blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 22, 2025, 03:16:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262360 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Bubble Analysis
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Bubble Analysis  (Read 2847 times)
No home
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


View Profile
« on: June 06, 2010, 12:34:40 AM »

I read a hand in this months poker player magazine stratagy section and really disagree with the play and would like other peoples opinion on the hand.

"You're in the bubble of a ten-player sit and go with 4 players left, payed 50%/30%20%. The blinds are 100/200 and you're second in chips with 3k, the other stacks are 7.5k, 2.5k and 500. The Cut off and button fold but the big stack pushes all in for 7.5k from the SB. Your holding   in the big blind, What do you do?

The magazine says "Fold, even if your opponent is pushing 100% of hands you cannot call here as you will only win around 33%. This would be a disaster on this payout structure since the short stack is likely to bust soon, guaranteeing at least 20% of the prize pool.

I disagree with this play because the Big stack is going to be pushin nearly 100% of the time in this situation and your way ahead of his range so I think its +EV to call in the long run......... Opinions please!!!!!!
« Last Edit: June 06, 2010, 01:02:30 AM by No home » Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2010, 12:39:08 AM »

The magazine says "Fold, even if your opponent is pushing 100% of hands you cannot call here as you will only win around 33%.

This is wrong -  is actually 33% to lose the hand - it's 67% to win.
Logged
No home
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2010, 01:18:53 AM »

The magazine says "Fold, even if your opponent is pushing 100% of hands you cannot call here as you will only win around 33%.
This is wrong -  is actually 33% to lose the hand - it's 67% to win.

I'm just writing what it says in the magazine here, i know  is better than 33% against any two here
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2010, 02:25:19 AM »

never folding  .

Not sure about  though
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Meister
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2010, 12:42:36 AM »

go home
Logged
the rage
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2010, 10:16:22 AM »

 As in most poker decisions, it's very much situational. You may well be correct in your assertion that villiain is pushing with any two cards. Obviously, in this scenario, none of us can be certain of what range villian is pushing with.
 If you fold, and keep folding for another few hands, you virtually guarantee yourself a 20% slice of the cake. You would appear to be about 2 /1 favourite against a random hand.
 My cautious side says fold into the money. My aggressive instinct says that poker is about taking risks, so shove them in..FTW and all that.
 I'm really not sure what the mathematically correct option is though. Hopefully someone on here with a better understanding of ICM will be able to explain. Smiley
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2010, 10:30:34 AM »

from an ICM perspective its a fold

whether i find a fold is a totally different matter
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2010, 11:34:04 AM »

Yeah, I probably fold and see what happens to the guy with 500. Sucks a bit that you have a good chipped up player to your left. The ladder from 0%->20% is big though. That said, there's only 1 short stack, and you're not exactly massively chipped up. Think it's quite close.
Logged

Blue text
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2010, 10:34:13 PM »

Its a fold and it is not really close.

If sb exposed 25o here it is still a fold.
Logged
DMorgan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4440



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2010, 12:22:54 AM »

Very standard fold....QQ is an interesting spot there
Logged

pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2010, 01:15:30 AM »

what does the guy need to show to make it a profitable call?
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2010, 01:15:53 AM »

a6o?
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2010, 01:18:42 AM »

what does the guy need to show to make it a profitable call?

I think if he shows ax or kx it might be a call. Probs close though.

Logged
DMorgan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4440



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2010, 02:25:01 AM »

Doesn't really matter what he shows when we have AK. We need >80% equity here to make this a call.
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.116 seconds with 20 queries.