blonde poker forum

OK so player a and b agree 10% ........... player a busts early and re-enters

both make final table and change to 25%

player b busts (no cash)

player a wins the tourney....

what happens to the re-entry buy in

split 50/50?
player a loses out the extra buy in?
or take off the re-entry then divide the 25%?

thanks all.

Chop after stake back right

Yeah take stake back and then chop seems like the fairest thing.

Why would u consider 50/50?

You pay 25% of the amount you cashed for.

25% of profit imo

50/50 on the re-entry fee not the winnings!

This: they swapped a percentage.

I would expect player A to give B 25% of the total win but if I was B I wOuld not be against giving A half of the rE entry back as a goodwill gesture.

Sort this all out before hand IMO

This. If u did not specify this then he is under no obligation but as Ur mate and as u won I would split the cost but u should discuss it beforehand

What if it's a min-cash which doesn't even cover the cost of the cashing player's buys in?

this is key obv

I would say that in general, once player A busts early then player B has lost his % as player A has won nothing.

If Player A wants to re-enter then he does that with his own money, and player B has no %. It's not like player A is freerolling here or anything as he's had to pay a whole second buyin. It's essentially a whole different person entering the tournament.

In the case as described though as both players have reaffirmed 25% I think the fairest thing to do is for A to give 25% of the cash over, and B to give him half of the buyin back so that both players have paid the same amount to enter the tournament. B isn't under any obligation to do this though, but I think it'd be the decent thing to do.

Best not to have any mates imo  ;)

Best thing about deals with friends, rather than business partners. If I swapped 10%, would never ask for any of a min cash.


Smashedagain absolutely spot on itt

Ok not sure what tournament you are talking about but if we use the dtd deepstack as an example. If we swap 10% on the friday and I bust but then buy back in on the saturday surely the 10% is now dead?

In your example I would say that 25% is owed as this was agreed at the final.

As said earlier best to sort this out before as it is going to be highly likely someone will be re-entering in a re-entry tourney.

P.S. Surely u didn't win a comp Lee!!

Apparently he flopped 8 sets, got aces 16 times. One for the nits!

Lol and is it you arguing with him over the re entry?

Says "mates" in the title Herbie. So not me

Lol.

Just random Dan it clearly states in op player a and player b!!

Sorry u winning the comp, I agree what a silly comment for me to make. haha

pretty sure if they were real mates it would be sorted pretty easily

or are they just gambling mates?

deffo gambling mates. Doesn't help that they're both massive nits

You give mate 25% of the cash and go for a steak together full of the joys of spring. The re-entry buy-in is too ghey to mention, esp at the dinner table.

Pretty sure it's the opposite, gamblers know how it's is. Non gamblers are the ones who get confused.

So if you never made the cash then the player who re-entered then makes the ft do you expect him to give out %%% for free???????????

Nah, once you get knocked out the % swap deal is history. If you re-enter and propose a new % swap deal at ft that's a completely seperate entity to the deal you had before.