hmmdizzla

[pleno1]

ok,m so sb was donking about massively, not folding at all pre. btn is unknown. i would flat here usually 95% of the time, but the sb really warranted a 3b. promise

flop i think betting is std.

turn i think is q close between betting and c/f

river i want to bet to get jj/qq to fold lol, he has 4400 otr btw.

its 50r on stars btw.


*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to hero [ ]
canabenol: folds
WhEADa: folds
OhRaisyDaisy: folds
StatusUp: folds
wugwugwugwug: folds
leopeluca: raises 80 to 160
Tomatee: calls 120
hero: raises 400 to 560
leopeluca: calls 400
Tomatee: calls 400
*** FLOP *** [td ]
Tomatee: checks
hero: bets 560
leopeluca: calls 560
Tomatee: folds
*** TURN *** [td ] []
hero: bets 880
leopeluca: calls 880
*** RIVER *** [td ] []
hero: bets 6740 and is all-in

[pleno1]

when i jam river i think he doesnt have a calling range outside of full houses

[skolsuper]

Turn to me is a simple bet/fold with a normal 50-60% pot sized bet, what made you deviate from this here?

Pre is good imo.

[pleno1]

yeh i was b/f the turn, i bet this size to set up a perceived pot sized river shove which id do with all my turn betting range, perhaps betting bigger is better.

thoughts on the river when we get there like this?

[pleno1]

flop is std sizing i think.

[skolsuper]

Sorry didn't spot that you included eff stack size, should read OPs properly, yeah flop + turn sizing makes sense in that case. Would be tempted to c/c river given that your line looks so strong when u shove yet doesn't work as a bluff imo. He doesn't ever have JJ/QQ for you to fold out.

[pleno1]

Sorry didn't spot that you included eff stack size, should read OPs properly, yeah flop + turn sizing makes sense in that case. Would be tempted to c/c river given that your line looks so strong when u shove yet doesn't work as a bluff imo. He doesn't ever have JJ/QQ for you to fold out.

ah ok, thats exactly what i was asking, i assumed when i jam river he doesnt have a calling range.

[SuuPRlim]

whenever I ask my friends about online MTT hands I've played, 95% of the time they tell me I bet too big at some point in the hand

[pleno1]

Basically if at all possible without overbettong the overall goal is to set up a pot sized river shove on the river. We don't have to shove the river but when betting turn we want to set up a perceived shove so that we get a lot of turn folds.

In regards to the flop we want to bet small so that it gives us leverage on the turn whilst still making our bluffs cheap. I would bluff this sizing on the flop too meaning it doesn't have to work a large % of the time. If we were always betting big then it probably wouldn't be profitable to bet as a bluff as it would have to work an insanely high amount of the time. I almost never cbet more than 60% and my sizing will change between 23-60 depending on stack sizes and board texture.

[DMorgan]

Don't really see you folding out anything better with a river jam - I'd probably to the old check/decide on the river. Probably call though. I like turn sizing with stacks as they are - pretty happy to jam most rivers for value. This is one of the worse ones though in that he can perceive it as a scare card for his range which I think contains a lot of pocket pairs that want to put the cape on

[Rupert]

check fold the river wp otherwise, turn is a bit thin