in-law's setting up a new telly for her (fml) and not expecting to be back until about 8pm. If that's any good to yer, let me know and the farce will be assured. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 02:11:41 PM I could help, but won't.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 02:24:11 PM I could help, but won't. +1 I can see (and look forward to the fact) that this is going to be a disaster of epic proportions. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 02:25:26 PM I could help, but won't. +1 I can see (and look forward to the fact) that this is going to be a disaster of epic proportions. She changed a question and wouldn't let me resubmit an answer for it - so no help from me at all. Instead, I'm going to be gatso and ItsMrAlex2U's unholy offspring tonight during the reveal. If I can be arsed. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 03:06:20 PM She hasn't been online today. Hope she's not smashed her PC to bits or anything like so she can get out of this.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 03:29:02 PM I am definitely online for this. Prepare for doom
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 05:50:00 PM We've actually been pretty crap with the past few weeks when it comes to giving the QM hassle. Adds that extra kick of comedy to the reveal imo therefore it's time to step it up a notch people! QM suck ups should be punished too. Let's have at 'em!!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 05:54:43 PM QM still hasn't been online today. This is quite concerning. Someone should ring her to make sure she's ok.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 05:59:22 PM QM still hasn't been online today. This is quite concerning. Someone should ring her to make sure she's ok. Probably still at work. Joobs and I will be here tonight as well. Have already realised I've made 2 EPIC fails. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 06:38:09 PM QM still hasn't been online today. This is quite concerning. Someone should ring her to make sure she's ok. been busy at work innit! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 06:38:54 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you. an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. WTF?! I've missed the last couple because of deadlines. Rush me backside to get it in for a change and now ya say I didn't need to rush?! FARCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can hardly be held responsible for the inflexibility of former QMs now, can I? Could use some help with the keeping the scores up to date tomorrow if there are any willing vounteers? I'd love to help if I can but I'm over my ex-mother-in-law's setting up a new telly for her (fml) and not expecting to be back until about 8pm. If that's any good to yer, let me know and the farce will be assured. you should have said 9pm imo, as reveal starting at 8.30. you're a superstar. thanks hun Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 06:41:16 PM Right. 24 entries. Marv.
Having set aside last night to go through the answers etc I was promptly sparked out at 9pm. Double Marv. Am glad of having a good night's sleep behind me as I've a feeling you lot won't be playing nicely tonight :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 06:42:46 PM 8.30pm start!? Sigh. I'm sat down ready for this as well.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 06:44:49 PM 8.30pm start!? Sigh. I'm sat down ready for this as well. hope it's a comfy seat Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 06:46:19 PM 8.30pm start!? Sigh. I'm sat down ready for this as well. hope it's a comfy seat Yup. Nice glass of red wine in hand too. Actually. This is a bit depressing. I should prob be out enjoying being young. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 06:50:09 PM I MAY be a few minutes late. Hasta go to the poeleece to collects me ID card. [ ] might get me through airport security without hassle in future.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 07:43:24 PM a rather pleasing 21 runners - thank you. an hour or so's leeway now if anyone wants to get a last minute entry in. WTF?! I've missed the last couple because of deadlines. Rush me backside to get it in for a change and now ya say I didn't need to rush?! FARCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can hardly be held responsible for the inflexibility of former QMs now, can I? Could use some help with the keeping the scores up to date tomorrow if there are any willing vounteers? I'd love to help if I can but I'm over my ex-mother-in-law's setting up a new telly for her (fml) and not expecting to be back until about 8pm. If that's any good to yer, let me know and the farce will be assured. you should have said 9pm imo, as reveal starting at 8.30. you're a superstar. thanks hun No probs chicka kjhdjhdfskhjfdefkjs Bit worried about this though: QM suck ups should be punished too. Let's have at 'em!! What can you offer me in the form of protection? Bearing in mind I'll be at her mercy in Killarney. FFS she threatened me for not supporting the Packers in the Super Bowl! Oh and by the way, wtf am I meant to be doing exactly ;D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 07:48:16 PM Oh and by the way, wtf am I meant to be doing exactly ;D keeping and posting the scores ffs. should keep you out of trouble enough that you won't have time for sucking up, and you'll be safe from the wrath of the crazy irish/american lady :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 07:48:56 PM lol score keeper is open for just as much abuse as the QM.
Make sure you don't make any mistakes Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 07:49:18 PM 8.30pm start!? Sigh. I'm sat down ready for this as well. hope it's a comfy seat Yup. Nice glass of red wine in hand too. Actually. This is a bit depressing. I should prob be out enjoying being young. yeah - once you hit 30 you'll forget what fun ever felt like ::) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 07:53:09 PM Someone is about to forfeit a scrabble game
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 07:54:30 PM Someone is about to forfeit a scrabble game Or two. Priorities please QM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 07:55:40 PM Someone is about to forfeit a scrabble game Or two. Priorities please QM Not talking to you ever again btw Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 07:56:31 PM Ooooh nearly 8pm.
Oh wait, we're starting at 8.30pm for some reason. grrrrrrrr Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 07:58:27 PM Someone is about to forfeit a scrabble game Or two. Priorities please QM Not talking to you ever again btw me? you helped me set a record. Unwittingly. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:00:19 PM Ooooh nearly 8pm. Oh wait, we're starting at 8.30pm for some reason. grrrrrrrr so i can do my scrabble moves first Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:04:27 PM Still not heard back from the poeleece, so gonna crack open a beer and swerve 'em til tomorrow. Will be here from the get go...wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!! [ ] lucky you
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:19:21 PM Can we start 10 mins early?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:20:20 PM Can we start 10 mins early? just getting a cuppa, then we'll go well, maybe Claire says (20:20): you ready to go in 3? Jack says (20:20): I'm trying to tabulate it for easy reading Claire says (20:20): is that a yes or a no, hun? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:24:41 PM Right then. everyone ready?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:25:24 PM Yes. First question please.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:26:58 PM technolog is official scorer?
Fuck our lives, Huns Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:27:00 PM Question1. Name an album that appears in the top 20 of NME's greatest albums of all time (as at 2006)
sheep - 3 points Dark side of the moon/Pink Floyd - technolog, the baron, sharplea London Calling/The Clash - tightend, AndrewT, Delboy Nevermind/Nirvana - jon mw, waz1892, cf 2 points Revolver/Beatles - snoopy, laxie Aces - 1 point Stone Roses/Stone Roses - nakor ok computer/radiohead - redsimon (What's the story) Morning Glory/Oasis - TRIP5 fails - 8 points Electric Ladyland/Jimi Hendrix - moonandback Thriller/Michael Jackson - stato_1, thewhisper, joobie, robert hm Funeral/Arcade Fire - girgy86 Bat out of hell/Meatloaf - hector62 Let it be/Beatles - mondatoo Rubber Soul/Beatles - kinboshi in utero/nirvana - silo graham Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:27:50 PM the full list, if anyone's interested:
1. ‘Definitely Maybe’ - Oasis 2. ‘Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band’ - The Beatles 3. ‘Revolver’ - The Beatles 4. ‘OK Computer' - Radiohead 5. ‘(What's The Story) Morning Glory?’ - Oasis 6. ‘Nevermind' - Nirvana 7. ‘The Stone Roses’ - The Stone Roses 8. ‘Dark Side Of The Moon’ - Pink Floyd 9. ‘The Queen Is Dead’ - The Smiths 10. ‘The Bends’ - Radiohead 11. ‘The Joshua Tree’ - U2 12. ‘London Calling' - The Clash 13. ‘The Beatles (The White Album)’ - The Beatles 14. ‘Abbey Road’ - The Beatles 15. ‘Up The Bracket’ - The Libertines 16. ‘Never Mind The Bollocks Here's The Sex Pistols’ - Sex Pistols 17. ‘Four Symbols (Led Zeppelin IV)’ - Led Zeppelin 18. ‘The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars’ - David Bowie 19. ‘A Night At The Opera' - Queen 20. ‘Is This It’ - The Strokes Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:29:24 PM No albums there since 2003 Claw, QM question-setting failure imo
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:29:48 PM Sigh. Originally had Sgt Pepper but thought it was a bit too obvious.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:30:06 PM No albums there since 2003 Claw, QM question-setting failure imo never said there were. that is the list, as at 2006. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:30:30 PM Chief suck-up here!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:31:11 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:31:14 PM London Calling/The Clash - tightend, AndrewT, Delboy
Damn. Lord Haw Haw, Public Schoolboy and Mr Nice all go for the flipping rebels The Clash. Go figure Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:31:24 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:32:38 PM presumably no objections on that one. jacqueline will be along with the scoresheet in a min.
