tough spot for stack

[GreekStein]

Guy like 0 hands that beat us check this river. He puts us in with every single boat in case we check back a flush or Ax/Aces up.

OP - How did you have Ah and villain had ?

There's no point checking unless we have big stacks behind. Abs no merit to it in this situation at all.

[Whollyflush]

lol at all's well that ends well

[iveysda]

lol at all's well that ends well

soz guys 

[DMorgan]

Checking this river is lolbad imo.

We're playing against random live players in a 1/2 cash game. A boat gets checked like 0% of the time here.

[StuartHopkin]

Lol at assigning live 1/2 players tight ranges.

[action man]

u just burnt £90 always and £180 often

[Boba Fett]

hands that have us beat

1. Raiser with AA
2. Raiser with KK
3. 34 in bb
4. A4 in bb
5. 33 from either spot

now going back thru the hand I can legitimately put the 4 'beating us' hands into the betting sequence as played allowing for trapping on the river

i think the hands that we beat and call have been played appallingly and we have to hope thats what they have and then still donk off

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm [  ] Jen Tilly

Not saying it's impossible mate but this is just a terrible idea. Why would you need to trap someone who has a flush if they only have 1/3 pot back? They're definitely calling with a flush if they made it this far. "Trapping" just misses value from 2 pairs/sets that might make a crying call. These hands are never going to bet themselves, and you never induce a bluff of £90 into £300 3-ways.

yeah fair enough, but i just dont think too many hands are paying us off here - well the point being there arent that many combos of hands that can given the board

i still check 

You're over-estimating the £1/£2 Glasgow tards here, Jam the river all day as any flush will call, most Ax's will call and half of the players at the table will call with any pair

[Q8Holds]

Surely you definatley have the villan beat , i cant see him checking a house to you as youve just been calling it would be wrong of him to assume that you would fire out a bet. I Jam it if its anywhere near the standard of some of the 1:1 cash games ive played, 50% of people wouldnt be able to lay down AK here or a lower flush

I dont think the bb is calling with a 3 £22 is way to much to be calling with a 3 even if its 33
As we dont know neither the agrresor or the BB its tricky but is the villian really firing £22 with AA, KK as he doesnt know you and you could quite easily just be wanting to see a flop in position. I cant see many hands that jusitify this play that are beating you

SB- AK
BB-89 of hearts


But then i know some people would call preflop with 43 and someone would even call the turn with kQ, i would be more than happy i was ahead here and ive changed my mind
-Bet £50 as your more likely to get paid off by both of them than maybe 1 caller and sigh call a re raise


EDIT: DIDNT READ PAGE 3 BEFORE POSTING JUST 1n 2 SO REAPEATED SOME STUFF AND SAID THE HANDS AFTER THEY WERE ANNOUNCED OOPS