agressive calling doesn't really exist in my head. I wouldnt make a point to activley call more than normal to stop someone bluffing as the natural reaction to this from a decent lpayer would be to bluff a LOT less and really widen up the hands that you bet for value.
If someone is showing a perpensity to bluff a lot than you would want to be calling with hands that are strong enough slightly more than you are betting them
Read this 5 times and still dont get it.
Am I right in thinking aggressive calling is checking to all bets then shoving on the river? I know the moves but not the terminology.
What I meant in response to the question is I dont think "aggressive calling" exists as a strategy particularly, opting for a strategy that is centered around a passive approach leaves you very open to being exploited by anyone able to adapt
If someone is showing a willingness to bluff/semi-bluff and barrell off much more than he is to call than I'd be wanting to chk/call with hands that I might otherwise want to bet with, these hands would as a stnd be from the mid-ish section of my range in any spot.
gogogogogogogogo post results plz
