Title: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on February 10, 2016, 12:27:02 PM So the world t20 tournament is under a month away now, and England have just announced their squad.
E Morgan, M Ali, S Billings, J Buttler, L Dawson, S Finn, A Hales, C Jordan, A Rashid, J Root, J Roy, B Stokes, R Topley, J Vince, D Willey A young squad, with no Chris Woakes in it being the only surprise really. New England attitude, attack at all costs. Some great results recently, and generally entertaining games. What do you think England's chances are? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 10, 2016, 12:34:28 PM good
India obvious favourites we are a fast developing side though, lots of batting firepower up top, will bat most of the way down too possibly lack a gun bowler, though rashid in the bbl, second highest wicket taker, pointed to potential in sub-continent conditions many of the other sides have problems, aus can't play spin, south africa have no depth, pakistan might not turn up, west indies are a rabble and might not care, NZL probably under-rated but not really their conditions, sri lanka probably a threat i haven't looked at the prices but i would have england top 3-4 in the market behind india Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on February 10, 2016, 12:41:16 PM http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-world-cup (http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-world-cup)
India 11/4 Australia 6/1 England 7/1 South Africa 7/1 I think India are right to be favourites in their own conditions, they are very hard to beat in the sub-continent, but then they did get skittled for 100 against Sri Lanka yesterday! Batsman-wise I like Kohli for top scorer. He has jsut come on in leaps and bounds in the last year, brilliant to watch and rarely lets them down. If they have a good tournament, either Kohli or Sharma will have gone well. Anyone think there may be some value in Buttler being top scorer? Paddy Power have him at 50/1. Is this because he wont be facing the necessary amount of balls to get the runs needed? If his one day form is an indicator, he could cause mayhem. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 10, 2016, 12:44:51 PM would need to be batting top 4
roy hales root and then who? it was Morgan, might not be now if you think its buttler at 4 fine. in odis they have pushed him higher up, perhaps the same applies in the T20 given you have stokes and willey to be finishers lower down will get a clue next week in the South Africa T20 matches at the end of this tour Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on February 10, 2016, 12:48:47 PM I think Vince slotted in at 3 in the UAE when he, Hales and Roy all played. So could look something like this from the squad given
Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Morgan Stokes Moeen Rashid Willey Finn Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 10, 2016, 12:54:08 PM I think Vince slotted in at 3 in the UAE when he, Hales and Roy all played. So could look something like this from the squad given Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Morgan Stokes Moeen Rashid Willey Finn could be. might be a bowler short in what will be tough bowling conditions, might be batting stokes too low looks a good squad though, plenty of options Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: swinebag22 on February 10, 2016, 01:35:48 PM Not sure about the exact playing conditions, but some venues could have teams playing 3 spinners. If England rock up on one of these tracks, we could be in trouble.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on February 10, 2016, 02:05:48 PM This England side play spin fine now
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on February 10, 2016, 03:35:13 PM I think Vince slotted in at 3 in the UAE when he, Hales and Roy all played. So could look something like this from the squad given Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Morgan Stokes Moeen Rashid Willey Finn could be. might be a bowler short in what will be tough bowling conditions, might be batting stokes too low looks a good squad though, plenty of options Topley for Vince I think is how they'll go. Vince played in UAE due to injury to stokes? Or root being rested? Can't remember. That still gives us Rashid and willey at 8/9, below that you don't need batting in t20. I think we'll go well but lack of experience in these conditions will be our undoing. Sides like India, Australia, south Africa and Windies (if they pick their good players) have imbraced ipl so their players have built up that experience over there. We just have Morgan. On a positive note We're a hell of a lot closer to winning than 12 months ago, and have the easier group imo Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: rinswun on February 10, 2016, 04:10:04 PM Should have picked Luke Wright. Top 10 T20 batsman in the world imo.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 10, 2016, 04:14:32 PM Should have picked Luke Wright. Top 10 T20 batsman in the world imo. and looking at KP in the BBL, he'd be in my top 4 too all other baggage aside, which isn't realistic, but still a world class T20 bat. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on February 10, 2016, 04:48:42 PM Should have picked Luke Wright. Top 10 T20 batsman in the world imo. and looking at KP in the BBL, he'd be in my top 4 too all other baggage aside, which isn't realistic, but still a world class T20 bat. Agreed. In superb form in this format, unfortunately Strauss is supreme leader now, and even though he has done a lot of good, this is a glaring mistake on his part. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on February 10, 2016, 05:23:56 PM Bangladesh are a very lively outsider. In familiar conditions and they've had some v good results in the last 12 months. Well balanced team and a few genuine worldies. Granted they've got to get through the qualifiers, I don't see them really fearing anyone. At 40/1 happy to take a punt.
If West Indies sort their politics out and the first team turns up I fancy them to go deep again. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on February 10, 2016, 05:28:03 PM England deffo have a chance, Ali and Rashid will be huge for them.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on February 10, 2016, 06:19:42 PM I really fancy England for this and the next ODI world cup.
It is a breath of fresh air watching them play and the have the real joker in the pack in Buttler. I'd like to see Root at 3 and Buttler at 4 throughout. Give him chance to play the big, match winning innings every game. Like us at the quoted price and will also have a dabble on Buttler top run scorer. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on February 10, 2016, 07:25:41 PM England are 5/2 to top their group with betv. Considering we have the easier of the 2 groups (Saffers, Windies and Sri Lanka in our group, instead of India, Australia, NZ, Pakistan and Bangladesh in the other :P ) that looks a fair price. Only a couple of firms have priced it up so far.
Could be worth taking if people fancy us to continue our strong white-ball form in the remaining ODI's and T20I series v Saffers, or if the Windies players are serious about striking over shite pay. www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-world-cup/twenty20-world-cup/group-b-winner Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on February 10, 2016, 08:02:01 PM New Zealand are 10/1? Given the clean hitting, decent bowling and world class fielding they possess i'm very surprised at that. They'll be full of confidence at the moment too. Granted they may have a poor subcontinent record but this is the strongest team player for player they've able to field for years.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on February 10, 2016, 08:59:24 PM New Zealand are 10/1? Given the clean hitting, decent bowling and world class fielding they possess i'm very surprised at that. They'll be full of confidence at the moment too. Granted they may have a poor subcontinent record but this is the strongest team player for player they've able to field for years. Tougher group, B Mc retired and weakish spin options. Would say main reason for them being behind Eng, SA and Windies in the outright betting is that 2 put of 3 of them will likely make the semi's, while NZ will have to beat India or Australia (the 2 favourites) to get to the knock-out's. Still have match-winners and will be competitive but got rough end of the stick with their group. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 11, 2016, 11:29:52 AM How the World T20 is careering towards disaster,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/twenty20/12150356/How-the-World-T20-is-careering-towards-disaster.html Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on February 13, 2016, 01:12:57 AM New Zealand are 10/1? Given the clean hitting, decent bowling and world class fielding they possess i'm very surprised at that. They'll be full of confidence at the moment too. Granted they may have a poor subcontinent record but this is the strongest team player for player they've able to field for years. Tougher group, B Mc retired and weakish spin options. Would say main reason for them being behind Eng, SA and Windies in the outright betting is that 2 put of 3 of them will likely make the semi's, while NZ will have to beat India or Australia (the 2 favourites) to get to the knock-out's. Still have match-winners and will be competitive but got rough end of the stick with their group. Ahh i see. Wow, it's been a while since i can last remember the group stages of a cricket WC actually having some meaning other than ensuring the top teams get ferried to the next stage. More of this please...the last few WC's have been horrendous. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on February 16, 2016, 02:09:28 PM liked this pic
Sam Billings practicing for friday's T20 in cape town today (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbVWfASUMAAKFc0.jpg) Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on February 17, 2016, 12:05:30 AM liked this pic Sam Billings practicing for friday's T20 in cape town today (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbVWfASUMAAKFc0.jpg) Billings been working on his keeping with Brad Haddin in the Pakistan Super League. A good example of how these young lads playing franchise cricket will be of benefit to their game not just their bank balance, as the cynics have always stated. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 08, 2016, 04:27:07 PM Enjoying the cricket today! Very fun and creative innings from Shahzad for Afghanistan.
