Problem with talking about this story is basically that everyone in poker seems to dislike and mistrust Feldman but likes and trusts Trickett.
Hence virtually everyone is going to take Sam's side without knowing the full facts.
In my experience, when there is a dispute like this, there is usually two sides to the story with a certain amount of right and wrong on both sides.
I just don't believe it's as cut and dried as has been portrayed.
While I'm no fan of Andrew Feldman, I wouldn't convict him until the full story of what happened has emerged.
---==========================
It's just poker,.... everyone owes everybody money at some point, who on this forum owes money to another player? Who is in makeup? the guys just couldn't resolve it and decided to air the dirty laundry which was pretty dumb IMO:
Hence virtually everyone is going to take Sam's side without knowing the full facts.
In my experience, when there is a dispute like this, there is usually two sides to the story with a certain amount of right and wrong on both sides.
I just don't believe it's as cut and dried as has been portrayed.
While I'm no fan of Andrew Feldman, I wouldn't convict him until the full story of what happened has emerged.
---==========================
It's just poker,.... everyone owes everybody money at some point, who on this forum owes money to another player? Who is in makeup? the guys just couldn't resolve it and decided to air the dirty laundry which was pretty dumb IMO: