blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 11:13:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262325 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Super-casino 'due to be scrapped'
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Super-casino 'due to be scrapped'  (Read 2149 times)
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« on: February 26, 2008, 10:29:44 AM »

bbc

Super-casino 'due to be scrapped'

The government is expected to officially announce the scrapping of a super-casino for Manchester and confirm plans for 16 regional casinos.

They are likely to be approved for towns across the UK, including Leeds, Milton Keynes, Swansea and Stranraer.

Manchester had won the bid to develop a Las Vegas-style resort but Gordon Brown effectively killed off the plans soon after taking over as prime minister.

Manchester Council may appeal against any decision to ditch the super-casino.

In January last year, Manchester was the surprise winner of a bid to create a gigantic casino in a depressed area of the city.

But Gordon Brown announced a review of the decision in July, saying super-casinos are not the best way to regenerate run-down areas.

Culture secretary Andy Burnham is expected to confirm in a statement to MPs that the super-casino will be ditched.

An announcement is also expected from communities secretary Hazel Blears on an alternative development package for the Manchester area.

Reports have indicated that casinos holding up to 150 slot machines with prizes of up to £4,000 are expected to be approved in Leeds, Southampton, Great Yarmouth, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Hull, Milton Keynes, and Newham in east London.

Permission has been predicted for smaller casinos in the Bath area; Stranraer in south-west Scotland; Scarborough; Wolverhampton; Swansea; Luton; Torbay in Devon; and East Lindsey in Lincolnshire, an area which contains resorts including Skegness.

Mr Brown's spokesman said: "As we said in July, there is a huge difference in scale in terms of gambling opportunities in a super-casino and smaller casinos.

"What we said was we would work up alternative regeneration packages which did not rely on a super-casino."

Shadow culture secretary Jeremy Hunt said: "After seven months of dithering, the government's gambling policy is a mess.

"When will the government understand this is not about the size of the casino but the underlying protections put in place to prevent and treat a social disorder that breaks up families?"

Liberal Democrat culture spokesman Don Foster said the government's gambling policy was "muddled and confused" with the original local authority bids for the super-casino costing more than £1m of taxpayers' money.

Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 10:36:16 AM »

good thing the councils didn't waste a lot of money trying to get something that was never going to be finally approved by the Government.

What a joke.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2008, 10:49:42 AM »

But Gordon Brown announced a review of the decision in July, saying super-casinos are not the best way to regenerate run-down areas.

The thing is, he's right. Casinos suck money out of areas. In Las Vegas this isn't a problem, as new money flies into the airport every day from all over the world. Even Blackpool would have used the supercasino as part of a wider plan to make themselves a place people would travel to from all over the country - spend a few days on holiday having a gamble with money which is essentially 'spare' and which is being brought into the area. But few people are going to have a holiday in Manchester - the casino is far more likely to be frequented by local people, using money which would have been spent in other local businesses, thus hurting the area.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 10:51:27 AM »

as for Manchester, Andrew, doesn't the same apply to

Leeds, Southampton, Great Yarmouth, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Hull, Milton Keynes, and Newham in east London.


some of which have casinos, some of which are deprived areas?
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2008, 11:06:22 AM »

as for Manchester, Andrew, doesn't the same apply to

Leeds, Southampton, Great Yarmouth, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Hull, Milton Keynes, and Newham in east London.

some of which have casinos, some of which are deprived areas?

Yes, it does. The local councils think these casinos are some sort of magic bullet to regenerate an area but I just don't see it. I mean, Stranraer?? The town is a port in the middle of nowhere with a high street and not much else.

Mind you, Solihull is actually very posh and well-to-do when you compare it to the places around it...
Logged
kenjude
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 246


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2008, 11:20:41 AM »

Let the legal battles, and more expense to the taxpayers, commence.