edit: there ya go, he's efficient Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:33:17 PM all ready to move on?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:33:40 PM We aim to please
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:34:16 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:34:34 PM We aim to please watch out - laxie'll be gunning for ya! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:34:57 PM ok. short and sweet reveal suits me fine too :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:35:27 PM I hope I get to taste the promised land of cheesecake before I die.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:35:36 PM ok. short and sweet reveal suits me fine too :) For now... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:35:43 PM 2. Name a current, regular, TV series on the Disney Channel or Disney XD in the UK
sheep - 3 points Hannah Montana - girgy85, jonmw, AndrewT, Wizards of Waverley Place - tightend, waz1892, thewhisper Phineas and Ferb - moonandback, silo graham, Delboy aces - 1 point The Suite Life of Zach and Cody - hector62 X-men - the baron The Suite Life on Deck - laxie fails - 8 points Zack and Cody - joobie that one with the two brothers and a sister trying to get them into trouble - robert hm High School Musical - snoopy Spongebob Squarepants - sharplea Tom and Jerry - mondatoo Dora the Explorer - TRIP5 pass - 0 points nakor, redsimon, stato_1, kinboshi, technolog, cf Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:37:56 PM http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4739516
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 08:38:06 PM Hannah Montana - girgy85, jonmw, AndrewT,
dirty boys secret pleasure revealed Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:38:32 PM Objection
aces - 1 point The Suite Life of Zach and Cody - hector62 It is not a current series as production stopped in 2009, to be superceded by Suite Life on Deck. Repeats occasionally fill the schedule but it is not a current series. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:39:20 PM Objection aces - 1 point The Suite Life of Zach and Cody - hector62 It is not a current series as production stopped in 2009, to be superceded by Suite Life on Deck. Repeats occasionally fill the schedule but it is not a current series. it's currently shown regularly on Disney XD in the UK. therefore it's a pass. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:39:48 PM Objection aces - 1 point The Suite Life of Zach and Cody - hector62 It is not a current series as production stopped in 2009, to be superceded by Suite Life on Deck. Repeats occasionally fill the schedule but it is not a current series. wtf just... wtf Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:40:40 PM yeah wtf Claw - idiot!
See Laxie? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:41:20 PM Objection again
A current, regular series as in your question implies one that is currently being made. Suite Life of Zack and Cody is not. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:42:14 PM http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4739516 overruled. i think we all know the answer. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 08:42:29 PM Damn...I think I forgot to put my pass in...can i pass this one instead ;)
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:42:53 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:43:44 PM Objection again A current, regular series as in your question implies one that is currently being made. Suite Life of Zack and Cody is not. most of the shows being shown in the UK were made a while back. 'currently' may imply 'being made' to you, but the intention was to prevent people from using series' that were no longer being shown. overrulled again. Scores please jack. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 08:44:03 PM Objection to Hannah Montana. Last ever episode was last month. No longer current.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:44:14 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS really? i might have to fail you too if i sustain this..... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:44:52 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS precisely QM's poor vocabulary should not be an excuse for dismissing valid objections current series=currently in production, I think currently showing=on the channel You asked the former, and meant the latter Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:45:36 PM The other fecking series stopped being produced TWO YEARS ago!!!!! Hence my own brilliant answer of Suite Life on Deck...which is in fact the CURRENT series.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:45:41 PM Objection to Hannah Montana. Last ever episode was last month. No longer current. Bingo. Well played sir Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 08:46:01 PM ok. short and sweet reveal suits me fine too :) foreplay is so overated Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:46:06 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS precisely QM's poor vocabulary should not be an excuse for dismissing valid objections current series=currently in production, I think currently showing=on the channel You asked the former, and meant the latter Claw joins the increasingly long list of QMs who don't know the difference between what they meant to ask and what they actually asked. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:46:17 PM The other fecking series stopped being produced TWO YEARS ago!!!!! Hence my own brilliant answer of Suite Life on Deck...which is in fact the CURRENT series. She's right Fail Hannah Montana too. ta. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:46:21 PM Objection to Hannah Montana. Last ever episode was last month. No longer current. not yet been shown in the UK to my knowledge - will check Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 08:48:55 PM The other fecking series stopped being produced TWO YEARS ago!!!!! Hence my own brilliant answer of Suite Life on Deck...which is in fact the CURRENT series. She's right Fail Hannah Montana too. ta. You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz PS I deserve credit for trying even though I have seen 10 mins of Disney Ch and think I put in a fair description Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:48:58 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS precisely QM's poor vocabulary should not be an excuse for dismissing valid objections current series=currently in production, I think currently showing=on the channel You asked the former, and meant the latter Claw joins the increasingly long list of QMs who don't know the difference between what they meant to ask and what they actually asked. Been there, done that. As she has an official chicka scorer the work required if she admitted her mistake would be done by him/her...so no real downsides to showing the required flexibility imo Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:49:49 PM You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz 8 time winner in 42 RSQs, sir. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:50:13 PM The other fecking series stopped being produced TWO YEARS ago!!!!! Hence my own brilliant answer of Suite Life on Deck...which is in fact the CURRENT series. She's right Fail Hannah Montana too. ta. You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz PS I deserve credit for trying even though I have seen 10 mins of Disney Ch and think I put in a fair description Oh man...you DON'T want to be on my list. Stop kissing up to the QM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:50:20 PM all objections overruled.
moving on. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:50:23 PM You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz 8 time winner in 45 RSQs, sir. [ ] will be 9 after today Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:50:38 PM OBJECTION!!!!!!!! CURRENT series is what you asked for...not currently showing FFS precisely QM's poor vocabulary should not be an excuse for dismissing valid objections current series=currently in production, I think currently showing=on the channel You asked the former, and meant the latter Claw joins the increasingly long list of QMs who don't know the difference between what they meant to ask and what they actually asked. Been there, done that. As she has an official chicka scorer the work required if she admitted her mistake would be done by him/her...so no real downsides to showing the required flexibility imo How about feck off! Overrule pls Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:50:48 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:50:50 PM all objections overruled. moving on. lol. Had a good try at it. Onwards.... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 08:50:57 PM You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz 8 time winner in 42 RSQs, sir. But not the last one Take the final scrabble move ffs. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:51:03 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:51:21 PM The other fecking series stopped being produced TWO YEARS ago!!!!! Hence my own brilliant answer of Suite Life on Deck...which is in fact the CURRENT series. She's right Fail Hannah Montana too. ta. You want to be decision maker? Win the quiz PS I deserve credit for trying even though I have seen 10 mins of Disney Ch and think I put in a fair description no credit. you could have been describing phineas and ferb or the wizards of waverly place. should be extra points for trying to get two answers. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:51:38 PM Head in Sand. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:51:54 PM because none of them are valid. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 08:51:57 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Suggests she is reasonable, you should know better. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:52:36 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Suggests she is reasonable, you should know better. Sigh. Fair point. Yer off me list...for now Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:53:10 PM Not that I really care about this one as it wasn't tighty's answer. Move on then.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:53:16 PM reason - because, despite trying very hard to ensure all questions were as unambiguously worded as possible, i failed. if I'd chosen shows that were 'in production' no doubt someone would have said i clearly implied 'currently showing'.
right. question 3. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:53:37 PM Dare I ask...
who's on the... errr... list? <quake> Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:54:10 PM Question3. Name a blonde member (forum name) who appears in the top ten for 'most time online' as at 2/2/2011
sheep - 6 points Tightend - jonmw, waz1892, AndrewT, silo graham, joobie, delboy 3 points Dewi Cool - kinboshi, snoopy, sharplea 2 points RED-DOG - redsimon, the baron colchester kev - girgy85, hector62 Eck - mondatoo, laxie aces - 1 point booder - nakor bongo - cf gatso - TRIP5 byronkincaid - tightend fails - 11 points snoopy - moonandback greekstein - stato_1 thetank - thewhisper Ironside - technolog, robert hm Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 08:54:46 PM Fabulous. Scores. Next.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 08:54:59 PM reason - because, despite trying very hard to ensure all questions were as unambiguously worded as possible, i failed. if I'd chosen shows that were 'in production' no doubt someone would have said i clearly implied 'currently showing'. right. question 3. ok thats an admission of sorts, but still no validation of not allowing a correct objection. Avoiding another error is not an excuse for ignoring this one Anyway, Q3 Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:55:15 PM You keep getting her to ignore objections to save yer scoring and yer absolutely at the top hun!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:55:40 PM reason - because, despite trying very hard to ensure all questions were as unambiguously worded as possible, i failed. if I'd chosen shows that were 'in production' no doubt someone would have said i clearly implied 'currently showing'. right. question 3. ok thats an admission of sorts, but still no validation of not allowing a correct objection. Avoiding another error is not an excuse for ignoring this one Anyway, Q3 ok, monopoly boy :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 08:56:18 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Suggests she is reasonable, you should know better. Sigh. Fair point. Yer off me list...for now What the fk, I didn;t know I was on it Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 08:57:11 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Suggests she is reasonable, you should know better. Sigh. Fair point. Yer off me list...for now What the fk, I didn;t know I was on it Kissing up to QM is auto entry to list obv Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:57:50 PM all objections overruled. moving on. WTF?! REASON PLEEEEEEASE? Suggests she is reasonable, you should know better. Sigh. Fair point. Yer off me list...for now What the fk, I didn;t know I was on it Kissing up to QM is auto entry to list obv shall i pm you a private list? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 08:58:16 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: George2Loose on February 08, 2011, 08:58:43 PM what the hell is this?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 08:59:43 PM 4. Name a team that reached the quarter finals in the 2010 FIFA world cup.