Have to say I think this format is great, with the smaller team getting a mini competition first and the top teams going through the main competition. Will for sure mean less washouts in the competition and with two teams going through the groups it should make for more exciting matches with any loss a big blow (compared to main World Cup where 4 go through) Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 08, 2016, 04:52:29 PM Enjoying the cricket today! Very fun and creative innings from Shahzad for Afghanistan. Have to say I think this format is great, with the smaller team getting a mini competition first and the top teams going through the main competition. Will for sure mean less washouts in the competition and with two teams going through the groups it should make for more exciting matches with any loss a big blow (compared to main World Cup where 4 go through) I thought it made perfect sense, which is strange for the ICC haha. Small nations still get their chance to shine, so it's not a closed shop for the associates. Then in the super ten every game matters with only top 2 going through so the level should be cranked up early doors. Hopefully plays out that way, and they replicate it for the 50-over version also. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 08, 2016, 07:11:18 PM Enjoying the cricket today! Very fun and creative innings from Shahzad for Afghanistan. Have to say I think this format is great, with the smaller team getting a mini competition first and the top teams going through the main competition. Will for sure mean less washouts in the competition and with two teams going through the groups it should make for more exciting matches with any loss a big blow (compared to main World Cup where 4 go through) I thought it made perfect sense, which is strange for the ICC haha. Small nations still get their chance to shine, so it's not a closed shop for the associates. Then in the super ten every game matters with only top 2 going through so the level should be cranked up early doors. Hopefully plays out that way, and they replicate it for the 50-over version also. +1. The last few world cups have been beyond rubbish. Personally I still remember the 1999 and 2003 world cups with fondness. I quite liked the super 6 format, certainly better than what we've had to put with for the last decade anyway. Enjoyed Shehzad's innings too, i've seen him pull off similar feats before. Incredible hand eye co-ordination and strength in his arms. Will get found out versus the more experienced bowling sides though i imagine. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 08, 2016, 08:48:06 PM Enjoying the cricket today! Very fun and creative innings from Shahzad for Afghanistan. Have to say I think this format is great, with the smaller team getting a mini competition first and the top teams going through the main competition. Will for sure mean less washouts in the competition and with two teams going through the groups it should make for more exciting matches with any loss a big blow (compared to main World Cup where 4 go through) Agree. Excellent entertainment today on both games. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 09, 2016, 05:06:24 PM I'm glued to the screen watching Ireland vs Oman. T20 is simply excellent.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 09, 2016, 06:26:14 PM Shocker for Ireland and Sorensen: defending 14 going into last over against number 9 and 10 batsman, he bowls two no-balls and concedes two boundaries and 4 byes, Oman beat Ireland
ball was like a bar of soap, but still. ouch Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 09, 2016, 07:32:28 PM Most of these associate nations are more than competent now,Especially in the shortest format. They've had some pretty good results recently.
I think the era of smaller associates getting smashed are gone. Imo they should have 4 groups of 4, with top 2 going through to quarters. I can see Afghanistan causing quiet a few problems for the big boys if they beat Zimbabwe to top spot. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 09, 2016, 09:01:49 PM Most of these associate nations are more than competent now,Especially in the shortest format. They've had some pretty good results recently. I think the era of smaller associates getting smashed are gone. Imo they should have 4 groups of 4, with top 2 going through to quarters. I can see Afghanistan causing quiet a few problems for the big boys if they beat Zimbabwe to top spot. The first 4 games have been fantastic. Is it true that all the associated have been booted out of the next 50 over World Cup? Are cricket authorities stupid? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 09, 2016, 09:05:07 PM To be fair watching Oman in a 50 over contest would be like watching paint dry, and they'd have absolutely no chance against the bigger teams unlike the higher variance format of T20.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 09, 2016, 10:25:41 PM Most of these associate nations are more than competent now,Especially in the shortest format. They've had some pretty good results recently. I think the era of smaller associates getting smashed are gone. Imo they should have 4 groups of 4, with top 2 going through to quarters. I can see Afghanistan causing quiet a few problems for the big boys if they beat Zimbabwe to top spot. The first 4 games have been fantastic. Is it true that all the associated have been booted out of the next 50 over World Cup? Are cricket authorities stupid? from recall, the top nations basically trying to operate a kabal for all the tv money. Though that may be getting changed in the near future Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 09, 2016, 10:34:34 PM To be fair watching Oman in a 50 over contest would be like watching paint dry, and they'd have absolutely no chance against the bigger teams unlike the higher variance format of T20. Ireland have beaten bigger teams in 50 overs matches and they are being tinned as well! We can have 16 team football world cups and 8 team rugby world cups using that argument. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 09, 2016, 10:50:43 PM To be fair watching Oman in a 50 over contest would be like watching paint dry, and they'd have absolutely no chance against the bigger teams unlike the higher variance format of T20. Ireland have beaten bigger teams in 50 overs matches and they are being tinned as well! We can have 16 team football world cups and 8 team rugby world cups using that argument. Idk about rugby but lower level football is still quite entertaining and people will go to games, but 50 over games involving weaker sides in ODI's doesn't attract an interested audience. Ireland are an exception to this though for sure and it's a shame they miss out, but generally associate cricket in the longer format will be as dull as dishwater and spring few surprises because the gap is far too big. Imo we should play the 20 over format every 2 years and probably extend more associates into it as clearly they can compete and play entertaining cricket in the slogfest format, thereby promoting cricket in these countries and giving them a chance to eventually compete on a more even keel in the longer formats. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 09, 2016, 11:09:45 PM Curses, I watched the first three games but went out today and missed the best one!
Looking forward to tomorrow already though. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 09, 2016, 11:12:28 PM I put a small bet on Joe Root as top runscorer ew paying 5 places at B0yles at 28-1. What do you guys think?
http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-world-cup/twenty20-world-cup/top-tournament-batsman Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 12, 2016, 11:28:02 AM Mohammad Shahzad didn't fancy hanging around, 40 off 23! I like the way the Afghan's play, plenty of aggressive intent. Hamilton Masakadza could be crucial in the chase, if he doesn't run himself out again ...
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 12, 2016, 11:29:50 AM Is the England game on TV? Can't find it anywhere....
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 12, 2016, 11:32:33 AM Is the England game on TV? Can't find it anywhere.... Today's game is only a warm up so not on tv as far as I knowTitle: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 12, 2016, 12:09:44 PM Mohammad Shahzad didn't fancy hanging around, 40 off 23! I like the way the Afghan's play, plenty of aggressive intent. Hamilton Masakadza could be crucial in the chase, if he doesn't run himself out again ... Afghans did well there to dig themselves out of a hole midway through and post a big score. Surely it will be too much for Zim with the Afghan spin options on that pitch. I think they might get skittled here for 80 if they go too fast too early. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 12, 2016, 12:11:39 PM Mohammad Shahzad didn't fancy hanging around, 40 off 23! I like the way the Afghan's play, plenty of aggressive intent. Hamilton Masakadza could be crucial in the chase, if he doesn't run himself out again ... Afghans did well there to dig themselves out of a hole midway through and post a big score. Surely it will be too much for Zim with the Afghan spin options on that pitch. I think they might get skittled here for 80 if they go too fast too early. I have Masakadza top bat but for them to get close he'll have to go for it early on, so not ideal. Afghan's should have 30 too many there. Quick start while the pace is still on the ball is Zim's only hope before the 3 spinners come on Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 12, 2016, 01:33:36 PM England got the 170 with 4 balls to spare v NZ :)
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 15, 2016, 05:32:07 PM India getting spun out, fun
Isn't it nice when you don't play on roads Great shout from Williamson to drop Boult and southeee for spinners Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 15, 2016, 08:59:32 PM India getting spun out, fun Isn't it nice when you don't play on roads Great shout from Williamson to drop Boult and southeee for spinners Mental game really. Kiwis looked to have set a poor total but it looked massive after the Indian powerplay. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 16, 2016, 05:12:16 PM England have showed in a few overs why they wont win this. Bowlers just not good enough.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 16, 2016, 11:05:30 PM Hales and Roy lost that for England. Using 33 percent of the overs with strike rate of 100 and having the power play is completely unacceptable.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 17, 2016, 01:10:29 AM Hales and Roy lost that for England. Using 33 percent of the overs with strike rate of 100 and having the power play is completely unacceptable. Im personally willing to blame Topley for everything. Utter garbage. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 17, 2016, 01:22:03 AM No idea why Morgan gives Rashid only 2 overs. He's the wicket taker. He's always expensive.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 17, 2016, 01:48:10 AM I'd prefer us to chase whenever possible. Inexperience is a downside with our side, and batting first we don't seem to know what a winnable score is, and then how to defend whatever we get. We aim for 200 when sometimes 170 would be enough etc. Given our current attacking ethos with the bat, I'd like to see us try and restrict teams and then commit to chasing whatever we need in the aggressive manner we've gone with since the WC debacle last year.
