blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 28, 2025, 01:31:37 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261924 Posts in 66597 Topics by 16986 Members
Latest Member: GazzaT
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Standard hand, plan on turn
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Standard hand, plan on turn  (Read 1537 times)
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6257



View Profile
« on: July 20, 2012, 06:58:47 AM »

18-man SNG.

Villain is a bad fish.

Stack size a little tricky on the turn.

Do we...

Bet/call
Bet/fold
Check?

Plan for river if we get there?


PokerStars Hand #83580133286: Tournament #589784871, $55.56+$4.44 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2012/07/20 6:49:33 WET [2012/07/20 1:49:33 ET]
Table '589784871 2' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: wellnobre (2850 in chips)
Seat 2: davin4a (1495 in chips)
Seat 4: geoserp (2615 in chips)
Seat 5: ambaal84 (920 in chips)
Seat 6: Marko586 (1110 in chips)
Seat 7: epitomised (1470 in chips)
Seat 8: bukithepro (1470 in chips)
Seat 9: OverTheTop43 (1570 in chips)
ambaal84: posts small blind 15
Marko586: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to epitomised [ ]
epitomised: raises 60 to 90
bukithepro: folds
OverTheTop43: folds
wellnobre: folds
davin4a: folds
geoserp: folds
ambaal84: calls 75
Marko586: folds
*** FLOP *** [ ]
ambaal84: checks
epitomised: bets 120
ambaal84: calls 120
*** TURN *** [ ] []
ambaal84: checks
epitomised:
« Last Edit: July 20, 2012, 09:27:11 AM by MC » Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
George2Loose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15127



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2012, 09:03:40 AM »

Think this early I check back. Bet/folding being option 2
Logged

Ole Ole Ole Ole!
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2012, 09:30:36 AM »

199/fold
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2012, 09:42:37 AM »

think i prefer b/f to checking back just because I think when he c/shoves were always behind. We can get called by worse while charging alot of draws and valuebet certain rivers.

Think bet/calling is pretty bad.
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2012, 05:18:49 PM »

B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn.
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2012, 05:28:23 PM »

Obv not loving it btw, but it's a sng, fish in these spaz off loads as you know, you're going to be wrong a lot b/f here.

Not sure how different 18's play to 180's early on but think it's a mistake to b/f vs fish if they're the same.
Logged
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1672


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2012, 06:00:47 PM »

B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn.

Yeah this is actually what i was thinking and would be the line i take. I think it just comes from my own experience really, the postflop plays of fish in sngs are just terrible and would expect you can safely profitably b/c AK here.
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6257



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2012, 06:47:57 PM »

B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn.

Obv not loving it btw, but it's a sng, fish in these spaz off loads as you know, you're going to be wrong a lot b/f here.

Not sure how different 18's play to 180's early on but think it's a mistake to b/f vs fish if they're the same.

B/c, he's a fish, unless he's a nitty bad fish then we lose to K9/T9 and QJ, lolz if he has 99. Ton of 1pr + draw hands he will over play on turn.

Yeah this is actually what i was thinking and would be the line i take. I think it just comes from my own experience really, the postflop plays of fish in sngs are just terrible and would expect you can safely profitably b/c AK here.

Yeah, this was my thinking as I was playing the hand. I nearly checked back, then I decided to bet/call, as I thought he might rejam as light as J9/Q9 or hands like that.

I think his stack size helped dictate this decision though, would have a harder time doing it if he was full stacked I think.

I just wasn't sure of the line. Sort of glad to see a dispute between all 3 options, thought I might have been posting up a really basic hand but it did feel like a tricky decision at the time.
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.194 seconds with 20 queries.