sheep - 6 points Spain - hector62, snoopy, silo graham, joobie, robert hm, delboy 5 points Uruguay - nakor, kinboshi, technolog, the baron, sharplea 4 points Holland - redsimon, moonandback, stato_1, jonmw Germany - mondatoo, AndrewT, TheWhisper, laxie 3 points Ghana - waz1892, cf, TRIP5 2 points Paraguay - girgy85, tightened Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:00:11 PM what the hell is this? Reverse Sheep Quiz. We have them every week. Where the feck have you been?! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:01:00 PM http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4739568
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:01:05 PM what the hell is this? Reverse Sheep Quiz. We have them every week. Where the feck have you been?! this. where are your answers? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:01:40 PM 3 points
Paraguay - girgy85, tightened 2 points please Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:01:43 PM http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=4739568 on what grounds? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:02:27 PM Found me whip. Ready for ya now
(http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/whiplash.gif) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:02:53 PM 3 points Paraguay - girgy85, tightened 2 points please fixed Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:02:58 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup.
The Netherlands on the other hand... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:03:09 PM Found me whip. Ready for ya now (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/whiplash.gif) ooo - likey Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:03:35 PM So anyone who sent "The Netherlands" passes and gets marked accordingly.
Anyone who sent Holland is wrong and fails. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Nakor on February 08, 2011, 09:03:42 PM Its all a little heated in here this evening !!!
Cadbury's caramel anyone? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:03:42 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... meh - one of two of 'em said the netherlands. same difference imo. letting it through on grounds of reasonableness. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 09:04:58 PM Its all a little heated in here this evening !!! Cadbury's caramel anyone? yeah, whay not? Good man Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:05:01 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... meh - one of two of 'em said the netherlands. same difference imo. letting it through on grounds of reasonableness. WTF is this. Reasonableness has no place in this quiz. Holland is wrong. Do you not know the difference? It's like submitting Lancashire as an answer for the English national team. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:05:17 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... I put Netherlands, fail Holland imo Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:06:00 PM cf is correct, sadly.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:06:23 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... meh - one of two of 'em said the netherlands. same difference imo. letting it through on grounds of reasonableness. WTF is this. Reasonableness has no place in this quiz. Holland is wrong. Do you not know the difference? It's like submitting Lancashire as an answer for the English national team. i know the difference geographically. as far as footy is concerned they're known as 'holland' innit. i'll change my post to show the answer as 'the netherlands' if you want, but anyone who said holland is getting lumped in. i'm not a pedant. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:06:59 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... meh - one of two of 'em said the netherlands. same difference imo. letting it through on grounds of reasonableness. WTF is this. Reasonableness has no place in this quiz. Holland is wrong. Do you not know the difference? It's like submitting Lancashire as an answer for the English national team. i know the difference geographically. as far as footy is concerned they're known as 'holland' innit. i'll change my post to show the answer as 'the netherlands' if you want, but anyone who said holland is getting lumped in. i'm not a pedant. (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/monkey-1.jpg) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:07:17 PM Holland didn't have a team in the world cup. The Netherlands on the other hand... meh - one of two of 'em said the netherlands. same difference imo. letting it through on grounds of reasonableness. WTF is this. Reasonableness has no place in this quiz. Holland is wrong. Do you not know the difference? It's like submitting Lancashire as an answer for the English national team. i know the difference geographically. as far as footy is concerned they're known as 'holland' innit. i'll change my post to show the answer as 'the netherlands' if you want, but anyone who said holland is getting lumped in. i'm not a pedant. No they're not. They're known as The Netherlands. Anyone in footy who calls them Holland is wrong. That does not make it a correct answer to your quiz. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:07:26 PM As far as footy is concerned they are called the Netherlands - NICKNAMED Holland.
Like putting The Gas as an answer for Bristol Rovers. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:08:13 PM ok. i'll give it 2 minutes if anyone wants to fight their corner over holland, then consider the cases put by both sides.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:08:18 PM As far as footy is concerned they are called the Netherlands - NICKNAMED Holland. Like putting The Gas as an answer for Bristol Rovers. correct Claw is incorrect. The Netherland national football team is not Holland. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:09:33 PM ok. i'll give it 2 minutes if anyone wants to fight their corner over holland, then consider the cases put by both sides. We've already spent 5 friggin minutes fighting it...WTF?! (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/monkey-1.jpg) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:10:12 PM ok. i'll give it 2 minutes if anyone wants to fight their corner over holland, then consider the cases put by both sides. We've already spent 5 friggin minutes fighting it...WTF?! (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/monkey-1.jpg) i either listen to and consider objections or i sail right through....... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:10:42 PM No-one will fight their corner over Holland they'll realise they've submitted a wrong answer.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:11:16 PM obv too scared to post on here....
Jack says (21:04): tell me when to post Jack says (21:08): Holland fine imo everyone knows them as Holland as you well know Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:11:26 PM As far as footy is concerned they are called the Netherlands - NICKNAMED Holland. Like putting The Gas as an answer for Bristol Rovers. correct Claw is incorrect. The Netherland national football team is not Holland. Wait, I thought Sharplea was arguing that it was reasonable to Whale the name with the nickname. I was going to withdraw my objection on that grounds. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 09:11:32 PM ok. i'll give it 2 minutes if anyone wants to fight their corner over holland, then consider the cases put by both sides. We've already spent 5 friggin minutes fighting it...WTF?! (http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/monkey-1.jpg) i either listen to and consider objections or i sail right through....... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:11:40 PM General surprise expressed at QM performance
(http://www.kernan.eu/d/273-1/startled-fionn.jpg) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:12:00 PM As far as footy is concerned they are called the Netherlands - NICKNAMED Holland. Like putting The Gas as an answer for Bristol Rovers. correct Claw is incorrect. The Netherland national football team is not Holland. Wait, I thought it Sharplea was arguing that it was reasonable to Whale the name with the nickname. I was going to withdraw my objection on that grounds. Moron. Holland is a FAIL. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 09:12:08 PM FIFA, whom The relevant FA's are members of , have no such team as Holland. But Netherlands are registered.
Have to Fail Holland Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:12:29 PM obv too scared to post on here.... Jack says (21:04): tell me when to post Jack says (21:08): Holland fine imo everyone knows them as Holland as you well know Yer on the list fo sho now hun. Cheesecake? What cheesecake? Good thing yer on a diet. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:13:01 PM As far as footy is concerned they are called the Netherlands - NICKNAMED Holland. Like putting The Gas as an answer for Bristol Rovers. correct Claw is incorrect. The Netherland national football team is not Holland. Wait, I thought it Sharplea was arguing that it was reasonable to Whale the name with the nickname. I was going to withdraw my objection on that grounds. Moron. Holland is a FAIL. OK I still object then Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:13:24 PM Awwww Dawn!
Please!?! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:13:25 PM OK. i would have been happy to allow leniency and whale holland and the netherlands, but as neither of the hollandees are fighting their corner i'm failing 'em. amended scores to follow
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:13:57 PM Thankyou. I will now go and withdraw the bad things I said about you elsewhere.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 09:15:20 PM OK. i would have been happy to allow leniency and whale holland and the netherlands, but as neither of the hollandees are fighting their corner i'm failing 'em. amended scores to follow But for clarity, you should be failing them for the right reasons, not because they couldn't fight the corner...they might be shy. The Fail should be for a non exsitant name being put forward. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:16:20 PM Anyway. On to the one we're all looking forward too...