We're learning on the job so to speak, only 1 player with IPL experience, it's going to be tough. Obvs bowling Rashid for 2 overs makes it tougher, should have been bowling all 4 and exclusively googlies to Gayle. Uphill struggle from here Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 17, 2016, 09:00:22 AM No apparent game management from the bowlers at all. Far too many bad balls bowled including a ridic amount of wides.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 17, 2016, 10:04:10 AM For those that can, West Indies to win t20 @ 11/1, 1/2 ew is a fantastic bet with 364
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Doobs on March 17, 2016, 10:10:42 AM For those that can, West Indies to win t20 @ 11/1, 1/2 ew is a fantastic bet with 364 it looks like an oddschecker error or it went quickly. 6/1 now edit, sure it is oddschecker, all the other prices look dated Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 17, 2016, 10:13:26 AM Pakistan were wrong on oddschecker aswell, seems just an oddschecker error or quickly snapped up on 365. Thanks for the spot though!
For those that can, West Indies to win t20 @ 11/1, 1/2 ew is a fantastic bet with 364 it looks like an oddschecker error or it went quickly. 6/1 now edit, sure it is oddschecker, all the other prices look dated Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 17, 2016, 10:36:51 AM For those that can, West Indies to win t20 @ 11/1, 1/2 ew is a fantastic bet with 364 it looks like an oddschecker error or it went quickly. 6/1 now edit, sure it is oddschecker, all the other prices look dated Must have been changed fairly sharpish, I got a bit on. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 17, 2016, 08:29:19 PM So if England lose tomorrow we're all but out of the comp. Thoughts on the format? Seems a bit silly that this can happen. Why don't we just put all 10 teams in 1 group and everyone plays everyone instead
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: rinswun on March 18, 2016, 12:35:37 AM Format is fine. Lose two games in a rugby or football World Cup and you're out too.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 18, 2016, 02:14:43 AM playing 9 games in group format against everyone would lead to dead rubbers and a boat load of corruption like ... for once I think the format is pretty good
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 18, 2016, 01:31:45 PM one of Australia & India pretty much guaranteed to be out now.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 18, 2016, 02:40:43 PM one of Australia & India pretty much guaranteed to be out now. India - Pakistan just got a touch more spice Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 18, 2016, 03:19:29 PM I don't understand why McCullum retired before this event? NZ looking awesome in his absence still. Santner seems like a future star
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 18, 2016, 03:26:10 PM England bowling been wretched. No dew to use as excuse this time. Will be chasing over 200!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: BorntoBubble on March 18, 2016, 06:06:37 PM England bowling been wretched. No dew to use as excuse this time. Will be chasing over 200! making it look easy... Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 18, 2016, 06:25:49 PM remarkable game
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 18, 2016, 06:28:07 PM I have to say, that innings by Joe Root is one of the best I have seen in any form of the game. The maturity and confidence he showed in the pacing of his innings against a strong, world class attack was incredible.
Very happy with my ticket on England at 8/1 to win this world cup. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 18, 2016, 06:37:40 PM Very happy with my ticket on England at 8/1 to win this world cup. not a hope unless the bowling turns up cannot win the world cup with willey (who i like a lot), topley, jordan, stokes (who i like a lot) and two spinners (both of whom i like a lot) just too hittable. he had to bowl topley and jordan towards the end today and his (morgan's) face was a picture only plunkett in reserve the batting line up is great to watch though Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: BorntoBubble on March 18, 2016, 06:50:00 PM Very happy with my ticket on England at 8/1 to win this world cup. not a hope unless the bowling turns up cannot win the world cup with willey (who i like a lot), topley, jordan, stokes (who i like a lot) and two spinners (both of whom i like a lot) just too hittable. he had to bowl topley and jordan towards the end today and his (morgan's) face was a picture only plunkett in reserve the batting line up is great to watch though by chasing this total down though hopefully anyone now setting a total will go off to quickly and therefore leave themselves open to losing to many early wickets. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 18, 2016, 06:52:37 PM Amazing game. The remarkable thing about Root's innings is he doesn't even look like he is in overdrive. Roy did brilliantly, but he looks like he is slogging and right on the edge. Root just looks so smooth yet scores like a rocket.
Someone mentioned it the other day, but England should look to chase every game I think so they don't have to worry about setting targets. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 18, 2016, 07:09:47 PM Jordan has got to be dropped I am amazed he still gets a gig. Plunkett would be the first seamer on the teamsheet for me. Spinners were v good tonight I thought.
I'd like Dawson to play too on a turning track. New Zealand have got it right so far not afraid to drop the big guns to benefit the team. Would be lovely to be on Santner top wicket taker! (I'm not) Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 18, 2016, 07:12:41 PM Today was one of the days where I wished I still played poker for a living and not had a job. Got home to watch the last 4 overs though #everycloud
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 18, 2016, 07:20:59 PM Not too fussed if they keep playing Jordan, but Topley needs dropping, he will never make an international cricketer as long as he has a hole in his bum.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 18, 2016, 07:25:09 PM mind you, any team defending anything at kolkota and mumbai under lights is going to struggle.
like fielding on Leicester viccy park rec in november its that wet huge toss bias in these games need to bat first up north where its dry and dusy and bowl first in the big cities Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Evilpengwinz on March 18, 2016, 09:09:11 PM So if England lose tomorrow we're all but out of the comp. Thoughts on the format? Seems a bit silly that this can happen. Why don't we just put all 10 teams in 1 group and everyone plays everyone instead Or maybe we could have two slightly bigger groups, and let some associates play? Just a thought ;whistle; Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 18, 2016, 10:44:43 PM So if England lose tomorrow we're all but out of the comp. Thoughts on the format? Seems a bit silly that this can happen. Why don't we just put all 10 teams in 1 group and everyone plays everyone instead Or maybe we could have two slightly bigger groups, and let some associates play? Just a thought ;whistle; Yeah i agree, the shorter the format the more associates should play. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 18, 2016, 11:18:23 PM Awesome batting performance from England,but they cannot bail out the bowlers every game. England wont get he chance to bat 2nd every game either and they cannot defend a total at all.
Topley bowling was a fking joke. Parks cricketer coudn't do any worse. Neither Jordan or Stokes bowling is good enough for T20, both just get hit too easily. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Longy on March 19, 2016, 02:09:04 AM I think Jordan has played way too much international cricket for England over the last couple of years. He doesn't contribute enough with ball or bat and being an exceptional fielder seems to be blind some of his inadequacies.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 19, 2016, 04:22:24 PM Finn's a big miss imo, cut above the current line up.
