blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 27, 2025, 09:05:12 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262525 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Touch typing test.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Touch typing test.  (Read 3936 times)
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2015, 05:16:56 PM »

I wonder what Tony would score with his one finger left handed keyboard turned sideways method?


512 CPM = 103 WPM.

103 words per month?
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10018


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2015, 09:31:21 PM »

pfffty getting sucky in my old age, each mistake I pressed spacebar then went back to fix and caused another one Cry


Your score: 639 CPM (that is 128 WPM)

In reality, you typed 655 CPM, but you made 3 mistakes (out of 120 words), which were not counted in the corrected scores.

Your mistakes were:

Instead of "self", you typed "seflf".
Instead of "bird", you typed "bhird".
Instead of "need", you typed "nee".

 Cry Cry
Logged
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41950



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2015, 09:36:56 PM »

i think we need a sweepstake on Ironside taking the test WPM and mistakes?
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
vegaslover
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4624


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2015, 11:03:03 PM »

your score 192 CPM (that is 38 WPM)

I'm very rusty, but that test seemed on the easy side for a typing test
Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6202



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2015, 12:22:24 AM »

your score 192 CPM (that is 38 WPM)

I'm very rusty, but that test seemed on the easy side for a typing test

Online touch typing tests always tend to be on the easy side. I've had quite a few in the past from employment agencies and they're usually a lot more thorough.



I think my of the younger generation will be able to do it we have grown up typing nowadays. We have a girl who was professionally a "typist" when we first employed her about 15 years ago. It wasn't till about 5 years after that I first touched a keyboard. She can spell better than me but I think I'm probably a few words a minute faster than her now touch typing and I've never been taught just learnt after consistent use

We've had a few young people do work for us over the past couple of years, the impression I get from them, and others I know, is that the younger generations of those at school or just leaving school do have a lot of practice typing and can often do it quick - but it's not touch typing. It's just pretty fast 2 finger typing. The problem is that this tends to mean a lot more typos (and spelling mistakes if you never learn to spell that well).

However quick it is initially, it's very unlikely to be faster than if the same person can touch type properly and spell checking afterwards pulls down the speed a massive amount.

I think they actually should specifically teach touch typing in school - I was taught it in a business studies lesson; but it wasn't on the curriculum - our teacher was actually really old fashioned. As it happens she was spot on and I think it would be ideal if it was actually taught as a basic skill early on in secondary school.
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
BorntoBubble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5887



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2015, 12:30:25 AM »

your score 192 CPM (that is 38 WPM)

I'm very rusty, but that test seemed on the easy side for a typing test

Online touch typing tests always tend to be on the easy side. I've had quite a few in the past from employment agencies and they're usually a lot more thorough.



I think my of the younger generation will be able to do it we have grown up typing nowadays. We have a girl who was professionally a "typist" when we first employed her about 15 years ago. It wasn't till about 5 years after that I first touched a keyboard. She can spell better than me but I think I'm probably a few words a minute faster than her now touch typing and I've never been taught just learnt after consistent use

We've had a few young people do work for us over the past couple of years, the impression I get from them, and others I know, is that the younger generations of those at school or just leaving school do have a lot of practice typing and can often do it quick - but it's not touch typing. It's just pretty fast 2 finger typing. The problem is that this tends to mean a lot more typos (and spelling mistakes if you never learn to spell that well).

However quick it is initially, it's very unlikely to be faster than if the same person can touch type properly and spell checking afterwards pulls down the speed a massive amount.

I think they actually should specifically teach touch typing in school - I was taught it in a business studies lesson; but it wasn't on the curriculum - our teacher was actually really old fashioned. As it happens she was spot on and I think it would be ideal if it was actually taught as a basic skill early on in secondary school.

i found for me that as ive grown older my left hand has moved further and further right and into the "correct" position so that now my hands do half ish the keyboard each whereas i used to be very right hand dominant.

Its really hard to talk about typing while typing, has anyone found this?

What ive found from work is that "professional typists" know a hell of a lot of keyboard shortcuts.
Logged

"ace high"

http://plascolwyn.co.uk/ - 9 Bed Self Catering Holiday let in Snowdonia, North Wales Pm for more details.

Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/CalMorgan7
Marky147
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22634



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2015, 12:46:48 AM »

I had to learn when I was on CT course in the Navy, so got pretty good quite fast.

Then wasn't using comps much when I left there, but started playing Poker in 2004, and have been plotted up at a PC in some way or another ever since.

Logged

lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2015, 01:33:07 AM »

pfffty getting sucky in my old age, each mistake I pressed spacebar then went back to fix and caused another one Cry


Your score: 639 CPM (that is 128 WPM)

In reality, you typed 655 CPM, but you made 3 mistakes (out of 120 words), which were not counted in the corrected scores.

Your mistakes were:

Instead of "self", you typed "seflf".
Instead of "bird", you typed "bhird".
Instead of "need", you typed "nee".

 Cry Cry

I expected better.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 13, 2015, 10:35:42 AM »

Can't compete with Titbean. Used to be able to hit 100wpm back in the day but rustier now - still pretty pleased with this:

your score: 391 CPM (that is 78 WPM).

In reality you typed 394 CPM, but you made 1 mistake (out of 86 words) which was not counted in the corrected scores.

Your mistake was:

Instead of "an" you typed "anm"
Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.167 seconds with 20 queries.