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:16:22 PM amended
4. Name a team that reached the quarter finals in the 2010 FIFA world cup. sheep - 6 points Spain - hector62, snoopy, silo graham, joobie, robert hm, delboy 5 points Uruguay - nakor, kinboshi, technolog, the baron, sharplea 4 points Germany - mondatoo, AndrewT, TheWhisper, laxie 3 points Ghana - waz1892, cf, TRIP5 2 points Paraguay - girgy85, tightened The Netherlands - redsimon jonmw fail - 11 points Holland - moonandback, stato_1 Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:17:01 PM Actually. I think Holland should be allowed.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:17:23 PM Anyway. On to the one we're all looking forward too... i'm gonna be relying on you lads to tell me if any of these are made up. they all sound feasible to me :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:17:48 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:18:53 PM Question 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day.
aces - 1 point ruined her - nakor done the deed - redsimon tapped that - moonandback drove one through her - stato_1 knocked her back out - girgy85 shagged it - mondatoo knocked her back door in - kinboshi left her smoking on the bed - technolog smashed the granny out of her - the baron nailed her - sharplea had sex with - cf we were 'going at it' - laxie gave the lady one - robert hm got some - TRIP5 gave her the benefit - Delboy fails - 6 points banged - jonmw, joobie ride - snoopy she was so hairy down here it was like wading through bracken - hector62 I made a late entry into her reverse sheep - AndrewT pass - 0 points tightend, waz1892, TheWhisper, silo graham Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:19:05 PM Actually. I think Holland should be allowed. Me too. We were a bit harsh really Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 09:19:23 PM amended 4. Name a team that reached the quarter finals in the 2010 FIFA world cup. sheep - 6 points Spain - hector62, snoopy, silo graham, joobie, robert hm, delboy 5 points Uruguay - nakor, kinboshi, technolog, the baron, sharplea 4 points Germany - mondatoo, AndrewT, TheWhisper, laxie 3 points Ghana - waz1892, cf, TRIP5 2 points Paraguay - girgy85, tightened The Netherlands - redsimon jonmw fail - 11 points Holland - moonandback, stato_1 couldn't remember if I put Holland or Netherlanads but both should count Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:19:37 PM banged her is good - regular one in Scouse land.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:20:03 PM banged her is good - regular one in Scouse land. no one said 'banged her' Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:20:31 PM its the "banged" bit mainly.
both men and women use it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:20:47 PM lol quality question.
object to smashed the granny. and done the deed. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:21:33 PM Banged is fine...
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:21:42 PM Quote banged 98 up, 41 down To have meaningless sex, or a word that you and your buds use in substitution of the word sex, make love, etc. from Urban Dictionary That's a separate entry to 'banged her' so valid by itself Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Joobie538 on February 08, 2011, 09:21:44 PM from the urban dictionary
5. banged a common word meaning to have sex-past tense "I got banged last night" Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:21:50 PM banged is good, so is ride. but cf's?! WTF?! Since when is 'had sex with' a SLANG term?!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:21:54 PM think the reverse sheep one is probably also true in Wales.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:22:03 PM oh my
I could be here a while Lets start with left her smoking on the bed - technolog ???? FAIL, SURELY? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:22:12 PM its the "banged" bit mainly. both men and women use it. not accepting one words answers. I asked for a phrase. phrase [freyz] Show IPA noun, verb, phrased, phras·ing. –noun 1. Grammar . a. a sequence of two or more words arranged in a grammatical construction and acting as a unit in a sentence. b. (in English) a sequence of two or more words that does not contain a finite verb and its subject or that does not consist of clause elements such as subject, verb, object, or complement, as a preposition and a noun or pronoun, an adjective and noun, or an adverb and verb. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:22:25 PM Done the deed implies something unpleasant has been done. You wouldn't brag to your friends about this.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:22:38 PM from the urban dictionary 5. banged a common word meaning to have sex-past tense "I got banged last night" yep - word. not a phrase. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:22:42 PM How is banged a fail?
One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:22:54 PM lol quality question. object to smashed the granny. and done the deed. both fine imo Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:22:57 PM banged is good, so is ride. but cf's?! WTF?! Since when is 'had sex with' a SLANG term?! Question never said slang. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Nakor on February 08, 2011, 09:23:01 PM WP Baron
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:23:19 PM Quote banged 98 up, 41 down To have meaningless sex, or a word that you and your buds use in substitution of the word sex, make love, etc. from Urban Dictionary That's a separate entry to 'banged her' so valid by itself see my reply to joobie Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:23:26 PM Done the deed implies something unpleasant has been done. You wouldn't brag to your friends about this. This. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:23:31 PM How is banged a fail? One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. ignore, Claire Outstanding QM pedantry on one word vs phrase. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:23:59 PM How is banged a fail? One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. not posting the reasoning again - read the thread. i asked for a phrase - not a word. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:24:30 PM oh my I could be here a while Lets start with left her smoking on the bed - technolog ???? FAIL, SURELY? I may be but the expression is full of WIN Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 09:24:38 PM Errrmmm...minor QM error...my answer was Got Some...
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:24:42 PM oh my I could be here a while Lets start with left her smoking on the bed - technolog ???? FAIL, SURELY? formal objection Not commonly used. Even by Jack Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:24:54 PM banged is good, so is ride. but cf's?! WTF?! Since when is 'had sex with' a SLANG term?! Question never said slang. No but it did say commonly used...where do you live?! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:24:55 PM oh my I could be here a while Lets start with left her smoking on the bed - technolog ???? FAIL, SURELY? i think clear lies and exaggeration are to be expected Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: AndrewT on February 08, 2011, 09:24:59 PM left her smoking on the bed - technolog This is why you need to warm them up a bit first. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:25:23 PM How is banged a fail? One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. not posting the reasoning again - read the thread. i asked for a phrase - not a word. Can you find anybody else at all who thinks it should be a fail? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:25:48 PM banged is good, so is ride. but cf's?! WTF?! Since when is 'had sex with' a SLANG term?! Question never said slang. No but it did say commonly used...where do you live?! In a place where we're obv far too classy to use crass terms should as banged and smashed it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:26:18 PM Errrmmm...minor QM error...my answer was Got Some... transposed yours and delboy's - scores remain the same Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:26:30 PM oh my I could be here a while Lets start with left her smoking on the bed - technolog ???? FAIL, SURELY? formal objection Not commonly used. Especially by Jack FYP Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:26:38 PM Done the deed implies something unpleasant has been done. You wouldn't brag to your friends about this. This. Bump. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:26:47 PM How is banged a fail? One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. not posting the reasoning again - read the thread. i asked for a phrase - not a word. Can you find anybody else at all who thinks it should be a fail? tightend not that it matters - qm decision final Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:27:52 PM Done the deed implies something unpleasant has been done. You wouldn't brag to your friends about this. This. Bump. whereas nailed, smashed, screwed etc don't? done the deed is fine Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:28:11 PM How is banged a fail? One of the more common terms on the list, imo, Claw. not posting the reasoning again - read the thread. i asked for a phrase - not a word. Can you find anybody else at all who thinks it should be a fail? tightend not that it matters - qm decision final I know, I agree with the decision - just didn't want to give in too easily Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: George2Loose on February 08, 2011, 09:28:27 PM had sex with should be a fail
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: celtic on February 08, 2011, 09:28:36 PM This is very clicky.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:29:01 PM any outstanding objections (by which i mean any i've missed, not extra specially good ones or regurgitated ones i've already ruled on)?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:29:18 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:29:21 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:29:26 PM Done the deed implies something unpleasant has been done. You wouldn't brag to your friends about this. This. Bump. whereas nailed, smashed, screwed etc don't? done the deed is fine No, they're completely different. Done the deed sounds like someone has just been to the toilet. You certainly wouldn't use it as a bragging phrase. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:29:29 PM This is very clicky. wonder how much RSQ1 would cost with the DVLA? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:29:58 PM had sex with should be a fail THANK YOU!!! FINALLY a voice of reason! Abso BS to say that's a 'common phrase' among lads when chatting the next day. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:30:10 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:30:32 PM agreed. 'had sex with' is now a fail.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: celtic on February 08, 2011, 09:30:48 PM This is very clicky. wonder how much RSQ1 would cost with the DVLA? £5999 with DVLA Sofa can get you it for £250k though as you're a mate. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:30:56 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! OK back to my spreadsheet then :( Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:30:57 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! it did. sorry. fail. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:31:12 PM agreed. 'had sex with' is now a fail. superb QMing. well played Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:31:47 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! it did. sorry. fail. 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day. Erm. Does it? I don't see it... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:32:18 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! No but it did say common. yer not typical is all I can reckon. agreed. 'had sex with' is now a fail. superb QMing. well played wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:32:55 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! it did. sorry. fail. 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day. Erm. Does it? I don't see it... oh. ffs. not a fail. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:33:28 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:33:49 PM lol tightend
lol laxie lol g2l Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:34:13 PM right - we're moving on.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:34:20 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! surely this warrants penalty points? put these people in their place. show your authority. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:34:40 PM lol tightend lol laxie lol g2l so close at getting a silvrikin flounce too Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:34:52 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! COMMON is what ya said. Name me one common lad who says, "Oi Lads. Guess what? I had sex with this really pretty girl last night. Tee hee." FFS...FARCE!!!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:34:58 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:34:58 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! surely this warrants penalty points? put these people in their place. show your authority. doubt any of them are going to win anyway Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: George2Loose on February 08, 2011, 09:35:03 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 09:35:12 PM had sex with should be a fail Agree. Slang asked for as previously stated. FAIL imo It didn't specify slang! it did. sorry. fail. 5. Give a commonly used phrase that a man might use to describe making love to a pretty girl when bragging to his friends about it the following day. Erm. Does it? I don't see it... oh. ffs. not a fail. wheeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is the standard of farce that has made the RSQ what it is today Keep up the good work :)up Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:35:31 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! COMMON is what ya said. Name me one common lad who says, "Oi Lads. Guess what? I had sex with this really pretty girl last night. Tee hee." FFS...FARCE!!!!!! i said commonly used. i'd imagine it's probably the most common of the lot! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:35:39 PM I'm more likely to use that than what Technolog came out with ffs.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:36:25 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" who are you? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:37:00 PM any further objections from non rsq clique members will be ignored.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: George2Loose on February 08, 2011, 09:37:14 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" who are you? no one but I make a good point mayhaps? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:37:24 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" who are you? yeah GTFO. no posting in here unless you're part of the click. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 09:37:27 PM lol quality question. object to smashed the granny.. Leave my fetish out of this Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:37:36 PM and all of you trying to convince me the question said 'slang' - shame on you! not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" who are you? no one but I make a good point mayhaps? nope. ignoring ya :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:37:50 PM Shockingly bad reversal of fail imo. QM has lost the plot with her own questions.