I don't know what's happened in the past but Morgan deffo not having Anderson or Broad anywhere near the team. England seemed to want to bat all the way down,so pick bowlers who can both. Of course in T20 in shouldn't be necessary to bat that deep, top 3 tend to win you games. If you are relying on 8-11 to get you runs, then you got bigger problems imo. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 19, 2016, 04:32:04 PM Anyone watching kolkota? Either a fantastic or terrible pitch. Turning square and bouncing loads .Impossible to score on
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 19, 2016, 04:34:56 PM Anyone watching kolkota? Either a fantastic or terrible pitch. Turning square and bouncing loads .Impossible to score on Don't get Pakistan picking Shami, surely you go with the extra spinner (wasim) I actually think 120 will be a good score on here Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 19, 2016, 04:38:09 PM Pakistan are playing 4 quicks! 18 overs of spin would make 100 a tough chase
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 19, 2016, 04:43:37 PM They've got malik and afridi, hafeez is banned. Do not get the thinking at all, shamis last game v Bangladesh in Asia cup he bowled absolute tosh in what was effectively a knock out.
Horrible wicket for a world cup game this Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 19, 2016, 04:47:39 PM I've seen fifth day test match wickets on the sub continent with less turn than this
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: WotRTheChances on March 19, 2016, 04:55:44 PM Crazy to think this pitch is a slow turner. It's not like KKR have a team full of spinners (Mishra, Hogg, Shakib etc.) and never go for more than 150.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 19, 2016, 05:40:02 PM Mohammed Amir absolutely different gravy
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 19, 2016, 06:54:31 PM Kohli's a bit special, played on a different deck to everyone else
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 19, 2016, 07:07:23 PM Kohli's a bit special, played on a different deck to everyone else This ^^^ Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KarmaDope on March 21, 2016, 05:32:31 PM Hahahaha, talk about perfect timing.
Watching AUS vs BAN and the commentator, Ian Bishop I think, is going on about Steve Smith and his strike rate in comparison to the rest of the Australia batting line up, and says something along the lines of "Australia have these players who have strike rates of 140+ in World T20. Steve Smith is not one of them." As he says the words "One of them", Smith walks down the track and hits a 90 metre six off the left arm offie. I can see why he's saying it though, how is the No. 1 ranked player in T20 (Aaron Finch) carrying the drinks? MBN to be Australia if they can casually leave him out. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 21, 2016, 05:41:17 PM you have 5 batsmen to fit into the top 4
khawaja has been in great form for 6 months and can only open watson is a valuable bowler on slow surfaces, can't leave him out. bowled at the start and the death today, smith is the captain warner is one of the first names on the sheet finch is no 1 ranked one has to miss out. if he wasn't captain it would be smith (in this format) at the moment i think next game we might see warner 3 and smith 4 for now finch can't get back in, which i think is understandable Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KarmaDope on March 21, 2016, 05:56:13 PM Surely you open with Finch and Khawaja, Warner 3, Watson 4, Maxwell and Smith 5 and 6. No need to play Mitchell Marsh - there's enough bowling in there already. Faulkner, Hastings, Coulter-Nile, Watson, Zampa, Maxwell and IIRC Finch/Warner can also bowl an over or two if needed.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 21, 2016, 05:59:58 PM Surely you open with Finch and Khawaja, Warner 3, Watson 4, Maxwell and Smith 5 and 6. No need to play Mitchell Marsh - there's enough bowling in there already. Faulkner, Hastings, Coulter-Nile, Watson, Zampa, Maxwell and IIRC Finch/Warner can also bowl an over or two if needed. think they are reluctant to rely on watson/maxwell for the 5th bowler overs. all about options and the all-rounder balances the team more than a sixth batsman. this is because (until today possibly) they weren't able to trust zampa and/or agar to bowl, say 4-0-30-x. agar and zampa were odd picks, it has to be said Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 21, 2016, 06:13:18 PM Would people consider a few changes to the England team v Afghanistan?
I think dropping Topley (from a great height preferably) for plunkett is a must, and I would probably look at bringing in Dawson for Jordan if the wicket is agreeable and looking at Vince or Billings and resting Morgan. Although saying all that, Afghanistan aren't a push over, so maybe it's not the game to? Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Stokes Ali Willey Rashid Plunkett Dawson Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 21, 2016, 06:16:03 PM Would people consider a few changes to the England team v Afghanistan? I think dropping Topley (from a great height preferably) for plunkett is a must, and I would probably look at bringing in Dawson for Jordan if the wicket is agreeable and looking at Vince or Billings and resting Morgan. Although saying all that, Afghanistan aren't a push over, so maybe it's not the game to? Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Stokes Ali Willey Rashid Plunkett Dawson plunkett i agree with, for topley wicket dependent dawson for jordan think they will leave top six as is. morgans captain, he plays root won't be moving from number 3 until he doesn't play t20s for england, imo. world class batsman in any format, first name on the team sheet batting 3. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 21, 2016, 06:20:07 PM Would people consider a few changes to the England team v Afghanistan? I think dropping Topley (from a great height preferably) for plunkett is a must, and I would probably look at bringing in Dawson for Jordan if the wicket is agreeable and looking at Vince or Billings and resting Morgan. Although saying all that, Afghanistan aren't a push over, so maybe it's not the game to? Hales Roy Vince Root Buttler Stokes Ali Willey Rashid Plunkett Dawson plunkett i agree with, for topley wicket dependent dawson for jordan think they will leave top six as is. morgans captain, he plays root won't be moving from number 3 until he doesn't play t20s for england, imo. world class batsman in any format, first name on the team sheet batting 3. He batted 4 v South Africa :p Get your point though, just think it would be nice to get some of the squad a game in. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 21, 2016, 07:32:59 PM I don't think we should take Afghanistan lightly. I'd be more worried on a different pitch, but I think they look a decent unit.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 22, 2016, 10:03:02 PM Can anybody halt the New Zealand train? They're starting to look pretty unstoppable!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KingPush on March 23, 2016, 02:54:32 AM Topleys still a potentially world class bowler. Think most people would mentally lose it a bit after that shocker with the run out. Chris Jordan will never even be a good one
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TommyPlus on March 23, 2016, 08:29:40 AM I'm just off to the Feroz Shah Kotla to watch the England game. Come on boys!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 23, 2016, 11:02:03 AM Oh dear, here we go....
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 23, 2016, 12:00:32 PM We're still 15-20 short of a par score. Powerplay will be key. Rashid and Ali will be tough to play on this, so they'll look to go after us when there is pace on the ball early. Shahzad will be the big wicket, 6 overs of him would put them well ahead of the game. Bet we wish we had Dawson playing now! Would like to see Willey/Stokes bowling cutters.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 23, 2016, 12:04:53 PM They did OK considering how bad it was looking, I thought we were going to struggle to get 3 figures at one point!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 23, 2016, 12:09:36 PM Warney on Sky Sports says Afghans have no chance getting these runs ... I'm not so sure mind
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 23, 2016, 01:44:00 PM How can Rashid take 2-18 off 3 and not bowl out?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 23, 2016, 01:45:11 PM Ludicrous not bowling Rashid out and serving up this Stokes tosh instead.
I remain unconvinced about Stokes in this format of the game. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Tommo on March 23, 2016, 01:47:35 PM How can Rashid take 2-18 off 3 and not bowl out? Was thinking the same about Rashid, I can't have stokes as a death bowler and I am a big fan of his. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 01:47:51 PM its all ifs and buts
if ali and willey dont fire late or if shahzad comes off then the narrative is completely different but when you look at eoin mrgan's captaincy against say kane williamson, who is brave and clever, its chalk and cheese amazed rashid didn't bowl 4, would have been punished for going back to stokes against a top 8 side Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 01:51:17 PM England could beat Sri Lanka and go out if SA beat West Indies and SL.
Haven't done enough with NRR here. SA beat Afg by 37 we beat them by 15, could be crucial if we end on the same points a win is a win though. we play sri lanka at delhi too. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 23, 2016, 02:13:16 PM England could beat Sri Lanka and go out if SA beat West Indies and SL. Haven't done enough with NRR here. SA beat Afg by 37 we beat them by 15, could be crucial if we end on the same points a win is a win though. we play sri lanka at delhi too. Yep - England desperate for Windies to beat SAF. Then it's just a case of beat SL and you're there (I think). Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 02:16:06 PM England could beat Sri Lanka and go out if SA beat West Indies and SL. Haven't done enough with NRR here. SA beat Afg by 37 we beat them by 15, could be crucial if we end on the same points a win is a win though. we play sri lanka at delhi too. Yep - England desperate for Windies to beat SAF. Then it's just a case of beat SL and you're there (I think). SA 8/11 WI 13/10 at Nagpur, interesting. would have it closer myself. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 23, 2016, 05:58:25 PM Tremendous bowling from Ashwin today, really enjoyed his overs.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 06:44:20 PM good grief, bangladesh mugged themselves off there.
