poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 18, 2025, 02:05:47 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262307
Posts in
66604
Topics by
16990
Members
Latest Member:
Enut
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
The Lounge
The Back to Basics RSQ
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
Author
Topic: The Back to Basics RSQ (Read 28760 times)
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #150 on:
March 03, 2014, 11:58:02 PM »
Nice one David - I enjoyed that.
I found a picture of a willow btw. I see what you mean now. Definitely not a tree.
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #151 on:
March 03, 2014, 11:59:58 PM »
Quote from: MintTrav on March 03, 2014, 11:58:02 PM
Nice one David - I enjoyed that.
I found a picture of a willow btw. I see what you mean now. Definitely not a tree.
You wouldn't have won anyways ya great lummox
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #152 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:01:40 AM »
I think Mulhuzz was joint winner
-5 points afte an ace being a 6
-7 points after the cooking show
-12points
He finishes on 31 points -12= 19
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #153 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:03:46 AM »
Erm... I'm not a tree expert but...
http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/learn/british-trees/native-trees/juniper/
Not sure why that failed?
I have to say that was back to basics in every way. One of the biggest farces we've had in a while
Logged
Blue text
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 41931
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #154 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:07:28 AM »
think i got a near perfect score
came 2nd after all the ties and i wasnt beaten by tightend
Logged
I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #155 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:08:07 AM »
Quote from: Cf on March 04, 2014, 12:03:46 AM
Erm... I'm not a tree expert but...
http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/learn/british-trees/native-trees/juniper/
Not sure why that failed?
I have to say that was back to basics in every way. One of the biggest farces we've had in a while
Yeah, I went to that page before marking it as a fail, maybe it was this bit
Common juniper (Juniperus communis) is an
evergreen
conifer native to the UK, Europe and much of the northern hemisphere.
Thanks for the compliment though.
Bit disappointed nobody got the play from the opening post of the reveal
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 41931
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #156 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:16:57 AM »
Quote from: david3103 on March 04, 2014, 12:08:07 AM
Bit disappointed nobody got the play from the opening post of the reveal
is it noises off?
Logged
I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #157 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:23:25 AM »
Never seen it, but is the play Shut Your Eyes and Think of England?The one where the guy has to pass off a prostitute at the office as his wife?
Good quiz, David. Excellent ruling with the Victoria Beckham/Adams whaling. And with Emma Bunton. I would have objected handsomely had either of those been ruled differently.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #158 on:
March 04, 2014, 12:42:44 AM »
Quote from: david3103 on March 04, 2014, 12:08:07 AM
Quote from: Cf on March 04, 2014, 12:03:46 AM
Erm... I'm not a tree expert but...
http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/learn/british-trees/native-trees/juniper/
Not sure why that failed?
I have to say that was back to basics in every way. One of the biggest farces we've had in a while
Yeah, I went to that page before marking it as a fail, maybe it was this bit
Common juniper (Juniperus communis) is an
evergreen
conifer native to the UK, Europe and much of the northern hemisphere.
Thanks for the compliment though.
Bit disappointed nobody got the play from the opening post of the reveal
Ah so it's something to do with leaves falling off?
I just read it as "name a tree" lol
Logged
Blue text
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #159 on:
March 04, 2014, 06:56:19 AM »
Quote from: Tal on March 04, 2014, 12:23:25 AM
Never seen it, but is the play Shut Your Eyes and Think of England?The one where the guy has to pass off a prostitute at the office as his wife?
Good quiz, David. Excellent ruling with the Victoria Beckham/Adams whaling. And with Emma Bunton. I would have
objected handsomely
had either of those been ruled differently.
You would have
what
?
It is possible to handsomely object?
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #160 on:
March 04, 2014, 07:01:46 AM »
Quote from: tikay on March 04, 2014, 06:56:19 AM
Quote from: Tal on March 04, 2014, 12:23:25 AM
Never seen it, but is the play Shut Your Eyes and Think of England?The one where the guy has to pass off a prostitute at the office as his wife?
Good quiz, David. Excellent ruling with the Victoria Beckham/Adams whaling. And with Emma Bunton. I would have
objected handsomely
had either of those been ruled differently.
You would have
what
?
It is possible to handsomely object?
I look to do things as handsomely as possible
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Redsgirl
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1387
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #161 on:
March 04, 2014, 09:40:05 AM »
Quote from: david3103 on March 03, 2014, 11:46:01 PM
Quote from: Redsgirl on March 03, 2014, 11:30:22 PM
Just noticed Kin and Teeks also won!
Sorry boys, Congratulations!
I'm deffo stepping aside, public vote I reckon.
BTW thanks David, great job x
Your call RedsGirl, but as QM for this week my final act is to pass on the baton to you. Your responsibility now is to make sure that one of the four of you sets a quiz for next week.
I'm sure you can persuade one of the three to set something. Although, as I recall it
Quote from: Jeeves on March 03, 2014, 09:42:20 AM
One has one's questions at the ready. My former master paid quite handsomely for my time too
One problem, he has to win it first
Shouldn't be too difficult to persuade Jeeves then
Thanks again David.
I would have happily done the next one, and the four other winners would have had to fight me in the car park for the honour but I'm off on a little last minute holiday on Saturday and I won't be back till Thursday, and as I know what a lot of effort goes into hosting these, I really wouldn't be able to make a decent offering.
So as you pointed out, if the super unflappable Jeeves has his questions at the ready and providing Tikay can make his own Horlicks and warm his own bedsocks for
one
evening,
there really is problem.
Over to you my good man, I know you won't let us down!
Logged
If a man speaks in a forest and no woman is there to hear him, is he still wrong?
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #162 on:
March 04, 2014, 10:23:00 AM »
I thoroughly enjoyed last night's reveal. The appeals add to the evening and although the Poplar and Willow questions were awkward I think both Tighty and Minty eventually accepted that the correct result was arrived at notwithstanding the outcome of the discussion.
I got lucky with the question sequence because all the issues that were open to debate came in the first five or six questions and that allowed the reveal to flow much quicker in the later stages whilst the appeals process continued. If/when I set another I shall endeavour to arrange for a similar pattern.
Thanks again to Mrs3103 whose assistance proved invaluable again, especially after I messed up with the scoring spreadsheet.
Thanks also to all the entrants and to those who have been kind enough to express their appreciation.
Jeeves, we're waiting with bated breath for questions about the right material for socks, about ironing and about the correct way to address the aristocracy. Take it for granted that I am IN.
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: The Back to Basics RSQ
«
Reply #163 on:
March 04, 2014, 10:24:43 AM »
I didn't accept it! I just didn't want to win, which looked possible if I reversed the fail.
Thank you David. I think four objections on the same point was a record, for me.
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Pages:
1
...
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...