OBVIOUSLY - not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: George2Loose on February 08, 2011, 09:38:26 PM Shockingly bad reversal of fail imo. QM has lost the plot with her own questions. OBVIOUSLY - not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" :D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:38:58 PM Shockingly bad reversal of fail imo. QM has lost the plot with her own questions. OBVIOUSLY - not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" dawn, dawn, dawn. getting within a foot of a female is something a lot of blokes would want to brag about, never mind actually getting in a real life girl's knickers. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:39:12 PM I feel it's gonna start going horribly wrong for me now :(
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:40:07 PM I feel it's gonna start going horribly wrong for me now :( not quite yet imo Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 09:40:18 PM Clicque here :- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXQpJu_gWCM&feature=fvst
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:40:22 PM Question 6. Name a singer that had at least one solo line in Band Aid's 'Do they know it's Christmas' (from any of the 1984, 1989 or 2004 versions)
sheep - 6 points Paul Young - redsimon, tightend, hector62, technolog, robert hm, TRIP5 5 points Bono - moonandback, mondatoo, silo graham, joobie, delboy 4 points Dizzee Rascal - nakor, girgy85, the baron, sharplea 2 points Boy George - jonmw, kinboshi aces - 1 point sonia - snoopy Robbie Williams - cf fails - 11 points Rod Stewart - stato_1 Midge Ure - laxie Thom Yorke - waz1892 Tony Hadley - AndrewT Sting - TheWhisper Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:40:30 PM Shockingly bad reversal of fail imo. QM has lost the plot with her own questions. OBVIOUSLY - not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" dawn, dawn, dawn. getting within a foot of a female is something a lot of blokes would want to brag about, never mind actually getting in a real life girl's knickers. Right. And they sure are gonna word it that way (I had sex with her) if they get further Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:41:48 PM Shockingly bad reversal of fail imo. QM has lost the plot with her own questions. OBVIOUSLY - not the slang more the bragging part. You wouldnt turn to your mates unless your a toff and say "i had sex with" and if your a toff you probably say "made love to" dawn, dawn, dawn. getting within a foot of a female is something a lot of blokes would want to brag about, never mind actually getting in a real life girl's knickers. Right. And they sure are gonna word it that way (I had sex with her) if they get further some would. we're on question 6 now. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:42:22 PM Oh HELL NO!!! Why is mine a fail?!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:42:55 PM Oh HELL NO!!! Why is mine a fail?! because he didn't have a solo line. obv. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 09:43:10 PM Oh HELL NO!!! Why is mine a fail?! because it is wrong. Suprised Sting is a fail though, unlucky that man Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:43:37 PM Boy George - jonmw, kinboshi [ ] shocked at this answer. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 09:43:45 PM Hi
Sorry I'm late Cliffs on last 14 pages pls? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:44:02 PM Oh HELL NO!!! Why is mine a fail?! Shit. Never mind. Read the damn question wrong so might actually be a fail. Not sure and about to give up the will to live over the last one anyway. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:44:11 PM Hi Sorry I'm late Cliffs on last 14 pages pls? farce Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:44:22 PM Oh HELL NO!!! Why is mine a fail?! because it is wrong. Suprised Sting is a fail though, unlucky that man yeah i didn't realise til i double checked it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:44:30 PM Hi Sorry I'm late Cliffs on last 14 pages pls? F. A. R. C. E. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 09:44:48 PM Sting sang 'the bitter sting of tears' line in the first one
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 09:45:19 PM Hi Sorry I'm late Cliffs on last 14 pages pls? F. A. R. C. E. Oh good Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:45:21 PM Sting sang 'the bitter sting of tears' line in the first one not solo - with tony hadley Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:46:24 PM Well someone is lying
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:46:53 PM Well someone is lying sharplea is - that's why he deleted his post :) he was thinking of: 'And there won't be snow in Africa, this Christmas time' Boy George/Paul Weller/Sting Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 09:46:56 PM Well someone is lying I might have been wrong. I saw him singing with Weller, then Hadley, then Sting again...so not sure. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 09:47:26 PM Sting sang 'the bitter sting of tears' line in the first one not solo - with tony hadley He was on his own in the video TH sang backing vocals to him Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:48:18 PM Right...moving on before we're as old as Tikay
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:48:24 PM musical interlude so i can grab a cuppa, and you can check the soloists :)
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5cX_ncZLls Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:50:42 PM Better musical interlude. What i'm currently listening to.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h37KQu64RY4 This was a potential RSQ question last time for me. Name a celebrity. But I figured apart from Noel Edmonds no-one else was obvious. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:52:17 PM Sighhhhhhhhhhhh...a break?! In all fairness.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:53:04 PM righto. as soon as jacky has done the scores, on to question 7
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:53:13 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:53:43 PM thanks honey xxx
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 09:54:04 PM righto. as soon as jacky has done the scores, on to question 7 hmmm. 9 secs. Must do better imo :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:54:24 PM Question 7. Name a compulsory subject on the National Curriculum for children in key stage 1 and 2 (primary school) in England.
sheep - 10 points Mathematics - nakor, girgy85, jonmw, mondatoo, AndrewT, the baron, joobie, cf, robert hm, delboy 3 points English - redsimon, TRIP5, TheWhisper 2 points Music - stato_1, silo graham Geography - kinboshi, snoopy Science - laxie, sharplea ace - 1 point PE - tightend fail - 15 points RE - waz1892, technolog pass - 0 points moonandback, hector62 Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:54:41 PM omg, could i win!! No. Because my next lot of answers are crap and prob all sheep :(
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:55:24 PM sigh. that's that :(
thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:56:03 PM omg, could i win!! No. Because my next lot of answers are crap and prob all sheep :( you may be surprised ;) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:56:47 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 09:57:30 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? you beat me to it Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:57:48 PM omg, could i win!! No. Because my next lot of answers are crap and prob all sheep :( you may be surprised ;) although unlikely, tbf Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 09:58:05 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? No because they used at least some part of the actual name...but I would seriously consider PE a fail. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 09:58:12 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? you beat me to it yes! I lost points by not being failed Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:58:17 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? you beat me to it lol. not doing it coz it'll probably give the lot of you a better score :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: AndrewT on February 08, 2011, 09:58:20 PM Music??
Really?? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 09:58:29 PM OBJECTION.
RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:58:38 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 09:58:42 PM sigh. that's that :( thought maths might have been a so obvious no one will go for it. should i fail everyone who said 'maths' rather than 'mathematics'? Nope...they'll probably end up with 9 points rather than the 10 they already have ;) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 09:59:42 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:00:45 PM Don't think can really argue against "maths" :(
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:00:51 PM PE is definitely a pass. School governor here, and its one that people are always surprised at.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:01:21 PM OBJECTION!!!
PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:01:46 PM Don't think can really argue against "maths" :( i'll bet you could if you'd said mathematics :D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:02:27 PM Don't think can really argue against "maths" :( i'll bet you could if you'd said mathematics :D Ok then. Objection to "maths". And objection to "PE". Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:02:47 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:03:42 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. That's rubbish! I could 've just given the answer of S so and ya'd hafta give it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:03:54 PM maths and PE both fine.
RE/religious education/religion/whatever fail. scores on the doors please! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:04:00 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. Yeah, but it was TightEnd's answer. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:04:17 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 10:04:43 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:04:49 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. Yeah, but it was TightEnd's answer. final warning. I don't want to send you to bed but one more bit of cheek and you will leave me with no choice. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:05:10 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. That's rubbish! I could 've just given the answer of S so and ya'd hafta give it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:05:14 PM OBJECTION!!! PE is not the name of the subject!!! It's Physical Education! No different to the Holland Netherlands debate imo. overruled. common sense ftw again I'm afraid. That's rubbish! I could 've just given the answer of S so and ya'd hafta give it. now you're just being silly. the rsq reveal is no place for sil........oh Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:05:21 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:06:17 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:06:33 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. Math obv Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:06:39 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:06:46 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. you are in danger of starting me off Government literature refers to PE as a matter of course. S could mean anything, PE is clearly the subject Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:07:44 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Only because your Governess taught you this Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:07:51 PM right - QM decisions have been made and are final
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:07:58 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii -got the boss man on me side now! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:08:08 PM PE sounds like an abbreviation to me.
:hello: Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:08:26 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. you are in danger of starting me off Government literature refers to PE as a matter of course. S could mean anything, PE is clearly the subject Science? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:08:55 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii -got the boss man on me side now! sigh - the boss man that decided that i must have been late to work coz i was in traffic at 9.30. never occurred to him i'd been in way before he had arrived and was already out doing stuff ::) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:09:25 PM Question 8. Name someone that has held the title of king or queen of the jungle after winning 'i'm a celebrity, get me out of here' (UK version only) sheep 4 points Carol Thatcher - nakor, moonandback, tightend, hector62 3 points Kerry Katona - redsimon, mondatoo, joobie Christopher Biggins - AndrewT, robert hm, TRIP5 Joe Swash - girgy85, waz1892, cf 2 points Phil Tuffnell - kinboshi, silo graham joe pasquale - technolog, the baron stacey solomon - sharplea, laxie aces - 1 point Gino D'Acampo - TheWhisper tony blackburn - snoopy fail - 9 points tara palmper tompkinson - stato_1 pass - 0 points pass - jonmw, delboy Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:09:40 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. you are in danger of starting me off Government literature refers to PE as a matter of course. S could mean anything, PE is clearly the subject Science? Sociology? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:09:46 PM People would tell their grandchildren of this moment.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:09:55 PM You asked for NAME - NOT abbreviation!!!
This is fecking ridiculous! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 10:10:05 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. last chance to make the correct decision...addition means to add too...that fact that it is being added to the list of compulsory subjects surely makes it one. The addition isn't due to it NOT being a true compulsory subject, but to make clear it isn't compulsory to attend Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:10:09 PM Just reading through the farcical reveal.
In a bit of a Holland-daze to be honest. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:10:15 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii -got the boss man on me side now! sigh - the boss man that decided that i must have been late to work coz i was in traffic at 9.30. never occurred to him i'd been in way before he had arrived and was already out doing stuff ::) Good bluffing skills! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:10:37 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii -got the boss man on me side now! sigh - the boss man that decided that i must have been late to work coz i was in traffic at 9.30. never occurred to him i'd been in way before he had arrived and was already out doing stuff ::) I couldn't work out how it took you 3 hrs to get to Park Royal from home?? I had a bad day!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:10:43 PM move on people - question 5 is done.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:11:08 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. last chance to make the correct decision...addition means to add too...that fact that it is being added to the list of compulsory subjects surely makes it one. The addition isn't due to it NOT being a true compulsory subject, but to make clear it isn't compulsory to attend Sorry, fairy stories aren't a compulsory subject - as the students don't HAVE TO be taught it. Which is too bloody right. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:11:15 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. I agree.. Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii -got the boss man on me side now! sigh - the boss man that decided that i must have been late to work coz i was in traffic at 9.30. never occurred to him i'd been in way before he had arrived and was already out doing stuff ::) I couldn't work out how it took you 3 hrs to get to Park Royal from home?? I had a bad day!!!! yeah, takes a while when you go via kensington and epsom ::) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:11:32 PM move on people - question 5 is done. Did you smash it? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:12:04 PM In fact, PE and Maths are fails. They aren't the NAME of the course. They're both slang or abbreviations which is not what you asked for. you are in danger of starting me off Government literature refers to PE as a matter of course. S could mean anything, PE is clearly the subject Science? Sociology? lol Not when I was at school Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:12:09 PM O
M G !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's not like he didn't know how to spell the whole fecking lot out! Giving an ace for laziness is just shocking imo. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:12:13 PM move on people - question 5 is done. Did you smash it? not for some time, sadly. i meant question 7, obv. farce. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:12:39 PM move on people - question 5 is done. Did you smash it? not for some time, sadly. Were you left smoking? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:13:25 PM move on people - question 5 is done. Did you smash it? not for some time, sadly. Were you left smoking? :-X i do like a cig after generally. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:14:13 PM presume everyone's ok with question 8?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:14:28 PM presume everyone's ok with question 8? What was it? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:14:40 PM Never thought I'd say this, but about time you showed up Kin.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:15:19 PM presume everyone's ok with question 8? What was it? kings/queens of the jungle Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:15:59 PM Never thought I'd say this, but about time you showed up Kin. Apologies. To be honest, I thought it'd be finished by now. Looks like it's descended into complete farce though. Holland, PE and leaving her smoking... would never have happened in gatso's day. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 10:16:27 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. last chance to make the correct decision...addition means to add too...that fact that it is being added to the list of compulsory subjects surely makes it one. The addition isn't due to it NOT being a true compulsory subject, but to make clear it isn't compulsory to attend Sorry, fairy stories aren't a compulsory subject - as the students don't HAVE TO be taught it. Which is too bloody right. so you don't believe in Robbie Fowler? lol. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:17:04 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:17:26 PM Question 9. Name a novel written by one of the Brontë sisters (Charlotte Brontë, Emily Brontë or Anne Brontë)
sheep - 7 points Jane Eyre - moonandback, waz1892, hector62, kinboshi, silo graham, cf, TRIP5 6 points Wuthering Heights - nakor, redsimon, stato_1, technolog, the baron, delboy 2 points Agnes Grey - tightend, jonmw fails - 12 points cf's blog - TheWhisper Pride and Prejudice - robert hm pass - 0 points girgy85, mondatoo, AndrewT, snoopy, sharplea, laxie, joobie Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:17:42 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. last chance to make the correct decision...addition means to add too...that fact that it is being added to the list of compulsory subjects surely makes it one. The addition isn't due to it NOT being a true compulsory subject, but to make clear it isn't compulsory to attend Sorry, fairy stories aren't a compulsory subject - as the students don't HAVE TO be taught it. Which is too bloody right. so you don't believe in Robbie Fowler? lol. Of course I do. But he isn't covered in the RE curriculum - which is why it's a load of rubbish. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:17:48 PM Never thought I'd say this, but about time you showed up Kin. Apologies. To be honest, I thought it'd be finished by now. Looks like it's descended into complete farce though. Holland, PE and leaving her smoking... would never have happened in gatso's day. There's even threats of draggin' jebus into it...or summat like that Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:18:26 PM WP tighty.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:18:27 PM come on tighty!!!
Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:18:37 PM Never thought I'd say this, but about time you showed up Kin. Apologies. To be honest, I thought it'd be finished by now. Looks like it's descended into complete farce though. Holland, PE and leaving her smoking... would never have happened in gatso's day. There's even threats of draggin' jebus into it...or summat like that Is there a danger of moving on to question 8 or 9 or whatever? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:18:46 PM worthy of being shared here - anonymously of course....:)
Jane Eyre (Charlotte) (had to study that for English A-level. It's about the emancipation of women and their ability to be independent and yet 'womanly' at the same time. Yeah, do me a favour love) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:19:26 PM Never thought I'd say this, but about time you showed up Kin. Apologies. To be honest, I thought it'd be finished by now. Looks like it's descended into complete farce though. Holland, PE and leaving her smoking... would never have happened in gatso's day. There's even threats of draggin' jebus into it...or summat like that Is there a danger of moving on to question 8? we're on question 9 now ::) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:19:43 PM Where is Gatso these days? Is he banned on Tuesdays?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Jon MW on February 08, 2011, 10:19:50 PM ... 3 points Agnes Grey - tightend, jonmw ... 2 points presumably Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 10:20:01 PM come on tighty!!! Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 Hmmmm, I think the score sheet must be broken... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: KarmaDope on February 08, 2011, 10:20:07 PM Objection to Tighty and JonMW getting 3 points.