2 needed off 3 caught in the deep, caught in the deep, miss/run out by keeper lose by a run jeez. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 23, 2016, 06:46:25 PM Yeah, was rooting for them too, they will be gutted. Exciting last few overs though.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 23, 2016, 06:49:40 PM I was expecting a mankad from the last ball!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 23, 2016, 06:51:58 PM a complete meltdown, all bangla need to do is touch it and run three balls in a row!
instead try to hit it out the park, twice! sport is great. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 23, 2016, 06:53:31 PM brilliant entertainment...
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: ripple11 on March 23, 2016, 06:54:01 PM good grief, bangladesh mugged themselves off there. 2 needed off 3 caught in the deep, caught in the deep, miss/run out by keeper lose by a run jeez. amazing ....and non striker, knowing he has to run, shouldn't be out run by a keeper standing 15 yds back ! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 23, 2016, 07:14:15 PM good grief, bangladesh mugged themselves off there. 2 needed off 3 caught in the deep, caught in the deep, miss/run out by keeper lose by a run jeez. Bangladeshi batsmen thick as cheap mince. Great game though. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 23, 2016, 10:36:49 PM England could beat Sri Lanka and go out if SA beat West Indies and SL. Haven't done enough with NRR here. SA beat Afg by 37 we beat them by 15, could be crucial if we end on the same points a win is a win though. we play sri lanka at delhi too. Yep - England desperate for Windies to beat SAF. Then it's just a case of beat SL and you're there (I think). SA 8/11 WI 13/10 at Nagpur, interesting. would have it closer myself. If it's a similar pitch to the India v New Zealand game then I'd definitely have it closer. South Africa struggle against spin, Badree will be tough to get away and Benn is steady enough. Duminy is an injury doubt so that would lessen Saffers spin options and they can only pick 1 frontline spinner as Phangiso got done for chucking. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 24, 2016, 01:01:00 AM What a cracking, if somewhat bizarre day of cricket.
England got out jail today. Batting again a shambles. Plunkett showed to be worth a place in the team. Would personally drop Stokes, batting is hit and miss but bowling is too erratic for T20. Keep him fit for tests/50 over stuff. Ali, once again,shows just how important he is batting down the order. Bangladesh - wow just wtf? game in the bag and completely lost it. ICC need to look at run out laws. Pretty ridic that someone gets in the crease by 2ft and is still given run out. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2016, 01:17:32 AM Missed the 2ft thing, u talking about th pulling the stump out of the ground thing?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 24, 2016, 01:22:41 AM Missed the 2ft thing, u talking about th pulling the stump out of the ground thing? No the Afghan batsmen slid in, most of bat was in the crease but it bounced up so given out, Pictures on tv replay were not even clear imo. The stumping in Bangladesh innings strange too. Batsmen in the crease but stepped from one foot to other. Dhoni broke stumps just as he went from one foot to the other, so no foot actually touching ground. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 24, 2016, 01:23:51 AM Missed the 2ft thing, u talking about th pulling the stump out of the ground thing? Guess it was the bounce bat? Also think the Bangladesh stumping was stupid. Guy never leaves his crease but Dhoni gets the stumps off on the nanosecond the guy has his foot off the ground. Stupid rule imo. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 24, 2016, 01:25:14 AM Ok missed those...
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on March 24, 2016, 01:27:59 AM Problem is the umps go to 3rd umpire all the time and technical microinfringements dismissals come up.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 25, 2016, 01:23:14 PM For anyone who wants to be West Indies they are best priced 6/4 now on PP and you get a free bet up to £25 if WI make 175 and still lose.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: flushthemout on March 25, 2016, 02:48:22 PM Both got decent anthems
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 26, 2016, 06:23:13 PM Phew......tight finish, exciting game ;danafish;
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on March 26, 2016, 06:47:49 PM Surely Buttler has to bat at 4 permanently now, right?
We've got a shot but I expect will be outsiders of the four teams left? Enjoyed the match again a lot today. Some great games so far. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 26, 2016, 08:05:03 PM I would think it goes India, NZ, west Indies England is the way the betting should go.
Great match today though. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 27, 2016, 04:33:20 PM Steve Smith really is a scumbag, isn't he. Walking off shaking his head and moaning after being given out.
Just accept it and get off Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KarmaDope on March 27, 2016, 04:53:55 PM How is it that in the ICC's major tournaments, the DRS isnt in use because of one country? Fuck that shit. Majority vote, get it in. Seen so many more bad decisions without it.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KarmaDope on March 27, 2016, 05:01:02 PM What a shot that is by Maxwell!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 27, 2016, 07:26:17 PM Kohli an absolute God when chasing a target, different class
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 27, 2016, 07:38:50 PM Unbeleivable, that was a tough pitch and he gets 13 an over off the last six. don't think many others in any team win that game in the spot
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 27, 2016, 11:20:57 PM Kohli just on a different level to everyone else, including Gayle.
Thought Yuvraj sacrificed himself as he clearly couldn't run anywhere Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: BorntoBubble on March 27, 2016, 11:45:15 PM really looking forward to the semi finals been a great event so far.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 28, 2016, 01:14:34 AM What a shot that is by Maxwell! Yeah was worthy of its own post! I think India have the edge overall on the teams remaining. The pressure is going to test the NZ boys while Windies and England just aren't anywhere near as good on paper. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 28, 2016, 11:13:35 AM What a fantastic event this has been, some great cricket and close finishes. You might think I'm mad, but I genuinely think England can win this although I agree that India are favourites on paper.
With England's batting, we can beat any team on any day. Let's hope Jos has another innings or two in him because if he scores big, England will have a massive chance. Quite happy with my 8/1 betting slip on England still. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 30, 2016, 09:38:42 AM Really looking forward to the match today, although I dont hold out much hope of us winning it. NZ spinners will probably stifle us too much, and they have a very good batting lineup.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on March 30, 2016, 09:54:20 AM What a fantastic event this has been, some great cricket and close finishes. You might think I'm mad, but I genuinely think England can win this although I agree that India are favourites on paper. With England's batting, we can beat any team on any day. Let's hope Jos has another innings or two in him because if he scores big, England will have a massive chance. Quite happy with my 8/1 betting slip on England still. Why would anyone think you are mad? In a 50/50 semifinal no reason can't win from here Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: fatcatstu on March 30, 2016, 04:58:18 PM NZ 153/8 off their 20 overs, only hit 20 runs off the last 4 overs. Superb bowling effort there, VERY gettable total. Come on boys!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on March 30, 2016, 05:23:19 PM Turns out we are quite good at this game.
Who knew Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on March 30, 2016, 05:33:16 PM Superb stuff this
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on March 30, 2016, 05:36:20 PM Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: rfgqqabc on March 30, 2016, 05:47:25 PM Not often you ser England openers all but see a game off. Great stuff
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 30, 2016, 05:50:27 PM we've always known the batting is big hitting and deep
what we din't know was that jordan, stokes, plunkett etc could come off at the back end of an innings with the ball. proper old school death over yorkers today..and NZ didn't have many strategies to get them away. A serious team if the bowling delivers, as we can chase a lot of totals bigger than this down... Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 30, 2016, 06:00:48 PM New Zealand choke in a semi, whats new?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Cavey007 on March 30, 2016, 06:03:37 PM How do 365 judge top team bowler? I'm assuming it's more than just economy?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 30, 2016, 06:08:01 PM How do 365 judge top team bowler? I'm assuming it's more than just economy? wickets taken Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Cavey007 on March 30, 2016, 06:10:09 PM How do 365 judge top team bowler? I'm assuming it's more than just economy? wickets taken Well this over has definitely helped with that then... Morgan fails again. Can we just go on and win the match now please guys Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: peejaytwo on March 30, 2016, 06:12:49 PM Rooooooot
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 30, 2016, 06:33:22 PM If we play that well again we will smash India too, fingers crossed.....
