poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 18, 2025, 12:56:23 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262307
Posts in
66604
Topics by
16990
Members
Latest Member:
Enut
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
JUSTICE
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: JUSTICE (Read 4906 times)
steeveg
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #15 on:
June 30, 2008, 11:57:25 PM »
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 11:29:08 PM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:13:33 PM
Quote from: jizzemm on June 30, 2008, 03:50:36 PM
Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug.
Totally agree.
Quote from: Indestructable on June 30, 2008, 05:44:21 PM
At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence.
The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is
likely
to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons:
a
: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and
b
: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead.
Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one.....
http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio
Rant over, need to go lay down......
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law.
But
WHY
is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ?
by pleading guilty it also saves the victims the trauma of having to give evidence
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #16 on:
July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM »
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 11:29:08 PM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:13:33 PM
Quote from: jizzemm on June 30, 2008, 03:50:36 PM
Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug.
Totally agree.
Quote from: Indestructable on June 30, 2008, 05:44:21 PM
At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence.
The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is
likely
to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons:
a
: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and
b
: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead.
Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one.....
http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio
Rant over, need to go lay down......
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law.
But
WHY
is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ?
"pleading the obvious" seriously?
it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty?
why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah?
rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a?
Logged
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 34178
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #17 on:
July 01, 2008, 02:01:01 PM »
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7483078.stm
Logged
Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #18 on:
July 01, 2008, 02:06:15 PM »
lol at the bird weighing in with punches, she hits harder than him
Logged
Rookie (Rodney)
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 12991
ISHIKAWAAAAAAAAA
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #19 on:
July 01, 2008, 02:06:48 PM »
****
Logged
HI HELEN!
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #20 on:
July 01, 2008, 02:24:35 PM »
He's VERY right handed isn't he?
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Josedinho
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4515
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #21 on:
July 01, 2008, 02:57:21 PM »
The Sun has a longer version.
He goes back for more.
Logged
Rookie (Rodney)
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 12991
ISHIKAWAAAAAAAAA
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #22 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:00:00 PM »
Quote from: Josedinho on July 01, 2008, 02:57:21 PM
The Sun has a longer version.
He goes back for more.
link FTW
Logged
HI HELEN!
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #23 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:03:16 PM »
Quote from: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 03:00:00 PM
Quote from: Josedinho on July 01, 2008, 02:57:21 PM
The Sun has a longer version.
He goes back for more.
link FTW
and does the bird bunk in again? if they were laying me out she'd be the one i'd be worried about, she looked MAD about something!
Logged
HaworthBantam
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 46
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #24 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:07:56 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 11:29:08 PM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:13:33 PM
Quote from: jizzemm on June 30, 2008, 03:50:36 PM
Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug.
Totally agree.
Quote from: Indestructable on June 30, 2008, 05:44:21 PM
At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence.
The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is
likely
to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons:
a
: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and
b
: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead.
Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one.....
http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio
Rant over, need to go lay down......
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law.
But
WHY
is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ?
"pleading the obvious" seriously?
With multiple witnesses could the accused plead anything else ?
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty?
why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah?
Hmm, don't remember saying that.
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a?
I have no problem with civil rights, up to a point. But when a guilty individual receives a lesser penalty through pleading guilty, and a bit of remorseful acting, the justice system becomes laughable imo. Still, I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously.
Logged
http://www.soitgoes.co.uk
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #25 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:20:17 PM »
Quote from: HaworthBantam on July 01, 2008, 03:07:56 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:49:14 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on June 30, 2008, 11:29:08 PM
Quote from: HaworthBantam on June 30, 2008, 11:13:33 PM
Quote from: jizzemm on June 30, 2008, 03:50:36 PM
Send the fecker down, 2 years more plz bloody thug.
Totally agree.
Quote from: Indestructable on June 30, 2008, 05:44:21 PM
At least he has owned up, although probably to get a shorter sentence.
The poker league I play in has, as one of it's players, a magistrate. We got on to many a subject on saturday night, one of them being donkey, chav, feckwit lowlifes..... The magistrate confirmed that if the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlife pleads guilty then that individual is
likely
to receive a reduced sentence. This is for two reasons:
a
: It's to the donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes credit that he/she admitted their guilt, and
b
: The courts save money and time processing a guilty plead.
Personally, I'd prefer to see these donkey, chav, feckwit, lowlifes introduced to prisons such as this one.....
http://www.mcso.org/index.php?a=GetModule&mn=Sheriff_Bio
Rant over, need to go lay down......
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL at you seeming to think this is some huge revelation, you really needed a magistrate to confirm for you that a person is likely to get a lighter sentence for pleading guilty rather going to trial and being found guilty? that's a rudimentary convention of criminal law.
But
WHY
is it a rudimentary convention of criminal law ? Why should some t*sser get a lesser sentence for pleading the obvious ? How have we let the criminal justice system get so lax and soft in it's treatment of these sh*t for brains ?
"pleading the obvious" seriously?
With multiple witnesses could the accused plead anything else ?
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
it's obvious that if you're charged with an offence you're guilty?
why not just sentence people at the police station, if you're arrested you must have done something wrong yeah?
Hmm, don't remember saying that.
Quote from: bolt pp on July 01, 2008, 12:00:47 AM
rule of law, ECHR, autonomy of the judiciary and anything that lends itself to the idea of inherent civil rights for the individual, might as well just forget about it all a?
I have no problem with civil rights, up to a point. But when a guilty individual receives a lesser penalty through pleading guilty, and a bit of remorseful acting, the justice system becomes laughable imo. Still, I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously.
I'm sure the victims of these people have a warm feeling in their heart knowing that the civil rights of these criminals are being protected so vigorously
We'll for the sakes of these victims to which you are referring i hope the above statement is true, for a person not to want human rights to be applied consistently thoughout mankind and to be deviated from for the sake of personal reprisal would make them petty, fickle, and abhorrently ignorant and it would be bad enough i imagine being a victim of crime without letting that crime affect you so significantly that you willingly reject the concept of civil liberties, lets hope there are some victims of crime out there with the intelligence to rise above such a malevolently blinkered point of view.
Logged
Josedinho
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4515
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #26 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:24:57 PM »
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1363000.ece
Logged
Rookie (Rodney)
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 12991
ISHIKAWAAAAAAAAA
Re: JUSTICE
«
Reply #27 on:
July 01, 2008, 03:30:23 PM »
Quote from: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 02:06:48 PM
****
Quote from: Rookie (Rodney) on July 01, 2008, 02:06:48 PM
****
Logged
HI HELEN!
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...