Live 1/1 hold'em game
7 handed
Playing £650
Villain 1 £600 (very drunk, playing slots on his phone. Seems to have an idea of how to play though, just not massively well. not seen him do anything massively outlandish but hes won a few pots at showdown with J4/Q6 etc but hes always made good hands, not seen him bluff.
Villain 2 £120 (extremely drunk, been at the table less than 20 minutes and doesnt really have a clue where he is, open raised first hand £25 with aces and got paid off lost abit since then)

Villain 1 posts BB
Villain 2 raises £10 ep
Hero  raises £25 OTB
Both call
Flop  
Checks to Hero we bet £40
Both Call
Turn 
Villain 1 bets £110
Villain goes allin for £60
We call
River 
Villain 1 Bets £85

Throughout the hand villain 1 continued to be playing on his phone, didn't take a seconds notice calling the flop and seemed to snap bet the turn, although he thought for a second before making the river bet. Villiain 2 is kind of irrelevent because he could have had anything was constantly moaning and was agonising over every call and stood up to leave on the river.
Thoughts on the turn? I thought it was pretty standard as although I dont really rate the opponant I think he can fold 2 pair alot as he didn't seem like he wanted to get stacked off. Do we ever raise?
Thoughts on the river? My plan was to call most blank river cards and reevaluate if a Spade came. If I got checked to I intended to value bet alot. His sizing is ridiculous though were getting 7-1 on the call so obv never folding but it looks so weak so do we ever raise here?

Deffo jamming now given the action. Personally i hate to 3-bet pre in 6 card especially out of position, your hand flops well so post flop play is always more profitable here imo.

Well I would say we have checked oop on flop with the intention of shoving any action but we get the exact action that makes our hand vulnerable.

Does that really hold true, though?

The fact we check may be exactly why our man pots it, because he senses weakness, he has position, and we checked.

Cause and effect.

He can also, of course, have the hand you suggest.

Think he's always wanting to get the money in thats why I thought it was interesting spot, punting in £1000 when we could be completely crushed. The straddle always has a good hand also, he never leads out with just 56 as hes a very good player and to do that is awful. So there are so many factors to consider in this hand and thats why a fold or shove are both reasonable given the action.

Glad to have recieved lots of insight on this hand from the Blonde community. It has all been a great read. Thanks

[(except the mention that it might be paul parker lol)]

I don't believe that can be true, i think he can have some (semi)bluffs and some weaker 56 hands, I've seen nothing in this thread (except the mention that it might be paul parker lol) aside from the fact he's been the tightest guy at the table, to suggest this is wrong, and as going all-in here is very much the stnd I'd need a great deal more of a read than that to suddenly completely revert from the very easy stnd play. I've made a lot of very bad hero folds in my life to "very tight" players having developed this read because they played very tight for 3 orbits in a live poker game. There has been many times I've played very tight for 3 hours in a live game and like I said no1 would fold this hand to me OTF.

Also from a theory/maths angle the amount we've invested really doesn't matter - its £200 to call with £800/£600 in stacks and thi is the hand we have (it does make a practical difference though)

And yes it was deffo Paul Parker he's been in all week and i've been chatting to him quite abit.

I do believe that re-potting is the most profitable play against almost anyone, there are just too many worse 56 combos out their that can spaz it in especially as its only 4 cards. The straddle is also a factor because he is getting the equity to get his stack in after I pot with any set+nut flush draw and therefore I think a hero fold isn't terrible but ultimately less profitable.

if he's opening J765sing UTG in the FR pokers then I'd be getting it in vs him OTF, cos the sort of playeer who'd open that UTG wont generally just need the uber-mega hand to get his stack in here (sweeping generalization from me I understand but "generally speaking" I think that's pretty accurate)

or as Cos said in 1200 words less than me.

Yup I'm very happily getting it in here

He didn't open, he flatted in late position. The UTG raiser folded the flop, op says this maybe I didn't make it clear. But yeah his hand shound never really see a flop.

OH RIGHT. Have I mis-read the HH cos that defo makes a difference

Playing 7 handed
UTG raises to 15
Hijack calls
I call SB
BB folds
Straddle calls

Flop: Straddle bets 40, utg folds, hijack pots £200

if he's opening J765sing UTG in the FR pokers then I'd be getting it in vs him OTF, cos the sort of playeer who'd open that UTG wont generally just need the uber-mega hand to get his stack in here (sweeping generalization from me I understand but "generally speaking" I think that's pretty accurate)

or as Cos said in 1200 words less than me.

Yup I'm very happily getting it in here

He didn't open, he flatted in late position. The UTG raiser folded the flop, op says this maybe I didn't make it clear. But yeah his hand shound never really see a flop.

Just to clarify I didn't fold. I got it in rather quickly, we agreed to run it twice and I got 1/4 back. He had 567sJs so was pretty sick. Just wanted to see if it is ever right to fold knowing this player is almost certainly getting it in and with the straddle behind as well only playing <600

is this @dtd btw, naming the villain would be pretty useful if its possible, I have a inkling who it is I think.

No it was at Didsbury this week during the gukpt. His name is Paul, hes black and wears funky clothes. Plays the circuit abit I think alot of people seem to know him.

Is there no merit for a fold here? The donk bet usually reads 56 also, and the guy who's potted is never light here. IMO at worst he has a bare 567 and i dont think hes ever folding. Does everyone really want to get in 1k here in the hope he has no redraws? My flush isn't great either so really just hoping to spike a blank 5 or 6 which there may not be many left if the straddle has it as well.

Playing 8 handed and everyone is sat with at least £500, straddles are £5

Dealer chooses 4 cards the only player that does this everyone else tends to have max

I'm the small blind playing 1.1k

HAND:  

Straddle to 5, utg raises to 15, 1 caller behind, I call the sb, bb folds and the straddle comes along.

FLOP:  

I check
Straddle bets out £40
Initial raiser folds and the caller pots it to approximately £200

Thoughts?

Straddle is a very competent reg, probably the best player at the table and playing £600ish. The potter im told is decent and seems to know how to play, he has been the tightest player at the table and has span £300 into £1000 he has only shown down aces full and the nut straight before. Im a relatively unkown but have been holding my own playing fairly tight.