blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 11:58:13 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262347 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Pokerstars Ten Million $Tournament ... Be Aware of how long it will take
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Pokerstars Ten Million $Tournament ... Be Aware of how long it will take  (Read 5215 times)
LeedsRhodesy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3952



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 19, 2011, 11:53:17 AM »

What did the winner get?



$1.1 million
Logged
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 19, 2011, 11:54:52 AM »

Best placed brit?
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 19, 2011, 11:57:06 AM »

What did the winner get?

1.1 mirrion
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
LeedsRhodesy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3952



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 19, 2011, 11:57:44 AM »

Best placed brit?


Juniorbomer $22k  22nd
Logged
AceofWands
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 256



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 19, 2011, 11:59:33 AM »

The top six got amounts ranging from $1,146,574 to $580,724.  The kid who agreed the lowest amount appears to have come 2nd when they played it out.
Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: December 19, 2011, 12:22:37 PM »

There was a pretty lol deal with 6 left.

Stars gave the chop numbers, then shortstack says he wants more, so top two give him a bit. 6th now is getting more than 5th, but 5th guy agrees?!?!?
Logged
Girgy85
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9507



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 19, 2011, 12:41:41 PM »

There was a pretty lol deal with 6 left.

Stars gave the chop numbers, then shortstack says he wants more, so top two give him a bit. 6th now is getting more than 5th, but 5th guy agrees?!?!?

Happy to lock up $500k?
Logged

Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis

Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie

Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis

Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
AceofWands
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 256



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2011, 01:03:25 PM »

There was a pretty lol deal with 6 left.

Stars gave the chop numbers, then shortstack says he wants more, so top two give him a bit. 6th now is getting more than 5th, but 5th guy agrees?!?!?

Happy to lock up $500k?

Sixth had $255k locked  anyway.
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 19, 2011, 01:05:03 PM »

There was a pretty lol deal with 6 left.

Stars gave the chop numbers, then shortstack says he wants more, so top two give him a bit. 6th now is getting more than 5th, but 5th guy agrees?!?!?

Happy to lock up $500k?

Sixth had $255k locked  anyway.

but the balance might have been 10 yrs salary?

and 200k still to play for
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
mulhuzz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3016



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2011, 02:24:27 PM »

Best placed brit?


Juniorbomer $22k  22nd

he was horrendously unlucky to the australian tunafish. lost 20 70%ers in 10 minutes and would have had about 60m going into final stretch.
Logged
vegaslover
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4623


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2011, 08:22:17 PM »

I think it's just luck, sooo many runners in a one off tourney. the guarantee attracted loads who wouldn't otherwise bother.
Logged
paulhouk03
Cliqueless
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7652



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2011, 11:59:26 PM »

Is there anything in the fact that between them the FT'ers have played very few games between them???

Seat 1: Unstoffable - 2 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $237
 Seat 2: tunafish919 - 350 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $21,891
 Seat 3: BLAABAR - 328 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $5,423
 Seat 4: SkunkDen  - 180 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $3,642
 Seat 5: fireballdio - 80 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $39
 Seat 6: Dimedroll  - 210 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $2,939
 Seat 7: kaalen - 42 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $1,596
 Seat 8: yokouno1980 - 5 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $210
 Seat 9: First-Eagle - 733 MTT's - Pre 10A Profits $20,360

Clearly First_Eagle was the experienced, (only) profitable player at the table. Excluding him, the others averaged 150 MTT's for 2011 - and all as losing players...

I don't really keep tabs on who wins what (bar looking at the money lists every now and then). Is it a normal occurrence to have so many inexperienced losing players at a FT of a Sunday Major?

Does this mean that luck/variance is much much more important than skill in these bigger fields?

could play on different sites.
Logged

Just me
NigDawG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1374



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 20, 2011, 08:45:17 AM »

Is there anything in the fact that between them the FT'ers have played very few games between them???