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 30, 2016, 06:35:27 PM England peaking at the right time it seems. Stokes and Jordan were superb at the death and with Roy and Hales performing again the result was never in doubt.
Bring on the final! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 30, 2016, 11:15:07 PM Fantastic all round performance today. I can't believe we've gone so well in Indian conditions despite not utilising our 2 spinners very well. Bayliss has coached KKR so will know conditions at the venue for the final well.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: BorntoBubble on March 30, 2016, 11:17:30 PM We are going to win the World Cup, maybe!
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 31, 2016, 12:23:28 AM Winning the toss and chasing again in the final would be nice. I feel England's power hitters are far better at chasing a score than setting one. The way Roy in particular got us ahead of the rate today made the chase routine. I heard it described as 'brutally effective' - think that sums up his innings today rather well.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Cavey007 on March 31, 2016, 06:55:44 PM Crazy game just gone finished to get the Windies through to the final. Not sure who I'd of preferred. Probably them over India.
Simmons has been out three times. 2 no balls and just got a 6 as he was caught with a foot on the boundary! Would of thought it was over once Gayle was out with arguably ball of the tournament early on. Strange giving Kohli the last over. Guess he thought give it to the man on form. Screw the proper bowlers! Oh dear India Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Woodsey on March 31, 2016, 07:01:55 PM Would have preferred to play India, beat the home team in their own backyard and all that but hey ho......atmosphere won't be that good at the final with the home team out.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on March 31, 2016, 07:25:04 PM England for me should be clear favs at eden gardens
However happy to watch and cheer the boys on Been a successful tournament regardless Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2016, 07:30:11 PM why?
eden gardens suits the wi attack more. slower and lower. england have only played at mumbai and delhi, neither of which have spun. bravo and co have played at nagpur twice, much more like kolkota than mumbai is. three out of four games at kolkota have been slow, low turners, one was almost unplayable we might assume they'll put on a good cricket wicket for the final but its not going to be the corker mumbai and the recent delhi pitches have been 50-50 game for me, matchwinners on both sides with the bat. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on March 31, 2016, 07:32:13 PM I think England have grown as the tournament progressed and are a better team than the Windies beat game 1. Personally I fancy England but I think its going to be a cracking game.
What a knock under pressure from Russell there! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on March 31, 2016, 07:36:02 PM why? eden gardens suits the wi attack more. slower and lower. england have only played at mumbai and delhi, neither of which have spun. bravo and co have played at nagpur twice, much more like kolkota than mumbai is. three out of four games at kolkota have been slow, low turners, one was almost unplayable we might assume they'll put on a good cricket wicket for the final but its not going to be the corker mumbai and the recent delhi pitches have been 50-50 game for me, matchwinners on both sides with the bat. Very hard to play across the line at Eden Gardens and the windies all love that shot. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2016, 07:41:06 PM why? eden gardens suits the wi attack more. slower and lower. england have only played at mumbai and delhi, neither of which have spun. bravo and co have played at nagpur twice, much more like kolkota than mumbai is. three out of four games at kolkota have been slow, low turners, one was almost unplayable we might assume they'll put on a good cricket wicket for the final but its not going to be the corker mumbai and the recent delhi pitches have been 50-50 game for me, matchwinners on both sides with the bat. Very hard to play across the line at Eden Gardens and the windies all love that shot. gayle, simmons and russell are classical hitters. straight bat through the arc. long on and long off can't be deep enough. i accept the odd slog is that far away, but then its not for jason roy or alex hales either. measuring russell's big one today at 99m was hilarious. went 160 up and about 120 deep! would be a good game for Rashid to come to the tournament though. should finally get a surface that gives him a shot. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: maldini32 on March 31, 2016, 08:00:48 PM I am amazed they have this as a flip, I have West Indies as firm favourites.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2016, 08:03:31 PM I am amazed they have this as a flip, I have West Indies as firm favourites. Eng 5/6, WI evens i saw i was surprised, but horsey/hutch are making me think Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: arbboy on March 31, 2016, 08:25:10 PM It's always a flip you either win or lose! The old ones are the best. This is a totally flip match surely. Of all the sports to smash into a short one I think 20/20 cricket must be the most insane form of sport to do so.
First time I have ever watched a 20/20 game from start to finish ever, are they all that good or was that a one off today? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on March 31, 2016, 08:31:38 PM First time I have ever watched a 20/20 game from start to finish ever, are they all that good or was that a one off today? this was one of the better ones 190 plays 190 will always be good. skills in the short format have really improved. power hitting especially 120 plays 120 will be really tense too! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on March 31, 2016, 08:59:56 PM Hard to pick a favourite for the final, it totally depends on which West Indies team shows up. Most unpredictable side in world cricket today for sure. They could just as easily blow England away or capitulate meekly. Personally i think you'd be mad to bet on it.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on March 31, 2016, 09:44:03 PM Matt Prior - don't like the cut of his jib - wp Windies, gwan England
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on March 31, 2016, 09:59:18 PM It's always a flip you either win or lose! The old ones are the best. This is a totally flip match surely. Of all the sports to smash into a short one I think 20/20 cricket must be the most insane form of sport to do so. First time I have ever watched a 20/20 game from start to finish ever, are they all that good or was that a one off today? Been a fair few games that have been really good/close in this comp. For me whoever bats 2nd is the likely winner in the final imo Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on March 31, 2016, 10:48:07 PM It's always a flip you either win or lose! The old ones are the best. This is a totally flip match surely. Of all the sports to smash into a short one I think 20/20 cricket must be the most insane form of sport to do so. First time I have ever watched a 20/20 game from start to finish ever, are they all that good or was that a one off today? Been a fair few games that have been really good/close in this comp. For me whoever bats 2nd is the likely winner in the final imo Yep, think this is the best WC so far for the quality of the games, not least because the batsman have just become so good/innovative etc Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on March 31, 2016, 10:54:38 PM It's always a flip you either win or lose! The old ones are the best. This is a totally flip match surely. Of all the sports to smash into a short one I think 20/20 cricket must be the most insane form of sport to do so. First time I have ever watched a 20/20 game from start to finish ever, are they all that good or was that a one off today? Been a fair few games that have been really good/close in this comp. For me whoever bats 2nd is the likely winner in the final imo Yup, will be backing whichever side wins the toss and chases Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on April 01, 2016, 12:25:07 AM Whilst watching Russell launch the ball into the top tier of the Wankhede stadium, my friends and I were discussing what innovations were going to be next in T20.