They should have 2. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:20:17 PM Inspired pass by me. wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:20:20 PM ... 3 points Agnes Grey - tightend, jonmw ... 2 points presumably i keep doing that to you two, don't I? yes. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:20:41 PM Objection to Tighty and JonMW getting 3 points. They should have 2. Come on tighty!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:21:34 PM worthy of being shared here - anonymously of course....:) Jane Eyre (Charlotte) (had to study that for English A-level. It's about the emancipation of women and their ability to be independent and yet 'womanly' at the same time. Yeah, do me a favour love) BAN Publishing PMs is bad form, imo. ('Tis bloody funny though, whoever said that) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:22:19 PM come on tighty!!! Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 one of you has sheeped question 10. the other has aced it. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:22:28 PM Where is Gatso these days? Is he banned on Tuesdays? He decided he'd had enough RSQ. I can see why... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:22:49 PM worthy of being shared here - anonymously of course....:) Jane Eyre (Charlotte) (had to study that for English A-level. It's about the emancipation of women and their ability to be independent and yet 'womanly' at the same time. Yeah, do me a favour love) BAN Publishing PMs is bad form, imo. ('Tis bloody funny though, whoever said that) i might have made it up ;D Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:22:56 PM come on tighty!!! Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 one of you has sheeped question 10. the other has aced it. Rock and a hard place for all concerned. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:23:17 PM worthy of being shared here - anonymously of course....:) Jane Eyre (Charlotte) (had to study that for English A-level. It's about the emancipation of women and their ability to be independent and yet 'womanly' at the same time. Yeah, do me a favour love) BAN Publishing PMs is bad form, imo. ('Tis bloody funny though, whoever said that) i might have made it up ;D Do me a favour, love. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 10:23:43 PM come on tighty!!! Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 one of you has sheeped question 10. the other has aced it. Rock and a hard place for all concerned. nh Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:24:03 PM come on tighty!!! Redsimon - 18 Tightend - 20 one of you has sheeped question 10. the other has aced it. Rock and a hard place for all concerned. nh true, too Good luck Redsimon Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:24:07 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:24:31 PM -10 on last question for me one time!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:24:52 PM oooh - it's exciting isn't it?!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:25:07 PM actually i think i might fail PE......
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:25:16 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 10:25:24 PM I did the deed on the last one tho WP tighty :)
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:25:31 PM I'd be roasting both of 'em if I hadn't fecked up that one stupid question
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:25:36 PM actually i think i might fail PE...... DO IT!!!!!!!!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:25:39 PM actually i think i might fail PE...... I'd agree with this but think I might get told off. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:25:41 PM Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:25:50 PM I'd be roasting both of 'em if I hadn't fecked up that one stupid question :o Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:26:11 PM actually i think i might fail PE...... and maths? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:26:24 PM no one wants Redsimon as QM again
Or me. GG RSQ on blonde Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:26:35 PM Question 10. Name an airline that appears in the top ten for number of scheduled passengers carried in 2010 (worldwide)
sheep - 6 points American Airlines - nakor, jonmw, the baron, cf, joobie, robert hm 2 points Delta - waz1892, laxie Ryanair - kinboshi, snoopy aces - 1 point Southwest Airlines - moonandback United - tightend fails - 11 points US Airlines - delboy British Airways - mondatoo, silo graham, TRIP5 Aeroflot - Andrew Air India - TheWhisper Cathay pacific - technolog Emirates - sharplea Virgin - redsimon Qantas - stato_1, hector62 Monarch - girgy85 Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:26:43 PM I'd be roasting both of 'em if I hadn't fecked up that one stupid question :o That would have been an ace for Q5. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:26:52 PM i lied - fail, not a sheep.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:27:06 PM I'd be roasting both of 'em if I hadn't fecked up that one stupid question :o oh...errrrrrrr. Delboy...help me out here with a proper posh version of what I meant, please and ty. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 10:27:15 PM no one wants Redsimon as QM again GG RSQ on blonde fyp Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:27:21 PM BOOM! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:27:26 PM Some great question choices in the sense of the massive amount of acceptable fails!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:27:52 PM final scores please hun!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 10:28:02 PM Question 10. Name an airline that appears in the top ten for number of scheduled passengers carried in 2010 (worldwide) sheep - 6 points American Airlines - nakor, jonmw, the baron, cf, joobie, robert hm 2 points Delta - waz1892, laxie Ryanair - kinboshi, snoopy aces - 1 point Southwest Airlines - moonandback United - tightend fails - 11 points US Airlines - delboy British Airways - mondatoo, silo graham, TRIP5 Aeroflot - Andrew Air India - TheWhisper Cathay pacific - technolog Emirates - sharplea Virgin - redsimon Qantas - stato_1, hector62 Monarch - girgy85 Ryan Air is in the top ten & British Airways isn't...what sort of daft world is this!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 08, 2011, 10:28:19 PM FARCE! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:28:30 PM Question 10. Name an airline that appears in the top ten for number of scheduled passengers carried in 2010 (worldwide) sheep - 6 points American Airlines - nakor, jonmw, the baron, cf, joobie, robert hm 2 points Delta - waz1892, laxie Ryanair - kinboshi, snoopy aces - 1 point Southwest Airlines - moonandback United - tightend fails - 11 points US Airlines - delboy British Airways - mondatoo, silo graham, TRIP5 Aeroflot - Andrew Air India - TheWhisper Cathay pacific - technolog Emirates - sharplea Virgin - redsimon Qantas - stato_1, hector62 Monarch - girgy85 Ryan Air is in the top ten & British Airways isn't...what sort of daft world is this!!!! one where people like cheap flights! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:28:45 PM Top ten list pls
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: redsimon on February 08, 2011, 10:29:04 PM Question 10. Name an airline that appears in the top ten for number of scheduled passengers carried in 2010 (worldwide) sheep - 6 points American Airlines - nakor, jonmw, the baron, cf, joobie, robert hm 2 points Delta - waz1892, laxie Ryanair - kinboshi, snoopy aces - 1 point Southwest Airlines - moonandback United - tightend fails - 11 points US Airlines - delboy British Airways - mondatoo, silo graham, TRIP5 Aeroflot - Andrew Air India - TheWhisper Cathay pacific - technolog Emirates - sharplea Virgin - redsimon Qantas - stato_1, hector62 Monarch - girgy85 What were other 5? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:29:41 PM Top ten list pls Rank Airline 2010 2009 2008 2007[1] 2006[2] 2005 1 Delta Air Lines4 162,614,714 161,049,000 106,070,000 72,900,000 73,584,000 86,007,000 [3] 2 United Airlines1 145,550,000 81,421,000 86,412,000 68,400,000 69,265,000 66,717,000 [4] 3 Southwest Airlines 130,948,747 101,339,000 101,921,000 101,911,000 96,277,000 88,380,000 [5] 4 American Airlines 105,163,576 85,719,000 92,772,000 98,162,000 99,835,000 98,038,000 [6] 5 Lufthansa2 90,173,000 76,543,000 70,543,000 66,100,000 53,400,000 51,300,000 [7] 6 China Southern Airlines 76,500,000 66,280,000 57,961,000 56,900,000 48,512,000 43,228,000 [8] 7 Ryanair 72,719,666 65,300,000 57,647,000 49,030,000 40,532,000 33,368,585 [9] 8 Air France-KLM3 70,750,000 71,394,000 73,844,000 74,795,000 73,484,000 70,015,000 [10] 9 China Eastern Airlines 64,877,800 44,042,990 37,231,480 39,161,400 35,039,700 24,290,500 [11] 10 US Airways 59,809,367 58,921,521 62,659,842 66,056,374 66,102,774 71,580,012 [12] Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:29:57 PM epic epic collapse by me at the end. almost as bad as ironsides in my quiz
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:30:12 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 10:30:41 PM See you in a fortnight
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:31:12 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. it sure did Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:31:49 PM I would have left them both far behind had I not, been flummoxed by that one awkward question. well played both :o oh...errrrrrrr. Delboy...help me out here with a proper posh version of what I meant, please and ty. FYP Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:31:52 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. Try again. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:31:59 PM
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:32:07 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. it sure did I know Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:32:23 PM I am nominating a QM to do RSQ44, please
anyone who hasn't done one before want it? first to post gets it Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:33:01 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. Try again. Wait. you were right. Oh who knows. I blame wine. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:33:07 PM me!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:33:14 PM Mine was NOT a FAIL please?