A government shambles - standard.
Logged

Cheers

Ken
ripple11
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6313



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 11:29:13 AM »


As I understand it , the Super Casino was going to be more of a Super Resort/Entertainment complex with bars/restaurants, a hotel etc....thus providing thousands of jobs in regeneration, where as the smaller ones will just be a bog standard casino.

Not convined Manchester was the better choice however....Blackpool was/is crying out for this.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2008, 05:49:33 PM »

as for Manchester, Andrew, doesn't the same apply to

Leeds, Southampton, Great Yarmouth, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Hull, Milton Keynes, and Newham in east London.

some of which have casinos, some of which are deprived areas?

Yes, it does. The local councils think these casinos are some sort of magic bullet to regenerate an area but I just don't see it. I mean, Stranraer?? The town is a port in the middle of nowhere with a high street and not much else.

Mind you, Solihull is actually very posh and well-to-do when you compare it to the places around it...


Not all of it!!  People in Solihull just think they're posher... Wink
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Geo the Sarge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5545



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2008, 07:19:29 PM »

as for Manchester, Andrew, doesn't the same apply to

Leeds, Southampton, Great Yarmouth, Middlesbrough, Solihull, Hull, Milton Keynes, and Newham in east London.

some of which have casinos, some of which are deprived areas?

Yes, it does. The local councils think these casinos are some sort of magic bullet to regenerate an area but I just don't see it. I mean, Stranraer?? The town is a port in the middle of nowhere with a high street and not much else.

Mind you, Solihull is actually very posh and well-to-do when you compare it to the places around it...

Let's not beat about the bush now Andrew.......Stranraer is a shit hole.

Geo
Logged

When you get..........give. When you learn.......teach
Pelham Boy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2186



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2008, 07:25:31 PM »

Phew! When i saw the title of the thread i thought the Luton G was closing!!
Logged

"The boy Gedge has written some of the best love songs of the Rock 'n' Roll Era. You may dispute this, but I'm right and you're wrong!" John Peel.
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2008, 07:29:05 PM »

Phew! When i saw the title of the thread i thought the Luton G was closing!!

Its not super!
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Hairydude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2458



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2008, 07:33:50 PM »


As I understand it , the Super Casino was going to be more of a Super Resort/Entertainment complex with bars/restaurants, a hotel etc....thus providing thousands of jobs in regeneration, where as the smaller ones will just be a bog standard casino.

Not convined Manchester was the better choice however....Blackpool was/is crying out for this.


I agree there was going to be much more than the casino with bars, clubs and restaurants erected but its all an ideology- your not guaranteed that this will increase the tourism in the area! I watched a very good documentary on Atlanta in the states-which was the same idea- and like AndrewT said it basically sucked money out of the local economy and created a lot of problem gamblers within the area- i'm sorry but I dont think putting a gambling mecca in a deprived area of poverty will work- if anything families in these areas will suffer more!

I agree a bit more with blackpool though as it is already a tourist economy and if the casino was to go anywhere it should be there to boost their dwindling tourist industry
Logged

Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream
Gazza
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 447



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2008, 07:31:51 PM »


As I understand it , the Super Casino was going to be more of a Super Resort/Entertainment complex with bars/restaurants, a hotel etc....thus providing thousands of jobs in regeneration, where as the smaller ones will just be a bog standard casino.

Not convined Manchester was the better choice however....Blackpool was/is crying out for this.


I agree there was going to be much more than the casino with bars, clubs and restaurants erected but its all an ideology- your not guaranteed that this will increase the tourism in the area! I watched a very good documentary on Atlanta in the states-which was the same idea- and like AndrewT said it basically sucked money out of the local economy and created a lot of problem gamblers within the area- i'm sorry but I dont think putting a gambling mecca in a deprived area of poverty will work- if anything families in these areas will suffer more!

I agree a bit more with blackpool though as it is already a tourist economy and if the casino was to go anywhere it should be there to boost their dwindling tourist industry

Atlanta, gambler's paradise Wink
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.182 seconds with 20 queries.