One of them suggested that 6 is no longer enough reward for some of the hits the batsman are now producing. Do you think we'll ever see an 8 or a 10? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Tal on April 01, 2016, 08:59:47 AM How about a batting powerplay where you get double runs?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Cavey007 on April 01, 2016, 09:00:47 AM Surely as they become more commonplace it'd make it less points? Maybe award 6 for over 100m instead of just clearing the boundary or similar
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on April 01, 2016, 10:38:03 AM I think the product is excellent at the moment so wouldn't change it too much. One thing I noticed though there are some games where the chasers have wickets in hand but the run rate gets too high and they are stuffed. How about making power play the 1st 4 overs and the last 2 overs just to make absurd run rates chaseable at the death?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 01, 2016, 10:54:40 AM there is a huge toss bias in t20 cricket, especially in sub-continent conditions where pitches are such a big factor
in this tournament 17 of 22 games since the supertens started have been won by the side winning the toss on slow low ones, win the toss and bat and then let your spinners defend a total as the pitch dies (nagpur, dharamsala etc) on good pitches, especially with dew a factor, ti can be impossible to defend a total. win toss and bowl (mumbai) new zealand won four tosses on the spin, batted first each time on slow ones and then sodhi/santner won them games, then lost as soon as they found themseleves put in on a decent pitch where it was tough to defend (delhi) west indies have won five tosses in a row, and have chased down everything apart from the afghanistan blip i might consider awarding the side that loses the toss 10 runs at the start of their innings whether batting first or second and try and even up the toss bias Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 02, 2016, 12:13:50 PM They have left some grass on the pitch.reckon this is great news for England.50-50 shot in a run fest and less than that if the pitch was a Turner, which it won't be now. There is a short boundary too as the chosen pitch is fresh/unused to the sodeq
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 02, 2016, 12:39:34 PM They have left some grass on the pitch.reckon this is great news for England.50-50 shot in a run fest and less than that if the pitch was a Turner, which it won't be now. There is a short boundary too as the chosen pitch is fresh/unused to the sodeq Match sixes a bet? 12.5 the line. I think the side who chases has a decent advantage, given the nature of the 2 sides. Anywhere you can do that bet, or just wait till the toss? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 02, 2016, 01:04:38 PM I have backed sixes.72 combined so far this tournament
Power hitters through both sides and side chasing to be favourites given toss bias over there Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 02, 2016, 02:00:26 PM Ok Corral 21/20 for over 12.5, as you say both sides have six-hitters all the way down the order, stats back it up so looks a fair bet. Others have gone 13.5 so getting odds against on 12.5 looks a good bet
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on April 02, 2016, 02:19:25 PM Ok Corral 21/20 for over 12.5, as you say both sides have six-hitters all the way down the order, stats back it up so looks a fair bet. Others have gone 13.5 so getting odds against on 12.5 looks a good bet Looks a great bet to sweat whilst watching the game. Can't remember looking forward to a game of cricket as much as I am this one! Good luck lads. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Evilpengwinz on April 02, 2016, 10:40:22 PM Strange giving Kohli the last over. Guess he thought give it to the man on form. Screw the proper bowlers! Oh dear India YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YKO-u6Kpks Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 03, 2016, 11:28:52 AM (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfB3K-mUkAACk5H.jpg)
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on April 03, 2016, 03:42:24 PM England doing their best to ruin the final already. Wretched innings from Morgan in the powerplay.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on April 03, 2016, 05:33:56 PM England doing their best to ruin the final already. Wretched innings from Morgan in the powerplay. Bang in it now though! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 03, 2016, 06:34:33 PM oooh this is a good finish
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on April 03, 2016, 06:48:57 PM Why the hell don't England hve a man straight on the deep, Samuels out shot right there
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on April 03, 2016, 06:55:22 PM ffs Stokes, served it up on a platter
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on April 03, 2016, 06:56:32 PM Just great Stokes.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: horseplayer on April 03, 2016, 06:58:40 PM Superb effort and some superb hitting last over by Braithwaite
A great tournament a brilliant final and this England group of players has a massive future Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Graham C on April 03, 2016, 06:59:01 PM 4 sixes in a row! Amazing
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on April 03, 2016, 06:59:38 PM Hard to begrudge the WI that win..great game
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: DungBeetle on April 03, 2016, 07:04:33 PM Great game but jeez. Wonder what odds Windies were before last over requiring 17?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bobby1 on April 03, 2016, 07:07:42 PM Great game but jeez. Wonder what odds Windies were before last over requiring 17? Think they were around 13/2 on the BF market. Over 39 million traded on the game on BF alone. :o Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 03, 2016, 07:27:08 PM West Indies started the match evens .Went 1/5 then 8/1 in running then won it. Great sporting event that
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: HutchGF on April 03, 2016, 07:29:37 PM West Indies started the match evens .Went 1/5 then 8/1 in running then won it. Great sporting event that Fully agree, and I'm sure I'll appreciate it even more tomorrow when I've come to terms with England losing. All in all, it has been a fantastic tournament and great entertainment. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KingPush on April 04, 2016, 12:08:01 AM Great final even though it was a disappointing end to it. What Bayliss and Farbrace have done to thsi team in a short amount of time is very impressive. Anyone know where the idea for the Root over came from?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on April 04, 2016, 02:12:59 AM How much of that last over was:
Bad Bowling Amazing technique from the batsman Luck? Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KingPush on April 04, 2016, 02:28:40 AM First ball was very bad, second ball was bad and I was in too much pain to watch the rest. Would have thought bowling outside off yorkers would be better than a middle to leg line with the way he was setting himself up.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on April 04, 2016, 03:09:14 AM First ball was very bad, second ball was bad and I was in too much pain to watch the rest. Would have thought bowling outside off yorkers would be better than a middle to leg line with the way he was setting himself up. Yeah this, Braithwaite well known to ove the on side, shoulda been wide on the off, tactic that was used well in previous games. Reckon that Root over had a lot to do with whatever got said on the field after he was out when batting. Certainly looked pissed off at WI when walking off Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 04, 2016, 11:06:41 AM great picture
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfImFSuWQAAqj0i.jpg) meanwhile... Combined-format stats Joe Root's over past year worth noting: 2855 runs @ 55.98 Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 04, 2016, 11:17:43 AM First ball was very bad, second ball was bad and I was in too much pain to watch the rest. Would have thought bowling outside off yorkers would be better than a middle to leg line with the way he was setting himself up. Yeah this, Braithwaite well known to ove the on side, shoulda been wide on the off, tactic that was used well in previous games. Reckon that Root over had a lot to do with whatever got said on the field after he was out when batting. Certainly looked pissed off at WI when walking off I think we should have gone wide yorkers, especially to Samuels are he backs away. Braithwaite showed he can hit inside-out so it would have been a risk but it's still far more difficult to hit sixes over cover than long on. Credit to braithwaite, his scoop shot changed the dynamic of the game and we got a bit muddled up with our thinking. Mid-off up to Samuels a particularly strange choice. One thing I was saying to my mates after the New Zealand game was that I didn't think we didn't bowl that well at the death. Those last 4 overs went for 20 and took wickets, everyone's saying it was amazing but it was very results-orientated. Ronchi's hit a full toss down long-off's throat. Anderson's hit a half volley down long-off's throat. If they both go for 6 no-one says they bowled great. Yesterday in the last 10 balls they hit their mark once (Jordan's last ball to Samuels was perfect). rest of Jordan's over was hittablle, first one went for 4 to vacant long-off region, the rest were mis-hit for ones but I keep thinking we'd got away with them. Stokes then missed his length and also his line, the 1st one is a free hit basically and the others are still too straight. Still no idea how the 3rd six has gone 20 rows back, nowhere near the middle of the bat! It's obviously super-tough bowling at the death in these pressure situations, and they'll learn from this. Be nice to see them work on some variations, like a slower ball. Would be a lot more difficult to set yourself as a batsman if you knew it would be either a yorker or a slowie, like when Bravo bowls at the back end. Both Jordan and Stokes seem to want to bowl at the death and enjoy the challenge (Stokes maybe not so much now!) so with a bit more practice they'll get better. All in all England definitely exceeded my expectations. Going to India with only 1 player with IPL experience (Morgan) and he only contributes 66 runs all tournament. Main spinners only bowl 33 overs all tournament for 10 wickets and go at 8.82 an over. To still make the final and be in with a great shout of winning it took some doing and they'll be together as a group for a good few years, so promising signs for sure. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: TightEnd on April 04, 2016, 12:31:44 PM ICC's team of the WT20: Roy, de Kock, Kohli (capt), Root, Buttler (wk), Watson, Russell, Santner, Willey, Badree, Nehra (12th: Mustafizur)
poor old Ish Sodhi cant get in! Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on April 04, 2016, 12:36:01 PM Anyone got a list of top wicket takers in the tourney without the prelims. The two NZ spinners tied for the most? Did Badree make top 4?
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 04, 2016, 12:45:26 PM Anyone got a list of top wicket takers in the tourney without the prelims. The two NZ spinners tied for the most? Did Badree make top 4? Sant 10 Sodhi 10 Willey 10 Mustifizur 9 Badree 9 Bravo 9 Russell 9 Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: bergeroo on April 04, 2016, 01:13:39 PM Thanks.
Really enjoyed the tournament a hell of a lot. A million times more than recent 50 over world cups which seemed to me to be interminable and incredibly boring. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on April 04, 2016, 01:27:56 PM Thanks. Really enjoyed the tournament a hell of a lot. A million times more than recent 50 over world cups which seemed to me to be interminable and incredibly boring. Yep. Don't think it would be a bad thing to scrap international 50 over cricket. Probably the only reason it survives is because it's the mainstay of club cricket Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 04, 2016, 01:39:56 PM Thanks. Really enjoyed the tournament a hell of a lot. A million times more than recent 50 over world cups which seemed to me to be interminable and incredibly boring. Yep. Don't think it would be a bad thing to scrap international 50 over cricket. Probably the only reason it survives is because it's the mainstay of club cricket Big 3 make a boat load a cash from the pointless 5-7 match ODI series, they'll never bin them. As with everything it'll all about the money Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: muckthenuts on April 04, 2016, 02:38:18 PM Speaking of which I just came across this wonderful quote from Dave Richardson -
"Again, the reason to go to a 10-team [2019 World Cup] tournament was done for a number of reasons some time back. Number one probably it was a format that would generate more competitive cricket and secondly more value. If we're honest with ourselves, a tournament which involves a guaranteed nine Indian matches is worth substantially more than a tournament with less Indian matches. And of course the money that's generated from that event is for the benefit of all members including the Associate members." Maybe one day cricket will be played purely for the sake of it rather than to fill the coffers of executives. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 04, 2016, 02:40:58 PM Speaking of which I just came across this wonderful quote from Dave Richardson - "Again, the reason to go to a 10-team [2019 World Cup] tournament was done for a number of reasons some time back. Number one probably it was a format that would generate more competitive cricket and secondly more value. If we're honest with ourselves, a tournament which involves a guaranteed nine Indian matches is worth substantially more than a tournament with less Indian matches. And of course the money that's generated from that event is for the benefit of all members including the Associate members." Maybe one day cricket will be played purely for the sake of it rather than to fill the coffers of executives. Haha, aye Dave, I'm sure loads of that money will get ploughed into developing cricket in Afghanistan, Ireland and Holland ... Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on April 04, 2016, 03:42:15 PM Speaking of which I just came across this wonderful quote from Dave Richardson - "Again, the reason to go to a 10-team [2019 World Cup] tournament was done for a number of reasons some time back. Number one probably it was a format that would generate more competitive cricket and secondly more value. If we're honest with ourselves, a tournament which involves a guaranteed nine Indian matches is worth substantially more than a tournament with less Indian matches. And of course the money that's generated from that event is for the benefit of all members including the Associate members." Maybe one day cricket will be played purely for the sake of it rather than to fill the coffers of executives. Haha, aye Dave, I'm sure loads of that money will get ploughed into developing cricket in Afghanistan, Ireland and Holland ... How exactly do they expect associate members to get better without playing the top nations. Bangladesh and Afghanistan looked well worth their place imo. Them being competitive made it a much better tournament Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: Tommo on April 04, 2016, 04:03:09 PM The final along with the whole tournament showed again that 20/20 is great entertainment, I had friends who think/thought cricket is the most boring sport going who loved yesterday's final.
For me as a huge cricket fan nothing beats the first morning of a test match, but I do love the excitement and innovation of 20/20. Also how good is Joe Root? Does it in all 3 formats of the game, think he has every chance of going on to be England's most complete batsmen ever if he isn't already very close to that already. I am a Yorkshireman so my view on Joe might be slightly biased. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nellberg on April 04, 2016, 04:48:47 PM Speaking of which I just came across this wonderful quote from Dave Richardson - "Again, the reason to go to a 10-team [2019 World Cup] tournament was done for a number of reasons some time back. Number one probably it was a format that would generate more competitive cricket and secondly more value. If we're honest with ourselves, a tournament which involves a guaranteed nine Indian matches is worth substantially more than a tournament with less Indian matches. And of course the money that's generated from that event is for the benefit of all members including the Associate members." Maybe one day cricket will be played purely for the sake of it rather than to fill the coffers of executives. Haha, aye Dave, I'm sure loads of that money will get ploughed into developing cricket in Afghanistan, Ireland and Holland ... How exactly do they expect associate members to get better without playing the top nations. Bangladesh and Afghanistan looked well worth their place imo. Them being competitive made it a much better tournament I think the Afghan's are great value, always enjoy watching them. Shahzad with the bat alone is worth tuning in for, but also in the field, quickies charging in and plenty of intensity, 17 (!) year old leggie and a bit of niggle from them all. Whether they could keep up the intensity and compete over 50 overs is debatable, but the more exposure they have the more likely they are to succeed. Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: vegaslover on April 04, 2016, 07:16:30 PM Sussex have signed Rahman for T20 and look forward to watching him play
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: nirvana on April 04, 2016, 07:16:57 PM Yep, was naïve to overlook the money angle. I guess the day out factor continues to make ODIs sell out even though the game is often dull.
Title: Re: Cricket World t20 - England have a chance? Post by: KingPush on April 05, 2016, 05:52:33 AM The final along with the whole tournament showed again that 20/20 is great entertainment, I had friends who think/thought cricket is the most boring sport going who loved yesterday's final. Think he's probably the best British sportsmen right now, just insanely good at batting and fielding. I really hope he doesn't become captain and is allowed to instead, inevitably become England's highest run scorer.For me as a huge cricket fan nothing beats the first morning of a test match, but I do love the excitement and innovation of 20/20. Also how good is Joe Root? Does it in all 3 formats of the game, think he has every chance of going on to be England's most complete batsmen ever if he isn't already very close to that already. I am a Yorkshireman so my view on Joe might be slightly biased. First ball was very bad, second ball was bad and I was in too much pain to watch the rest. Would have thought bowling outside off yorkers would be better than a middle to leg line with the way he was setting himself up. Yeah this, Braithwaite well known to ove the on side, shoulda been wide on the off, tactic that was used well in previous games. Reckon that Root over had a lot to do with whatever got said on the field after he was out when batting. Certainly looked pissed off at WI when walking off I think we should have gone wide yorkers, especially to Samuels are he backs away. Braithwaite showed he can hit inside-out so it would have been a risk but it's still far more difficult to hit sixes over cover than long on. Credit to braithwaite, his scoop shot changed the dynamic of the game and we got a bit muddled up with our thinking. Mid-off up to Samuels a particularly strange choice. One thing I was saying to my mates after the New Zealand game was that I didn't think we didn't bowl that well at the death. Those last 4 overs went for 20 and took wickets, everyone's saying it was amazing but it was very results-orientated. Ronchi's hit a full toss down long-off's throat. Anderson's hit a half volley down long-off's throat. If they both go for 6 no-one says they bowled great. Yesterday in the last 10 balls they hit their mark once (Jordan's last ball to Samuels was perfect). rest of Jordan's over was hittablle, first one went for 4 to vacant long-off region, the rest were mis-hit for ones but I keep thinking we'd got away with them. Stokes then missed his length and also his line, the 1st one is a free hit basically and the others are still too straight. Still no idea how the 3rd six has gone 20 rows back, nowhere near the middle of the bat! It's obviously super-tough bowling at the death in these pressure situations, and they'll learn from this. Be nice to see them work on some variations, like a slower ball. Would be a lot more difficult to set yourself as a batsman if you knew it would be either a yorker or a slowie, like when Bravo bowls at the back end. Both Jordan and Stokes seem to want to bowl at the death and enjoy the challenge (Stokes maybe not so much now!) so with a bit more practice they'll get better. All in all England definitely exceeded my expectations. Going to India with only 1 player with IPL experience (Morgan) and he only contributes 66 runs all tournament. Main spinners only bowl 33 overs all tournament for 10 wickets and go at 8.82 an over. To still make the final and be in with a great shout of winning it took some doing and they'll be together as a group for a good few years, so promising signs for sure. |