Seat 1: Unstoffable - 2 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $237
 Seat 2: tunafish919 - 350 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $21,891
 Seat 3: BLAABAR - 328 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $5,423
 Seat 4: SkunkDen  - 180 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $3,642
 Seat 5: fireballdio - 80 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $39
 Seat 6: Dimedroll  - 210 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $2,939
 Seat 7: kaalen - 42 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $1,596
 Seat 8: yokouno1980 - 5 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $210
 Seat 9: First-Eagle - 733 MTT's - Pre 10A Profits $20,360

Clearly First_Eagle was the experienced, (only) profitable player at the table. Excluding him, the others averaged 150 MTT's for 2011 - and all as losing players...

I don't really keep tabs on who wins what (bar looking at the money lists every now and then). Is it a normal occurrence to have so many inexperienced losing players at a FT of a Sunday Major?

Does this mean that luck/variance is much much more important than skill in these bigger fields?

not sure what u used to get this information but ur statistics are wrong. BLAABAR for example is a 2p2er who has played over 1800 games on stars
Logged

Christopher Brammer
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 20, 2011, 08:53:51 AM »

Is there anything in the fact that between them the FT'ers have played very few games between them???

Seat 1: Unstoffable - 2 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $237
 Seat 2: tunafish919 - 350 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $21,891
 Seat 3: BLAABAR - 328 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $5,423
 Seat 4: SkunkDen  - 180 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $3,642
 Seat 5: fireballdio - 80 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $39
 Seat 6: Dimedroll  - 210 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $2,939
 Seat 7: kaalen - 42 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $1,596
 Seat 8: yokouno1980 - 5 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $210
 Seat 9: First-Eagle - 733 MTT's - Pre 10A Profits $20,360

Clearly First_Eagle was the experienced, (only) profitable player at the table. Excluding him, the others averaged 150 MTT's for 2011 - and all as losing players...

I don't really keep tabs on who wins what (bar looking at the money lists every now and then). Is it a normal occurrence to have so many inexperienced losing players at a FT of a Sunday Major?

Does this mean that luck/variance is much much more important than skill in these bigger fields?

not sure what u used to get this information but ur statistics are wrong. BLAABAR for example is a 2p2er who has played over 1800 games on stars

Looks like he may have used figures from the last 1 or 3 months etc
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
FTPlederer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 20, 2011, 11:52:06 AM »

Is there anything in the fact that between them the FT'ers have played very few games between them???

Seat 1: Unstoffable - 2 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $237
 Seat 2: tunafish919 - 350 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $21,891
 Seat 3: BLAABAR - 328 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $5,423
 Seat 4: SkunkDen  - 180 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $3,642
 Seat 5: fireballdio - 80 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $39
 Seat 6: Dimedroll  - 210 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $2,939
 Seat 7: kaalen - 42 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $1,596
 Seat 8: yokouno1980 - 5 MTT's - Pre 10A Losses $210
 Seat 9: First-Eagle - 733 MTT's - Pre 10A Profits $20,360

Clearly First_Eagle was the experienced, (only) profitable player at the table. Excluding him, the others averaged 150 MTT's for 2011 - and all as losing players...

I don't really keep tabs on who wins what (bar looking at the money lists every now and then). Is it a normal occurrence to have so many inexperienced losing players at a FT of a Sunday Major?

Does this mean that luck/variance is much much more important than skill in these bigger fields?

not sure what u used to get this information but ur statistics are wrong. BLAABAR for example is a 2p2er who has played over 1800 games on stars

if we are talking games for 2011, OPR states 253games http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/BLAABAR/poker/results/B2C85FF169E3430EB584AB585D8B2E53.html?t=2&rc= & http://pokerprolabs.com/topsharkpro?pnid=1&pn=BLAABAR&tt=mtt prolabs states 374 games over last 360 days.

on OPR > BLAABAR overall games including S&G's is closer to to 1800(tracked since 2007)

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.227 seconds with 20 queries.