blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2025, 05:29:41 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262448 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Strong hand but nit is leading multiway.....turn fold?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Strong hand but nit is leading multiway.....turn fold?  (Read 4481 times)
LuckyLloyd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 625



View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2008, 05:05:15 AM »


u two think this is simple fold? seriously? he can have 66 or flopped flush in my eyes, personally i think the turn decision is very tough, add more or keep schtum imo.

Keep schtum? Not happening. How can you be a reg at 5 / 10; describe the guy leading out as extremely ABC and nitty; have top pair on that board in a multiway pot; and not think it's a simple fold? Tsk.
Logged

"All glory comes from daring to begin" - Eugene F. Ware.
Hairydude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2458



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2008, 07:31:47 AM »


u two think this is simple fold? seriously? he can have 66 or flopped flush in my eyes, personally i think the turn decision is very tough, add more or keep schtum imo.

Keep schtum? Not happening. How can you be a reg at 5 / 10; describe the guy leading out as extremely ABC and nitty; have top pair on that board in a multiway pot; and not think it's a simple fold? Tsk.

to be fair mate you could be a little more constructive with your comments rather than post snidy comments like "why post this?"
Logged

Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2008, 11:14:12 AM »


u two think this is simple fold? seriously? he can have 66 or flopped flush in my eyes, personally i think the turn decision is very tough, add more or keep schtum imo.

Keep schtum? Not happening. How can you be a reg at 5 / 10; describe the guy leading out as extremely ABC and nitty; have top pair on that board in a multiway pot; and not think it's a simple fold? Tsk.

i know the player, he moved up from 500nl early this year. I was taking a shot and got felted, wanted constructive criticism and got this "why post this?" bollocks. Not needed.
Logged
action man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10650



View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2008, 12:16:21 PM »

i think its a standard fold i would like your line more if the pot was hu vs you and the villain. Id imagine he has a set here. or a made flush
Logged
LuckyLloyd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 625



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2008, 08:11:15 PM »

There is no requirement for replies to be in a certain format. And there is certainly no requirement to pussyfoot around and be all "hard luck mate", "tough spot" if a situation isn't tough or unlucky. Sorry you took a shot and got stacked - and because you got stacked during a shot the hand may seem significant to you. But the turn decision is a trivial one imo and this hand isn't particularly interesting.
Logged

"All glory comes from daring to begin" - Eugene F. Ware.
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2008, 08:24:13 PM »

its fine that to you this hand has no significant interest and is simple. im not looking for pussyfooting around or sympathy, just want to discuss merits of lines in an effort to improve. might i suggest just not replying to a hand you think is not particuarly interesting. 
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2008, 08:25:37 PM »

How would people's thinking differ if the player wasn't as nitty or ABC?

Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
deepreacher
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 742



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2008, 09:30:17 PM »

How would people's thinking differ if the player wasn't as nitty or ABC?



I still think it would be a standard fold. Unless you know he is a complete spewtard
Logged
LuckyLloyd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 625



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2008, 09:33:08 PM »

its fine that to you this hand has no significant interest and is simple. im not looking for pussyfooting around or sympathy, just want to discuss merits of lines in an effort to improve. might i suggest just not replying to a hand you think is not particuarly interesting. 

You've raised preflop and called on the flop which are absolutely standard, could not argue anything else decisions.

Flatcalling the turn with the intention of folding to further action on the river is obviously silly - and getting it in here is essentially a bluff when he never folds anything he isn't bluffing with and should hardly ever be bluffing! Sooo...just fold.
Logged

"All glory comes from daring to begin" - Eugene F. Ware.
snoopy1239
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33034



View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2008, 10:36:52 PM »

I'd fold this pretty shaprish. A tight player is firing into you and you still have a player behind.
Logged
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2008, 12:23:03 PM »

AS played I pass on the turn.

Folding the flop is a bit nitty, raising or calling flop is fine.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.202 seconds with 20 queries.