I thought we already established (with me confirming your original idea) that my opinions are worthless...therefore almost by definition my opinion is unlikely to be more credible than yours, no?
Oh and you do not want to see me go all "Tourette" on the forum..I'd overtake Snoopies post count within a week

Heartens me to see I got you to almost double your post count though. See, thanks to me you are now more active on this lovely forum...you should be thanking me really

I have no problem with you thinkin Walcott is a smackhead BTW..I don't even need to see pictures...it's fine...really...it even explains why he's such a fast little bugger....do you think that's why Eriksson took him to the world-cup last time?..Did Sven do drugs with Theo?...Does Theo have proof and did he blackmail Sven into taking him to the WC? Sven's taking the magic mushrooms, isn't he?..i knew there was something dodgy about him!...I'm gonna phone the News of the world!...sell the story for millions!
You see, the problem I had with your original assertion was that it undermines what could be an interesting debate. It's an opinion purporting to back up your stance on drugs in sport, but in reality it's just recycling second hand gossip. When you're trying to make a serious point - as you were - you can't expect to be taken seriously when the basis of your argument is a piece of unsubstantiated gossip.
Incidentally, and back on topic, Ferdinand missed just one drug test, not ‘several’ as you claimed.