evri are the absolute worst - complain to the seller and say that you won't use them again as they use evri. I arranged for an evri delivery to a pick up point which never arrived. They informed the seller that I had refused to accept the item.

Played a senior open at Cawder (easy course of their two) to the north east of Glasgow on Thursday. Finished with 33 stabos but a bit disappointed as I had 29 with four not particularly hard holes to go.

I ldropped a not too bad score on my index so I have crept up from 27.9 to 28.

This is a bit different, but should raise the spirits

That's very sad indeed. rip

played my first competition of the year, lanark 4-ball seniors. Our playing partners were from eck's club alloa and did pretty well, might have got a prize. The course was pretty tough - my index is 27.4, the course handicap was 32!  The weather forecast was for it to be cool and breezy but it turned out to be a marvellous spring day.

though if they fall for that they deserve all the bad luck they get. 

One theory

There is a question as to why the majority of the hosts of brood parasites care for the nestlings of their parasites. Not only do these brood parasites usually differ significantly in size and appearance, but it is also highly probable that they reduce the reproductive success of their hosts. The "mafia hypothesis" proposes that when a brood parasite discovers that its egg has been rejected, it destroys the host's nest and injures or kills the nestlings. The threat of such a response may encourage compliant behavior from the host.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brood_parasitism

yes I agree that the albatross odds seem a little high, but they are very likely the odds used in the wikipedia article hence the huge figure

The par four hole in one might slightly change hole in one stats, but not albatross stats. I assume the lady in question holed in one and albatrossed different holes (as otherwise the achievement wouldn't be so noteworthy). So (leaving aside multiple opportunities through the round) the odds of it occuring are the product of the odds multiplied.

The albatross is huge odds in itself - according to the internet 1 milllion to one for pro's (male presumably). So multiply that by the hole in one odds and you get the huge figure. The actual 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the card doesn't require an albatross, so I would think the odds of that aren't a huge amount more than the hole in one.

That looked like a fantastic day Kev

and it was

This wouldn't fit on the post. Didn't know that boats had turbine engines.

Did you ever visit the transport museum when you were up in Glasgow for Skypoker, tikay?

There's some great stuff there.

6. So the evidence appears to be this. 8 years ago, a Man was questioned about what he may, or may not, have done with a man aged between 16 and 18. Between 26 and 29 years ago. And, for whatever reason, the Police did not proceed with criminal charges

They now say that the alleged allegations involve a sub-16yo. Though if that was sub-16 right at the beginning of any alleged contact hasn't been released.

I take your general point though and can't really see Mills letting this go without a decent payout and a statement of apology. Which ironically will enrage the non-license payer types even more that the action they have taken.

Another factor in your whs is that if it's based on 3 scores they knock 2 off it. You have to submit at least 7 scores for it to be based entirely on your submissions.