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:33:19 PM I want it FFS!!! I was nearest to the mark!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Nakor on February 08, 2011, 10:33:32 PM Well played Claw, epic RSQ all except the result obv ;)
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:33:45 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. Try again. Wait. you were right. Oh who knows. I blame wine. she modified her post whilst you were quoting it, i think. i still don't understand! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:34:12 PM Mine was NOT a FAIL please? there's no such airline as 'US Airlines' Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:34:26 PM Well played Claw, good fun
Newbies have til 11am to volunteer If not, cf does it as first past winner to volunteer Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:34:38 PM And yes, wd claw. That was good fun :)
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:34:46 PM Kinda surprised Ryanair didn't beat Southwest into the top ten tbh. Try again. Wait. you were right. Oh who knows. I blame wine. she modified her post whilst you were quoting it, i think. i still don't understand! yer all just seeing things. Now pleeeese let me do the next one!!!! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:35:01 PM Mine was NOT a FAIL please? there's no such airline as 'US Airlines' you know what I meant or did I? I can't remember Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:35:19 PM Well played Claw, good fun Newbies have til 11am to volunteer If not, cf does it as first past winner to volunteer 11pm surely. If they aren't here now then they don't care enough. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:35:25 PM well done tighty. and nice work on the scoring jack. thanks again hun xxx
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Graham C on February 08, 2011, 10:35:49 PM lol Dawn seems mighty keen :D GL
WP Claire, congrats Tighty, well done everyone else Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:35:55 PM Mine was NOT a FAIL please? there's no such airline as 'US Airlines' you know what I meant not really - didn't know if you meant american airlines or us airways. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:36:02 PM Well played Claw, good fun Newbies have til 11am to volunteer If not, cf does it as first past winner to volunteer 11pm surely. If they aren't here now then they don't care enough. 11pm yes or else cf gets it Laxie cannot get it, Londonderry precedent. Never ever could I nominate her Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:36:23 PM And yes, wd claw and her glamorous assistant. That was good fun :) :( FYP humbly Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TRIP5 on February 08, 2011, 10:36:51 PM Well played Claw, good fun Newbies have til 11am to volunteer If not, cf does it as first past winner to volunteer Judging by Cf's answers his questions should ROCK!!!! On that basis alone I second Cf's application. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:37:22 PM And yes, wd claw and her glamorous assistant. That was good fun :) :( FYP humbly Was good scoring to be fair. Accurate, and quite quick. Could never use your services myself though. Sign of a poor QM. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:37:48 PM well done tighty. and nice work on the scoring jack. thanks again hun xxx wiiiiiii welcome chicka Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Delboy on February 08, 2011, 10:37:53 PM Well played Claw, epic RSQ all except the result obv ;) This. wish I was here from the beginning Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:38:08 PM And yes, wd claw and her glamorous assistant. That was good fun :) :( FYP humbly Was good scoring to be fair. Accurate, and quite quick. Could never use your services myself though. Sign of a QM who isn't a student. fyp ;) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:39:07 PM wd tighty
wd Claw Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Waz1892 on February 08, 2011, 10:39:31 PM Well done Claire.
Well done again Tighty! Good luck CF. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:39:43 PM wd tighty wd Claw wd me Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:39:54 PM wd tighty wd Claw all joking aside, your scoring was class. well done. Don't fancy running one of these yourself? go on..... Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:42:10 PM go on then
okay if I do it naked? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:42:52 PM gah. it better be good!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:43:02 PM Well played Claw, good fun Newbies have til 11am to volunteer If not, cf does it as first past winner to volunteer 11pm surely. If they aren't here now then they don't care enough. 11pm yes or else cf gets it Laxie cannot get it, Londonderry precedent. Never ever could I nominate her YOU, Sir are on my list! And no fecking cheesecale EVER for ya either! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:43:07 PM fml
did I really just say yes? ;dingdell; Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:43:50 PM go on then okay if I do it naked? ffs. i nominate you to do it and you wriggle out of it. tighty asks and you do it at the drop of a hat! you're not my hun anymore! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: TightEnd on February 08, 2011, 10:44:26 PM technolog is the next QM
No backing out now Questions asap please Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:44:43 PM go on then okay if I do it naked? ffs. i nominate you to do it and you wriggle out of it. tighty asks and you do it at the drop of a hat! you're not my hun anymore! yes, but I've now been schooled in scoremastery. ty ma'am :) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:45:00 PM i'm sure han solo graham will be equally unamused!
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 10:45:33 PM yes, but I've now been schooled in scoremastery. ty ma'am :) you mean you'll do it now you've nicked my spreadsheet? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:46:19 PM yes, but I've now been schooled in scoremastery. ty ma'am :) you mean you'll do it now you've nicked my spreadsheet? Yes. obv. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:46:36 PM go on then okay if I do it naked? ffs. i nominate you to do it and you wriggle out of it. tighty asks and you do it at the drop of a hat! you're not my hun anymore! yes, but I've now been schooled in scoremastery. ty ma'am :) Less posting on here. More setting questions. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: technolog on February 08, 2011, 10:49:11 PM technolog is the next QM No backing out now Questions asap please Okay. Questions won't be up until tomorrow evening. I've not had me feckin' tea yet, sarnies to make and forums to catch-up on! Multi-tasking obv a skillset still to learn. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:50:22 PM technolog is the next QM No backing out now Questions asap please Okay. Questions won't be up until tomorrow evening. I've not had me feckin' tea yet, sarnies to make and forums to catch-up on! Multi-tasking obv a skillset still to learn. This is becoming increasingly common. When did this become acceptable practice? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Graham C on February 08, 2011, 10:50:49 PM i'm sure han solo graham will be equally unamused! Very about what? Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 10:53:11 PM If it was me - the questions would be up already. But nooooooooooooo. Tighty has his nickers in a twist.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Cf on February 08, 2011, 10:53:47 PM Mine would've been up by now too. Farce.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 08, 2011, 11:00:09 PM Ah well...suppose we've got time
(http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a167/Laxie/image0011-1.jpg) Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Robert HM on February 08, 2011, 11:32:29 PM Questions not up yet, fail and a farce. Tighty pick someone else before it all goes tits up.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Claw75 on February 08, 2011, 11:37:13 PM Questions not up yet, fail and a farce. Tighty pick someone else before it all goes tits up. well volunteered! Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: snoopy1239 on February 09, 2011, 12:19:33 AM Just got in from a lovely night. Had a nice meal, a few drinks, chatted with friends. It was fantastic. Then I saw this. It has ruined my night.
This thread is an absolute disgrace. Worst Reverse Sheep ever. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Laxie on February 09, 2011, 12:37:27 AM That'll learn ya not to go out on RSQ reveal night. WTF were you thinking having such a good time whilst we suffered through this torture? No pity for ya tbh.
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: kinboshi on February 09, 2011, 06:07:20 AM Just got in from a lovely night. Had a nice meal, a few drinks, chatted with friends. It was fantastic. Then I saw this. It has ruined my night. This thread is an absolute disgrace. Worst Reverse Sheep ever. How many times did we go for the same bloody answer? ;grr; Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: Ironside on February 09, 2011, 06:41:26 AM Since when has back door meant having sex fail pls
Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: The Baron on February 14, 2011, 06:03:04 PM WP Baron Ty sir. Your answer to the NME album Q drew nuff respeck. Title: Re: RSQ 43 - potentially crap, deffo over in a week (thank god) Post by: The Baron on February 14, 2011, 06:11:36 PM OBJECTION. RE is a Compulsary subject " Schools also have to teach religious education, though parents have the right to withdraw children for all or part of the religious education curriculum." that's an addendum to the list of compulsory subjects, on which RE does not appear. Schools are obliged to teach it, kids are not obliged to attend the lessons, therefore not compulsory. so we agree its in addtion to the compulsary list, therefore it is compuslory...that schools have to teach, the parents / kids dont have to attend. Question was, Compulsary subjects, of which (albeit an addtional capicity) RE is. it can't be compulsory and be in addition to the complusory subjects. still a fail i'm afraid waz. last chance to make the correct decision...addition means to add too...that fact that it is being added to the list of compulsory subjects surely makes it one. The addition isn't due to it NOT being a true compulsory subject, but to make clear it isn't compulsory to attend Sorry, fairy stories aren't a compulsory subject - as the students don't HAVE TO be taught it. Which is too bloody right. so you don't believe in Robbie Fowler? lol. More love here imo. |